SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13490F + Intel Arc A310

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

86 Score

Top 14% Ranking

86 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

88%

GPU

85%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13490F

28,185 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310

7,550 Benchmark Score

Top 15% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

The Intel Core i5-13490F paired with the Intel Arc A310 presents an unusual balance of capabilities. The CPU sits at the 80th percentile among all processors, while the GPU lands at only the 40th percentile among all graphics cards. This 40-point gap indicates a substantial imbalance where the processor vastly outperforms the graphics solution in raw compute capability.

Benchmark data confirms the CPU's dominance. The i5-13490F achieves a multi-threaded score of 22747 in Cinebench R23, while the Arc A310 manages only 5433 in Passmark G3D and 2157 in GPU compute tests. In gaming workloads, the GPU becomes the limiting factor almost immediately. The CPU's single-thread score of 3211 in Cinebench R23 and 1002 in 3DMark single-thread tests indicate it can feed frames far faster than the A310 can render them.

The 3DMark thread scaling data reveals the processor's behavior under varying loads. With 2 threads, the chip scores 1959; at 4 threads, it reaches 3552; at 8 threads, 5731; and at maximum threads, 7550. This near-linear scaling up to 8 threads demonstrates strong core utilization, but the jump from 8 to 16 threads yields only marginal gains (5731 to 7550), suggesting diminishing returns beyond 8 threads for many workloads. The Arc A310, with only 768 shading units and 16 ROPs, cannot leverage this CPU headroom in frame rendering.

For CPU-bound tasks like data compression (Passmark score of 328397), encryption (17902), and integer math (83723), the i5-13490F operates without meaningful bottleneck. The GPU's 124.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 64-bit bus width become the constraint in graphics-heavy scenarios. The absence of measured FPS data for this pairing means all gaming estimates derive from benchmark scores, but the 40-percentile gap strongly suggests the GPU will cap frame rates in virtually every 3D workload.

# GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A310 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture using TSMC's 6 nm process, packing 7,200 million transistors into a 157 mm² die. This entry-level Alchemist part (Arc 3 generation) operates with a fixed 1750 MHz clock for both base and boost, with memory running at 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective). The 4 GB GDDR6 frame buffer across a 64-bit bus delivers 124.0 GB/s bandwidth — a modest figure that will constrain texture streaming and high-resolution rendering.

The A310's compute resources include 768 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 raster output units. Pixel throughput is rated at 28.00 GPixel/s with texture fill at 56.00 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance reaches 2.688 TFLOPS for FP32 and 5.376 TFLOPS for FP16 via 2:1 ratio. These figures place the card in entry-level territory, roughly on par with older discrete solutions. The nearest rivals in benchmark data — the AMD Radeon R7 250 (deltaPct -0.1), AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 (deltaPct -0.4), NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (deltaPct 1), and AMD Radeon HD 8850M (deltaPct 1.4) — confirm this positioning.

Ray tracing hardware is present with 6 dedicated RT cores, and the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. This API support means modern rendering features like ray-traced effects and mesh shaders are technically available, though the modest compute throughput will limit their practical use. The 30 W TDP and single-slot design with no power connectors make this an exceptionally power-efficient card, with a suggested PSU of 200 W. Display output is handled through 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 connections.

Passmark scores show the A310's DirectX performance hierarchy: DirectX 9 scores 69, DirectX 10 scores 31, DirectX 11 scores 33, and DirectX 12 scores 29. The dramatic drop from legacy APIs to modern ones suggests driver overhead or architectural inefficiencies in newer graphics pipelines. The G2D score of 625 indicates modest 2D acceleration capability. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 30607 and Vulkan score of 28964 reveal better compute performance in synthetic workloads than the Passmark G3D figure of 5433 might suggest, though the GPU compute score of 2157 tempers expectations for general-purpose compute tasks.

# Benchmark Performance

The i5-13490F posts an average benchmark score of 28185, placing it at the 80th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435, scores 28128 for a deltaPct of 0.2 — essentially a statistical tie. The Intel Core i5-14500T (28065, deltaPct 0.4) and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE (28054, deltaPct 0.5) are also within half a percent. The only rival ahead is the Intel Core i9-11950H at 28332, a deltaPct of -0.5 from the i5-13490F's perspective. This clustering indicates the 13490F sits at a performance plateau where several competing processors deliver nearly identical results.

In Cinebench, the CPU achieves 2292 in R15 multi-core and 323 single-core, 9553 in R20 multi-core and 1348 single-core, and 22747 in R23 multi-core with 3211 single-core. Passmark results show 26569 for multithread and 3828 for single-thread. The 3DMark thread tests reveal strong scaling: 7556 at 16 threads, 7550 at max threads, 5731 at 8 threads, 3552 at 4 threads, and 1959 at 2 threads, with a single-thread score of 1002.

The Arc A310's average benchmark score is 7550, at the 40th percentile of all GPUs. Its closest competitor, the AMD Radeon R7 250, scores 7557 (deltaPct -0.1). The AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 posts 7580 (deltaPct -0.4), while the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 trails at 7472 (deltaPct 1). The AMD Radeon HD 8850M scores 7447 (deltaPct 1.4). The combined percentile for this CPU-GPU pairing is 60, reflecting the CPU's strength pulling the overall score above the GPU's standalone position.

The combined picture shows a system where the processor delivers top-quartile performance while the graphics card operates in the lower half of all GPUs. For productivity workloads that rely on CPU throughput, this build performs admirably. For graphics-intensive tasks, the A310 becomes the decisive constraint, capping overall system capability well below what the CPU could support with a stronger GPU.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The i5-13490F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform with the Raptor Lake architecture on Intel's 10 nm process. The die measures 215 mm². Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, though ECC memory is not supported. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 16 lanes available from the CPU. This platform flexibility allows builders to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-performance DDR5 memory.

The CPU's TDP is 65 watts, making it efficient for a 10-core, 16-thread processor. The Arc A310 draws just 30 W, and the suggested PSU for the GPU is 200 W. This low power envelope means the entire system can run on modest power supplies, and the GPU requires no auxiliary power connectors. The combined thermal and power requirements are minimal, enabling compact desktop builds with limited cooling.

The production status of the CPU is Active, while the GPU is End-of-life, with its successor identified as Battlemage. This distinction matters for upgrade planning. The platform itself remains viable for CPU upgrades within the LGA 1700 socket family, though the i5-13490F's 65 W TDP and 80th percentile standing leave limited headroom for meaningful processor upgrades without changing platforms. The GPU, however, is clearly the bottleneck and the primary upgrade candidate.

A sensible next upgrade would prioritize replacing the Arc A310 with a more powerful graphics card. The 200 W suggested PSU provides headroom for a GPU with modest power requirements, though a larger PSU might be necessary for higher-tier cards. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface on the A310 means the slot supports full x8 bandwidth, and the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes can accommodate current and next-generation GPUs without interface bottlenecks. The 4 GB VRAM limitation of the A310 makes this upgrade particularly pressing for modern games and larger textures.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread configuration?

A: The Intel Core i5-13490F has 10 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and boost clock of 4.80 GHz.

Q: How much VRAM does the Arc A310 have and what type?

A: The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this pairing?

A: The combined percentile for the CPU and GPU together is 60, reflecting the CPU's 80th percentile and GPU's 40th percentile positions.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, ECC memory is not supported. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the TDP of each component?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 watts, and the GPU has a TDP of 30 watts, with a suggested PSU of 200 watts for the graphics card.

Q: What PCIe interface does the GPU use?

A: The Arc A310 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, while the CPU provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes.

Q: Is the GPU still in production?

A: No, the Arc A310 is end-of-life, with its successor designated as Battlemage. The CPU remains active in production.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination, so all gaming frame rates discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements. The dataIsMeasured flag is false, meaning these figures should be treated as approximations based on the relative performance of the components.

The Arc A310's Passmark G3D score of 5433 and DirectX 12 score of 29 suggest very limited gaming capability in modern titles. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus will constrain texture quality and resolution. At 1080p with ultra settings, frame rates will likely fall below playable thresholds in most contemporary games, given the card's 40th percentile standing among all GPUs. The nearest rival comparisons — particularly the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 with a deltaPct of 1 — provide context for expected performance, with the A310 slightly ahead of that older card in average benchmarks.

The CPU's strong single-thread performance (3211 in Cinebench R23, 1002 in 3DMark single-thread) means it will not bottleneck in gaming scenarios. However, the GPU will cap frame rates severely. The 16 ROPs and 28.00 GPixel/s pixel rate limit fill-rate-bound scenes, while the 56.00 GTexel/s texture rate and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth constrain texture-heavy environments. For esports titles with modest graphics requirements, the A310 may achieve acceptable frame rates at lower settings, but the 768 shading units and 2.688 TFLOPS FP32 throughput place hard limits on what is achievable.

Older games or titles with scalable graphics options could run at playable frame rates, particularly at 720p or 1080p with reduced settings. The DirectX 9 score of 69 suggests legacy titles perform relatively better than modern ones. However, for any recent AAA release, the expectation is that this pairing will struggle to maintain 30 FPS at medium-to-high settings. The CPU will remain largely idle in gaming workloads, with utilization driven by game logic and physics rather than rendering.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13490F is a 10-core, 16-thread desktop processor from the Core 13th Gen series, built on the Raptor Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-S codename). It uses Intel's 10 nm process node and carries a die size of 215 mm². The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU was released on 2023-02-09 with a launch MSRP of $235.

Clock speeds range from 2.50 GHz base to 4.80 GHz boost. The multiplier is locked, preventing overclocking. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, without ECC. PCIe connectivity includes Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The market segment is desktop, and the production status is active. The part number is SRMC0.

Benchmark results demonstrate strong multi-threaded performance. Cinebench R23 multi-core scores 22747, while Passmark multithread reaches 26569. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 7556 nearly matches the max-thread score of 7550, indicating that 16 threads capture essentially all available performance. Single-thread scores are respectable: 3211 in Cinebench R23, 3828 in Passmark single-thread, and 1002 in 3DMark single-thread.

The 80th percentile ranking places this CPU comfortably above most processors. The nearest rivals are all within 0.5% in average score, showing that the 13490F competes directly with a cluster of mid-range and upper-mid-range chips. Real-world workloads that benefit from this processor include data compression (Passmark score of 328397), integer math (83723), floating-point math (60273), and random string sorting (34042). Extended instruction performance scores 20837, and data encryption reaches 17902.

The 10-core, 16-thread configuration uses a hybrid architecture typical of Raptor Lake, though the FACT PACK does not specify performance-core versus efficiency-core counts. The 24 MB shared L3 cache benefits workloads with large working sets. The 65 W TDP is notably efficient for this level of performance, making the CPU suitable for compact systems with modest cooling requirements.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i5-13490F with the Intel Arc A310. The CPU represents a high-tier processor at the 80th percentile, while the GPU sits at the 40th percentile. The combined percentile is 60, placing the overall system in the middle of the benchmark distribution.

The pairing is fundamentally mismatched in performance class. The i5-13490F is a capable 10-core, 16-thread processor suited to demanding productivity workloads, while the Arc A310 is an entry-level graphics card with 4 GB VRAM and 2.688 TFLOPS FP32 throughput. This configuration resembles a workstation-oriented build where CPU compute matters more than graphics, or a budget gaming system where the GPU was chosen for cost or power efficiency rather than performance.

The 65 W CPU TDP and 30 W GPU TDP make this an energy-efficient desktop configuration. The GPU requires no power connectors and suggests a 200 W PSU, enabling very compact builds. The CPU's 80th percentile performance means productivity tasks like content creation, software development, and data processing will perform well. The GPU's 40th percentile limits gaming and graphics workloads significantly.

For a balanced desktop experience, the GPU would need to be upgraded to match the CPU's capability. As configured, this build maximizes CPU-bound performance while minimizing graphics capability — a profile that suits specific professional or educational use cases more than general-purpose gaming.

# Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users whose workloads are primarily CPU-bound and who require only basic graphics output. The i5-13490F's 80th percentile performance in multi-threaded benchmarks makes it suitable for software developers compiling code, students running computational assignments, and small business workstations handling spreadsheets, documents, and database queries.

Content creators working with audio processing or data analysis pipelines will benefit from the CPU's strong Passmark scores in integer math (83723), floating-point math (60273), and data compression (328397). The 10-core, 16-thread configuration handles parallel workloads efficiently, as shown by the 3DMark thread scaling from 1959 at 2 threads to 7556 at 16 threads.

Gamers at 720p or 1080p with low-to-medium settings in older or less demanding titles might find this build acceptable, given the Arc A310's DirectX 9 performance (score of 69) being relatively stronger than its DirectX 12 showing. However, gamers targeting modern AAA titles at high settings or 1440p and above should look elsewhere, as the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 40th percentile ranking will prove insufficient.

Students and professionals needing a quiet, power-efficient desktop for productivity tasks will appreciate the 65 W CPU and 30 W GPU power envelope. The lack of a discrete power connector on the GPU simplifies installation. The platform's DDR4 and DDR5 memory support provides flexibility in memory selection. The 200 W suggested PSU keeps system cost low and enables compact cases.

Users planning to upgrade the GPU later will find the CPU provides ample headroom. The i5-13490F's 80th percentile performance means it will not bottleneck a more powerful graphics card in most scenarios. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes and 16-lane CPU interface support current and future GPUs. This build makes sense as a starting point for a system that will evolve, with the understanding that the Arc A310 is a temporary solution rather than a long-term gaming component.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13490F + Intel Arc A310

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13490F

Intel Arc A310

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds