SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12600KF + Intel Arc A770

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
88%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-12600KF

27,799 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A770

68,809 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Intel Core i5-12600KF and Intel Arc A770 form a desktop pairing that lands in the 85th percentile overall, placing it above most current systems. The CPU sits at the 79th percentile among all processors, while the GPU commands a stronger position at the 90th percentile among all graphics cards. This gap immediately signals that the graphics subsystem is the dominant component in this build, a dynamic that shapes every workload from gaming to rendering.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry between the two components is the defining characteristic of this pairing. The Arc A770 ranks 11 percentile points higher than the Core i5-12600KF, meaning the GPU is comparatively stronger in the broader hardware landscape. In gaming, this typically translates to the CPU acting as the limiting factor at lower resolutions, while the GPU becomes the constraint at higher resolutions where pixel throughput demands more from the graphics card.

Benchmark data supports this interpretation. The CPU’s 3dmark single-thread score of 1016 and 2-thread score of 1995 show solid but not exceptional per-core performance. The GPU’s Geekbench Vulkan score of 94284 and OpenCL score of 109175 dwarf the CPU’s Geekbench single-core result of 2157, indicating that raw graphics compute vastly exceeds CPU throughput. When a workload is heavily parallelized, the CPU’s 16 threads and 10 cores can keep pace, as shown by the 3dmark 16-thread score of 7956 nearly matching the max-thread score of 7952. But the single-thread ceiling will cap performance in lightly threaded tasks.

The 125 W TDP of the CPU versus the 225 W TDP of the GPU further clarifies the balance. The GPU draws nearly twice the power, and the suggested 550 W PSU accommodates both components with headroom for the rest of a system. The data implies that in CPU-bound scenarios like physics calculations or data compression, the i5-12600KF will be the bottleneck, while in GPU-bound scenarios like 4K gaming or ray tracing, the A770 will be the limiting factor. The PassMark physics score of 1539 and find prime numbers score of 91 are modest figures, suggesting the CPU handles complex logical operations adequately but not exceptionally.

Benchmark Performance

The Core i5-12600KF delivers an average benchmark score of 27799, placing it in the 79th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals cluster remarkably close: the Intel Core i9-10900K scores 27872 (0.3% higher), the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D scores 27896 (0.3% higher), and the AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE scores 27712 (0.3% lower). This tight grouping means the i5-12600KF trades blows with a previous-generation flagship and AMD’s gaming-focused 3D V-Cache part.

Multi-threaded performance is the CPU’s strength. Cinebench R23 multicore yields 23391 points, while the single-core score of 3302 shows a respectable but less dominant result. The 3dmark results tell a similar story: 7956 at 16 threads, 6128 at 8 threads, 3806 at 4 threads, and 1995 at 2 threads. Scaling from 8 to 16 threads is nearly linear (6128 to 7956), indicating efficient use of the hybrid core layout.

The Intel Arc A770 posts an average benchmark score of 68809, sitting in the 90th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA CMP 90HX at 69000 (0.3% higher), the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 at 68562 (0.4% lower), and the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 at 69870 (1.5% higher). The GPU’s 3dmark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2969 provides a modern DirectX 12 rasterization figure, while the Geekbench Vulkan score of 94284 indicates strong compute under Vulkan’s API. The combined percentile of 85 for the pairing reflects a system where both components are above average, but the GPU’s superior standing means it carries the performance profile.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A770 uses the DG2-512 chip built on TSMC’s 6 nm process, packing 21,700 million transistors into a 406 mm² die. The Xe-HPG architecture powers 4096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, and 128 raster operation units. Clock speeds run at 2100 MHz base and 2400 MHz boost, with memory clocked at 2000 MHz achieving 16 Gbps effective. The 16 GB GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus delivers 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth, a substantial figure that supports high-resolution textures and large datasets.

Ray tracing hardware is present with 32 dedicated RT cores. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, covering the modern graphics API landscape. Pixel rate reaches 307.2 GPixel/s and texture rate hits 614.4 GTexel/s, figures that indicate strong fill-rate capabilities for geometry-heavy scenes. FP32 compute is rated at 19.66 TFLOPS, while FP16 doubles to 39.32 TFLOPS, useful for workloads that leverage reduced precision.

The 3dmark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2969 reflects the GPU’s rasterization performance in a modern API. Geekbench OpenCL at 109175 and Vulkan at 94284 show the card’s compute potential across different interfaces. The 16 GB VRAM is a distinguishing feature, as many competing cards in this performance tier offer less memory, which benefits texture-heavy rendering and AI inference workloads that need large working sets. The card is end-of-life, with Battlemage as its successor, but its benchmark data shows it remains competitive.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming at 1080p will be CPU-limited in many titles. The i5-12600KF’s single-thread score of 1016 in 3dmark and 3302 in Cinebench R23 single-core is sufficient for high frame rates, but the GPU’s 90th percentile standing means it will often wait on the CPU to issue draw calls. At 1440p, the balance shifts toward the GPU, and the A770’s 16 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth provide ample headroom for modern game assets.

Streaming benefits from the CPU’s 16 threads and the GPU’s hardware-accelerated encoding, though the data does not list encoder specifications. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23391 indicates the CPU can handle game plus encoding overhead in most scenarios, while the GPU’s Vulkan score of 94284 suggests it can offload compute tasks effectively.

Video editing workloads rely on both components. The CPU’s PassMark data compression score of 343231 and integer math score of 87830 indicate strong throughput for codec operations and timeline processing. The GPU’s OpenCL score of 109175 accelerates effects and color grading. The 16 GB VRAM prevents out-of-memory issues with large timelines and high-resolution footage.

3D rendering favors the GPU. The A770’s 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 39.32 TFLOPS FP16 compute provide substantial ray tracing and rasterization horsepower. The CPU’s Cinebench R20 multicore score of 9824 and R15 multicore score of 2357 handle CPU-based rendering tasks, but GPU-accelerated renderers will scale with the graphics card’s compute capabilities.

Software development benefits from the CPU’s compilation throughput. The PassMark multithread score of 27575 and data encryption score of 18445 show efficient parallel processing for build pipelines. The extended instructions score of 22003 indicates good SIMD performance for optimized code. Student and office work sees strong single-thread performance from the PassMark single-thread score of 3925, which handles everyday applications smoothly, while the 20 MB shared L3 cache aids multitasking.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-12600KF is a 10-core, 16-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 10 nm process. The die size is 215 mm², and the CPU uses a hybrid layout mixing performance and efficiency cores, though the fact pack does not specify the core distribution. Base clock runs at 3.70 GHz with a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, and the multiplier is unlocked for overclocking. The L3 cache is 20 MB shared, with 1.25 MB L2 per core and 80 KB L1 per core.

The 125 W TDP reflects a desktop-focused power envelope. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, giving builders flexibility in platform choice. PCIe connectivity is Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, sufficient for a modern GPU and NVMe storage. The CPU supports no ECC memory and has no integrated graphics, meaning a discrete GPU is mandatory.

Benchmark results place the i5-12600KF in a tight battle with the Intel Core i9-10900K and AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23391 exceeds what those rivals achieve in many tests, while the single-core score of 3302 demonstrates strong per-thread performance. The Geekbench multicore score of 12137 and single-core score of 2157 corroborate the Cinebench results. PassMark integer math at 87830 and floating point math at 67074 show balanced compute capabilities, while random string sorting at 35602 indicates solid memory-bound operation.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination. The fact pack contains no measuredFps entries for any game or resolution, so all frame rate expectations are estimates derived from benchmark scores. The dataIsMeasured field is false, confirming this limitation.

Based on the component benchmarks, the pairing should deliver strong 1440p performance. The GPU’s 3dmark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2969 places it in the 90th percentile, suggesting it can handle demanding titles at high settings. The CPU’s 3dmark 8-thread score of 6128 and 16-thread score of 7956 indicate sufficient processing power for modern game engines that utilize multiple cores.

At 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread score of 1016 in 3dmark may limit maximum frame rates in esports titles, where the GPU has excess headroom. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the primary constraint, and the 16 GB VRAM ensures texture quality remains high even at 4K. The 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth supports high-resolution rendering without stutter. Ray tracing workloads will rely on the 32 RT cores, which are present but not benchmarked in isolation, so performance expectations should be moderated.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets gamers who prioritize 1440p or 4K resolution over maximum frame rates at 1080p. The GPU’s 90th percentile ranking and 16 GB VRAM make it suitable for high-fidelity gaming at these resolutions, while the CPU’s 79th percentile ranking handles the associated game logic and physics without becoming a severe bottleneck.

Content creators working in video editing or 3D rendering will find the combination capable. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23391 accelerates export and encoding tasks, while the GPU’s OpenCL score of 109175 and FP32 compute of 19.66 TFLOPS speed up effects and GPU-accelerated renderers. The 16 GB VRAM accommodates large scenes and high-resolution textures.

Software developers benefit from the CPU’s PassMark multithread score of 27575 and data compression score of 343231, which handle build systems and version control operations efficiently. The unlocked multiplier allows tuning for specific workloads. Students and office workers get a responsive system from the PassMark single-thread score of 3925, though the lack of integrated graphics means a dedicated GPU is always active, consuming power even during light tasks.

FAQ

Q: How does the Core i5-12600KF compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D?

A: The i5-12600KF has an average benchmark score of 27799, which is 0.3% lower than the Ryzen 7 5800X3D’s 27896. The difference is minimal, making them effectively equivalent in overall CPU performance.

Q: What is the GPU’s VRAM capacity and memory bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc A770 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: Does this CPU support overclocking?

A: Yes, the Core i5-12600KF has an unlocked multiplier, allowing overclocking. Its base clock is 3.70 GHz with a boost clock of 4.90 GHz.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this GPU?

A: The Intel Arc A770 has a suggested PSU of 550 W. The GPU’s TDP is 225 W, and the CPU’s TDP is 125 W.

Q: Which API versions does the Arc A770 support?

A: The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this CPU-GPU combination?

A: No, the fact pack contains no measured FPS data for this exact pairing. All gaming performance figures are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Q: What is the CPU’s socket type and memory support?

A: The Core i5-12600KF uses Intel Socket 1700 and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core i5-12600KF uses Intel Socket 1700, which supports 12th Gen Alder Lake and later processors in the same family. The platform offers PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, accommodating modern GPUs and NVMe SSDs. Memory support spans both DDR4 and DDR5, so a builder can choose either memory type, though the dual-channel bus width is fixed.

The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16, which matches the CPU’s PCIe Gen 4 capability. The suggested PSU of 550 W covers the combined 350 W TDP of CPU and GPU with headroom for drives, fans, and other components. The GPU requires a 1x 6-pin plus 1x 8-pin power connector, and it occupies a dual-slot width.

A sensible next upgrade would be a newer Intel processor on the same socket, potentially with more cores or higher clocks, provided the motherboard BIOS supports it. The GPU is end-of-life with Battlemage as its successor, so a future GPU upgrade would target the next architecture generation. The 16 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth on the current GPU remain competitive, so a GPU upgrade would only be necessary for substantially higher compute demands.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core i5-12600KF with the Intel Arc A770, resulting in a system that ranks in the 85th percentile overall. The CPU, at the 79th percentile among all processors, provides strong multi-threaded performance with its 10 cores and 16 threads, while the GPU, at the 90th percentile among all graphics cards, delivers high-end rasterization and compute capabilities.

The combined system excels in GPU-accelerated workloads, with the Arc A770’s 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 16 GB VRAM supporting demanding applications. The CPU’s 23391 Cinebench R23 multicore score ensures it does not bottleneck most tasks. The pairing is best suited for 1440p gaming, content creation, and development work, where the GPU’s strength and the CPU’s balanced performance complement each other. The lack of measured FPS data means gaming expectations rely on benchmark-derived estimates, but the component scores indicate a capable system for high-resolution workloads.