SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13490F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

86 Score

Top 14% Ranking

86 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

88%

GPU

84%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13490F

28,185 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER

6,270 Benchmark Score

Top 16% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13490F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is a desktop build that combines a 10-core Raptor Lake processor with a Blackwell 2.0 architecture GPU. The data for this specific combination contains no measured FPS rows, so all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of each component rather than direct testing. The CPU holds an 80th percentile position among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 36th percentile among all GPUs, and the combined pairing lands at the 58th percentile overall.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination, so the following gaming analysis is framed entirely as estimates based on the benchmark scores of the individual components. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER delivers a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6269.5, which places it in a dead heat with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102, which scores 6270.0, showing a delta of 0.0%. This GPU score suggests the card is capable of handling demanding 1440p and 4K gaming workloads, given its 16 GB of GDDR7 memory and 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth, though exact frame rates cannot be stated.

The CPU side provides a strong foundation for gaming, with a 3DMark single-thread score of 1002 and a 3DMark 2-thread score of 1959. These scores indicate solid single-core performance that is essential for games that rely heavily on one or two threads. The 3DMark 8-thread score of 5731 and the 3DMark 16-thread score of 7556 show that the processor scales well with additional threads, which benefits modern titles that utilize multiple cores. For high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread performance should be sufficient to keep up with the GPU, though at 4K resolution the GPU becomes the more critical factor.

The GPU’s FP32 performance of 43.94 TFLOPS and pixel rate of 235.4 GPixel/s provide a strong basis for estimating high frame rates in most games. At 1440p Ultra settings, the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER should deliver smooth gameplay across a wide range of titles, given its benchmark parity with the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102. At 4K Ultra, the 16 GB of VRAM becomes an asset for texture-heavy games, though the 36th percentile GPU ranking suggests it is not at the very top of the performance hierarchy. The lack of measured FPS data means these are qualitative expectations rather than verified results.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark results paint a picture of a well-rounded processor. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22747 is notably strong, while the single-core score of 3211 shows competitive per-thread capability. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 9553 and single-core score of 1348 reinforce this pattern. In PassMark tests, the multi-thread score of 26569 and single-thread score of 3828 indicate balanced performance across both lightly-threaded and heavily-threaded workloads. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 28185, which places it at the 80th percentile among all CPUs.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER’s only listed benchmark is the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, where it scores 6269.5. This puts the GPU at the 36th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 6270. The nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102, scores 6270 with a delta of 0.0%, showing that the two cards are essentially identical in this specific test. Other nearby rivals include the NVIDIA Quadro K620 at 6282 (-0.2%) and the AMD FirePro W600 at 6223 (+0.8%), though these are lower-tier workstation cards that do not represent direct gaming competition.

The combined picture shows a CPU that outperforms the majority of processors while the GPU sits slightly below the 50th percentile. This creates an interesting dynamic where the CPU has more headroom than the GPU in most workloads. The combined percentile of 58 reflects this middle-of-the-pack positioning, suggesting that the build is balanced but not extreme in either direction. The CPU outperforms its nearest rivals — the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 (28128, +0.2%), Intel Core i5-14500T (28065, +0.4%), and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE (28054, +0.5%) — while also edging out the Intel Core i9-11950H (28332, -0.5%).

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13490F uses the Intel Socket 1700, which is native to the Core 13th Gen Raptor Lake platform. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, giving builders flexibility in choosing between older and newer memory technologies. PCIe connectivity is provided through Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which is sufficient for modern graphics cards and NVMe storage. The motherboard platform determines whether DDR4 or DDR5 is used, and the CPU’s lack of ECC memory support means it is not suited for error-correcting memory configurations.

The GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s Gen 5 lanes, ensuring no bandwidth bottleneck for the graphics card. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a TDP of 350 W, while the CPU has a TDP of 65 W. This indicates that the power supply needs to be sized to handle the GPU’s demands, though the exact suggested PSU wattage is not provided in the data. The GPU requires a single 16-pin power connector, which is a modern standard that may require an adapter depending on the power supply.

A sensible next upgrade path would involve focusing on the GPU, since the CPU’s 80th percentile ranking suggests it has more performance headroom than the GPU’s 36th percentile. Upgrading the GPU to a higher-tier model would likely yield larger performance gains than upgrading the CPU, particularly in GPU-bound scenarios like 4K gaming. The platform’s support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means that memory upgrades are possible without changing the motherboard, though the choice of memory type is locked in by the board. The CPU’s 65 W TDP and the GPU’s 350 W TDP together suggest a total system draw that is manageable for a standard desktop power supply.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets gamers who play at 1440p or 4K resolution and want a capable system without chasing the absolute highest GPU performance tier. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER’s 16 GB of GDDR7 memory and 896.0 GB/s bandwidth make it well-suited for high-resolution textures and modern game assets, while the CPU’s strong multi-core scores handle background tasks and streaming. Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering will find the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22747 and the GPU’s FP32 performance of 43.94 TFLOPS useful for acceleration.

Software developers benefit from the CPU’s PassMark data compression score of 328397 and integer math score of 83723, which indicate strong performance in compilation and data processing tasks. Students and small business users building a workstation will appreciate the CPU’s 65 W TDP, which allows for efficient cooling solutions, and the platform’s support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory offers cost flexibility. The build is less suited for users who demand top-tier GPU performance, given the 36th percentile ranking, but it provides a solid foundation for a wide range of productivity and gaming workloads.

The CPU’s 80th percentile position makes it a strong choice for users who prioritize processor-heavy tasks, while the GPU’s moderate percentile means it is better matched to 1440p gaming than to extreme 4K or high-refresh-rate 1080p esports scenarios. The combined 58th percentile indicates that this is a mid-to-upper-tier desktop build that balances CPU and GPU capabilities without excessive focus on either component.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13490F is a 10-core, 16-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 10 nm process node. It has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, with a 65 W TDP that keeps power consumption modest. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The die size is 215 mm², and the processor was released on 2023-02-09 with a launch MSRP of $235.

Benchmark results show the CPU excels in multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22747 is strong for a 65 W processor, while the R20 multi-core score of 9553 and R15 multi-core score of 2292 confirm consistent scaling across versions. PassMark tests show a multi-thread score of 26569, with floating point math at 60273 and integer math at 83723. The data encryption score of 17902 and extended instructions score of 20837 indicate solid performance in security and SIMD-heavy applications.

Single-thread performance is competitive but not class-leading. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3211 and R20 single-core score of 1348 are respectable, while the 3DMark single-thread score of 1002 and PassMark single-thread score of 3828 place it in the upper middle of the CPU hierarchy. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 7556 and max-thread score of 7550 show that the processor reaches its performance ceiling with 16 threads, which aligns with its 10-core, 16-thread configuration. For real workloads, this means the CPU handles video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation efficiently, while gaming performance benefits from strong multi-core scaling in modern titles.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s 3DMark 8-thread score of 5731 and single-thread score of 1002 suggest it can drive high frame rates in competitive titles, though the GPU’s 36th percentile ranking means it is better suited to 1440p at high refresh than to 1080p at extreme refresh rates. The GPU’s 43.94 TFLOPS FP32 performance supports this estimate.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 threads and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22747 provide enough headroom for simultaneous gaming and encoding, while the GPU’s tensor cores (280 of them) can assist with AI-based encoding features, though specific streaming benchmarks are not available.

Video editing: The CPU’s PassMark floating point score of 60273 and integer score of 83723 indicate strong processing for filters and effects, while the GPU’s 16 GB of GDDR7 memory and 896.0 GB/s bandwidth accelerate timeline scrubbing and preview rendering. The combined benchmark scores suggest smooth 4K editing workflows.

3D rendering: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22747 provides solid CPU-based rendering performance, while the GPU’s 70 ray tracing cores and 43.94 TFLOPS FP32 performance enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6269.5 supports the GPU’s DirectX 12 rendering capability.

Software development: The CPU’s PassMark data compression score of 328397 and random string sorting score of 34042 indicate fast compilation and code analysis, while the 16 threads handle parallel builds efficiently. The 24 MB L3 cache reduces latency for frequently accessed data.

Student and office work: The CPU’s 65 W TDP allows for quiet and efficient operation, while the single-thread score of 3828 in PassMark handles everyday applications with ease. The 80th percentile CPU ranking ensures responsive multitasking, and the GPU’s 36th percentile is more than sufficient for office productivity tasks.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile ranking among all CPUs?

A: The Intel Core i5-13490F ranks at the 80th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 28185.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER scores 6269.5 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 scores 6270.0, resulting in a delta of 0.0%.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The Intel Core i5-13490F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory capacity and bandwidth?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR7 memory with a 256-bit bus width and 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the CPU’s TDP and the GPU’s TDP?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 350 W.

Q: What socket does the CPU use?

A: The Intel Core i5-13490F uses the Intel Socket 1700.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this build?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing is 58.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs a 10-core Intel Core i5-13490F with a 16 GB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER. The CPU’s 80th percentile ranking places it well above the midpoint of all processors, while the GPU’s 36th percentile ranking puts it below the midpoint of all GPUs. The combined percentile of 58 indicates that the overall system sits slightly above the middle of the performance spectrum.

The CPU brings strong multi-threaded performance with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22747 and a PassMark multi-thread score of 26569, while the GPU delivers a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6269.5. This pairing is best described as a mid-to-upper-tier desktop system that prioritizes CPU capability over GPU extremity. The 65 W CPU TDP and 350 W GPU TDP show a significant power asymmetry, with the GPU demanding more than five times the power of the CPU.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a clear imbalance between the CPU and GPU. The CPU’s 80th percentile ranking far exceeds the GPU’s 36th percentile, indicating that the processor has more relative performance headroom than the graphics card. In CPU-bound workloads such as software compilation, data compression, and multi-threaded rendering, the CPU will be the primary driver of performance, and the GPU will not limit these tasks. The CPU’s PassMark data compression score of 328397 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22747 demonstrate its capability in these areas.

In GPU-bound workloads, particularly gaming at high resolutions, the GPU becomes the limiting factor. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6269.5, which matches the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102, suggests that the GPU will constrain frame rates in demanding titles. The FPS scaling between resolutions would likely show smaller gains from the CPU and larger gains from GPU upgrades at 4K. At 1080p, the CPU’s strong single-thread score of 1002 in 3DMark could still be the bottleneck in lightweight esports titles, but in most modern games, the GPU will be the limiting component.

The 16 GB of GDDR7 memory and 896.0 GB/s bandwidth on the GPU are sufficient for high-resolution textures, but the 36th percentile ranking indicates that higher-tier GPUs would provide significant performance gains. Upgrading the GPU would yield the most substantial overall system improvement, while the CPU has enough headroom to support a more powerful graphics card without becoming a bottleneck in most scenarios. The combined percentile of 58 reflects this balance, where the CPU boosts the system above the median but the GPU holds it back from the upper tier.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13490F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13490F

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds