SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7900X + Intel Arc A750

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X

53,288 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A750

20,582 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X and Intel Arc A750 form a desktop pairing where a 12-core, 24-thread Zen 4 processor meets a mid-range Xe-HPG graphics card. The data in this analysis is derived entirely from the provided benchmark scores, with no measured FPS rows existing for this exact combination; all frame rate discussions are therefore estimates based on the CPU’s and GPU’s synthetic performance results. The CPU sits at the 91st percentile among all processors, while the GPU lands at the 66th percentile among all graphics cards, producing a combined percentile of 79 for the pairing. This gap in percentile ranking is the first indicator that the system’s workload balance favors CPU-bound tasks, though the GPU still holds its own in specific scenarios. The following sections walk through the benchmark data, platform details, and usage implications step by step.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Ryzen 9 7900X and the Arc A750 is asymmetric, and the bottleneck shifts depending on the workload type. For multi-threaded CPU tasks, the processor’s 3DMark max threads score of 12536 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 29300 show a compute capacity that the GPU cannot match in general-purpose compute. The GPU’s PassMark GPU compute score of 5368 is modest compared to the CPU’s PassMark multi-thread score of 51406, indicating that for tasks like physics simulation, data compression, or encryption, the CPU will be the limiting factor only if the software is not GPU-accelerated. Conversely, in gaming or 3D rendering where the GPU dominates, the Arc A750’s 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 performance becomes the constraint, and the CPU’s single-thread score of 1093 in 3DMark single-thread will rarely be the bottleneck at higher resolutions.

The FPS scaling evidence, though estimated, points to a system where the CPU has headroom. At 1080p with lower graphical loads, the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 12534 and DirectX 12 score of 70 suggest the Arc A750 will be the primary limiter, as the CPU’s 3DMark 8-thread score of 7798 and 16-thread score of 10972 provide ample processing power for game logic and physics. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU’s memory bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s and 8 GB GDDR6 capacity become more critical, further shifting the bottleneck entirely to the GPU. For productivity workloads like video editing, the balance is more even: the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 29300 handles encoding, while the GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 98554 accelerates effects and rendering, but the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM may limit very large projects.

The percentile data reinforces this asymmetry. The CPU’s 91st percentile versus the GPU’s 66th percentile means that in mixed workloads, the GPU will often be the component that holds back overall system performance, especially in graphics-intensive applications. The combined percentile of 79 reflects this middle ground, where the system is not balanced but rather CPU-heavy. In practice, this means users should expect the Arc A750 to be the first component to reach its limits, while the Ryzen 9 7900X operates well below its maximum in most gaming scenarios. The only exception is in highly parallel CPU tasks like data encryption, where the CPU’s PassMark data encryption score of 37263 and extended instructions score of 47619 show a clear advantage over any GPU-based encryption that does not use specialized hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The Ryzen 9 7900X delivers strong synthetic CPU scores across the board. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 29300 and single-core score of 2016.5 place the processor in the top tier for desktop CPUs. Geekbench results show a multi-core score of 19267 and single-core score of 2617, aligning with the processor’s 12 cores and 24 threads. The 3DMark CPU tests provide a scaling curve: 2 threads score 2137, 4 threads score 4151, 8 threads score 7798, 16 threads score 10972, and max threads score 12536. This scaling is nearly linear up to 8 threads, then shows diminishing returns, which is typical for a 12-core part with a 64 MB shared L3 cache. PassMark tests further detail the CPU’s strengths: integer math scores 169273, floating point math scores 103952, and extended instructions score 47619. The average benchmark score for the CPU is 53288, placing it at the 91st percentile. Its nearest rivals include the AMD EPYC 7313P with an average score of 53206 (0.2% behind), the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 with 53469 (0.3% ahead), the Intel Xeon 634 with 52974 (0.6% behind), and the Intel Core i7-14700F with 53620 (0.6% ahead). These deltas are all within 1%, meaning the Ryzen 9 7900X sits in a tightly contested performance band.

The Intel Arc A750’s GPU benchmarks are more varied. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2612, which is a modern test reflecting current gaming loads. Geekbench OpenCL scores 98554, while Vulkan scores 85631, showing the GPU’s compute capabilities are strong for its class. PassMark results include a G3D score of 12534, a G2D score of 732, and a GPU compute score of 5368. The DirectX tests are notably low: DirectX 9 scores 181, DirectX 10 scores 65, DirectX 11 scores 72, and DirectX 12 scores 70. These low DirectX scores are unusual and suggest that the PassMark DirectX tests may not fully utilize the GPU’s architecture, or they reflect driver-level issues; the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2612 is likely a more reliable indicator of modern gaming performance. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 20582, placing it at the 66th percentile. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Arc B570 with an average score of 20556 (0.1% behind), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile with 20534 (0.2% behind), the AMD Radeon R9 M390X with 20662 (0.4% ahead), and the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M with 20480 (0.5% behind). The Arc A750 is effectively neck-and-neck with these competitors, all within half a percent.

The combined picture shows a CPU that outperforms its rivals by a hair, while the GPU matches its immediate competitors. The CPU’s 91st percentile is substantially higher than the GPU’s 66th, meaning the system’s overall performance tier is dragged down by the GPU in graphics workloads. For CPU-only tasks, the system performs at a level comparable to server-class EPYC and Xeon parts, while for GPU tasks, it performs like a mid-range desktop card from 2022.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s multi-threaded performance compared to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 9 7900X has an average benchmark score of 53288, which is 0.2% higher than the AMD EPYC 7313P (53206) and 0.6% higher than the Intel Xeon 634 (52974), but 0.3% lower than the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 (53469) and 0.6% lower than the Intel Core i7-14700F (53620). All four rivals are within 0.6% of the 7900X.

Q: How does the Arc A750’s gaming performance compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Arc A750 has an average benchmark score of 20582, which is 0.1% higher than the Intel Arc B570 (20556) and 0.2% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (20534), but 0.4% lower than the AMD Radeon R9 M390X (20662) and 0.5% higher than the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M (20480). The GPU is within 0.5% of all four rivals.

Q: What is the CPU’s single-thread performance?

A: The CPU scores 1093 in 3DMark single-thread, 323 in Cinebench R15 single-core, 2016.5 in Cinebench R23 single-core, 2617 in Geekbench single-core, and 4238 in PassMark single-thread. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2016.5 indicates strong per-core performance for a 12-core part.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 9 7900X supports ECC memory, which is a feature typically found in server and workstation platforms. This is notable given its desktop market segment.

Q: What is the GPU’s VRAM capacity and bandwidth?

A: The Arc A750 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 2000 MHz, with 16 Gbps effective speed.

Q: Is the GPU still in production?

A: No, the Intel Arc A750 is marked as end-of-life in the data, with its production status listed as “End-of-life.” Its predecessor is Xe Graphics and its successor is Battlemage.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for the Ryzen 9 7900X and Arc A750 is 79. This is between the CPU’s 91st percentile and the GPU’s 66th percentile, reflecting the GPU’s lower standing.

Who Should Build It

The Ryzen 9 7900X + Arc A750 build serves users who prioritize CPU compute power over graphics. Gamers at 1080p or 1440p with medium to high settings will find the system capable, as the GPU’s 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for most titles, though the estimated FPS will vary by game. Content creators working with video editing will benefit from the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 29300 and Geekbench multi-core score of 19267, which handle encoding and export tasks efficiently, while the GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 98554 accelerates effects and transcoding. Software developers compiling large codebases will see strong performance from the CPU’s PassMark integer math score of 169273 and data compression score of 632505, making the 7900X an excellent choice for build servers or developer workstations.

Students in engineering or data science programs will appreciate the CPU’s 12 cores and 24 threads for simulations and data analysis, with the ECC memory support adding reliability for long-running computations. Small business workstations that run database queries, financial modeling, or virtualization will find the CPU’s 91st percentile performance and 64 MB shared L3 cache beneficial, while the GPU handles basic graphics and compute tasks. However, users whose primary workload is 3D rendering or high-end gaming at 4K should note that the GPU’s 66th percentile and 8 GB VRAM may become a limiting factor, and the system is better suited for CPU-heavy tasks. The build is also suitable for hobbyists who want to experiment with Intel’s Arc architecture, given its support for DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X is a 12-core, 24-thread desktop processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael. It has a base clock of 4.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, with a TDP of 170 W. The CPU is built on TSMC’s 5 nm process node, containing 13,140 million transistors across a die size of 2x 71 mm². The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 64 MB of shared L3 cache, which is substantial for a desktop part. Memory support is DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, providing 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth, and ECC memory is supported. The CPU has 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes (CPU only) and includes integrated Radeon Graphics, though the discrete Arc A750 will handle graphics duties.

Benchmark scores reveal the CPU’s character. The 3DMark thread scaling from 2137 (2 threads) to 12536 (max threads) shows that the processor scales well up to 8 threads (7798), then adds only 47% more performance when going from 8 to 24 threads. This suggests that the 12 cores are efficient, but the memory controller and cache design limit perfect scaling. Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 29300 is strong, placing the CPU in the high-end desktop tier, while the single-core score of 2016.5 is competitive for gaming and lightly-threaded applications. PassMark results show the CPU excels at integer math (169273) and floating point (103952), while the find prime numbers score of 388 is relatively low, indicating that certain algorithmic workloads may not benefit from the architecture. The average benchmark score of 53288 and 91st percentile confirm that this is a top-tier CPU, with rivals like the EPYC 7313P and Core i7-14700F trading blows within 0.6%.

For real workloads, the CPU’s strengths lie in multi-threaded tasks such as video encoding, 3D rendering, and compilation. The 64 MB L3 cache helps with data-heavy workloads like database processing, and the ECC memory support makes it viable for workstations where data integrity is critical. The unlocked multiplier allows overclocking, though the boost clock of 5.60 GHz is already high. The CPU’s high TDP of 170 W means it requires a capable cooling solution, but the performance per core is strong enough that it competes with server parts in benchmarks.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 9 7900X uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which is current for AMD’s desktop processors. The platform supports DDR5 memory, and the CPU’s dual-channel memory bus with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for most workloads. The CPU provides 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is generous for a desktop part, allowing for high-speed NVMe SSDs or future expansion cards. The integrated Radeon Graphics provide a fallback display output, though the Arc A750 will be the primary GPU.

The Intel Arc A750 uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface, which is backward compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 slots. The GPU has a TDP of 225 W and requires a 550 W power supply according to the suggested PSU rating. The power connectors are 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin, which are standard for mid-range GPUs. The GPU’s dual-slot design and display outputs of 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0 make it suitable for multi-monitor setups.

A sensible next upgrade for this system would be to replace the GPU with a higher-performance card, as the CPU’s 91st percentile leaves headroom for more demanding graphics. The 550 W suggested PSU provides some headroom for a slightly more power-hungry GPU, but a significant upgrade would likely require a larger PSU. Alternatively, users could add more DDR5 memory or faster NVMe storage to take advantage of the PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The CPU’s production status is active, meaning it is still available, while the GPU is end-of-life, so users should consider that when planning upgrades. The platform’s AM5 socket is expected to support future AMD processors, though the data does not specify which generations.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Arc A750’s 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth should handle 1080p gaming at high refresh rates in most titles, with the CPU’s 3DMark single-thread score of 1093 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2016.5 ensuring minimal CPU bottlenecks. However, the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM may limit texture quality at 1440p, and the PassMark DirectX 12 score of 70 suggests that driver overhead could be a factor in some games.

Streaming: The CPU’s 12 cores and 24 threads, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 29300, can handle software encoding while gaming, as the 3DMark 8-thread score of 7798 shows enough headroom for concurrent tasks. The GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 98554 can also assist with encoding, but the lack of dedicated tensor cores means the CPU will likely do most of the work.

Video editing: The CPU’s PassMark floating point math score of 103952 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 29300 make it excellent for timeline editing and export, while the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth accelerate effects and color grading. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 98554 supports GPU-accelerated rendering in compatible software.

3D rendering: The CPU’s 12 cores and 64 MB L3 cache, with a 3DMark max threads score of 12536, handle CPU-based rendering well, but the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 may limit GPU rendering scenes with high polygon counts. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2612 provides a baseline for modern render engines.

Software development: The CPU’s PassMark integer math score of 169273 and data compression score of 632505 make it ideal for compiling large codebases and managing repositories. The 24 threads allow parallel builds, and the ECC memory support reduces the risk of corruption during long compilations.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread performance, with a Geekbench single-core score of 2617, handles everyday tasks smoothly, while the 12 cores provide headroom for multitasking. The integrated Radeon Graphics can drive basic displays, and the GPU is not needed for office applications, making this a robust but potentially over-specified build for basic productivity.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X, a 12-core Zen 4 processor, with the Intel Arc A750, a mid-range Xe-HPG graphics card. The CPU is a high-end part at the 91st percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 66th percentile among all GPUs, resulting in a combined percentile of 79. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 53288 is within 0.6% of its nearest rivals, including the AMD EPYC 7313P and Intel Core i7-14700F, while the GPU’s average score of 20582 is within 0.5% of rivals like the Intel Arc B570 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile. The system is fundamentally CPU-centric, with the processor providing most of the compute power, while the GPU offers adequate but not exceptional graphics performance. The build class is desktop, and the combined percentile of 79 suggests it sits in the upper-middle tier of all desktop systems, though the GPU holds it back from the CPU’s top-tier standing.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate figures here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2612 and PassMark G3D score of 12534 indicate that at 1080p with ultra settings, the Arc A750 should deliver playable frame rates in most titles, likely in the 60-90 FPS range for modern games, though the PassMark DirectX 12 score of 70 suggests some titles may underperform due to driver or API overhead. At 1440p ultra, the 8 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth become limiting, and frame rates may drop to 40-60 FPS in demanding games. At 4K ultra, the GPU is likely to struggle, with frame rates potentially below 30 FPS in the most demanding titles, as the 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 is modest for 4K. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance, with a 3DMark single-thread score of 1093 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2016.5, should not bottleneck the GPU at any resolution, meaning the GPU is always the limiting factor in gaming. For esports titles, the GPU’s DirectX 9 score of 181 and DirectX 11 score of 72 suggest that older or lighter games may run at high frame rates, though these scores are low and may not reflect real-world performance. The estimated FPS should be treated as approximate, and users should expect variance based on game optimization and driver maturity.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A750 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, codenamed DG2-512, using TSMC’s 6 nm process node with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. It has 3584 shading units, 224 TMUs, and 112 ROPs, with 28 ray tracing cores. The GPU has no dedicated tensor cores, but its FP32 performance of 17.20 TFLOPS and FP16 performance of 34.41 TFLOPS (2:1) provide solid compute capability. The base clock is 2050 MHz with a boost clock of 2400 MHz, and the memory runs at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) across a 256-bit bus, yielding 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The 8 GB GDDR6 VRAM is adequate for 1080p and entry-level 1440p gaming, but may be insufficient for high-resolution textures or large compute workloads. The GPU’s pixel rate is 268.8 GPixel/s and texture rate is 537.6 GTexel/s, which are mid-range figures. The TDP is 225 W, requiring a 550 W suggested PSU, and the power connectors are 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin.

Benchmark scores for the GPU are mixed. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2612 is a strong indicator of modern gaming performance, placing it above entry-level cards. Geekbench OpenCL (98554) and Vulkan (85631) scores show good compute capabilities for productivity tasks. However, the PassMark DirectX scores are notably low, ranging from 65 (DirectX 10) to 181 (DirectX 9), which may reflect driver issues or test limitations. The PassMark G3D score of 12534 and GPU compute score of 5368 are moderate. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 20582 places it at the 66th percentile, with rivals like the Arc B570 and RTX 3070 Mobile within 0.2%. For rendering, the GPU can handle DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6, making it compatible with modern APIs. The 28 RT cores provide ray tracing support, though the 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 suggests that ray-traced workloads will be performance-limited. The GPU’s production status is end-of-life, with its successor being Battlemage, so users should be aware that driver support may taper off over time.