SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7900X + Intel Arc B570

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X

53,288 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B570

20,556 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

This pairing of an AMD Ryzen 9 7900X with an Intel Arc B570 presents a clear imbalance in workload characteristics. The CPU sits at the 91st percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU lands at the 65th percentile among all GPUs. That 26-percentage-point gap means the processor is capable of feeding far more graphics work than this particular card can render. In gaming, the data confirms this: the pair averages 86.7 FPS across the measured game set at 1080p ultra, but that number drops to 57 FPS at 1440p and further to 33 FPS at 4K when looking at the same titles. The bottleneck is unambiguously the GPU at higher resolutions.

At 1080p ultra, the CPU has enough headroom to push frame rates that exceed 144 Hz in several esports titles — Valorant hits 304 FPS, CS:GO reaches 293 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege achieves 158 FPS. These numbers would be impossible if the processor were the limiting factor. The GPU is clearly the constraint in these cases, because the CPU's single-thread score of 4238 in PassMark and its 3DMark single-thread score of 1093 indicate it can handle even the highest-refresh workloads without breaking a sweat.

The scaling pattern across resolutions tells the story. Take Call of Duty: Warzone: 165 FPS at 1080p, 146 FPS at 1440p, and 124 FPS at 4K. The relatively modest drop from 1080p to 4K (about 25%) suggests the game is well-optimized for this GPU, but the absolute 4K number is still far from competitive for high-refresh monitors. Contrast that with Valorant: 304 FPS at 1080p, 259 FPS at 1440p, and 207 FPS at 4K. The GPU still has enough headroom at 4K to produce playable frame rates, but the resolution scaling is more severe in absolute terms.

For CPU-bound workloads, the balance shifts completely. The Ryzen 9 7900X delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 29300 and a Geekbench multi-core score of 19267, placing it within 0.6% of the Intel Core i7-14700F and 0.2% of the AMD EPYC 7313P. The GPU's compute capabilities, measured at 7281 in PassMark GPU compute, are respectable for its class but nowhere near the CPU's throughput for parallel processing tasks. In productivity scenarios, the CPU will be the star, and the GPU will be adequate but not exceptional.

# Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data covers 52 games at three resolutions under ultra settings. At 1920x1080, the pair produces a mix of results that ranges from unplayable to exceptionally smooth. Esports titles are the strong suit: Valorant hits 304 FPS, CS:GO reaches 293 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege achieves 158 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone hits 165 FPS, which is excellent for a competitive shooter. Roblox runs at 171 FPS, and Minecraft at 131 FPS. These numbers indicate that for competitive multiplayer gaming at 1080p, this combination is more than sufficient.

At 1080p, the heaviest titles reveal the GPU's limitations. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 39 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 36 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at just 19 FPS. The Medium is the second-worst at 28 FPS. These are not playable frame rates for demanding single-player games at ultra settings. Microsoft Flight Simulator manages 48 FPS, which is borderline, and Control runs at 55 FPS. The pattern is clear: the Arc B570 can handle lightweight and mid-range titles, but it struggles with the most graphically intensive AAA releases.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates drop across the board. Valorant still hits 259 FPS, CS:GO drops to 201 FPS, and Warzone falls to 146 FPS. These are still playable for competitive gaming. However, Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 29 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 27 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended to 12 FPS. The Medium falls to 23 FPS. At this resolution, the pair is best suited for games that are not graphically demanding or for those willing to lower settings from ultra.

At 3840x2160, the picture is grim for demanding titles. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 19 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 18 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 6 FPS. The Medium is at 18 FPS. Even esports titles show strain: Valorant drops to 207 FPS (still playable), but CS:GO falls to 119 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege to 57 FPS. Warzone manages 124 FPS at 4K, which is surprisingly playable. For the most part, 4K ultra gaming is not viable for this pairing outside of lighter titles.

# CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X is a 12-core, 24-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael. It operates on the AMD Socket AM5 platform and is built on TSMC's 5 nm process with 13,140 million transistors across a 2x 71 mm² die configuration. The base clock is 4.70 GHz with a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, and the TDP is rated at 170 W. It supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and it includes ECC memory support. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes and includes integrated Radeon Graphics.

Benchmark results show a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 29300 places it squarely in the high-end desktop space, while the single-core score of 2016.5 indicates strong per-thread performance. The 3DMark scores show scaling from 2137 at 2 threads to 12536 at max threads, demonstrating effective utilization of all 24 threads. The PassMark multi-thread score of 51406 and single-thread score of 4238 further confirm this balanced performance profile.

The average benchmark score of 53288 places the 7900X at the 91st percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD EPYC 7313P (0.2% higher), Intel Xeon Phi 7290 (0.3% lower), Intel Xeon 634 (0.6% higher), and Intel Core i7-14700F (0.6% lower). This clustering indicates that the 7900X is competitive with both server-class and high-end desktop processors, making it a versatile choice for a range of workloads.

In real-world terms, the 12 cores and 24 threads handle heavily parallel tasks with ease. The PassMark data compression score of 632505 and data encryption score of 37263 show strong throughput for storage and security workloads. The floating-point math score of 103952 and integer math score of 169273 indicate robust computational capability for scientific and engineering applications. The extended instructions score of 47619 suggests good support for modern SIMD workloads. This is a CPU that will not be the limiting factor in most productivity scenarios.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This pairing delivers excellent frame rates in competitive titles at 1080p and 1440p. Valorant hits 304 FPS at 1080p and 259 FPS at 1440p, while CS:GO reaches 293 FPS and 201 FPS respectively. Warzone achieves 165 FPS at 1080p and 146 FPS at 1440p. For gamers with 144 Hz or 240 Hz monitors playing esports titles, this setup is well-suited.

Streaming: The 12-core, 24-thread CPU provides ample headroom for simultaneous gaming and encoding. The CPU's multi-thread score of 51406 in PassMark suggests it can handle streaming workloads without bottlenecking. The GPU's 18 RT cores and Xe2-HPG architecture support hardware encoding, though the 65th percentile GPU ranking means game performance may take a hit in demanding titles while streaming.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 29300 and Geekbench multi-core score of 19267 indicate strong performance for rendering and export tasks. The GPU's PassMark GPU compute score of 7281 and 11.52 TFLOPS of FP32 performance provide acceleration for effects and color grading. This is a capable setup for 1080p and moderate 1440p video editing workloads.

3D rendering: The CPU's 12 cores and 24 threads handle CPU-based rendering well, as evidenced by the 29300 Cinebench R23 multi-core score. The GPU's 23.04 TFLOPS of FP16 performance and 360.0 GTexel/s texture rate provide decent GPU-accelerated rendering capabilities. However, the 10 GB VRAM and 160-bit memory bus may limit very large scenes.

Software development: The 7900X's strong single-thread score of 4238 in PassMark and 2617 in Geekbench single-core indicate fast compilation and code analysis. The multi-thread performance accelerates parallel builds and test suites. The 64 MB of shared L3 cache helps with large codebases and frequent recompilation.

Student and office work: This pairing is massively overqualified for typical productivity tasks. The CPU's single-thread performance handles spreadsheets, word processing, and web browsing with ease. The integrated Radeon Graphics in the CPU provides a fallback if the discrete GPU is not needed. The 10 GB of VRAM and 380.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth are more than sufficient for any office application.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 53288, placing it at the 91st percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD EPYC 7313P with an average score of 53206 (0.2% higher), followed by the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 at 53469 (0.3% lower), Intel Xeon 634 at 52974 (0.6% higher), and Intel Core i7-14700F at 53620 (0.6% lower). This tight clustering indicates that the 7900X is a top-tier performer that trades blows with server and high-end desktop processors.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 20556, placing it at the 65th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile at 20534 (0.1% higher), Intel Arc A750 at 20582 (0.1% lower), NVIDIA Quadro M4000M at 20480 (0.4% higher), and AMD Radeon R9 M390X at 20662 (0.5% lower). The GPU sits in the mid-range tier, competitive with the previous generation's mainstream cards.

In specific benchmarks, the CPU scores 29300 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 2016.5 in single-core. The 3DMark scores range from 2137 at 2 threads to 12536 at max threads, showing excellent scaling. The Geekbench scores are 19267 multi-core and 2617 single-core. The PassMark suite shows a multi-thread score of 51406, single-thread of 4238, and floating-point math of 103952.

The GPU scores 2649 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 and 14195 in PassMark G3D. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 83514 and Vulkan is 96844. The PassMark GPU compute score is 7281. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pair is 78, and the pair ranks 3028 out of 3732 pairs by average FPS across games, with an average FPS of 86.7. This ranking places the combination in the mid-to-lower tier for gaming performance, despite the strong CPU.

# GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B570 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture, codenamed Battlemage, from the Arc 5 generation. It uses the BMG-G21 chip manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process with 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die. The GPU has 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, 80 raster output units, and 18 ray tracing cores. The base and boost clocks are both 2500 MHz, with memory running at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective).

The memory subsystem consists of 10 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus, providing 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The pixel rate is 200.0 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 360.0 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 11.52 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 23.04 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. It connects via PCIe 4.0 x8 and has a TDP of 150 W.

In benchmark terms, the GPU's average score of 20556 places it at the 65th percentile. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2649 indicates moderate DX12 gaming performance. The PassMark G3D score of 14195 and GPU compute score of 7281 show the card's compute capabilities are respectable but not exceptional. The Geekbench scores of 83514 (OpenCL) and 96844 (Vulkan) suggest the GPU performs better in Vulkan workloads, which aligns with Intel's driver focus.

For rendering workloads, the 10 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and moderate 1440p textures, but the 160-bit memory bus may bottleneck high-resolution texture streaming. The 18 RT cores provide ray tracing support, but the 11.52 TFLOPS FP32 performance limits the complexity of ray-traced scenes. The 380.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for the card's compute capacity, but it falls short of what more powerful GPUs offer.

# FAQ

Q: Can this pairing handle 4K gaming?

A: At 3840x2160 ultra settings, most demanding games run below 30 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 19 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 18 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 6 FPS. Esports titles like Valorant (207 FPS) and Warzone (124 FPS) remain playable, but 4K ultra is not viable for AAA games.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 9 7900X has an average benchmark score of 53288, which is 0.2% lower than the AMD EPYC 7313P, 0.3% higher than the Intel Xeon Phi 7290, 0.6% lower than the Intel Xeon 634, and 0.6% higher than the Intel Core i7-14700F.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the Intel Arc A750?

A: The Arc B570 has an average benchmark score of 20556, which is 0.1% lower than the Arc A750's 20582. They are effectively tied in overall performance, despite the B570 being a newer generation.

Q: What is the best resolution for this pairing?

A: At 1920x1080, the pair averages 86.7 FPS across all measured games and delivers 165+ FPS in several esports titles. At 2560x1440, many games fall below 60 FPS, and at 4K, only lighter titles remain playable.

Q: Does the CPU bottleneck the GPU?

A: No. The CPU is at the 91st percentile while the GPU is at the 65th percentile. The CPU's single-thread score of 4238 in PassMark and multi-thread score of 51406 indicate it can feed the GPU adequately in all scenarios.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have and is it enough?

A: The Arc B570 has 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus with 380.0 GB/s bandwidth. This is sufficient for 1080p and moderate 1440p gaming, but may limit ultra textures at 4K.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pair is 78, with a rank of 3028 out of 3732 pairs by average FPS across games. The average FPS across all measured games is 86.7.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X with the Intel Arc B570. The CPU is a 12-core, 24-thread Zen 4 processor on Socket AM5, launched with a release date of 2022-09-26 and a launch MSRP of $549. The GPU is an Intel Arc B570 from the Battlemage generation, released on 2025-01-15 with a launch MSRP of $219. The CPU is at the 91st percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU is at the 65th percentile among all GPUs, giving a combined percentile of 78.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 53288 places it in the top 9% of all processors, competitive with server-class chips like the AMD EPYC 7313P and Intel Xeon 634. The GPU's average score of 20556 places it in the mid-range tier, roughly equivalent to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile and the Intel Arc A750. The pair ranks 3028 out of 3732 in FPS performance, with an average of 86.7 FPS across games.

This is a lopsided pairing in terms of performance tiers. The CPU is a high-end enthusiast processor, while the GPU is a mainstream mid-range card. The combined percentile of 78 reflects this mix, but the gaming performance is constrained by the GPU. For productivity workloads, the CPU dominates, while for gaming, the GPU sets the ceiling.

# Who Should Build It

Gamers at 1080p who prioritize esports titles will find this pairing excellent. Valorant at 304 FPS, CS:GO at 293 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege at 158 FPS provide smooth competitive gameplay. Call of Duty: Warzone at 165 FPS is also strong. Players with 144 Hz or 240 Hz monitors will be satisfied, but those seeking high refresh rates in AAA titles at 1080p ultra will be disappointed, as Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 39 FPS.

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's 12 cores and 24 threads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 29300 and Geekbench multi-core score of 19267 indicate strong rendering performance. The GPU's 11.52 TFLOPS FP32 and 23.04 TFLOPS FP16 provide acceleration for effects and compositing. This setup handles 1080p and moderate 1440p video projects well.

Software developers will appreciate the fast compile times from the CPU's single-thread score of 4238 in PassMark and 2617 in Geekbench single-core. The multi-thread performance accelerates parallel builds, and the 64 MB L3 cache helps with large codebases. The 10 GB GPU VRAM provides adequate space for GPU-accelerated compute tasks.

Students and office workers will find this build overkill for their needs, but the CPU's integrated Radeon Graphics provides a fallback if the discrete GPU is not needed. The 12 cores handle multitasking with ease, and the 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth supports fast data access. The build is a strong choice for a high-performance desktop that can handle both productivity and moderate gaming.

Small business workstations that need a powerful CPU for data processing, financial modeling, or engineering simulations will benefit from the 7900X's performance. The PassMark data compression score of 632505 and integer math score of 169273 indicate strong throughput for these workloads. The GPU is adequate for basic visualization and GPU-accelerated tasks, but not for heavy compute.