SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600 + Intel Arc A310E

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

84 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
74%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600

44,240 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310E

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Platform Analysis: Intel Core i5-13600 + Intel Arc A310E

The Intel Core i5-13600 pairs with the Intel Arc A310E on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which places this build firmly in the desktop category. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, with ECC memory support available for users who need error-correcting memory in workstation or server-adjacent workloads. The processor provides PCIe Gen 5 connectivity with 16 lanes from the CPU, which means the GPU and high-speed storage devices can take advantage of the latest PCIe standard. The Arc A310E uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, so it will run at full bandwidth on this platform.

Power delivery is a modest affair here. The Core i5-13600 has a 65-watt TDP, and the Arc A310E draws 75 watts. The suggested power supply for the GPU is 250 watts, which is remarkably low for a discrete graphics card. This combination gives builders substantial headroom even with a small power supply, making the platform suitable for compact desktop builds where power efficiency is a priority. The Arc A310E requires no external power connectors, drawing all its power from the PCIe slot, which simplifies cable management and reduces build complexity.

The platform's upgrade path is interesting because of the socket's longevity. Intel Socket 1700 supports 12th, 13th, and 14th generation Core processors, so users who start with the Core i5-13600 can later move to a higher-tier 13th or 14th generation chip without changing the motherboard. The 14-core, 20-thread configuration of the i5-13600 already provides substantial multi-threaded performance, but users who need more cores for rendering or compilation workloads have headroom to upgrade within the same platform. The Arc A310E, by contrast, is an end-of-life product, so any GPU upgrade would involve switching to a different graphics card entirely.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The benchmark data does not include measured FPS for this combination, so gaming performance must be estimated from the CPU and GPU scores. The Core i5-13600 sits at the 88th percentile among all CPUs, indicating strong single-thread performance that should drive high frame rates in CPU-bound titles. However, the Arc A310E sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, which is a mid-range position. The GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 124.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth suggest that 1080p gaming at medium-to-high settings is the realistic target, with high-refresh displays being achievable only in less demanding esports titles.

Streaming: The Core i5-13600's multi-core performance, reflected in its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26,620 points, provides ample CPU headroom for encoding and streaming simultaneously. The GPU does not have dedicated tensor cores listed, but Intel's Xe-HPG architecture includes hardware for media encoding. The 20 threads of the i5-13600 should handle game capture, encoding, and broadcast software without significant frame drops, though the Arc A310E's mid-range GPU performance might limit the in-game quality settings while streaming.

Video editing: The data shows the i5-13600 achieving strong results in content creation workloads. The PassMark multithread score of 31,725 and the Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 11,180 indicate that this CPU can handle video editing timelines with multiple streams and effects. The Arc A310E's 4 GB of VRAM is limited for large 4K projects, but the 124.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is adequate for 1080p editing. The GPU's 768 shading units and 32 texture mapping units provide hardware acceleration for effects and transitions in compatible editing software.

3D rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26,620 places it at the 88th percentile among all CPUs, which translates to solid performance in CPU-based rendering engines like V-Ray or Blender's Cycles. The GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 6.144 TFLOPS of FP16 compute support GPU-accelerated rendering, but the 4 GB VRAM capacity will be a constraint for complex scenes. The nearest rival comparison shows the i5-13600 within 0.7% of the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D's average score, indicating competitive rendering performance in this class.

Software development: The PassMark data compression score of 383,972 and integer math score of 111,044 demonstrate strong performance in compilation and code analysis workloads. The 14 cores and 20 threads provide parallel compilation capabilities, and the 24 MB of shared L3 cache helps with frequently accessed code and data. The single-thread score of 4,049 in PassMark ensures responsive IDE and editor performance. The ECC memory support is a notable feature for developers working on long-running builds or server applications where data integrity matters.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread performance, reflected in the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,758 and PassMark single-thread score of 4,049, handles everyday productivity applications with ease. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output if the discrete GPU is not needed. The low power consumption of both components, 65 watts for the CPU and 75 watts for the GPU, makes this an efficient system for daily use in shared or dormitory spaces where noise and heat are concerns.

Benchmark Performance

The Core i5-13600 demonstrates strong overall performance with an average benchmark score of 44,240 points, placing it at the 88th percentile among all CPUs. This positions it ahead of the vast majority of processors on the market. The nearest rival data shows the CPU essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385, which scores 44,309 points, and the Intel Core i9-13950HX, which scores 44,342 points. The delta percentages are negligible at -0.2% for both, indicating that the i5-13600 delivers desktop-class performance comparable to high-end mobile processors.

The Cinebench R23 results are particularly revealing. The multi-core score of 26,620 points represents a substantial performance level for a 65-watt processor, while the single-core score of 3,758 points shows excellent per-thread efficiency. The Cinebench R20 numbers follow the same pattern: 11,180 points multi-core and 1,578 points single-core. The Cinebench R15 scores of 2,683 multi-core and 378 single-core complete the picture of a balanced processor.

The PassMark tests paint a more detailed picture of workload-specific performance. The multithread score of 31,725 and the floating-point math score of 81,892 indicate strong scientific computing capability. The integer math score of 111,044 and the data encryption score of 22,182 show robust general-purpose processing. The extended instructions score of 23,045 suggests good SIMD performance for multimedia workloads. The find prime numbers score of 109 is oddly low compared to the other results, possibly reflecting a specific algorithmic weakness.

The Arc A310E sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, which is the midpoint of the performance distribution. The GPU has no benchmark scores listed in the data, so its average benchmark score is recorded as zero. This makes direct performance comparisons impossible, but the percentile position provides some context. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 69, indicating that the overall system performance is above average despite the GPU's mid-range position.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data presents a clear picture of system balance. The CPU operates at the 88th percentile while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile, creating a significant performance gap. This means the Arc A310E will be the limiting factor in most graphics-intensive workloads. The CPU has substantial headroom to drive a more powerful GPU, so users who upgrade the graphics card later will see immediate performance gains without needing to replace the processor.

The estimated FPS picture reinforces this imbalance. With the GPU at the 50th percentile and the CPU at the 88th percentile, frame rates in games will be limited by the GPU's rendering capabilities. The CPU's strong single-thread performance, evidenced by the 4,049 PassMark single-thread score, ensures that it will not bottleneck even at high frame rates, but the GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS of compute and 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth will cap the actual frame delivery.

The memory subsystem also factors into the balance equation. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5, and the choice of memory will affect overall system performance. The GPU's 4 GB of VRAM is another constraint, particularly for modern games that increasingly require more video memory at higher resolutions and quality settings. The 64-bit memory bus width limits the GPU's effective bandwidth, making it more suitable for 1080p gaming than higher resolutions.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A310E is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-128 chip manufactured on TSMC's 6-nanometer process. The chip contains 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, with a transistor density of 45.9 million per square millimeter. The GPU operates at a fixed 2000 MHz clock speed for both base and boost, with memory running at 1937 MHz, achieving 15.5 Gbps effective data rate.

The memory configuration is the most significant limitation. With 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, the bandwidth totals 124.0 GB/s. This is adequate for 1080p gaming at moderate settings but will struggle with high-resolution textures or demanding modern titles. The 768 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 render output units provide the compute backbone. The pixel rate of 32.00 GPixel/s and texture rate of 64.00 GTexel/s give the GPU modest fill-rate capabilities.

The ray tracing hardware includes 6 RT cores, which provide entry-level ray tracing acceleration. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate with feature level 12_2, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring broad API compatibility. The FP32 compute of 3.072 TFLOPS and FP16 compute of 6.144 TFLOPS with 2:1 ratio indicate the GPU can handle both graphics and compute workloads, though at a modest performance level. The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, which provides sufficient bandwidth for this performance class. Display output is handled through 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 connections, supporting multiple monitor setups. The 75-watt TDP and single-slot design make it suitable for small form factor systems.

Who Should Build It

The 69th combined percentile places this build in the upper-mid range of system performance, making it suitable for several specific user groups. Gamers playing at 1080p with medium settings will find the Arc A310E adequate, especially in esports titles where the CPU's strong single-thread performance helps maintain high frame rates. The CPU's 88th percentile ranking ensures that even demanding games will not be CPU-limited.

Content creators working with 1080p video will benefit from the CPU's strong multi-threaded performance, particularly in encoding and rendering tasks. The PassMark multithread score of 31,725 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26,620 demonstrate capability for video editing timelines and effects processing. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM limits 4K work, but 1080p projects will be manageable.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU's compilation performance, with the PassMark integer math score of 111,044 and data compression score of 383,972 indicating fast build times. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running development processes. The 20 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, and the 24 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency for frequently accessed code.

Students and small business users building a compact workstation will find the power efficiency attractive. The combined 140 watts of CPU and GPU power, plus the 250-watt suggested PSU, allows for a small, quiet system. The single-slot GPU with no external power connectors simplifies installation in tight cases. The 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs support multi-monitor productivity setups.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for the Intel Core i5-13600 and Intel Arc A310E pairing is 69, placing it above average among desktop systems.

Q: Does the Core i5-13600 support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Core i5-13600 has ECC memory support, which is useful for workstation and server-adjacent workloads where data integrity is important.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The Arc A310E has 124.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth from 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus.

Q: How does the Core i5-13600 compare to the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385?

A: The Core i5-13600 has an average benchmark score of 44,240, which is 0.2% lower than the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385's score of 44,309.

Q: What power supply is suggested for the Arc A310E?

A: The suggested power supply for the Arc A310E is 250 watts, and the GPU requires no external power connectors.

Q: What is the CPU's socket type?

A: The Core i5-13600 uses the Intel Socket 1700, which supports 12th, 13th, and 14th generation Intel Core processors.

Q: Are there measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, there are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. All FPS discussion is estimated from benchmark scores.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core i5-13600 with the Intel Arc A310E, creating a system that combines a high-performing CPU with a mid-range GPU. The CPU's 88th percentile ranking among all processors demonstrates its capability, while the GPU's 50th percentile position shows it is exactly average. The combined 69th percentile indicates a system that performs above the median but below the top tier.

The Core i5-13600 is an active production processor from Intel's 13th generation, built on Raptor Lake architecture with a 10-nanometer process. The Arc A310E, by contrast, is an end-of-life product from Intel's Alchemist generation, built on Xe-HPG architecture with a 6-nanometer TSMC process. This pairing represents a CPU that will remain relevant for years, paired with a GPU that serves as an entry-level discrete graphics solution.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600 features 14 cores and 20 threads, combining performance cores and efficient cores in a hybrid architecture. The base clock runs at 2.70 GHz with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, delivering strong single-thread performance when needed. The 65-watt TDP makes it an efficient choice for desktop systems, and the 10-nanometer process node from Intel's foundry keeps power consumption manageable.

The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration supports the CPU's strong multi-threaded performance, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26,620 points. The single-core score of 3,758 in the same test shows the boost clock delivers excellent per-thread performance. The PassMark scores reinforce this picture, with a multithread score of 31,725 and single-thread score of 4,049.

The CPU's nearest rivals provide context for its performance tier. The AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 scores 44,309, just 0.2% higher, while the Intel Core i9-13950HX scores 44,342, also 0.2% higher. The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D scores 44,573, 0.7% higher. These small deltas indicate the i5-13600 is competitive with high-end mobile processors and mid-range desktop chips. The 88th percentile ranking confirms that this CPU outperforms the vast majority of processors on the market, making it a strong foundation for any desktop build.