SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7900X + Intel Arc A380E

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

95%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X

53,288 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A380E

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X and Intel Arc A380E represent a pairing of a high-end desktop processor with an entry-level discrete graphics card. This combination is unusual, as the CPU’s compute capabilities far outstrip the GPU’s rendering output. The data provided contains no measured frame rate (FPS) rows for this exact combination, so all gaming performance discussion must be treated as estimates derived from the individual component benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X is a 12-core, 24-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael. It operates on a 5 nm process node fabricated by TSMC, with a transistor count of 13,140 million spread across a dual-die design of 2x 71 mm². The base clock is 4.70 GHz, boosting up to 5.60 GHz, and the chip carries a 170 W TDP. This is a desktop-class processor, and the unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the 91st percentile among all CPUs, indicating it is a top-tier performer for multi-threaded and single-threaded workloads alike. The data shows a single-thread score of 1093 in 3dmark_single_thread and 2016.5 in Cinebench R23 single-core, with a multi-core score of 29300 in Cinebench R23. The Geekbench scores of 2617 (single-core) and 19267 (multi-core) reinforce this position. In the 3dmark thread scaling tests, the processor scales effectively from 2137 at 2 threads to 12536 at max threads, demonstrating robust multi-threading capabilities.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the Ryzen 9 7900X holds a slight edge over the AMD EPYC 7313P with a deltaPct of 0.2 and the Intel Xeon 634 with a deltaPct of 0.6. It trails the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 by 0.3 and the Intel Core i7-14700F by 0.6. The PassMark multithread score of 51406 and the Cinebench R15 multicore score of 4820.5 further cement its position as a high-throughput processor. For real workloads, this means the CPU excels in rendering, compilation, and any task that can utilize more than 8 threads, while the strong single-thread scores (4238 in PassMark single-thread) ensure responsive performance in everyday applications and lightly-threaded games.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 9 7900X uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which is a modern desktop socket. It supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and it also supports ECC memory. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 connectivity with 24 lanes from the CPU itself. The integrated Radeon Graphics on the chip provide a fallback display output, which is useful for troubleshooting or basic tasks without a discrete GPU.

The platform’s power requirements are notable. The CPU’s TDP is 170 W, and while the GPU’s suggested PSU is 250 W, the overall system power draw will be dictated by the CPU under heavy multi-threaded loads. The data suggests that a capable power supply is necessary to handle the CPU’s peak demands, though no specific combined wattage is provided. The motherboard should be selected based on the AM5 socket, ensuring it has adequate VRM cooling for the 7900X’s power draw.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data indicates that the CPU is not the bottleneck in this pairing. The 7900X is a high-end part that will remain relevant for several years. The logical upgrade path would be to replace the Intel Arc A380E with a more powerful discrete GPU to match the CPU’s performance class, but the CPU itself is near the top of its generation. The platform supports PCIe Gen 5, which means future graphics cards will be able to run at full bandwidth, though the current GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 53288, placing it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. This is a strong result, with the nearest rival being the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 at an average score of 53469 (a -0.3 deltaPct). The data shows the CPU is slightly behind the Intel Core i7-14700F (53620, -0.6 deltaPct) but ahead of the AMD EPYC 7313P (53206, 0.2 deltaPct) and the Intel Xeon 634 (52974, 0.6 deltaPct). These deltas are all within a narrow band of less than one percent, indicating that the 7900X is performing as expected for its class.

The GPU, the Intel Arc A380E, has no benchmark scores listed in the data and an average benchmark score of 0. Its percentile rank is 50, which places it at the median of all GPUs. This suggests that while the CPU is a top-tier part, the GPU is an entry-level or mid-range component. The combined percentile for this pairing is 71, reflecting the fact that the CPU is significantly stronger than the GPU.

The combined picture is one of imbalance. The CPU’s 91st percentile performance is dragged down by the GPU’s 50th percentile ranking, resulting in a combined percentile of 71. For CPU-bound workloads like compilation or data compression, this system will perform exceptionally well, as shown by the PassMark data compression score of 632505. For graphics-bound tasks, the system will be limited by the GPU, as the CPU will often have headroom to spare.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who prioritize CPU compute over graphics rendering. The Ryzen 9 7900X’s 12 cores and 24 threads make it suitable for content creators who work with video encoding, 3D rendering, and large software builds. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 29300 and the PassMark multithread score of 51406 indicate that this CPU can handle demanding multi-threaded workflows with ease.

Developers will find value in the CPU’s compilation speeds, as the integer math score of 169273 and the extended instructions score of 47619 in PassMark suggest strong performance in code compilation and scientific computing. Students and small business workstations that run virtual machines or heavy spreadsheet analysis will also benefit from the CPU’s threading capabilities, though the GPU is sufficient for basic 2D desktop work and office productivity.

Gamers at 1080p with low graphical settings might find the A380E adequate for esports titles, but the data does not support high-refresh or high-detail gaming on this GPU. The CPU’s single-thread scores (1093 in 3dmark_single_thread, 2016.5 in Cinebench R23 single-core) are high enough to avoid bottlenecking modern games, but the GPU will be the limiting factor. This build is best suited for users who need a powerful workstation CPU and only require a basic display output for occasional light gaming.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X has 12 cores and 24 threads, based on the Zen 4 architecture.

Q: What is the CPU’s memory support?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s and also supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory size and type?

A: The Intel Arc A380E has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus, with a memory bandwidth of 186.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the PCIe interface for the GPU?

A: The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, while the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes.

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile among all CPUs?

A: The Ryzen 9 7900X is in the 91st percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 53288.

Q: What is the GPU’s TDP and suggested PSU?

A: The Intel Arc A380E has a TDP of 75 W and a suggested PSU of 250 W.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 9 7900X includes integrated Radeon Graphics.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This is not the intended use case. The GPU’s 50th percentile ranking and lack of benchmark scores suggest it will struggle to maintain high frame rates at high refresh rates. The CPU’s single-thread performance is sufficient, but the GPU will bottleneck. FPS figures for this scenario are estimates, and they are likely to be low even at 1080p with reduced settings.

Streaming: The CPU’s 12 cores and 24 threads are more than adequate for encoding a stream while gaming. The PassMark multithread score of 51406 indicates that the CPU can handle the encoding workload without dropping frames, but the GPU will limit the game’s visual quality and frame rate during the stream.

Video editing: This is a strong scenario for the CPU. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 29300 and the Geekbench multi-core score of 19267 indicate that timeline scrubbing, rendering, and export will be fast. The GPU can assist with some effects, but its 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 performance is modest, so GPU-accelerated effects will be slower than on higher-end cards.

3D rendering: The CPU is the star here. The 12 cores and high multi-threaded scores will render CPU-based scenes quickly. The GPU can handle basic viewport acceleration, but its 8 RT cores and 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 performance are not designed for heavy 3D rendering workloads.

Software development: The CPU’s PassMark integer math score of 169273 and data compression score of 632505 suggest fast compilation and linking times. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, making this a viable and cost-effective choice for developers who do not game.

Student and office work: The CPU is overkill for this scenario, but it will never feel slow. The high single-thread score of 4238 in PassMark ensures snappy responsiveness in office suites and web browsing. The GPU is sufficient for 2D desktop rendering and video playback.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A380E is a discrete graphics card based on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-128 chip, codenamed Alchemist (Arc 3). It is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC, with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The GPU operates at a fixed clock speed of 2000 MHz for both base and boost. It has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 186.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 1937 MHz, which translates to 15.5 Gbps effective.

The GPU has 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output pipelines. It also includes 8 ray tracing cores, though it lacks dedicated tensor cores. The pixel rate is 64.00 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 128.0 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 4.096 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 8.192 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). This places the GPU in the 50th percentile of all GPUs, which is a median position. This indicates that the A380E is an entry-level part, not designed for high-end gaming or professional rendering.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it feature-complete for modern APIs. It has a TDP of 75 W and requires no external power connectors, drawing all power from the PCIe slot. The suggested PSU is 250 W, which is modest. The card is single-slot, measuring 254 mm in length, 127 mm in height, and 20 mm in width, with four DisplayPort 2.0 outputs. It is end-of-life, with a successor in Battlemage. For rendering, the benchmark scores are absent, so performance must be inferred from the specifications: the 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 and 8 RT cores suggest it can handle light ray-traced effects and 1080p gaming at low-to-medium settings, but it is not a content creation powerhouse.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X CPU with the Intel Arc A380E GPU. The CPU is a high-end part, ranking in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is a median part, ranking in the 50th percentile. The combined percentile for this pairing is 71, which reflects the CPU’s dominance in the overall system score. This is a workstation-oriented build where the CPU is the primary investment and the GPU is a secondary component for basic display output.

The build class is desktop, meaning it is intended for a stationary tower system. The overall tier is mid-to-high, driven almost entirely by the CPU’s strong multi-threaded and single-threaded performance. The GPU is an afterthought, suitable for basic tasks but not for demanding graphics workloads. This is not a balanced gaming machine; it is a compute-focused system with minimal graphics capability.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows a severe imbalance between the CPU and GPU. The CPU’s 91st percentile rank and the GPU’s 50th percentile rank mean the CPU will almost always be waiting on the GPU in graphics-intensive tasks. For gaming, the GPU is the bottleneck, as the CPU’s single-thread scores (1093 in 3dmark_single_thread, 4238 in PassMark single-thread) are more than sufficient to feed most games, but the GPU’s 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 performance will limit frame rates.

In CPU-bound workloads, such as video encoding, compilation, or data processing, the CPU is the limiting factor only in the sense that it is the component doing the work. However, the GPU will not constrain the CPU in these tasks, as they do not rely heavily on the GPU. The PassMark data compression score of 632505 and the integer math score of 169273 show that the CPU operates at full capacity when the GPU is idle. The bottleneck in this system is the GPU in any scenario that requires 3D rendering or gaming, while the CPU is the star in all other scenarios. The FPS scaling would be poor, as the GPU cannot keep up with the CPU’s frame generation capability.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU and GPU combination in the FACT PACK, so all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU’s high single-thread performance (2016.5 in Cinebench R23 single-core) suggests it can handle game logic and physics without bottlenecking. However, the GPU’s 50th percentile rank and lack of benchmark scores indicate it will be the limiting factor.

For 1080p gaming at ultra settings, the estimated frame rates would be low, likely below 60 FPS in most modern titles. The GPU’s 6 GB of VRAM is adequate for 1080p, but the 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 performance is not sufficient for high-detail rendering. At 1440p, the frame rates would drop further, and at 4K, the GPU would be severely overtaxed. Esports titles with lower graphical demands might achieve playable frame rates, but the data does not support high-refresh gaming. These estimates are based purely on the GPU’s hardware specifications and percentile ranking, and the CPU’s strong scores do not compensate for the GPU’s limitations.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7900X + Intel Arc A380E

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X

Intel Arc A380E

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds