SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13400E + Intel Arc A770

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

88 Score

Top 12% Ranking

88 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

78%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13400E

6,638 Benchmark Score

Top 22% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A770

68,809 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Platform Analysis: Intel Core i5-13400E + Intel Arc A770

This pairing combines a 10-core Raptor Lake desktop processor with Intel's flagship Alchemist-generation graphics card, targeting the 76th percentile of all desktop configurations in the benchmark database. The combination sits in the upper-middle tier of performance, with the CPU at the 62nd percentile and the GPU at the 90th percentile, creating an interesting asymmetry where the graphics subsystem significantly outperforms the processor in relative standing. The data shows a desktop-class build with strong rasterization potential and substantial memory capacity, but the lack of measured FPS data for this exact combination means all gaming performance discussion must be framed as estimates derived from component-level benchmark scores.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13400E uses the LGA 1700 socket, which places it firmly in Intel's 12th and 13th generation desktop ecosystem. This socket supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in choosing between more affordable DDR4 modules or higher-bandwidth DDR5 kits. The dual-channel memory bus is standard for this class, and the platform's ECC memory support is a notable feature for workstation-oriented builds where data integrity matters. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the processor itself, which means the primary graphics card slot can run at PCIe 5.0 speeds with compatible motherboards, though the Arc A770 in this pairing uses PCIe 4.0 x16 and will negotiate down to that interface speed.

The power delivery requirements for this platform are moderate. The CPU has a 65W TDP, which is a mainstream figure that most LGA 1700 motherboards can handle without elaborate VRM cooling. The GPU, however, draws significantly more power with its 225W TDP, and Intel recommends a 550W power supply for systems using the Arc A770. This suggests the total system power draw will be well within the range of a quality 550W to 650W unit, leaving some headroom for additional drives, fans, and peripherals. The GPU requires both a 6-pin and an 8-pin power connector, so builders must ensure their power supply has both available.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data points to the processor as the primary bottleneck in this pairing. Since the GPU sits at the 90th percentile while the CPU is at the 62nd percentile, moving to a higher-core-count LGA 1700 processor would better balance the system. The platform supports 13th generation Core i7 and i9 parts, which would provide additional cores and threads while keeping the same motherboard and memory. Alternatively, builders could consider a 14th generation processor if their motherboard receives a BIOS update, though the fact pack does not explicitly confirm compatibility beyond the 13th generation. The memory situation also offers an upgrade path: starting with DDR4 and later moving to DDR5 would require a new motherboard, but starting with DDR5 leaves the option to increase capacity or speed without changing platforms.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmarks show a consistent pattern across Cinebench versions. In Cinebench R15, the i5-13400E scores 2313 in multi-core and 326 in single-core. Moving to Cinebench R20, the scores are 9639 multi-core and 1360 single-core. The most recent Cinebench R23 results show 22950 multi-core and 3240 single-core. These scores place the processor at the 62nd percentile of all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 6638. The nearest rivals are remarkably close: the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X scores 6647 (a -0.1% delta), the Intel Core i9-9940X scores 6657 (-0.3% delta), and the Intel Core i9-12900E scores 6611 (a +0.4% delta). Interestingly, the Intel Pentium Gold G6405 also appears in the nearest rivals list with a score of 6605 (+0.5% delta), though this is likely an artifact of the averaging methodology rather than an indication of comparable real-world performance.

The GPU benchmarks are equally telling. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the Arc A770 scores 2969. Geekbench OpenCL shows 109175, and Geekbench Vulkan shows 94284. The average benchmark score is 68809, placing the GPU at the 90th percentile of all GPUs in the database. The nearest rivals include the NVIDIA CMP 90HX at 69000 (-0.3% delta), the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 at 68562 (+0.4% delta), the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 at 69870 (-1.5% delta), and the NVIDIA Quadro P6000 at 69986 (-1.7% delta). The GPU's 90th percentile ranking is substantially higher than the CPU's 62nd percentile, which means the combined system percentile of 76 reflects a GPU-heavy imbalance.

No measured FPS data exists for this specific CPU-GPU combination, so all gaming performance estimates must be derived from the component benchmark scores. The GPU's strong 3DMark and Geekbench compute results suggest it is capable of high frame rates at mainstream resolutions, but the CPU's lower relative percentile will likely limit performance in CPU-bound scenarios.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13400E is a 10-core, 16-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10nm process with a die size of 215 mm². It runs at a 2.40 GHz base clock and boosts up to 4.60 GHz, which is a wide frequency range that allows the chip to stay efficient at idle while providing solid single-thread performance when needed. The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 20 MB L3 cache. This cache configuration is substantial for a mid-range processor and helps with latency-sensitive workloads.

The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22950 indicates strong multi-threaded performance for a 65W processor. This score is competitive with much higher-TDP parts from previous generations, as evidenced by the near-identical average benchmark scores of the Threadripper 2950X and Core i9-9940X. The single-core score of 3240 in R23 is also respectable, placing it in the upper tier of processors for lightly-threaded workloads. The architecture's efficiency is notable: achieving these scores within a 65W TDP envelope means the processor can sustain long rendering or compilation sessions without thermal throttling in a well-ventilated case.

For real-world workloads, the data suggests the i5-13400E is a capable all-rounder. The 16 threads handle multi-threaded tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation with ease, while the high boost clock ensures snappy single-thread performance in everyday applications and games. The processor's ECC memory support adds credibility for workstation use cases where memory errors are unacceptable. However, the 62nd percentile ranking indicates that there are many faster processors available, particularly in the high-core-count workstation and HEDT segments. The processor will not embarrass itself in any workload, but it is not a top-tier part either.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry between the CPU and GPU in this pairing is significant. The GPU at the 90th percentile substantially outperforms the CPU at the 62nd percentile, which means the processor will be the limiting factor in most GPU-intensive workloads. In gaming at lower resolutions like 1080p, the CPU's single-thread performance will determine the maximum frame rate in many titles, particularly in scenes with many NPCs or complex physics. The GPU's high compute throughput will be underutilized in these scenarios because the CPU cannot feed it data fast enough.

At higher resolutions like 1440p or 4K, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck because the rendering load shifts to the graphics card. In these cases, the Arc A770's 90th percentile performance will be fully utilized, and the CPU's lower relative standing becomes less of a limiting factor. The benchmark data supports this: the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2969 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 94284 indicate strong raw graphics throughput that can handle demanding rendering workloads.

The combined percentile of 76 suggests that this system is well-balanced for high-resolution gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads, but less ideal for competitive esports at high refresh rates where CPU performance dominates. The lack of measured FPS data means we cannot quantify the exact bottleneck percentage, but the percentile difference of 28 points between the CPU and GPU is a clear indicator of where the system's limitations lie. For content creators who use GPU acceleration for rendering or encoding, this pairing works well because the GPU can offload much of the compute work from the CPU. For CPU-bound tasks like physics simulation or heavy multitasking, the processor will be the constraint.

FAQ

Q: What socket does the Intel Core i5-13400E use?

A: The processor uses Intel Socket 1700, which is compatible with 12th and 13th generation Intel desktop motherboards.

Q: Does this CPU support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the i5-13400E supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, giving builders the option to choose either memory type.

Q: What is the GPU's memory capacity and bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc A770 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X?

A: The i5-13400E has an average benchmark score of 6638, which is 0.1% lower than the Threadripper 2950X's 6647, indicating essentially identical overall performance in the database's benchmark suite.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this GPU?

A: Intel recommends a 550W power supply for the Arc A770, which has a 225W TDP and requires both a 6-pin and an 8-pin power connector.

Q: Does the GPU support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Arc A770 includes 32 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes hardware-accelerated ray tracing capabilities.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The Arc A770 ranks at the 90th percentile of all GPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 68809.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who want strong GPU performance without sacrificing CPU capability entirely. Gamers playing at 1440p or 4K resolutions will benefit most from the Arc A770's 90th percentile ranking, as the GPU will be the primary driver of frame rates in these scenarios. The 16 GB of VRAM provides ample capacity for high-resolution textures and modern game assets, making this a viable option for gamers who want to play at high settings without worrying about memory limitations.

Content creators working with GPU-accelerated applications will find the Arc A770's compute capabilities valuable. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 109175 indicates strong general-purpose compute performance, which translates well to video encoding, image processing, and 3D rendering tasks that leverage the GPU. The CPU's 16 threads and ECC memory support also make this a credible workstation for software developers, particularly those working on multi-threaded applications or running virtual machines. Students and small business users will appreciate the platform's flexibility with DDR4 or DDR5 memory options, allowing them to build within their means while maintaining a clear upgrade path.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, this system will likely be CPU-limited in many titles. The i5-13400E's 62nd percentile ranking means it falls short of the fastest gaming processors, so frame rates in competitive shooters may not reach the heights achievable with higher-end CPUs. The GPU's performance will be underutilized in this scenario, making it a less-than-ideal choice for esports enthusiasts chasing maximum FPS. At 1440p, the balance shifts toward the GPU, and the Arc A770's 90th percentile performance will deliver smooth frame rates in most titles with high settings. The 16 GB VRAM is particularly beneficial for modern games that require more than 8 GB at high resolutions.

Streaming and content creation sees a more balanced picture. The CPU's 16 threads handle encoding workloads well, while the GPU can take over encoding tasks using hardware acceleration. The combination of 65W CPU TDP and 225W GPU TDP keeps overall system power manageable, making this a practical build for a single-PC streaming setup. Video editing in applications like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve will see strong performance, with the GPU accelerating effects and rendering while the CPU handles timeline operations and export encoding.

3D rendering workloads benefit from both components. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22950 ensures that CPU-based renderers will complete tasks in reasonable time, while the GPU's compute capabilities accelerate GPU-based renderers like Blender Cycles or Octane. Software development is another strong use case: the 16 threads compile code efficiently, and the ECC memory support provides reliability for long-running build processes. For students and office workers, this system is overkill but not wasteful. The CPU's single-core performance of 3240 in Cinebench R23 ensures snappy application responsiveness, while the GPU's power is there for occasional creative projects or light gaming.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i5-13400E with the Intel Arc A770, representing a 76th percentile configuration overall. The system occupies an interesting middle ground: the GPU is a top-tier part at the 90th percentile, while the CPU is a solid mid-range offering at the 62nd percentile. This asymmetry defines the system's character as a GPU-first build that excels in graphics-intensive workloads but leaves some CPU performance on the table for highly threaded tasks.

The pairing makes sense for users who prioritize visual fidelity and GPU compute over raw CPU throughput. The 16 GB of VRAM is a standout feature that future-proofs the system for upcoming games and creative applications that demand large memory pools. The CPU's 65W TDP keeps thermals and power consumption reasonable, while the GPU's 225W TDP is typical for a high-end graphics card. The total system is well-suited for a mainstream desktop tower with adequate airflow and a 550W or higher power supply.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A770 is built on the DG2-512 chip using the Xe-HPG architecture, fabricated on TSMC's 6nm process with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. This makes it a large, complex chip with a transistor density of 53.4 million per mm². The GPU operates at a base clock of 2100 MHz and boosts to 2400 MHz, with memory running at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). The memory subsystem consists of 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth—a generous allocation that exceeds what most competing cards at this tier offer.

The compute resources are substantial: 4096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, and 128 raster operations pipelines. The GPU also includes 32 ray tracing cores for hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the fact pack does not list tensor cores, which are typically used for AI acceleration in NVIDIA's architecture. Pixel rate is 307.2 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 614.4 GTexel/s, indicating strong fill-rate performance. The FP32 compute throughput is 19.66 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 39.32 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio), which is competitive for a mid-to-high-end GPU.

The benchmark results confirm the GPU's strong standing. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2969 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 94284 indicate solid DirectX 12 and Vulkan performance, respectively. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 109175 shows good general-purpose compute capability. The 90th percentile ranking places the Arc A770 above many established GPUs, including the NVIDIA Quadro P6000 and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200, which are professional-grade cards with higher average scores but only marginally so. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, covering the full range of modern graphics APIs. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0, enabling high refresh rate and high-resolution displays. The card is dual-slot and uses a 1x 6-pin plus 1x 8-pin power configuration, with a suggested 550W PSU. As an end-of-life product with a successor in Battlemage, the Arc A770 offers a compelling feature set at its 90th percentile performance level, though buyers should consider driver maturity and long-term support when evaluating this GPU.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13400E + Intel Arc A770

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13400E

Intel Arc A770

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds