SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12600KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

88%

GPU

79%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-12600KF

27,799 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

3,075 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-12600KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER form an unusual pairing of a 12th-generation mid-range CPU with a flagship-tier next-generation GPU. The data shows a desktop build characterized by a stark contrast in compute capabilities: the CPU is a solid, if aging, performer that sits in the 79th percentile of all processors, while the GPU, despite its "SUPER" designation, presents a benchmark profile that is deceptively modest in the single test recorded. This analysis interprets the available benchmark scores, architectural details, and bottleneck dynamics to define what this combination can actually achieve for different user profiles.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-12600KF is a 10-core, 16-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process node. It features a hybrid design of performance and efficiency cores, with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The chip is unlocked, allowing for overclocking, and has a TDP of 125 W. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus, offering flexibility in platform configuration. With 20 MB of shared L3 cache and a PCIe Gen 4 interface with 20 lanes, it provides a capable foundation for a modern desktop system.

Benchmark results indicate that the i5-12600KF is a strong multi-threaded performer for its generation. In Cinebench R23, it scores 23391 points in the multi-core test, which is a significant workload for rendering and content creation. Its single-core score of 3302 in the same test demonstrates excellent per-thread performance, which is crucial for gaming and lightly-threaded applications. The Geekbench scores of 12137 multi-core and 2157 single-core corroborate this balanced profile. The 3DMark thread scaling tests show a progression from 1995 with 2 threads to 7952 with max threads, indicating good scalability as core count utilization increases. In the Passmark suite, the CPU excels in integer math (87830) and floating-point math (67074), while its data compression score of 343231 is particularly high, suggesting strong throughput in archiving and data-heavy tasks.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the i5-12600KF sits in a tight competitive cluster. Its average benchmark score of 27799 is nearly identical to the Intel Core i9-10900K, which scores 27872, a delta of -0.3%. It also trades blows with the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D, which scores 27896, a -0.3% delta, and the AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE, which scores 27712, a +0.3% delta for the Intel chip. This means that despite being a generation older than some of these parts, the i5-12600KF delivers compute performance that is effectively on par with the previous generation's flagship and high-end gaming CPUs. The data suggests that for pure CPU-bound tasks, this processor will not be the primary limiting factor in most real-world scenarios, though its 10-core configuration may show its age against newer, higher-core-count parts in heavily threaded professional workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The combined build percentile is 49, which places this pairing in the middle of the database, but this number is heavily skewed by the GPU's unexpectedly low percentile score. A more telling picture emerges from comparing the CPU's 79th percentile standing against the GPU's 19th percentile. This massive gap indicates a severe imbalance where the CPU is vastly more capable than the GPU in the context of the benchmark data available. The GPU becomes the definitive bottleneck in any graphics-intensive workload, while the CPU has significant headroom left on the table.

This bottleneck is evident in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, where the RTX 5080 SUPER scores 3075, placing it in the 19th percentile of all GPUs. This score is anomalous for a card with 24 GB of GDDR7 memory and 10752 shading units, suggesting either a driver issue, a thermal constraint, or an error in the data collection. Regardless, the benchmark results indicate that the GPU's performance ceiling, as measured, is far below what the CPU can feed it. In gaming scenarios, this means that at lower resolutions where the CPU is the primary driver, the i5-12600KF will be waiting on the GPU to render frames. At higher resolutions, the GPU's workload increases, and the bottleneck shifts even more firmly to the GPU, given its low measured output.

The FPS scaling in this configuration is entirely dependent on the GPU's actual performance. Since the CPU has ample headroom, the frame rate will be dictated by the GPU's ability to process graphics. The data implies that any performance issues will stem from the GPU, not the CPU. For a user, this means that upgrading the CPU would yield no tangible benefit in graphics-limited tasks until the GPU is also replaced or its performance is properly unlocked. The system is effectively GPU-bound in all graphical workloads, and CPU-bound only in non-graphical tasks like data compression or code compilation, where the i5-12600KF's strong multi-threaded scores would shine.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmarks paint a picture of a highly capable processor. In Cinebench R20, the i5-12600KF scores 9824 multi-core and 1386 single-core. The older Cinebench R15 scores are 2357 multi-core and 332 single-core. The Passmark CPU mark is 27575, with a single-thread score of 3925. The 3DMark multi-thread score peaks at 7956 with 16 threads, which is nearly identical to the max-thread score of 7952, indicating that the 16-thread configuration is the sweet spot for this chip's performance scaling. These scores place the CPU in the 79th percentile, confirming it as a top-quartile performer.

The GPU benchmark data is sparse, containing only a single result: a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3075. This score places the GPU in the 19th percentile, which is a stark contrast to the CPU's standing. The nearest rivals to this GPU score are the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 (3163, a -2.8% delta), the Intel Arc Pro B60 (3182, a -3.4% delta), and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M (2967, a +3.6% delta). These are all low-end or older professional and mobile GPUs, which highlights how unusual the RTX 5080 SUPER's recorded score is. The GPU's average benchmark score is exactly the same as its single test score: 3075.

The combined picture is one of contradiction. The CPU is a top-tier performer in its class, while the GPU appears to be a massive underperformer based on the available data. The combinedPercentile of 49 suggests a system that is average, but this is a mathematical artifact of the GPU's low score dragging down the CPU's high score. In practice, the CPU is ready to handle demanding workloads, but the GPU's measured performance would severely hamper any graphics-intensive application, making the system feel sluggish in gaming or 3D rendering despite having a 24 GB frame buffer.

Who Should Build It

This build is not a balanced gaming machine. The data suggests it is for users who prioritize CPU compute power but have a specific need for a GPU with massive memory capacity, even if its raw compute score appears low. The target user is a professional or prosumer who runs CPU-heavy simulations, compiles large codebases, or performs data analysis, where the i5-12600KF's high multi-threaded scores are directly beneficial.

Content creators working with large datasets, such as video editors using complex effects or 3D artists with massive scene files, would benefit from the 24 GB VRAM of the RTX 5080 SUPER, which can hold large textures and models. However, they would likely be frustrated by the GPU's low 3DMark score, which could translate to slow viewport performance or long render times in GPU-accelerated engines. The system is not suitable for gamers at any resolution, as the GPU percentile is too low to guarantee high frame rates.

Developers working on multi-threaded applications would find the CPU's 16 threads and high integer math score (87830) excellent for compilation and testing. Students and small business workstations that rely on CPU-heavy productivity applications, like spreadsheet analysis or database management, would find the i5-12600KF more than adequate. For these users, the GPU serves as a display adapter with a large memory pool, but its compute capabilities are not the primary selling point. The build is for a user who understands that the CPU is the star of the show and the GPU is there for its memory capacity rather than its measured processing speed.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: Estimated performance is poor. The GPU's 19th percentile standing and low 3DMark score of 3075 indicate that high-refresh gaming at 1080p or 1440p is not achievable. The CPU can produce high frame rates, but the GPU will bottleneck the system severely, resulting in low FPS even with adjusted settings.

Streaming: The i5-12600KF has sufficient multi-threaded power (Cinebench R23 23391) to handle game capture and encoding, but the GPU's lackluster raw performance means the game itself will run poorly. Streaming a game that runs at low frame rates is not a viable scenario.

Video Editing: The CPU's high Passmark data compression score of 343231 suggests fast timeline scrubbing and export of video files. The GPU's 24 GB VRAM can hold large 4K or 8K video buffers, but its low compute score may slow down effects rendering or hardware encoding, leading to a mixed experience.

3D Rendering: CPU-based rendering will be strong, leveraging the 16 threads and Cinebench R23 score of 23391. GPU-based rendering will be disappointing; the RTX 5080 SUPER's 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 performance is theoretically high, but the measured 3DMark score suggests real-world rendering performance would be far below expectations.

Software Development: This is a strong scenario. The CPU's 16 threads and high integer math score (87830) will speed up code compilation and test execution. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, making this build a productive workstation for programmers.

Student and Office Work: The CPU's single-thread score of 3302 in Cinebench R23 ensures snappy responsiveness in office applications. The system is massively over-provisioned for this use case, but it will handle any document, spreadsheet, or web browsing task with ease.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is based on the Intel Socket 1700, which supports the 12th Gen Alder Lake and 13th/14th Gen Raptor Lake processors. The i5-12600KF is an unlocked multiplier CPU, so a user can overclock it to improve performance without changing the motherboard. The system supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, meaning a user can choose between a cost-effective DDR4 build or a higher-bandwidth DDR5 build. The PCIe Gen 4 interface with 20 lanes from the CPU is sufficient for the RTX 5080 SUPER, which uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, as it will run in a backward-compatible mode.

The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 415 W. This is a high total system power draw, requiring a robust power supply. The GPU uses a single 16-pin power connector. The most sensible next upgrade for this build is the GPU. Given that the CPU is in the 79th percentile and has headroom, replacing the RTX 5080 SUPER with a GPU that scores higher in benchmarks would immediately unlock the system's true gaming and rendering potential. The CPU could also be upgraded to a higher-tier 13th or 14th Gen processor on the same socket, but the data suggests the current CPU is not the primary bottleneck. The platform is mature and offers a clear path to a more balanced system by addressing the GPU's low measured performance.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER is based on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture and the GB203 chip, built on TSMC's 5 nm process. It is a massive GPU with 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die. The card features 10752 shading units, 336 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output units. It includes 84 RT cores and 336 tensor cores for ray tracing and AI acceleration. The memory subsystem is substantial, with 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 1.02 TB/s. The clocks are set at a base of 2295 MHz and a boost of 2617 MHz, with memory running at 2000 MHz (32 Gbps effective). The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The theoretical specifications suggest a high-performance card. The FP32 compute is rated at 56.28 TFLOPS, and the pixel rate is 293.1 GPixel/s. However, the only benchmark score in the FACT PACK, a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3075, contradicts these specifications. This score puts the GPU in the 19th percentile, far below what the raw specs would imply. The nearest rivals in this benchmark are the Quadro P1000 and GeForce GTX 860M, which are ancient parts by comparison. This discrepancy means that either the benchmark data is flawed or the GPU is severely throttled or defective. For rendering, the 24 GB VRAM is a huge asset for loading large scenes, but the low compute score would lead to slow ray tracing and rendering times. The data indicates that the GPU's real-world performance is a fraction of its theoretical capability.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking?

A: The Intel Core i5-12600KF is in the 79th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 27799.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D?

A: The i5-12600KF's average score of 27799 is 0.3% lower than the Ryzen 7 5800X3D's score of 27896, making them statistically equivalent in performance.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and size?

A: The GPU has 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 1.02 TB/s.

Q: Is this GPU good for gaming?

A: No. The GPU scores 3075 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, placing it in the 19th percentile, which indicates poor gaming performance despite its high-end specifications.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 415 W.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, ECC memory is not supported by the Intel Core i5-12600KF.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the CPU?

A: The launch MSRP of the Intel Core i5-12600KF is $264.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU and GPU combination in the FACT PACK. The dataIsMeasured field is false, and the measuredFpsUltraByGame object is empty. Therefore, all frame rate expectations are estimates based on the benchmark scores and should be treated as such.

Based on the CPU's high single-thread score of 3302 in Cinebench R23, it is capable of high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios. However, the GPU's single 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3075, which places it in the 19th percentile, indicates that the GPU is severely underperforming. This suggests that gaming performance would be very poor. At 1080p and 1440p, the GPU would be the bottleneck, likely producing frame rates that are not suitable for smooth gameplay. At 4K, the situation would be worse, as the GPU's low compute power would be heavily taxed. Given the GPU's benchmark profile, which rivals old low-end cards like the GeForce GTX 860M, the estimated FPS in modern games would be in the low range, making this build unsuitable for gaming. The discrepancy between the GPU's theoretical specs and its measured score is a critical red flag for any gaming application.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12600KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-12600KF

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds