SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9950X + Intel Arc A380E

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

86 Score

Top 14% Ranking

86 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

97%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 9950X

74,640 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A380E

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X and Intel Arc A380E pairing is a study in extremes: a 16-core flagship desktop processor paired with an entry-level discrete GPU. The data indicates a desktop build where the CPU operates in the top tier of all processors, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile of all GPUs. Because no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, all performance analysis must be derived from the individual component benchmark scores, which clearly show a system heavily skewed toward CPU-bound workloads.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The Intel Arc A380E is a modest entry-point GPU built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-128 chip. It is manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC and contains 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The GPU operates at a fixed 2000 MHz for both base and boost clocks, with memory clocked at 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective). This hardware configuration results in a peak FP32 throughput of 4.096 TFLOPS and FP16 performance of 8.192 TFLOPS (2:1).

Memory capacity is 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 96-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 186.0 GB/s. This is a limiting factor for modern rendering workloads, as the 96-bit interface constrains data throughput. The GPU includes 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 ROPs. Pixel rate is 64.00 GPixel/s and texture rate is 128.0 GTexel/s.

For real-time ray tracing, the Arc A380E has 8 dedicated RT cores. This is minimal hardware for ray-traced effects; the data suggests it can handle the feature set but with severe performance constraints. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, meaning the API feature set is modern even if the raw throughput is not. It has no listed tensor cores, so AI-accelerated workloads that rely on dedicated tensor hardware would either be absent or fall back to the general-purpose shaders.

The benchmark data for this GPU is empty, meaning there are no direct scores to cite. Its percentileVsAllGpus is 50, placing it exactly at the midpoint of all GPUs. The practical interpretation is that this card is suited for basic rendering, 1080p gaming at low-to-medium settings, and as a display output solution. For serious 3D rendering, video editing with heavy effects, or high-refresh gaming, the 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 6 GB VRAM will be bottlenecks. The GPU’s 75 W TDP and single-slot design indicate a low-power, space-saving board.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform is built around the AMD Socket AM5, which is the current desktop standard for AMD’s 9000 series. The Ryzen 9 9950X supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and it supports ECC memory. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes (CPU only). This is a forward-looking platform: PCIe Gen 5 offers double the bandwidth of the previous generation, which is relevant for future high-end GPUs and NVMe storage.

The Intel Arc A380E connects via PCIe 4.0 x8. This is sufficient for the GPU’s 186.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, but it means the system is not utilizing the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 lanes for graphics. The CPU’s 170 W TDP is substantial, reflecting its 16-core design. The GPU’s TDP is just 75 W, and the suggested PSU is 250 W. This is a very low total system draw; the CPU is the dominant power consumer.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the GPU. The CPU has the headroom to drive a much more powerful graphics card. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes and the high single-thread and multi-thread scores indicate the platform can handle a high-end GPU without the CPU becoming a bottleneck in most scenarios. The 24 CPU lanes allow for multiple Gen 5 devices, so a future GPU upgrade plus a fast Gen 5 NVMe drive is feasible. The power supply recommendation of 250 W is tied to the GPU; a more powerful GPU would require a higher-wattage PSU, but the data here only supports a 250 W suggestion.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X is the flagship of the 9000 series, built on the Zen 5 architecture (codename Granite Ridge) using a 4 nm process at TSMC. It contains 16,630 million transistors across a 2x 70.6 mm² die configuration. The CPU has 16 cores and 32 threads, with a base clock of 4.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.70 GHz. The TDP is 170 W. Cache is generous: 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 64 MB of shared L3.

The benchmark data shows exceptional multi-threaded performance. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scored 40924 in multi-core and 2202 in single-core. The Geekbench scores are 25616 multi-core and 3029 single-core. The 3DMark results scale well with thread count: 2543 at 2 threads, 4958 at 4 threads, 9298 at 8 threads, 16263 at 16 threads, and 16780 at max threads. This scaling indicates that the CPU is efficient at utilizing additional cores, with the jump from 16 to 32 threads (max threads) only adding a small 3% gain, suggesting diminishing returns beyond 16 threads for that workload.

PassMark results reinforce the multi-threaded strength: a multi-thread score of 66030 and a single-thread score of 4737. Specific workload tests show 896544 in data compression and 44366 in data encryption. Floating-point math scored 159063, while integer math scored 242097. The extended instructions score of 71564 indicates strong SIMD performance. The CPU’s percentileVsAllCpus is 94, meaning it outperforms 94% of all CPUs.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the 9950X is tightly clustered. Against the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9745, the 9950X trails by 0.2% in average score. Against the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475, it leads by 0.2%. Against the AMD EPYC 4545P, it trails by 1%, and against the Intel Core Ultra 9 285, it trails by 1.1%. These deltas are all within statistical noise, meaning the 9950X is effectively tied with these other high-end chips in average performance.

For real workloads, this means the CPU is a powerhouse for compiling code, rendering 3D scenes, running virtual machines, and any heavily threaded task. The single-thread score of 2202 in Cinebench R23 and 3029 in Geekbench indicate excellent responsiveness for everyday tasks and gaming.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This build targets users who prioritize CPU compute over graphics. The 94th percentile CPU and 50th percentile GPU make this clear. The primary audience is software developers and engineers who need fast compilation times. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 40924 and PassMark multi-thread score of 66030 indicate that parallel build tasks will complete quickly.

Content creators working with video encoding or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU, but the GPU will be a limiting factor. The 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 GPU and 6 GB VRAM will slow GPU-accelerated renders, but CPU-based rendering will be very fast. Data scientists running simulations or data processing will see strong performance in data compression (896544) and integer math (242097).

Gamers at 1080p resolution who play less demanding titles may find this acceptable, but the GPU is the bottleneck. The CPU’s single-thread score of 2202 in Cinebench R23 ensures high frame rates in CPU-bound games, but the GPU will limit graphical settings. Students and small business workstations that rely on office productivity, spreadsheets, and web development will find the system overkill for the CPU but adequate for the GPU, as those tasks are not graphically intensive.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The combined picture is one of severe imbalance. The CPU’s avgBenchmarkScore is 74640, with a percentileVsAllCpus of 94. The GPU has no benchmark scores listed, but its percentileVsAllGpus is 50. The combinedPercentile for the build is 72.

The CPU’s nearest rivals are all within 1.1% of its average score. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9745 has an average score of 74761 (0.2% higher), the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 has 74496 (0.2% lower), the AMD EPYC 4545P has 75373 (1% higher), and the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 has 75488 (1.1% higher). This indicates that the 9950X is at the top of the heap but not the absolute fastest; it is part of a tight pack of flagship processors.

The GPU’s 50th percentile means it is exactly average, but with a 6 GB VRAM buffer and 186.0 GB/s bandwidth, its real-world performance is below what modern games expect at high settings. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all FPS discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores. The estimate is that CPU-bound workloads will perform at the 94th percentile, while GPU-bound workloads will perform at the 50th percentile.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the CPU’s multi-threaded performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X scores 40924 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 2202 in single-core.

Q: How much VRAM does the Intel Arc A380E have?

A: The Intel Arc A380E has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus, providing 186.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile ranking against all CPUs?

A: The Ryzen 9 9950X ranks in the 94th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 74640.

Q: What PCIe generation does the CPU support?

A: The Ryzen 9 9950X supports PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes (CPU only). The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8.

Q: What is the GPU’s FP32 performance?

A: The Intel Arc A380E delivers 4.096 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 8.192 TFLOPS of FP16 (2:1).

Q: What is the suggested power supply for the GPU?

A: The Intel Arc A380E has a 75 W TDP, and the suggested PSU is 250 W.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core Ultra 9 285?

A: The Ryzen 9 9950X has an average score of 74640, which is 1.1% lower than the Intel Core Ultra 9 285’s score of 75488.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The bottleneck analysis is clear from the percentiles. The CPU is at the 94th percentile, while the GPU is at the 50th. Any workload that relies on the GPU will be constrained by the Arc A380E. This includes gaming at higher resolutions and graphical settings, 3D rendering with GPU acceleration, and video encoding using hardware encoders.

For gaming, the estimated FPS scaling would show that at 1080p with low settings, the GPU might approach its limits but the CPU can push frame rates high. At higher resolutions or settings, the GPU’s 4.096 TFLOPS and 6 GB VRAM become the limiting factor, and frame rates will drop accordingly. The CPU’s single-thread score of 3029 in Geekbench ensures that it is not the bottleneck in most games; it can feed the GPU with draw calls faster than the GPU can render them.

For CPU-bound workloads, the situation reverses. Software compilation, data compression (896544 in PassMark), and encryption (44366) are limited by the CPU, and the GPU is idle. The 16 cores and 32 threads provide ample parallelism. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 16263 versus the max-thread score of 16780 shows that beyond 16 threads, the CPU gains only 3% performance, meaning most software cannot fully utilize all 32 threads, but the 16 physical cores are very effective.

In a mixed workload like 3D rendering, the CPU will handle geometry and physics while the GPU handles rasterization. The CPU’s PassMark physics score of 3279 is strong, but the GPU’s pixel rate of 64.00 GPixel/s will limit final output resolution and frame rate. The conclusion is that the GPU is the limiting component for graphics, and the CPU is the limiting component for pure compute.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop build, per the buildClass field. It combines the flagship AMD Ryzen 9 9950X with the entry-level Intel Arc A380E. The combinedPercentile is 72, which places this system in the upper-middle tier of all builds. However, this single percentile masks the extreme disparity between components.

The CPU is top-tier (94th percentile), and the GPU is mid-tier (50th percentile). This pairing is not balanced; it is a CPU-centric workstation that happens to have a discrete GPU. The system is designed for maximum CPU throughput, with the GPU providing basic display output and light acceleration. The Arc A380E is marked as "End-of-life" production status, with a successor named Battlemage, indicating it is a last-generation part.

The Ryzen 9 9950X is an active production part with a launch MSRP of $649. The GPU has no launch MSRP listed. The overall tier is defined by the CPU’s dominance; this is a high-performance compute platform with limited graphics capability.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-Refresh Gaming: The CPU’s 2202 Cinebench R23 single-core score is more than sufficient for high-refresh gaming, but the GPU’s 50th percentile ranking and 6 GB VRAM will cap settings. Estimated FPS at 1080p in esports titles could be high, but modern AAA games will require medium settings to maintain playable frame rates. The GPU is the limiting factor.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 cores and 32 threads handle encoding exceptionally well. The PassMark data compression score of 896544 indicates fast encoding, and the multi-thread score of 66030 ensures no dropped frames while gaming. The GPU can handle the game output, but its performance will limit the quality of the game itself.

Video Editing: CPU-based editing and rendering will be fast, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 40924. Timeline scrubbing and effects that use the CPU will be responsive. However, GPU-accelerated effects will be slow due to the A380E’s 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 and 186.0 GB/s bandwidth. Export times will vary depending on whether the encoder uses the CPU or GPU.

3D Rendering: CPU rendering in applications like Blender (Cycles) or V-Ray will excel, given the Geekbench multi-core score of 25616. GPU rendering will be severely limited by the A380E’s 8 RT cores and 6 GB VRAM, making complex scenes impractical. The 64 MB L3 cache helps with scene data.

Software Development: This is the strongest scenario. The PassMark integer math score of 242097 and multi-thread score of 66030 indicate fast compilation. The 16 cores handle parallel builds efficiently, and the single-thread score of 4737 ensures responsive IDE performance. The GPU is irrelevant for this workload.

Student and Office Work: The system is massively overprovisioned for this use case. The CPU’s 94th percentile is wasted on word processing and spreadsheets, but the 4 nm process and 170 W TDP mean it is power-hungry for such tasks. The GPU’s 4x DisplayPort 2.0 outputs support multiple monitors, which is useful for research. The 32 threads are surplus for most student workloads, but the system will not struggle with any office task.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9950X + Intel Arc A380E

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 9950X

Intel Arc A380E

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds