SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9900X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

87 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
79%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 9900X

57,498 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

3,075 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER form a desktop build with an unusually wide performance gap between the two main components. The CPU is a 12-core Zen 5 part that lands in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU's single benchmark score places it in the 19th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile for the pairing is 56. There is no measured FPS data for this exact combination — the fact pack contains an empty measuredFpsUltraByGame set and the dataIsMeasured flag is false — so all gaming frame-rate discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than observed results.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, and what the scores mean

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with the GB203 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC with 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die. It ships with 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 1.02 TB/s of memory bandwidth. The base clock is 2295 MHz, the boost clock is 2617 MHz, and the memory runs at 2000 MHz with 32 Gbps effective speed. The GPU has 10,752 shading units, 336 texture mapping units, 112 ROPs, 84 RT cores, and 336 tensor cores. Pixel throughput is rated at 293.1 GPixel/s, texture throughput at 879.3 GTexel/s, and FP32 compute at 56.28 TFLOPS with FP16 also at 56.28 TFLOPS (1:1). The card is dual-slot, 304 mm long, 137 mm tall, and 40 mm wide, drawing up to 415 W, with a single 16-pin power connector. It connects via PCIe 5.0 x16 and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The only measured GPU benchmark in the dataset is 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, where the card scores 3075. That result places it at the 19th percentile of all GPUs, which is a strikingly low position for a card with this memory and compute configuration. The nearest rivals reinforce the picture: the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 scores 3163 (delta −2.8%), the Intel Arc Pro B60 scores 3182 (−3.4%), the NVIDIA GeForce 820A scores 2983 (+3.1%), and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M scores 2967 (+3.6%). The 5080 SUPER's measured score is within 3.6% of these cards, meaning the benchmark data places its actual rendered output roughly on par with entry-level workstation and older mobile GPUs, not with the high-end segment that its 24 GB memory and 84 RT cores would imply. The RT core count and tensor core count are present on the silicon, but the measured score indicates the GPU is the limiting factor in any rendering workload. The data suggests that for compute tasks that rely on the GPU's FP32 or FP16 throughput, the card may still have headroom, but for real-time rendering — the type of workload Steel Nomad represents — the score is the only measured evidence, and it is low. The launch MSRP for this GPU is 999 USD.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark results are extensive. In 3DMark, the 9900X scores 12552 at 16 threads, 9114 at 8 threads, 4886 at 4 threads, 2519 at 2 threads, 13929 at max threads, and 1286 in single-thread. In Cinebench R15 it scores 5008 multi-core and 353 single-core; in Cinebench R23 it scores 32172 multi-core and 2253 single-core. Geekbench gives a multi-core score of 22174 and a single-core score of 3010. Passmark results include a multithread score of 54643, single-thread 4672, data compression 683579, data encryption 33421, extended instructions 55243, floating point math 120083, integer math 181056, physics 3381, and random string sorting 72013. The CPU's average benchmark score is 57498, which places it in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs — a very strong position.

The nearest rival CPUs are all within a narrow band. The AMD EPYC 9015 scores 57555 (delta −0.1%), meaning the 9900X trails it by just 0.1%. The AMD EPYC 7313 scores 57399 (delta +0.2%), so the 9900X is 0.2% ahead. The Intel Core i9-14900 scores 58115 (delta −1.1%), placing the 9900X 1.1% behind. The Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M scores 58323 (delta −1.4%), 1.4% ahead of the 9900X. In short, the 9900X sits in a tight cluster with these four rivals, separated by less than 1.5 percentage points in either direction.

The GPU's only score is the Steel Nomad DX12 3075, at the 19th percentile. The combined percentile for the CPU+GPU pairing is 56. That combined figure reflects the enormous gap: a 92nd-percentile CPU and a 19th-percentile GPU average out to a mid-table build. The data shows the CPU is the dominant component in this system, and the GPU is the clear weak point. The measured 3DMark CPU scores show strong scaling from 2 threads (2519) up to 16 threads (12552), and the single-thread score of 1286 is consistent with the CPU's high clock speeds. The Passmark multithread score of 54643 is more than double the single-thread score of 4672, showing good multi-core scaling. The GPU score of 3075 is a single data point, but it is the only one available, and it defines the GPU's percentile.

FAQ

Q: What are the CPU's core and thread counts?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X has 12 cores and 24 threads.

Q: What memory does the CPU support?

A: It supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth and ECC support.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The RTX 5080 SUPER has 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, with 1.02 TB/s bandwidth.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this build?

A: No — the dataset has no measured FPS rows (the measuredFpsUltraByGame field is empty and dataIsMeasured is false), so all gaming frame figures are estimates.

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking?

A: The CPU is in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking?

A: The GPU is in the 19th percentile of all GPUs.

Q: What is the combined percentile of the build?

A: The combined percentile is 56.

Q: Does the CPU include an integrated GPU?

A: Yes, it has Radeon Graphics integrated.

Who Should Build It

This build is a desktop system, and the data points to a very specific audience: users who need CPU compute and do not need GPU rendering. The CPU's 92nd percentile means it can handle heavily threaded workloads. The Passmark scores are the clearest signal: data compression at 683579, data encryption at 33421, floating point math at 120083, and integer math at 181056. Those numbers indicate a machine that can chew through code compilation, data processing, spreadsheet and database workloads, and scientific calculations. The single-thread score of 4672 (Passmark) and 3010 (Geekbench) also show strong responsiveness for everyday tasks, which benefits software developers, students, and small business workstations where the CPU is the bottleneck.

For gamers, the picture is less favorable. With the GPU in the 19th percentile, this build is not positioned for high-frame-rate gaming. The CPU's strong single-thread performance — Cinebench R23 single-core 2253, Geekbench single-core 3010 — means the CPU would not be the limiting factor in most games, but the GPU's low score means the frame rate will be low at any resolution. The build is a poor fit for 4K or even 1440p high-refresh gaming, and would be more sensible for a developer or content creator who works primarily with CPU-bound tasks and only needs basic display output. The GPU does have 24 GB of VRAM, which is plenty for large datasets, but the measured score suggests the actual rendering throughput is modest. For content creators working with video encoding or 3D rendering that offloads to the GPU, the GPU would be a bottleneck; for creators whose work is CPU-bound (like audio processing or data analysis), the CPU shines.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 9 9900X is a 12-core, 24-thread desktop processor built on the Zen 5 architecture with the Granite Ridge codename. It uses a 4 nm process from TSMC, with 16,630 million transistors on a die size of 2x 70.6 mm². The base clock is 4.40 GHz and the boost clock is 5.60 GHz, with a TDP of 120 W. The cache layout is 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 64 MB L3. It supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth and ECC, and it has 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The CPU includes Radeon integrated graphics, has an unlocked multiplier, and was released in 2024 with a launch MSRP of $499.

The benchmark results show a processor that is strong in both single-thread and multi-thread. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32172 is nearly 14× the single-core score of 2253, reflecting the core count. Geekbench shows a multi-core score of 22174 versus a single-core score of 3010, a ratio of about 7.4×. In 3DMark, the max-thread score of 13929 is only 1.1× the 16-thread score of 12552, suggesting the chip is nearing its scaling limit at high thread counts. The Passmark multithread score of 54643 is 11.7× the single-thread score of 4672. The 92nd percentile ranking puts it above the vast majority of CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals are all within 1.4% of its average score, so it is not a clear winner — it is at the same level as the EPYC 9015, EPYC 7313, Core i9-14900, and Xeon Platinum 8260M. The 9900X is a competitive part, but the data shows it is not head-and-shoulders above its nearest competition; it trades within a percentage point of all four.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU sits on AMD Socket AM5. The platform supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, with ECC support, and 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth. The CPU provides 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The GPU uses PCIe 5.0 x16, which is a good match for the platform. The CPU's TDP is 120 W, and the GPU's TDP is 415 W — the sum implies a power supply with a substantial headroom, but the dataset does not list a suggested PSU, so no specific wattage can be stated. The GPU is dual-slot, 304 mm long, and uses a single 16-pin power connector. The CPU is an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is possible, though the data does not provide any overclocking results.

The most sensible next upgrade for this system is a more powerful GPU. The CPU is in the 92nd percentile and is the strongest component; the GPU is in the 19th percentile and is the weakest. Replacing the GPU with a higher-performing model would bring the build closer to balance, and the PCIe 5.0 x16 slot is already in place. The platform also supports DDR5 memory, so a memory upgrade to a faster kit (within the supported 89.6 GB/s bandwidth) is possible, but the data does not specify which speeds are supported beyond the dual-channel DDR5. The CPU's ECC support suggests a server-oriented workload, but the desktop socket AM5 makes it a workstation-class platform. The 120 W CPU TDP leaves room for a lower-power CPU if needed, but the 92nd percentile CPU is already near the top of the database.

Balance and Bottleneck

The single biggest bottleneck in this build is the GPU. The CPU's 92nd percentile versus the GPU's 19th percentile is a massive gap. In CPU-bound workloads — data compression, encryption, floating-point math, integer math — the CPU will run at full speed, and the GPU will be idle. In GPU-bound workloads, such as 3D rendering or gaming, the GPU's low score will limit the system, and the CPU's fast single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 2253, Geekbench single-core 3010) will not compensate. The combined percentile of 56 reflects this: the build is dragged down by the GPU. The CPU's Passmark multithread score of 54643 versus the GPU's Steel Nomad score of 3075 illustrates the gap. For a user who runs a CPU-heavy workload like video encoding, the CPU will be the star. For a user who games at any resolution, the GPU will be the bottleneck. The data does not provide FPS scaling figures, but the percentile gap is evidence enough.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build — the buildClass field is "desktop" — pairing an AMD Ryzen 9 9900X (12 cores, 24 threads, Zen 5, 92nd percentile) with an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER (24 GB GDDR7, Blackwell 2.0, 19th percentile). The combined percentile is 56. The build is CPU-leaning: a high-end CPU with a low-end GPU. The CPU's 12 cores and 5.6 GHz boost make it a top-tier desktop processor, while the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3075 places it in the bottom 20% of the GPU population. The system is a desktop workstation with a strong CPU and a weak GPU, and the overall tier is mid-level, at the 56th percentile. The launch MSRP for the CPU is $399 and for the GPU is 999 USD.

Gaming Performance

There is no measured FPS data for this exact combination. The dataset contains no rows in measuredFpsUltraByGame, and the dataIsMeasured flag is false. Therefore, all gaming frame figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The GPU's Steel Nomad score of 3075 at the 19th percentile is a low bar — it is within 3.6% of the Quadro P1000, GeForce 820A, Arc Pro B60, and GTX 860M. Those are entry-level GPUs, so the estimated gaming performance is low. The CPU's strong single-thread score (Cinebench R23 single-core 2253) and high clock speed would not be a limiting factor, but the GPU's low score would cap the frame rate. At 1080p, the GPU would likely deliver modest frame rates; at 1440p and 4K, the frame rates would drop further. The 24 GB VRAM would allow for high texture settings, but the GPU's raw throughput is the constraint. These are estimates, not measured results, and the data is clear that no FPS was recorded for this build.