SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7900X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

87 Score

Top 13% Ranking

87 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

79%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X

53,288 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

2,690 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER is a desktop combination that immediately raises a question: what happens when a CPU sitting in the 91st percentile of all processors is matched with a GPU whose sole recorded benchmark score places it in the 18th percentile of all GPUs? The data tells an unusual story — a heavily CPU-forward build where the graphics subsystem's standing, at least as recorded in this database, lags far behind. The combined percentile of 55 reflects that tension. Notably, no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK; all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than drawn from recorded game testing.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 5070 SUPER is a Blackwell 2.0 part built on TSMC's 5 nm process, using the GB205 chip with 31,100 million transistors packed into a 263 mm² die — a transistor density of 118.3M per mm². The raw specification sheet reads like a modern upper-mainstream card: 6,400 shading units, 200 texture mapping units, 80 render output units, 50 RT cores, and 200 tensor cores. Clocks run from a 2,325 MHz base to a 2,512 MHz boost, with memory clocked at 1,750 MHz but rated at 28 Gbps effective.

The memory subsystem is arguably the card's strongest documented asset. Eighteen gigabytes of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus delivers 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth — a figure that matters enormously for rendering workloads, where large textures and scene assets stream constantly. For viewport work and GPU-accelerated path tracing, bandwidth and VRAM capacity frequently matter more than raw shading throughput, and 18 GB is a comfortable buffer for scenes that would force smaller-footprint cards to spill into system memory.

Compute and throughput numbers flesh out the picture. FP32 performance is 32.15 TFLOPS, with FP16 running at a 1:1 ratio for the same 32.15 TFLOPS. The pixel rate is 201.0 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 502.4 GTexel/s. Fifty RT cores and 200 tensor cores mean the hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI-assisted upscaling and denoising is present in quantity — the tensor count in particular is what enables modern rendering suites to push denoised path-traced previews in real time.

Then there is the benchmark data, and it demands scrutiny. The card's single recorded score — 2,690 in 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12) — places it in the 18th percentile against all GPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 2,690. Its nearest rivals by that metric are an eclectic set: the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M (avgScore 2,664, deltaPct 1), the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (2,662, deltaPct 1.1), the Intel Arc Pro B50 (2,660, deltaPct 1.1), and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 (2,645, deltaPct 1.7). Those deltas are small — the 5070 SUPER sits only about 1 to 1.7 percent ahead of these cards on the recorded average.

That result is difficult to reconcile with the specification sheet, and it is worth being direct about the discrepancy. A card with 672 GB/s of GDDR7 bandwidth and 32.15 TFLOPS of FP32 should not, under a complete test suite, cluster alongside entries like the GT 1030 and GT 440. The most plausible reading is that the database holds only one benchmark result for this recently released card (production status: Active, released 2025-12-31), and a single Steel Nomad score may not represent its full standing. The 18th percentile should therefore be treated as provisional — the data shows what it shows, but the sample is thin, and the specification list suggests the true performance envelope is broader than one test captures. For rendering specifically, the VRAM, bandwidth, RT core count, and tensor core count all point to capable GPU-accelerated viewport and path-tracing performance, whatever the single recorded benchmark implies.

The card connects over PCIe 5.0 x16, draws 275 W, uses a single 16-pin power connector, and occupies a dual-slot footprint measuring 245 mm long, 115 mm tall, and 40 mm wide. Display output consists of one HDMI 2.1b and three DisplayPort 2.1b ports, with API support spanning DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU side of the ledger is far more densely documented. The Ryzen 9 7900X carries an average benchmark score of 53,288 and sits in the 91st percentile versus all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals cluster astonishingly tightly around it: the AMD EPYC 7313P averages 53,206 (the 7900X is 0.2 percent ahead), the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 averages 53,469 (0.3 percent ahead of the 7900X), the Intel Xeon 634 averages 52,974 (0.6 percent behind), and the Intel Core i7-14700F averages 53,620 (0.6 percent ahead). In practical terms, the 7900X performs as a statistical twin to all four — an elite server-class EPYC, a many-core Xeon Phi, a Xeon 634, and a high-end desktop i7 all land within a fraction of a percent of its aggregate score.

The individual CPU results confirm that standing. Cinebench R23 multi-core lands at 29,300 with a single-core score of 2,016.5; Cinebench R15 records 4,820.5 multi-core and 323 single-core. Geekbench posts 19,267 multi-core and 2,617 single-core. PassMark multithread reaches 51,406 with a single-thread score of 4,238, plus a physics score of 3,060. The 3DMark CPU scaling ladder runs 1,093 single-thread, 2,137 at two threads, 4,151 at four, 7,798 at eight, 10,972 at sixteen threads, and 12,536 at maximum threads.

The GPU contributes a single 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,690 at the 18th GPU percentile. The combined build percentile is 55 — almost exactly the midpoint — which is the arithmetic signature of a lopsided pairing: an elite CPU dragging the average up, a low-percentile GPU dragging it down. Whether that reflects the card's genuine performance or an incomplete benchmark record is the central open question in this dataset.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 9 7900X is a 12-core, 24-thread Zen 4 processor (codename Raphael) on the AM5 socket, manufactured by TSMC on a 5 nm node. It runs a 4.70 GHz base clock with boosts to 5.60 GHz, carries a 170 W TDP, and ships with an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. The cache hierarchy is generous: 64 KB of L1 and 1 MB of L2 per core, with a shared 64 MB L3 slice. Memory support is dual-channel DDR5 with 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth, ECC is supported, and the platform exposes 24 lanes of PCIe Gen 5 from the CPU. The chip also includes integrated Radeon Graphics. It launched at an MSRP of $549 with a release date of September 2022, and its part number is 100-000000589. Total transistor count is 13,140 million across two 71 mm² dies — a chiplet design.

What do the scores mean for real workloads? The scaling data is revealing. Doubling from single-thread (1,093) to two threads (2,137) is nearly perfect; going to four (4,151) stays near-linear; eight threads (7,798) retains roughly 89 percent efficiency; and the jump to the max-thread score of 12,536 across 24 threads shows the diminishing-but-still-strong returns typical of a healthy SMT implementation. For compiling code, the Geekbench multi-core score of 19,267 and PassMark multithread score of 51,406 indicate fast parallel builds. For content creation, the R23 multi-core result of 29,300 sits in genuinely high-end desktop territory — enough for 4K timeline editing, multi-camera projects, and long renders without invoking workstation silicon. The PassMark subscores reinforce versatility: 632,505 in data compression, 37,263 in encryption, 103,952 in floating point math, 169,273 in integer math, 47,619 in extended instructions, 74,658 in string sorting, and 388 in prime number finding.

Single-thread strength matters just as much. A PassMark single-thread score of 4,238 and Geekbench single-core of 2,617 mean older game engines, DCC applications, and scripting runtimes — many of which remain lightly threaded — execute quickly. That 91st-percentile standing, statistically indistinguishable from the i7-14700F, marks the 7900X as a top-decile all-rounder.

Balance and Bottleneck

The percentile spread tells the bottleneck story by itself: CPU at 91, GPU at 18, combined at 55. In any workload where the graphics card must carry the frame — modern AAA titles at high resolutions with ray tracing — the recorded data indicates the GPU is the limiting component. In any workload where the CPU carries the load — simulation, compilation, physics, streaming encode alongside gameplay — the 7900X has headroom to spare, sitting within a fraction of a percent of server-class EPYC and Xeon parts on aggregate score.

But the investigative caveat from the GPU section applies here too. If the single Steel Nomad result under-represents the card — and the hardware specifications strongly hint it might — then the true bottleneck picture could shift dramatically. A card with 672 GB/s of bandwidth, 18 GB of VRAM, and 200 tensor cores would, under a fuller test suite, plausibly climb well above the 18th percentile, converting this from a CPU-dominant pairing into something far more balanced. Because there are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, frame scaling cannot be verified directly; the honest conclusion is that the database currently predicts CPU headroom with high confidence and GPU limits with low confidence, pending more benchmark entries.

Who Should Build It

For content creators, this pairing is defensible on the CPU numbers alone: a 29,300 R23 multi-core score and 91st-percentile standing handle video editing, 3D rendering, and batch exports well, while 18 GB of GPU VRAM keeps large scenes resident. Software developers get 24 threads, 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes for fast NVMe storage, ECC support for build servers or long-running jobs, and a 19,267 Geekbench multi-core score for parallel compilation. Students and small-business workstation users benefit from the same thread count plus integrated Radeon Graphics as a fallback, ECC-capable memory, and a single-socket AM5 platform. Gamers are the awkward case: at the recorded 18th GPU percentile, the data points toward modest frame rates in demanding titles, best suited to lower resolutions or older engines where the 7900X's single-thread strength (PassMark single-thread 4,238) can dominate. If the GPU's benchmark record is simply incomplete, high-refresh and high-resolution gaming come back on the table — but strictly by the numbers in this database, gamers should wait for measured FPS data before committing.

Gaming Performance

To restate clearly: no measured FPS rows exist for this combination in the FACT PACK, and dataIsMeasured is false — every figure below is an estimate framed from benchmark scores, not recorded testing.

What can be estimated? The CPU ladder (1,093 single-thread up to 12,536 max-thread in 3DMark CPU tests, plus a 3,060 PassMark physics score) indicates that game-side computation — draw calls, physics, AI logic — will essentially never be the constraint. Frame delivery will be governed by the GPU's recorded 2,690 Steel Nomad result and its 18th-percentile standing. Taken at face value, that suggests esports titles and older engines will run at high frame rates on the strength of the 7900X's single-core performance, while graphically demanding modern titles at high resolutions and settings with ray tracing would be expected to land at modest frame rates. The 200 tensor cores at least enable AI upscaling to stretch those frames further. Until the database accumulates measured rows and additional GPU benchmarks for the 5070 SUPER, any resolution-by-resolution FPS projection would exceed what the data supports; treat all gaming expectations here as provisional estimates derived from the scores above.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 9 7900X compare to its nearest rivals in the database? A: Its average score of 53,288 sits within a fraction of a percent of the AMD EPYC 7313P (0.2 percent behind it), Intel Xeon Phi 7290 (0.3 percent ahead), Intel Xeon 634 (0.6 percent behind), and Intel Core i7-14700F (0.6 percent ahead) — effectively a four-way statistical tie at the 91st percentile.

Q: What GPU benchmark scores are recorded for the RTX 5070 SUPER? A: A single result: 2,690 in 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12), which places it in the 18th percentile versus all GPUs, roughly 1 to 1.7 percent ahead of the Quadro K1100M, GT 1030, Arc Pro B50, and GT 440 on average score.

Q: Are there measured game FPS numbers for this pairing? A: No. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this combination, so all gaming discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does each component have? A: The GPU provides 672.0 GB/s across an 18 GB GDDR7 bus, while the CPU's dual-channel DDR5 delivers 83.2 GB/s.

Q: Does the build support ECC memory? A: Yes — the 7900X lists ECC memory support on its AM5, dual-channel DDR5 platform.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable? A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, with a stock base clock of 4.70 GHz and boost up to 5.60 GHz.

Q: What power connectors and slot footprint does the GPU need? A: One 16-pin power connector, a 275 W TDP, and a dual-slot footprint of 245 mm length by 115 mm height by 40 mm width.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build (buildClass: desktop) pairing a 12-core, 24-thread Zen 4 flagship-tier Ryzen 9 with a Blackwell 2.0 GeForce 50-series card on the AM5 platform. Its overall tier is best summarized by the combined percentile of 55 — a mid-pack aggregate produced by a top-decile CPU (91st percentile) and a bottom-quintile recorded GPU standing (18th percentile). By specification, it reads as a high-end content-creation and development machine; by recorded benchmark aggregate, it reads as a mid-tier gaming rig with unusually strong CPU headroom. Both readings are supported by the data, and the gap between them is the defining feature of this pairing's database entry.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: Estimated, not measured. The CPU's 1,093 3DMark single-thread and 4,238 PassMark single-thread scores can drive very high frame rates in lightly threaded engines, but the GPU's recorded 18th percentile suggests graphically heavy titles will be limited — high-refresh play is plausible in esports and older games, unverified elsewhere.

Streaming: Strongly supported on the CPU side. A 12,536 max-thread 3DMark score and 51,406 PassMark multithread leave ample threads for encoding alongside gameplay, and 18 GB of GPU VRAM provides buffer headroom for capture at high resolutions.

Video editing: The 29,300 Cinebench R23 multi-core and 19,267 Geekbench multi-core scores handle timeline scrubbing, proxies, and exports efficiently, while 18 GB of GDDR7 with 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth keeps 4K footage playback smooth.

3D rendering: Well covered. The 50 RT cores accelerate ray tracing, 200 tensor cores enable AI denoising, and 18 GB of VRAM holds substantial scenes; the CPU's 29,300 R23 multi-core result delivers fast CPU-based final renders in engines like Cinebench's own workload family.

Software development: Near-ideal. Twenty-four threads at a 19,267 Geekbench multi-core score mean fast parallel builds, 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes support fast NVMe storage, ECC is available for stability-critical work, and the 2,617 single-core score keeps single-threaded tooling responsive.

Student and office work: Overkill in the best sense. Documents, browsers, and research workloads barely engage a 91st-percentile CPU, and the integrated Radeon Graphics means the system remains usable even if the discrete card is removed — a genuine resilience advantage for a study or small-office machine.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform foundation is AMD Socket AM5 with dual-channel DDR5, 24 lanes of PCIe Gen 5 from the CPU, and ECC support — a modern, forward-looking base. The GPU slots into a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, so no bandwidth compromise exists at the bus level. Power planning must account for a 170 W CPU TDP and a 275 W GPU TDP; the card requires a single 16-pin connector, and the FACT PACK lists no suggestedPsu value, so no specific wattage recommendation can be drawn from this data — qualitatively, a quality PSU with a 16-pin capability and generous headroom above the combined thermal load is the sensible choice.

The upgrade path is where this build gets interesting. Because the CPU already sits in the 91st percentile, statistically tied with an EPYC 7313P, a Xeon Phi 7290, a Xeon 634, and an i7-14700F, replacing the processor would yield marginal gains at best. The highest-leverage upgrade is clearly on the graphics side: moving to a GPU that scores meaningfully above the recorded 2,690 Steel Nomad result would rebalance the pairing and lift the combined 55th percentile. The AM5 socket itself preserves CPU upgrade options for future Ryzen generations, and the 5 nm Raphael chip's unlocked multiplier offers a zero-cost tuning path within cooling limits. The data's verdict is unambiguous: this platform is built to outlast its graphics card, and that is precisely the order in which it should be upgraded.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7900X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds