SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13400E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

78 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 22% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
78%
VS
GPU
79%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13400E

6,638 Benchmark Score
Top 22% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

3,075 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13400E is a 10-core, 16-thread desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture and manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node. It uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform and features a base clock of 2.40 GHz with a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The chip carries a 65 W TDP, positioning it as a mainstream power envelope part. Its cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 20 MB L3 cache. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it includes ECC memory support, which is notable for workstation-oriented builds that require data integrity.

Benchmark results for the i5-13400E show a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22950 and a single-core score of 3240. In Cinebench R20, the chip scores 9639 multi-core and 1360 single-core, while Cinebench R15 yields 2313 multi-core and 326 single-core. The average benchmark score across all recorded tests is 6638. This places the CPU at the 62nd percentile among all CPUs in the database. The nearest rivals in terms of average score include the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X at 6647 (0.1% higher), the Intel Core i9-9940X at 6657 (0.3% higher), the Intel Core i9-12900E at 6611 (0.4% lower), and the Intel Pentium Gold G6405 at 6605 (0.5% lower). The delta percentages are extremely tight, all within a 0.5% band, meaning the i5-13400E sits in a performance class where small architectural differences, rather than raw core counts, determine ranking.

The multi-core scores indicate that the 10-core, 16-thread configuration handles heavily threaded workloads competently. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22950 is strong for a 65 W part, suggesting that the hybrid architecture (performance and efficiency cores, though not explicitly listed) efficiently distributes work. The single-core score of 3240 in R23 reflects solid boost clock behavior at 4.60 GHz, which matters for lightly threaded tasks like web browsing, office applications, and older games that rely on single-thread performance. The L3 cache of 20 MB shared across cores helps with data reuse in workloads like code compilation and database queries, where repeated access to working sets is common.

The process node at 10 nm and die size of 215 mm² indicate a mature design. The integrated UHD Graphics 730 provides basic display output capabilities, but the presence of a discrete GPU in this build makes the iGPU largely redundant for rendering tasks. The memory controller supporting both DDR4 and DDR5 gives builders flexibility, though the dual-channel bus width means memory bandwidth is capped by the number of channels rather than the memory type alone. The PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 lanes on the CPU enables high-bandwidth connectivity for modern GPUs and NVMe storage, though the actual benefit depends on peripheral support.

The percentile ranking at 62 means the CPU outperforms roughly six out of ten CPUs in the database. The near-tie with the Threadripper 2950X — a much higher-tier HEDT part with more cores — is telling. The i5-13400E achieves comparable average scores through higher clock speeds and architectural efficiency, compensating for fewer cores. The closeness to the i9-12900E, which shares the same socket generation, suggests that the 13400E is a well-binned middle-tier option that closes much of the gap to its higher-numbered sibling.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Intel Core i5-13400E and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER hinges on which component becomes the limiting factor in different workload types. The CPU's average benchmark score of 6638 sits at the 62nd percentile, while the GPU's average benchmark score of 3075 places it at the 19th percentile among all GPUs. This percentile gap — 43 points in favor of the CPU — indicates that the CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers, while the GPU underperforms its own peer group significantly. For gaming workloads, this suggests the GPU will be the primary bottleneck in most scenarios, as the CPU can feed frames faster than the GPU can render them.

The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22950 provides ample headroom for frame generation and physics calculations in games. The single-core score of 3240 ensures that game logic and draw call processing, which are often single-threaded, will not stall. In contrast, the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3075, combined with its 19th percentile ranking, indicates that the graphics card is the limiting factor for high-resolution gaming. At 1080p, the CPU might occasionally become a bottleneck in CPU-intensive titles, but the data suggests that the GPU will still be the first to saturate. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU bottleneck becomes absolute, as pixel throughput demands outstrip the CPU's frame delivery capability.

For productivity workloads, the balance shifts. The CPU's multi-core strength drives video encoding, 3D rendering, and code compilation, while the GPU accelerates tasks like ray tracing, machine learning inference, and GPU-accelerated rendering. The CPU's 65 W TDP versus the GPU's 415 W TDP shows a power asymmetry — the GPU draws over six times the power — which means the system's thermal and power delivery design must prioritize the GPU. The PCIe Gen 5 x16 interface on the GPU and Gen 5 on the CPU ensure no bandwidth bottleneck between the two components, allowing data to flow at full speed.

The FPS scaling evidence, while not directly measured for this combination, can be inferred from the benchmark scores. The CPU's percentile position suggests it can handle high-refresh gaming at 1080p in less demanding titles, but the GPU's low percentile means frame rates will be capped by graphics processing. The combined percentile of 41 for the whole build reflects this imbalance — the system sits below the median due to the GPU's weak relative standing.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmarks for the Intel Core i5-13400E show consistent performance across Cinebench versions. In Cinebench R15, the multi-core score of 2313 and single-core score of 326 illustrate the scaling from 10 cores. Cinebench R20 increases the workload complexity, yielding 9639 multi-core and 1360 single-core. Cinebench R23, the most demanding of the three, produces 22950 multi-core and 3240 single-core. The average benchmark score of 6638 places the CPU at the 62nd percentile, with nearest rivals all within 0.5% — the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X at 6647 (0.1% higher), the Intel Core i9-9940X at 6657 (0.3% higher), the Intel Core i9-12900E at 6611 (0.4% lower), and the Intel Pentium Gold G6405 at 6605 (0.5% lower). These tight deltas mean the i5-13400E trades blows with much more expensive or differently configured parts.

The GPU benchmark consists of a single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3075. This places the RTX 5080 SUPER at the 19th percentile among all GPUs — a surprisingly low position for a card with this nameplate. The nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 at 3163 (2.8% higher), the NVIDIA GeForce 820A at 2983 (3.1% lower), the Intel Arc Pro B60 at 3182 (3.4% higher), and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M at 2967 (3.6% lower). The GPU is effectively bracketed by professional and entry-level mobile parts, which indicates that the 3DMark Steel Nomad score may not capture the card's full capabilities, or that the benchmark is particularly punishing for this architecture.

The combined picture shows a CPU that ranks above average (62nd percentile) paired with a GPU that ranks well below average (19th percentile). The build's combined percentile is 41, reflecting the GPU's drag on the overall standing. In CPU-bound tasks, the system performs competitively with top-tier parts from previous generations. In GPU-bound tasks, the system performs like a much lower-tier graphics solution. This disparity is the defining characteristic of this pairing — the CPU has headroom that the GPU cannot utilize in graphics-intensive workloads.

# Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, the CPU's single-core score of 3240 in Cinebench R23 is sufficient to drive high frame rates in esports titles, but the GPU's 19th percentile ranking suggests the graphics card will limit the experience. Players seeking 240 Hz or higher refresh rates may find the GPU unable to keep pace with the CPU's frame delivery capability.

Streaming and content creation benefit from the CPU's 10-core, 16-thread configuration, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22950 that handles simultaneous game encoding and streaming software. The GPU's tensor cores, while present, do not translate into strong benchmark results, so hardware encoding performance remains uncertain based on the data.

Video editing workloads rely on both CPU and GPU. The CPU's multi-core scores support timeline scrubbing and effect processing, while the GPU's low percentile suggests that GPU-accelerated effects and color grading may be slower than expected for a 50-series card. Editors working with 4K footage may experience bottlenecks in the GPU pipeline.

3D rendering in applications like Blender or Maya benefits from the CPU's strong multi-core performance, with the 22950 R23 score indicating solid ray tracing on the CPU side. However, GPU-accelerated renderers like Octane or Redshift would be hampered by the GPU's weak relative performance, making CPU rendering the more viable path.

Software development and code compilation utilize the CPU's 10 cores and 16 threads, with the 20 MB L3 cache reducing cache misses during large builds. The GPU is largely irrelevant for this workload, so the i5-13400E's 62nd percentile ranking is the deciding factor.

Student and office work involves light multitasking, web browsing, and document editing. The CPU's single-core score of 3240 handles these tasks with ease, and the integrated UHD Graphics 730 provides a fallback if the discrete GPU is not needed. The 65 W TDP keeps power consumption low for all-day use.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for the exact combination of the Intel Core i5-13400E and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, so all frame rate discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximate rather than definitive.

Based on the CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3240 and multi-core score of 22950, the processor is capable of sustaining high frame rates in most games. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3075, however, places it at the 19th percentile, suggesting that the graphics card will be the limiting factor in GPU-bound scenarios. At 1080p with ultra settings, the CPU can likely push frame rates above 100 FPS in many titles, but the GPU may cap them lower. At 1440p, the GPU's workload increases, and the low percentile ranking indicates the graphics card will struggle to maintain high refresh rates. At 4K, the GPU becomes the absolute bottleneck, with frame rates likely falling below 60 FPS in demanding titles.

The estimated FPS figures are derived from the relative performance of the components. The CPU's strong single-core performance ensures frame pacing is smooth, but the GPU's weak standing means resolution and graphics settings will have a disproportionate impact on playability. For competitive gaming at lower settings, the CPU can unlock higher frame rates, but the GPU's ceiling remains the constraining factor.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13400E uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, ensuring full bandwidth for the graphics card. Memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 gives builders the option to use existing DDR4 modules or migrate to DDR5 for higher bandwidth, though the dual-channel bus limits maximum throughput regardless of memory type.

The CPU's 65 W TDP is modest, while the GPU's 415 W TDP is substantial. The suggested PSU is not listed in the FACT PACK, so power supply headroom cannot be quantified. However, the GPU's dual-slot design and single 16-pin power connector indicate a high-power component that requires a robust power supply. The CPU's low TDP means a modest VRM design on the motherboard can handle it, freeing power budget for the GPU.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the GPU with a higher-performing model, as the CPU's 62nd percentile ranking provides ample headroom. The CPU's near-tie with the Intel Core i9-12900E (0.4% lower score) suggests that upgrading the CPU would yield minimal gains. The GPU's 19th percentile is the clear weak point, and improving it would have the largest impact on overall system performance.

# Who Should Build It

Gamers at 1080p and 1440p who prioritize CPU-bound titles and are willing to lower graphics settings could benefit from the i5-13400E's strong single-core performance, but the GPU's low percentile means they should expect frame rate limitations. Content creators focused on CPU-intensive tasks like video encoding or software development would find the 10-core, 16-thread configuration appealing, with the 22950 R23 multi-core score handling heavy workloads. Students and small business users running office applications and light multitasking would find the CPU's efficiency at 65 W TDP attractive, though the GPU is overkill for such tasks. The build targets users who need a strong CPU for productivity and are willing to accept a weaker GPU, or those who plan to upgrade the GPU in the future.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i5-13400E has 10 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What is the GPU's memory size and type?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER has 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score of 6638 is 0.1% lower than the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X and 0.4% higher than the Intel Core i9-12900E.

Q: What is the GPU's benchmark score and percentile?

A: The GPU scores 3075 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, placing it at the 19th percentile among all GPUs.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13400E supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the GPU's launch MSRP?

A: The launch MSRP is 999 USD.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 41.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using TSMC's 5 nm process node. The GB203 chip contains 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, with a transistor density of 120.6 million per mm². The GPU has 10752 shading units, 336 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output units. It features 84 RT cores and 336 tensor cores, providing hardware support for ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads. The base clock is 2295 MHz with a boost clock of 2617 MHz, and the memory runs at 2000 MHz with 32 Gbps effective speed.

The memory subsystem consists of 24 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 1.02 TB/s. This large memory capacity supports high-resolution textures and large datasets, while the bandwidth ensures data can be fed to the GPU quickly. The pixel rate is 293.1 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 879.3 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 56.28 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same rate (1:1), indicating balanced compute capability for both single-precision and half-precision workloads.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3075 places the GPU at the 19th percentile, which is unexpectedly low for a 50-series card. The nearest rivals — the NVIDIA Quadro P1000, GeForce 820A, Intel Arc Pro B60, and GeForce GTX 860M — span a range of professional and entry-level parts. The GPU's performance in this benchmark suggests that either the test is not well-suited to the Blackwell architecture, or the card's real-world gaming performance is lower than its specifications imply. The RT and tensor cores are present in large numbers (84 and 336, respectively), but the benchmark does not appear to leverage them effectively.

The GPU's TDP of 415 W and dual-slot design indicate a high-power component that requires adequate cooling. The single 16-pin power connector simplifies cabling but demands a compatible power supply. The display outputs include one HDMI 2.1b and three DisplayPort 2.1b, supporting modern high-refresh monitors. The API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

For rendering workloads, the GPU's FP32 performance of 56.28 TFLOPS suggests strong compute capability, but the low benchmark percentile implies that real-world rendering performance may disappoint. The 24 GB VRAM is generous for large scenes, but the bandwidth of 1.02 TB/s may be insufficient for the data demands of high-resolution rendering. The tensor cores could accelerate AI denoising, but the lack of measured data prevents a definitive assessment.

# Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i5-13400E with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER in a desktop configuration. The CPU, a Raptor Lake part with 10 cores and 16 threads, achieves a 62nd percentile ranking among all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 6638. The GPU, a Blackwell 2.0 part with 24 GB of GDDR7 memory, achieves a 19th percentile ranking among all GPUs with a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3075. The combined percentile of 41 indicates the system sits below the median overall.

The CPU is the stronger component by a wide margin. Its 62nd percentile ranking means it outperforms most CPUs in the database, while the GPU's 19th percentile means it underperforms most GPUs. The build's overall tier is mid-to-low, driven entirely by the GPU's weak benchmark showing. The CPU provides a solid foundation for productivity and gaming, but the GPU limits graphics-intensive performance. This pairing is best suited for users who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads and are willing to accept lower GPU performance, or those who plan to upgrade the graphics card in the future. The desktop form factor allows for component swaps, so the GPU can be replaced without changing the platform.