SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13500E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

78 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 22% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
77%
VS
GPU
79%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13500E

6,586 Benchmark Score
Top 23% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

3,075 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13500E and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER pairing is a desktop configuration that presents a stark contrast in benchmark positioning. The CPU sits at the 62nd percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks at the 19th percentile among all graphics cards, creating a system where the processor is the clear performance leader relative to its peers. The combined percentile for this pairing is 41, indicating that the overall system performance is heavily weighted by the CPU’s stronger standing. Because the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination, all frame rate discussions below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and percentile positions, not from direct testing of this specific build.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this pairing will be limited by the GPU’s low percentile standing. The RTX 5080 SUPER scores 3075 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, which places it just 2.8% below the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 and 3.4% below the Intel Arc Pro B60 in average benchmark score. These nearest rivals are not typically associated with high-end gaming performance, suggesting that the GPU will struggle to maintain high frame rates at demanding settings. The CPU’s strong single-core score of 3214 in Cinebench R23 is more than capable of feeding a fast GPU, but the graphics card’s relatively low position in the GPU hierarchy will cap achievable FPS in most titles.

Streaming workloads benefit from the CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads, which provide ample headroom for encoding and simultaneous gaming. The i5-13500E’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22772 places it 0.3% ahead of the Intel Atom x7405C and only 0.4% behind the Intel Core i9-12900E, indicating solid multi-threaded throughput for handling encoding tasks. However, the GPU’s lower percentile means that any streaming scenario that relies on GPU-based encoding will see reduced performance relative to what the CPU alone can deliver. The system can handle streaming, but the bottleneck will be the graphics card.

Video editing is a mixed scenario for this build. The CPU’s 62nd percentile ranking and multi-core score of 22772 in Cinebench R23 suggest strong performance for rendering timelines and applying effects in software that utilizes CPU threads. The 24 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel memory support for DDR4 and DDR5 provide a solid foundation for large media files. Conversely, the GPU’s 19th percentile ranking and 3DMark score of 3075, which is 3.1% above the NVIDIA GeForce 820A, indicate that GPU-accelerated effects and export tasks will be markedly slower. Editors working with heavy GPU effects will feel the graphics card’s limitations, while those relying on CPU-based processing will see better results.

3D rendering favors the CPU significantly. The i5-13500E’s Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 9564 and R15 multi-core score of 2295 demonstrate consistent scaling across workloads, with the single-core scores of 1349 and 323 respectively showing strong per-thread performance. These numbers place the CPU in the 62nd percentile, meaning it outperforms the majority of processors. The RTX 5080 SUPER, with its 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 45,600 million transistors, has raw compute capability, but its 19th percentile rank and score of 3075 in 3DMark Steel Nomad suggest that real-world rendering performance in GPU-accelerated engines will be below what the hardware specifications alone might imply. CPU-based rendering will be the stronger path.

Software development benefits from the CPU’s balanced architecture. The 14 cores and 20 threads handle parallel compilation tasks efficiently, and the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3214 ensures fast response for single-threaded build steps. The 65W TDP and support for ECC memory make this a stable platform for long compile sessions. The GPU’s lower standing is less relevant for most development tasks, though GPU compute for machine learning or shader compilation will be slower. The CPU’s 62nd percentile ranking relative to all CPUs indicates this is a competent development machine for code, but not for GPU-accelerated workloads.

Student and office work is a scenario where this build is massively overqualified on the CPU side but underqualified on the GPU side. The i5-13500E’s integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback for basic display tasks, and the CPU’s 62nd percentile ensures smooth multitasking across office applications, web browsing, and document editing. The Cinebench R15 single-core score of 323 indicates fast application launch times and responsive UI interactions. The discrete GPU is unnecessary for these tasks and, given its 19th percentile rank, does not offer advantages for typical office software. The system would perform office work admirably, but the GPU adds cost without benefit in this scenario.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built on Intel Socket 1700, which accommodates the Raptor Lake architecture of the i5-13500E. This socket is compatible with the Core 13th Gen series, and the CPU’s production status is Active, meaning it remains a current product. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, giving builders flexibility to use existing DDR4 modules or upgrade to DDR5 for higher bandwidth. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the processor, while the GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, ensuring the graphics card has full bandwidth available for data transfer.

The 65W TDP of the CPU is modest, and the GPU has a TDP of 415W, which is a substantial power draw. The FACT PACK does not list a suggested PSU wattage, so power supply requirements must be considered qualitatively. The GPU requires a 1x 16-pin power connector, and its dual-slot design with dimensions of 304 mm in length means the case must accommodate a long, power-hungry card. The CPU’s low TDP leaves headroom in the overall system power budget, but the GPU’s 415W TDP dominates the power requirements. A sensible next upgrade would focus on the GPU, as the CPU’s 62nd percentile ranking is significantly higher than the GPU’s 19th percentile, indicating the processor is not the limiting factor.

The PCIe Gen 5 support from the CPU is forward-looking, but the current GPU uses PCIe 5.0 x16, which is fully compatible. The 16 lanes from the CPU are dedicated to the graphics card, and the memory bandwidth of 1.02 TB/s on the GPU is substantial, though the GPU’s benchmark performance does not reflect this capability. Upgrading the GPU to a higher-performing model would be the most direct path to improved system performance, as the CPU has demonstrated it can compete with the Intel Core i9-12900E, which is only 0.4% ahead in average score. The platform’s DDR4 and DDR5 support means memory upgrades are possible without changing the motherboard, but the CPU’s locked multiplier (multiplierUnlocked is false) limits overclocking potential.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13500E is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on a 10 nm process by Intel. The base clock is 2.40 GHz, with a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, and the die size is 215 mm². The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache, which is substantial for a mid-range part. The CPU supports ECC memory, a feature typically found in workstation-class processors, and includes integrated UHD Graphics 770 as a fallback display solution.

Benchmark results show consistent performance across versions of Cinebench. The R15 multi-core score of 2295 and single-core score of 323 scale to R20 scores of 9564 and 1349, and R23 scores of 22772 and 3214, respectively. These scores place the CPU at the 62nd percentile among all CPUs, meaning it outperforms a majority of processors. The nearest rivals confirm this positioning: the Intel Atom x7405C is just 0.3% behind, while the Intel Core i9-12900E is 0.4% ahead, indicating the i5-13500E sits in a competitive mid-to-high range of CPU performance. The average benchmark score of 6586 further solidifies this, with rivals all within a 0.4% delta.

For real workloads, the multi-core scores indicate strong parallel processing capability. The 20 threads handle multi-threaded applications like video encoding, 3D rendering, and scientific computing effectively, as evidenced by the R23 multi-core score of 22772. The single-core score of 3214 in R23 shows that the 4.60 GHz boost clock delivers excellent per-thread performance, which is critical for gaming, legacy software, and tasks that cannot use many cores. The 14-core configuration, combining performance and efficiency cores, provides a balance that is well-suited for mixed workloads, though the 65W TDP suggests power efficiency is a design priority.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting high-refresh 1080p or 1440p play will find the CPU sufficient but the GPU lacking. The i5-13500E’s 62nd percentile ranking and single-core score of 3214 in Cinebench R23 ensure the CPU will not bottleneck most games, but the RTX 5080 SUPER’s 19th percentile ranking and 3DMark score of 3075, which is 2.8% below the NVIDIA Quadro P1000, suggest frame rates will be below expectations for a 5080-series card. Data shows the GPU is closer in performance to entry-level parts like the GeForce 820A (3.1% lower) than to high-end competitors, so gamers should expect modest FPS in demanding titles, especially at higher resolutions.

Content creators focused on CPU-intensive tasks like video rendering or 3D modeling will benefit from the i5-13500E’s multi-core strength. The R23 multi-core score of 22772 and 62nd percentile position mean rendering times will be competitive with the Intel Core i9-12900E, which is only 0.4% faster. The 24 MB of L3 cache and dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support provide adequate memory bandwidth for large datasets. However, creators relying on GPU acceleration for effects or final renders will be disappointed by the GPU’s 19th percentile standing, as the 3DMark score of 3075 indicates limited compute performance relative to other GPUs.

Software developers will find this a capable build for compilation and testing. The 14 cores and 20 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, and the 65W TDP means the CPU runs cool under sustained load. The ECC memory support is a boon for developers working on data integrity-sensitive applications. The GPU’s low percentile is less critical for development, though tasks like shader compilation or CUDA-based workloads will be slower. The CPU’s 62nd percentile ranking assures that development tools like IDEs and compilers will run smoothly.

Students and small business workstations are a poor match for this build due to the GPU. The i5-13500E’s integrated UHD Graphics 770 is sufficient for office tasks, and the CPU’s 62nd percentile ensures responsive performance in spreadsheets, word processors, and web applications. The discrete GPU is unnecessary and underperforms its class, as indicated by its 19th percentile rank and score of 3075, which is 3.6% above the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M. These users would be better served by a CPU-only build, as the GPU adds no measurable benefit for typical office workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows the GPU is the primary bottleneck in this pairing. The CPU’s 62nd percentile rank versus the GPU’s 19th percentile rank is a 43-point gap, indicating a severe imbalance where the processor is significantly more capable than the graphics card. In CPU-bound workloads like software compilation or CPU-based rendering, the i5-13500E will perform at its expected level, as evidenced by its R23 multi-core score of 22772. In GPU-bound workloads like gaming at high settings or GPU-accelerated rendering, the RTX 5080 SUPER’s low percentile will dominate performance, capping frame rates and reducing compute throughput.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent because the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this combination. However, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3075, which is 2.8% below the NVIDIA Quadro P1000, suggests that the GPU will produce frame rates consistent with a low-tier graphics card, not a 5080-series flagship. The CPU’s single-core score of 3214 in Cinebench R23 indicates it can handle high frame rate scenarios, but the GPU will not deliver the frames to match. This imbalance means that upgrading the GPU would yield significant performance gains, while upgrading the CPU would show minimal improvement in GPU-bound tasks.

The CPU’s 65W TDP and the GPU’s 415W TDP further highlight the imbalance. The CPU is a low-power part that can be cooled by modest solutions, while the GPU requires substantial power delivery and cooling, as indicated by its 1x 16-pin connector and dual-slot design. The system’s combined percentile of 41 reflects this bottleneck, pulling the overall performance down from the CPU’s 62nd percentile toward the GPU’s 19th percentile. This is a classic case of a strong processor paired with a weak graphics card, where the GPU limits the system’s real-world performance in graphics-intensive scenarios.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this specific CPU-GPU combination, so all frame rate figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores and percentile positions. The RTX 5080 SUPER’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3075 places it at the 19th percentile, with nearest rivals including the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 (2.8% faster) and the Intel Arc Pro B60 (3.4% faster). These rivals are not gaming-focused parts, indicating that the GPU will produce frame rates well below what a 5080-series card name suggests. The CPU’s strong single-core score of 3214 in Cinebench R23 ensures it will not be the limiting factor in most games.

At 1080p resolution with ultra settings, the CPU’s 62nd percentile and high single-core performance can drive high frame rates, but the GPU’s low percentile will constrain output. Given the 3DMark score is 3.1% above the NVIDIA GeForce 820A, which is an entry-level mobile GPU, estimated FPS in demanding titles would be low, possibly in the range that would be considered unplayable for competitive gaming. Less demanding e-sports titles might achieve moderate frame rates, but the GPU’s 19th percentile ranking suggests it will not deliver a high-refresh experience in modern AAA games.

At 1440p and 4K, the GPU’s limitations become more pronounced. The 24 GB of GDDR7 memory and 1.02 TB/s bandwidth are ample, but the 3DMark score of 3075 indicates the processing power is not there to utilize this memory effectively. The GPU’s 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 performance is a raw compute number that does not translate to gaming performance, as evidenced by its low percentile. Estimated frame rates at 1440p ultra would be lower than 1080p, and at 4K, the GPU would struggle to maintain smooth playability in most titles. The CPU’s performance is sufficient, but the GPU will be the primary limiter across all resolutions.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The Intel Core i5-13500E is at the 62nd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 6586.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rival in benchmark scores?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER scores 3075 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, which is 2.8% below the NVIDIA Quadro P1000’s score of 3163.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13500E supports ECC memory, along with both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The RTX 5080 SUPER has 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 1.02 TB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this CPU-GPU combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact pairing, so frame rate discussion is estimated from benchmark scores.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock speed?

A: The Intel Core i5-13500E has a boost clock of 4.60 GHz and a base clock of 2.40 GHz.

Q: What is the combined percentile for this build?

A: The combined percentile for the Intel Core i5-13500E and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER is 41, reflecting the GPU’s lower standing.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core i5-13500E, a 14-core Raptor Lake processor, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER, a Blackwell 2.0 architecture GPU. The CPU is positioned at the 62nd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 6586, while the GPU is at the 19th percentile with a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3075. The combined percentile of 41 indicates that the system’s overall performance is dragged down by the GPU’s low ranking relative to its peers.

The CPU is a solid mid-to-high-range performer, as shown by its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22772 and single-core score of 3214. The GPU, despite having 45,600 million transistors and 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 performance, ranks low in benchmarks, with nearest rivals including the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 and Intel Arc Pro B60, which are not high-end gaming parts. This pairing is unbalanced, with the CPU capable of much more than the GPU can deliver in graphics-intensive tasks.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i5-13500E achieves a Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 2295 and single-core score of 323. In Cinebench R20, the scores are 9564 multi-core and 1349 single-core. The R23 results show 22772 multi-core and 3214 single-core. These scores place the CPU at the 62nd percentile, with an average benchmark score of 6586. The nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-12900E, is only 0.4% ahead, while the Intel Atom x7405C is 0.3% behind, indicating the i5-13500E is well-matched against higher-tier processors.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER scores 3075 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 benchmark, placing it at the 19th percentile among all GPUs. The nearest rivals show it is 2.8% below the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 and 3.4% below the Intel Arc Pro B60, while it is 3.1% above the NVIDIA GeForce 820A and 3.6% above the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M. The combined picture is a CPU that outperforms 62% of processors but a GPU that outperforms only 19% of graphics cards, resulting in a system where the processor is the dominant component and the GPU is a significant weak point in the overall performance profile.