SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9900X + Intel Arc A350

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

85 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
GPU Bottleneck
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 9900X

57,498 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X and Intel Arc A350 form a desktop pairing with a striking asymmetry: a 12-core Zen 5 flagship-class CPU matched with Intel's entry-level Alchemist GPU. The benchmark data available does not include any measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all gaming performance discussion below is estimated from the individual CPU and GPU benchmark scores rather than from direct frame-rate testing. This pairing's combined percentile of 71 places it above most systems in the database, but the source of that position is almost entirely the processor.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data paints a clear picture of where the performance ceiling resides in this system. The Ryzen 9 9900X sits at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 57,498, while the Intel Arc A350 sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 0 (no GPU benchmarks are populated in the fact pack). This is not a balanced pairing; the CPU is the dominant component by a wide margin, and the GPU is the limiting factor in graphics-bound workloads.

The CPU's multi-threaded scores reinforce this asymmetry. In Cinebench R23, the 9900X scores 32,172 in multicore and 2,253 in single-core, while in Geekbench it scores 22,174 multi-core and 3,010 single-core. The 3DMark thread scaling shows a steady climb from 1,286 in single-thread to 12,552 in 16-thread and 13,929 in max-thread tests, indicating strong scaling up to 16 threads with diminishing returns beyond that point. The PassMark multi-thread score of 54,643 with a single-thread score of 4,672 suggests the processor can feed even demanding rendering workloads without becoming the bottleneck itself.

However, the Arc A350's specifications cap what the system can deliver in frame-rate-sensitive scenarios. The GPU has 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 raster output units, with a pixel rate of 48.00 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 96.00 GTexel/s. Its FP32 throughput of 3.072 TFLOPS is modest by discrete GPU standards. In games that stress the GPU more than the CPU, the Arc A350 will be the limiting factor regardless of the 9900X's headroom. The CPU's PassMark physics score of 3,381 and integer math score of 181,056 indicate it can handle game logic and physics calculations, but the GPU's 64-bit memory bus with 124.0 GB/s bandwidth and 4 GB of GDDR6 memory will constrain texture loading and high-resolution rendering.

The data suggests the bottleneck shifts depending on workload. In CPU-bound scenarios like data compression (PassMark score 683,579), encryption (33,421), or random string sorting (72,013), the 9900X performs at a level that leaves the GPU irrelevant. In GPU-bound scenarios like rasterization at high resolutions or ray-traced effects, the Arc A350's specifications — 6 ray tracing cores, 48.00 GPixel/s pixel rate — become the ceiling. The 9900X's 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth and dual-channel DDR5 support provide ample data flow to the CPU, but the GPU's 124.0 GB/s bandwidth is a fraction of what a high-end GPU would offer, reinforcing that the graphics card is the limiting factor for visual workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The Ryzen 9 9900X delivers a comprehensive benchmark profile that places it at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs. Its average benchmark score of 57,498 places it just 0.1% behind the AMD EPYC 9015 (55,575 average, -0.1% delta) and 0.2% ahead of the AMD EPYC 7313 (57,399, +0.2% delta). Against Intel rivals, the 9900X trails the Intel Core i9-14900 by 1.1% (58,115 average) and the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M by 1.4% (58,323 average). These are narrow margins, indicating the 9900X competes directly with server and high-end desktop silicon.

In Cinebench R23, the multicore score of 32,172 positions the CPU as a serious multi-threaded performer, while the single-core score of 2,253 indicates strong per-thread efficiency. The Geekbench scores of 22,174 multi-core and 3,010 single-core corroborate this pattern. The 3DMark results show a scaling curve from 2,519 in 2-thread tests to 9,114 in 8-thread and 13,929 in max-thread tests, with the 16-thread score of 12,552 being slightly lower than the max-thread score — suggesting that beyond 16 threads, the additional 8 threads (for a total of 24) add roughly 11% more performance rather than the 50% one might expect from doubling thread count.

The PassMark suite reveals workload-specific strengths. Integer math scores 181,056, floating-point math scores 120,083, and extended instructions score 55,243. Data compression scores 683,579, which is an outlier performance level likely reflecting the CPU's large 64 MB L3 cache. Data encryption scores 33,421, and finding prime numbers scores 436. The single-thread score of 4,672 is strong for general desktop responsiveness.

The Intel Arc A350 has no populated benchmark scores in the fact pack, so its performance must be inferred from its specifications. Its 50th percentile among all GPUs suggests it sits at the median of the GPU performance distribution, but with an average benchmark score of 0, there is no direct numeric comparison available. The combined percentile of 71 for this CPU+GPU pairing reflects the CPU's strength pulling the overall position upward.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 9 9900X compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-14900?

A: The 9900X has an average benchmark score of 57,498, which is 1.1% lower than the Intel Core i9-14900's average score of 58,115. The delta of -1.1% places the two processors within a margin that is effectively negligible for most workloads.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile relative to all GPUs?

A: The Intel Arc A350 sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, meaning it is exactly at the median of the performance distribution. However, its average benchmark score is listed as 0, so this percentile is derived from specification-based comparisons rather than measured benchmark results.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 9 9900X supports ECC memory. It uses DDR5 memory through a dual-channel bus with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and ECC capability is listed as true in the specifications.

Q: How many threads does the 9900X have in total?

A: The Ryzen 9 9900X has 24 threads across 12 cores. The 3DMark max-thread score of 13,929 reflects this configuration, while the 16-thread score of 12,552 shows that performance scales well up to that point.

Q: What is the die size and transistor count for the CPU?

A: The 9900X uses a 4 nm process from TSMC with 16,630 million transistors spread across two 70.6 mm² dies. The total die area is therefore approximately 141.2 mm², though the fact pack lists the die size as "2x 70.6 mm²" without a combined figure.

Q: Is the GPU's power requirement high?

A: No. The Arc A350 has a TDP of 25 W and a suggested PSU of 200 W. This is low by discrete GPU standards, and the CPU's TDP of 120 W means a combined system power draw that a modest power supply can handle.

Q: What PCIe interface does the GPU use?

A: The Arc A350 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes (CPU only), so the GPU operates below the CPU's maximum PCIe generation but still benefits from the available lanes.

Who Should Build It

The data suggests this pairing serves users who need substantial CPU compute power but do not prioritize high-end graphics. Gamers targeting 1080p or 1440p with moderate settings would find the Arc A350's 4 GB GDDR6 memory and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth sufficient for older or less demanding titles, though the GPU's 50th percentile position indicates it will struggle with modern AAA games at high detail. The 9900X's 92nd percentile CPU performance ensures that frame rates in CPU-bound games will remain high, but GPU-bound scenarios will see the Arc A350 cap performance.

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering software would benefit from the 9900X's multi-threaded scores: Cinebench R23 multicore of 32,172, Geekbench multicore of 22,174, and PassMark multi-thread of 54,643. The GPU's modest FP32 throughput of 3.072 TFLOPS limits GPU-accelerated rendering, but CPU-based rendering workloads would run efficiently. Software developers compiling large codebases would see strong performance from the CPU's integer math score of 181,056 and data compression score of 683,579, though the GPU's role in development is minimal.

Students and small business workstations that run office productivity, spreadsheet analysis, or database applications would find the CPU's single-thread performance of 4,672 in PassMark and 2,253 in Cinebench R23 more than sufficient. The system's combined percentile of 71 reflects a desktop that exceeds most general-purpose computers, with the caveat that the GPU is not built for demanding visual workloads. The 9900X's 12 cores and 24 threads provide headroom for virtualization, multi-tasking, and parallel workloads that benefit from high thread counts.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming at 1080p is feasible for esports and older titles, where the CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 1,286 and max-thread score of 13,929 indicate strong frame pacing. However, the Arc A350's 64-bit memory bus and 4 GB VRAM will limit texture quality and resolution scaling, so modern games at high settings will likely drop below high-refresh rates.

Streaming while gaming would put the 9900X's 24 threads to work encoding video, with the PassMark data encryption score of 33,421 suggesting capable throughput for encoding tasks. The GPU's lack of dedicated encoder specifications in the fact pack means streaming quality depends on CPU encoding, which the 9900X handles comfortably based on its multi-threaded benchmark scores.

Video editing in software like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve would rely heavily on the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 32,172 for timeline rendering and export. The GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance could accelerate some effects, but the 4 GB memory capacity and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit 4K or higher resolution work.

3D rendering with CPU-based renderers would excel with the 9900X's PassMark floating-point math score of 120,083 and multi-thread score of 54,643, making this a capable workstation for Blender or Maya CPU rendering. GPU rendering would be constrained by the Arc A350's 6 ray tracing cores and modest compute throughput.

Software development benefits from the CPU's compile times, driven by integer math of 181,056 and extended instructions score of 55,243. The 64 MB L3 cache accelerates repeated compilation passes, and the 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth handles large project files.

Student and office work is more than adequately served by the 9900X's single-thread performance of 4,672 in PassMark and 3,010 in Geekbench. Spreadsheets, document editing, and web browsing will feel instant, while the GPU handles basic display output without strain.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture with a DG2-128 chip, manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The 4 GB of GDDR6 memory runs on a 64-bit bus with a bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s, and the memory clock is listed at 1937 MHz with 15.5 Gbps effective speed. The base and boost clocks are both 2000 MHz, with no separate game clock specified.

Compute resources include 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 24 ROPs, producing a pixel rate of 48.00 GPixel/s and texture rate of 96.00 GTexel/s. FP32 throughput is 3.072 TFLOPS, while FP16 achieves 6.144 TFLOPS via a 2:1 ratio. The GPU has 6 ray tracing cores, though tensor cores are not listed. Its TDP is 25 W with a suggested PSU of 200 W, and it uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. The GPU is end-of-life with no release date or launch MSRP in the fact pack.

The GPU's 50th percentile position among all GPUs suggests it performs at the median level for graphics cards, but the lack of benchmark scores means this is based on specification comparisons. For rendering, the 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 figure indicates entry-level compute capability, while the 6 RT cores provide some ray tracing support for games that implement it. The 124.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 4 GB capacity are the primary constraints for modern game textures and high-resolution framebuffers. The 200 W suggested PSU reflects the GPU's low power draw, keeping system power requirements modest.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 9 9900X uses AMD Socket AM5 with DDR5 memory support in a dual-channel configuration, providing 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The CPU supports ECC memory, which is valuable for workstation reliability. PCIe Gen 5 is available with 24 lanes from the CPU, while the GPU currently uses PCIe 4.0 x8 — meaning the GPU is not utilizing the full PCIe bandwidth the platform offers.

The CPU's TDP is 120 W, and the GPU's TDP is 25 W with a suggested PSU of 200 W. This leaves significant power supply headroom for upgrades. The most sensible next upgrade would be replacing the Arc A350 with a more powerful GPU, as the 9900X's 92nd percentile CPU performance will not bottleneck any graphics card in the database. A higher-end GPU with greater memory bandwidth and VRAM would take advantage of the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes and the platform's overall capability.

The 9000 series platform with the 9900X's 12 cores and 24 threads has headroom for future applications. The CPU's production status is Active, suggesting ongoing availability, while the GPU is End-of-life, making a GPU upgrade almost mandatory for users who want to maintain relevance in modern games. The DDR5 memory support and dual-channel bus provide a foundation for memory upgrades, and the ECC capability allows for error-corrected configurations.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X — a 12-core, 24-thread Zen 5 processor from the Granite Ridge codename, part of the 9000 series — with the Intel Arc A350, an entry-level Alchemist generation GPU from the Arc 3 family. The CPU sits at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 57,498, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs. The combined percentile for this pairing is 71, indicating that the system as a whole outperforms 71% of configurations in the database.

The CPU's release date is August 14, 2024, with a launch MSRP of $499. It is unlocked for overclocking and has a production status of Active. The GPU's production status is End-of-life, which is notable for a pairing with a current-generation CPU. The GPU has no release date listed and no launch MSRP. The build class is desktop, and the data indicates this is a CPU-centric system where the processor does the heavy lifting and the GPU provides basic visual output.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X is a 12-core, 24-thread processor built on the Zen 5 architecture with the Granite Ridge codename, manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It uses 16,630 million transistors across two 70.6 mm² dies, giving a total die area of approximately 141.2 mm². The base clock is 4.40 GHz with a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, and the TDP is 120 W. It supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth and ECC capability. The CPU provides 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes and includes integrated Radeon Graphics.

Benchmark results show the CPU's strengths across multiple suites. In 3DMark, scores scale from 1,286 single-thread to 13,929 max-thread, with 2-thread at 2,519, 4-thread at 4,886, 8-thread at 9,114, and 16-thread at 12,552. Cinebench R15 scores are 5,008 multicore and 353 single-core, while R23 scores are 32,172 multicore and 2,253 single-core. Geekbench scores are 22,174 multicore and 3,010 single-core. PassMark results include data compression at 683,579, encryption at 33,421, extended instructions at 55,243, prime number finding at 436, floating-point math at 120,083, integer math at 181,056, multi-thread at 54,643, physics at 3,381, random string sorting at 72,013, and single-thread at 4,672.

These scores place the 9900X in direct competition with server processors. The nearest rivals are the AMD EPYC 9015 (57,555 average, -0.1% delta), AMD EPYC 7313 (57,399, +0.2% delta), Intel Core i9-14900 (58,115, -1.1% delta), and Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M (58,323, -1.4% delta). The 9900X's performance is within 1.4% of all four rivals, indicating it matches server-class silicon in synthetic benchmarks while offering desktop platform features like unlocked multipliers.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X + Intel Arc A350 combination in the fact pack, so all frame rate figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and GPU specifications. The data clearly indicates that gaming performance will be GPU-limited in most scenarios. The Arc A350's 4 GB GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 124.0 GB/s bandwidth will cap texture memory and resolution, while the 768 shading units and 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 throughput place it at the entry level of discrete GPUs.

At 1080p with low to medium settings, esports titles and older games should run smoothly, driven by the 9900X's strong single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread 1,286, PassMark single-thread 4,672) and the GPU's 48.00 GPixel/s pixel rate. The CPU's 3DMark 16-thread score of 12,552 suggests it can maintain high frame pacing in CPU-bound scenes. However, the GPU's 64-bit memory bus will likely cause frame rate drops in open-world games with large texture streaming demands.

At 1440p, the 4 GB VRAM becomes a hard limit for modern game assets, and the 124.0 GB/s bandwidth will struggle to feed the GPU's shading units at higher resolutions. The 50th percentile GPU position relative to all GPUs suggests roughly median performance, which in modern AAA titles translates to medium settings at 1080p or low settings at 1440p. The CPU's performance is not the constraint here; the 9900X's 92nd percentile position means it will not bottleneck any GPU in the database.

Ray tracing performance will be minimal. The GPU has 6 RT cores, but their throughput is not specified in benchmark scores. The 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 figure indicates limited compute headroom for ray tracing workloads. Gamers interested in high-refresh or high-detail experiences should consider this pairing primarily for CPU-heavy games or older titles, with the understanding that the GPU is the limiting factor in all GPU-bound scenarios.