SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13500E + Intel Arc A770

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

87 Score

Top 13% Ranking

87 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

77%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13500E

6,586 Benchmark Score

Top 23% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A770

68,809 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i5-13500E + Intel Arc A770: A 65-Watt Efficiency Chip Paired With a 90th-Percentile Discrete GPU

This is an unusual pairing worth investigating. The Intel Core i5-13500E is a 65 W efficiency-focused desktop processor sitting at the 62nd percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel Arc A770 is a 225 W discrete GPU at the 90th percentile of all GPUs. Together the two land at a combined percentile of 76, which raises an immediate question: does a mid-tier, thermally constrained CPU hold back a GPU that benchmarks in the top decile? The data suggests a build that is decisively GPU-forward — strong for GPU-bound rendering and gaming at higher resolutions, with a capable but unspectacular CPU feeding it. Notably, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination, so all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than directly measured.

GPU Analysis

The Arc A770 is the more interesting half of this build, and its specification sheet explains why it benchmarks where it does. The DG2-512 chip, built on TSMC's 6 nm process, packs 21,700 million transistors onto a 406 mm² die — a density of 53.4 million transistors per square millimetre. That silicon translates into 4096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, and 128 render output units, producing a texture fill rate of 614.4 GTexel/s and a pixel rate of 307.2 GPixel/s. Compute output stands at 19.66 TFLOPS FP32, doubling to 39.32 TFLOPS FP16 at a 2:1 ratio.

Clocks are a 2100 MHz base with a 2400 MHz boost, and the memory subsystem is arguably the card's strongest asset: 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, running at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) for a total of 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. That is a genuinely large memory allocation for this tier, and it matters for rendering and creative workloads — large scenes, high-resolution textures, and GPU compute datasets that would force other cards into swapping can fit comfortably. For rendering specifically, bandwidth and capacity often determine whether a scene completes at all.

Ray tracing is served by 32 RT cores, and the card targets DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The tensor core field is null in this data, so no AI-acceleration claims can be made.

The benchmark scores tell a consistent story. In 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12) the A770 scores 2969; in Geekbench OpenCL it reaches 109175, and in Geekbench Vulkan it scores 94284. Those figures place it at the 90th percentile against all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 68809. The nearest rivals list is revealing: the NVIDIA CMP 90HX sits at 69000 (a deltaPct of -0.3, meaning the A770 trails it marginally), the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 at 68562 (the A770 is 0.4% ahead), the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 at 69870 (-1.5), and the NVIDIA Quadro P6000 at 69986 (-1.7). In other words, this is a card trading blows with professional-class hardware of a previous era — a strong result for OpenCL and Vulkan compute workloads, which is exactly where rendering engines increasingly live.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform story starts with Intel Socket 1700 and the Raptor Lake architecture (codename Raptor Lake-S), manufactured on Intel's own 10 nm node across a 215 mm² die. Memory support is notably flexible: the i5-13500E accepts both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, and — unusually for this segment — it supports ECC memory. That ECC capability is a genuine differentiator for workstation use, where data integrity during long renders or computations matters.

PCIe connectivity is PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. There is a wrinkle worth flagging: the Arc A770 itself uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface, so the card cannot exploit the CPU's Gen 5 bandwidth. That is not a practical limitation for this GPU, but it does mean the platform retains headroom for a future Gen 5 card.

Power is where the pairing gets interesting. The CPU carries a 65 W TDP; the GPU a 225 W TDP with a suggested PSU of 550 W. The GPU's dual-slot design requires one 6-pin and one 8-pin power connector. With suggested PSU guidance of 550 W covering both components' demands, the arithmetic implies comfortable headroom for the rest of the system. The CPU's locked multiplier (multiplierUnlocked is false) closes off overclocking as an upgrade lever — the sensible next upgrade is clearly on the graphics side. The A770 is listed as end-of-life with the Battlemage architecture as its successor, so a future GPU swap on the same Socket 1700 board is the natural path. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 also provides a fallback display output if the discrete card is ever removed.

Display connectivity is generous: one HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 2.0 outputs.

CPU Analysis

The Core i5-13500E is a 14-core, 20-thread processor — a hybrid configuration typical of Raptor Lake — with a 2.40 GHz base clock and a 4.60 GHz boost. Cache allocation is 80 KB of L1 and 1.25 MB of L2 per core, plus a shared 24 MB of L3. The "E" suffix and 65 W TDP mark it as an efficiency-binned part, and the benchmark results reflect that positioning honestly.

In Cinebench R23 the chip scores 22772 multi-core and 3214 single-core. Rolling back a generation: 9564 multi / 1349 single in R20, and 2295 multi / 323 single in R15. Those single-core numbers are respectable — a 4.60 GHz boost on modern Raptor Lake cores delivers snappy per-thread response — while multi-core output sits firmly in mid-tier territory rather than workstation class.

The percentile data frames it precisely: the i5-13500E sits at the 62nd percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 6586. Its nearest rivals are an eclectic group: the Intel Atom x7405C at an average of 6568 (the i5 leads by 0.3%), the Intel Core i9-10940X at 6605 (trailing by 0.3%), the Intel Pentium Gold G6405 also at 6605 (-0.3%), and the Intel Core i9-12900E at 6611 (-0.4%). Landing between an Atom and a previous-generation Core i9 on aggregate scores tells you this is a chip whose strengths are balance and efficiency, not raw throughput. For real workloads, that means competent multi-threaded performance for compilation, video encoding, and background tasks, and single-thread performance strong enough not to embarrass itself anywhere.

One oddity in the rival list deserves scrutiny: averaging near a Pentium Gold G6405 suggests the aggregate metric blends single- and multi-core results across tests, flattening the i5-13500E's 14-core advantage. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22772 is the more honest signal for sustained workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The combined percentile of 76 sits almost exactly between the CPU's 62nd and the GPU's 90th — and closer inspection suggests the GPU is the stronger asset in this pairing. A GPU at the 90th percentile fed by a CPU at the 62nd percentile raises the classic question: at what resolution does the balance invert?

At lower resolutions, where the CPU's frame-delivery capability dominates, the i5-13500E's mid-tier single-core and multi-core results become the constraint. The data points toward 1080p gaming being partially CPU-limited with a GPU this capable. At higher resolutions — 1440p and especially 4K — the workload shifts to the Arc A770's 512 GB/s of bandwidth and 4096 shading units, and the CPU's role diminishes. In that regime the GPU's 90th-percentile standing drives frame rates, and the CPU's efficiency advantage (65 W TDP) means it can sustain its contribution without thermal pressure.

For rendering and GPU compute, the bottleneck question is nearly moot: the Geekbench OpenCL score of 109175 and Vulkan score of 94284 are GPU-dominated, and the CPU's role is mostly scene preparation and I/O. The 24 MB of shared L3 and 20 threads are adequate for that supporting role.

The honest verdict: this is a deliberately GPU-weighted build. Anyone choosing it is buying 90th-percentile graphics performance with a sensible, efficient CPU underneath — not a balanced 50/50 pairing.

Benchmark Performance

The full score sheet, in one place:

CPU: Cinebench R15 — 2295 multi / 323 single; Cinebench R20 — 9564 multi / 1349 single; Cinebench R23 — 22772 multi / 3214 single. Average benchmark score 6586, 62nd percentile versus all CPUs.
GPU: 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12) — 2969; Geekbench OpenCL — 109175; Geekbench Vulkan — 94284. Average benchmark score 68809, 90th percentile versus all GPUs.
Combined: 76th percentile for the pairing.

What does the combined picture imply? The GPU out-ranks the CPU by 28 percentile points, and the combined result of 76 lands roughly at the midpoint — but percentile blending understates what happens per workload. In GPU-bound scenarios the build behaves like a 90th-percentile machine; in CPU-bound scenarios like a 62nd-percentile one. Against rivals, the A770 sits within 1.7% of a Quadro P6000's average and ahead of the Radeon Instinct MI25, while the i5-13500E trades within half a percent of parts as varied as the Atom x7405C and the i9-12900E. The data describes a build that punches above its CPU's weight whenever the graphics card is the star.

Who Should Build It

High-refresh 1080p gamers should think carefully: the CPU sits at the 62nd percentile, and at 1080p ultra the processor frequently becomes the limiter. This build is better matched to 1440p and 4K gamers, where the A770's 90th-percentile standing and 16 GB of VRAM carry the experience and the CPU recedes into a supporting role.

Content creators and video editors are well served: 16 GB of GDDR6 accommodates large timelines and high-resolution footage, the 512 GB/s of bandwidth moves it quickly, and the CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads handle encoding passes — the Cinebench R23 multi score of 22772 confirms genuine multi-threaded throughput.

3D rendering artists benefit most of all. The Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan results show GPU compute performance rivaling the Quadro P6000 and Radeon Pro WX 8200 — professional-tier averages — and the ECC-capable platform adds workstation credibility.

Developers and students get a pragmatic machine: 20 threads handle parallel compilation, and single-core scores of 3214 in R23 keep interactive tooling responsive. Small business workstations are arguably the ideal fit: ECC support, a 65 W CPU, and a dual-slot GPU with modest PSU requirements (550 W suggested) make for a compact, stable, capable system. Note that launch MSRP for the GPU was 329 USD; no pricing discussion beyond that single fact is included here.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU/GPU combination in the database — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps entries and dataIsMeasured is false. All figures below are estimates inferred from the benchmark scores, not measurements.

What can be estimated? A GPU at the 90th percentile with a 2969 Steel Nomad DX12 score and 19.66 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput is, qualitatively, a high-refresh 1440p card and a viable 4K card in modern titles. The 32 RT cores enable ray-traced effects, though RT workloads will reduce frame rates relative to rasterization. The 16 GB frame buffer means texture-heavy games at maximum settings should not run out of memory — a common failure mode for cards with smaller allocations.

At 1080p, estimates suggest frame rates high enough that the 62nd-percentile CPU likely limits peak refresh in CPU-bound titles. At 1440p, the balance shifts toward the GPU and the pairing should be well matched. At 4K ultra, the GPU's bandwidth becomes the primary determinant and the CPU is essentially along for the ride. These are reasoned expectations from the scores — treat them as directional, not measured.

FAQ

Q: Is this build balanced between CPU and GPU?

A: No. The GPU sits at the 90th percentile versus all GPUs; the CPU at the 62nd versus all CPUs. The combined percentile is 76. It is a GPU-weighted pairing.

Q: How much PSU capacity does this build need?

A: The GPU's suggested PSU is 550 W. The CPU's TDP is 65 W and the GPU's is 225 W, so a 550 W unit provides headroom for the complete system. The GPU requires one 6-pin and one 8-pin connector.

Q: Can the CPU be overclocked?

A: No. The multiplier is locked (multiplierUnlocked is false).

Q: Does this platform support ECC memory?

A: Yes. The i5-13500E supports ECC, and it accepts both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus.

Q: How does the Arc A770 compare to rival GPUs?

A: Its average benchmark score of 68809 places it 0.4% ahead of the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25, 0.3% behind the NVIDIA CMP 90HX, 1.5% behind the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200, and 1.7% behind the NVIDIA Quadro P6000.

Q: How much VRAM does the Arc A770 have, and why does it matter?

A: 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus with 512 GB/s of bandwidth. The large capacity suits high-resolution gaming, video editing, and 3D rendering with large scenes.

Q: Are the FPS figures in this analysis measured?

A: No. The database contains no measured FPS data for this exact pairing; all frame-rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: Best pursued at 1440p rather than 1080p. The GPU's 90th-percentile standing supports high frame rates, but at 1080p the 62nd-percentile CPU likely caps output in CPU-bound titles. No measured FPS data exists to confirm exact figures.

Streaming: Viable. The 14 cores and 20 threads handle encoding alongside gameplay, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22772, while the GPU's 39.32 TFLOPS of FP16 compute offers hardware encoding headroom.

Video editing: Strong. The 16 GB of GDDR6 and 512 GB/s of bandwidth handle high-resolution footage, and the Vulkan score of 94284 indicates capable GPU compute for accelerated effects and timeline work.

3D rendering: The standout scenario. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 109175 and the A770's proximity to the Quadro P6000 (-1.7%) in average score place GPU rendering performance in professional-adjacent territory, with 32 RT cores accelerating ray-traced renders.

Software development: Solid. The single-core score of 3214 in Cinebench R23 keeps IDEs and interpreters responsive; 20 threads parallelize builds; and the Socket 1700 platform with PCIe Gen 5 support preserves upgrade room.

Student and office work: Comfortable and efficient. A 65 W CPU keeps the system cool and quiet, ECC support adds stability for long-running work, and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a display fallback if the discrete GPU is ever removed.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing Intel's efficiency-binned Core i5-13500E — a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake chip at the 62nd percentile of all CPUs — with the Arc A770, Intel's 16 GB DG2-512 discrete GPU at the 90th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile of 76 defines its tier: upper-mid-range overall, but with performance that swings toward the top decile in any GPU-bound workload. The platform is modern (Socket 1700, DDR4/DDR5 flexibility, PCIe Gen 5, ECC support) and frugal on the CPU side at 65 W, while the GPU's 225 W demand and 550 W suggested PSU define the power envelope. The data describes a build optimized for graphics-first work: high-resolution gaming, video editing, and GPU rendering, with an efficient and competent — but not class-leading — processor doing the supporting work.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13500E + Intel Arc A770

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13500E

Intel Arc A770

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds