SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7900 + Intel Arc A380E

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

84 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
74%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7900

49,228 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A380E

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 and Intel Arc A380E form a desktop pairing that sits at the 70th percentile overall, with the CPU at the 90th percentile among all processors and the GPU at the 50th percentile among all graphics cards. This is a configuration where the processor is the clear performance anchor, while the graphics card provides entry-level rendering capabilities. The following analysis draws exclusively from the provided benchmark data to interpret what this combination means for real-world workloads, gaming, and productivity tasks.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 is a 12-core, 24-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael, built on TSMC’s 5 nm process node. It belongs to the 7000 series and targets the desktop market segment. The base clock is 3.70 GHz, boosting to 5.40 GHz, within a 65 W TDP. The silicon contains 13,140 million transistors across a die size of 2x 71 mm², with the CPU socket being AMD Socket AM5. Cache hierarchy includes 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 64 MB shared L3 cache. The memory controller supports DDR5 in dual-channel mode, offering 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth, and ECC memory is supported. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU. The integrated Radeon Graphics provides a fallback display output, though the discrete GPU handles rendering in this build.

Benchmark scores reveal a processor with strong single-threaded and exceptional multi-threaded performance. In 3DMark tests, the single-thread score is 1069, while the 2-thread score reaches 2067, the 4-thread score 3994, the 8-thread score 7454, the 16-thread score 10056, and the max-thread score 10953. This scaling from 2 to 24 threads shows near-linear gains in the early thread counts, with diminishing returns after 16 threads, indicating efficient utilization of the 12 physical cores. Cinebench R23 scores are 1966 for single-core and 24776 for multi-core, while Cinebench R15 yields 315 single-core and 4020 multi-core. Geekbench reports 2495 single-core and 17726 multi-core. Passmark results include a single-thread score of 4130, a multithread score of 48347, integer math at 164075, floating-point math at 97943, data encryption at 34708, data compression at 577847, extended instructions at 42253, physics at 3059, and random string sorting at 68474. The average benchmark score is 49228, placing it at the 90th percentile versus all CPUs.

Compared to nearest rivals, the Ryzen 9 7900 is effectively tied with the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G, which scores 49196 (a 0.1% delta). It sits slightly behind the Intel Core i5-14600KF, which scores 49394 (a -0.3% delta), and slightly ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245, which scores 48995 (a 0.5% delta). The Intel Xeon Gold 5318H scores 48698, putting the Ryzen 9 7900 1.1% ahead. These small deltas suggest that in mixed workloads, the Ryzen 9 7900 is competitive with mid-range to high-end desktop and server processors, with no single rival dominating by more than a fraction of a percent. The multi-threaded Cinebench R23 score of 24776 indicates strong rendering throughput for video encoding, 3D scene compilation, and software builds that can leverage 24 threads.

FAQ

Q: What is the core and thread count of the AMD Ryzen 9 7900?

A: The processor has 12 cores and 24 threads, based on the Zen 4 architecture with a 5 nm process node.

Q: How does the CPU perform in single-threaded tasks?

A: The 3DMark single-thread score is 1069, Cinebench R23 single-core is 1966, and Geekbench single-core is 2495, indicating strong per-core performance for everyday responsiveness.

Q: What memory type does the platform support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A380E has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus, providing 186.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, allowing manual overclocking on compatible AM5 motherboards.

Q: What is the production status of the GPU?

A: The Intel Arc A380E is end-of-life, with the successor being Battlemage.

Q: What PCIe generation does the CPU support?

A: The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark position for this CPU+GPU pairing is the 70th percentile among all desktop configurations. The CPU alone ranks at the 90th percentile versus all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 49228. This places it just above the Intel Core i5-14600KF (49394, -0.3% delta) and just below the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G (49196, +0.1% delta), meaning the processor is in a narrow band of high-end CPUs where differences are negligible. The GPU ranks at the 50th percentile versus all GPUs, with no benchmark scores listed in the data and no nearest rivals provided, so its position is entirely based on its percentile ranking rather than head-to-head comparisons.

The GPU’s compute capabilities are modest: FP32 performance is 4.096 TFLOPS, FP16 is 8.192 TFLOPS (at a 2:1 ratio), with 1024 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. The pixel rate is 64.00 GPixel/s and texture rate is 128.0 GTexel/s. The combination of a 90th-percentile CPU and a 50th-percentile GPU means that in CPU-bound tasks like code compilation, data processing, and multi-threaded rendering, the system will outperform most others, but in GPU-bound tasks like high-resolution gaming or complex 3D rendering, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The CPU’s passmark multithread score of 48347 and Cinebench R23 multi-core of 24776 demonstrate that heavy parallel workloads will run efficiently, while the GPU’s 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggests it can handle light to medium graphics loads but will struggle with demanding titles at high settings.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly indicates a CPU-heavy imbalance. The CPU sits at the 90th percentile, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile, a full 40 percentile points lower. In gaming scenarios, the GPU will almost always be the bottleneck, as the CPU’s fast single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread 1069, Cinebench R23 single-core 1966) can feed frames quickly, but the GPU’s 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 186.0 GB/s memory bandwidth will limit frame rates. The CPU’s multi-threaded capabilities (Cinebench R23 multi-core 24776) are far ahead of what most games require, so even at lower resolutions where CPU load increases, the GPU will still cap performance. Conversely, in productivity workloads that are CPU-bound—such as video encoding, 3D scene rendering in Cinebench, or data compression (passmark data compression 577847)—the GPU is not a factor, and the system will operate near its CPU’s full potential.

The memory bandwidth disparity reinforces this: the CPU’s 83.2 GB/s DDR5 bandwidth is modest for a 12-core part, but the GPU’s 186.0 GB/s is also relatively low for a modern graphics card, meaning neither component will saturate the other in mixed workloads. For gaming, the bottleneck is the GPU, as evidenced by its 50th-percentile ranking versus the CPU’s 90th. The FPS scaling, if estimated from these scores, would show that lowering resolution or graphics settings will yield minimal gains because the GPU is already at its limit, while the CPU has headroom to spare. For professional workloads, the bottleneck shifts to the CPU in multi-threaded tasks, but the GPU’s lack of benchmark scores means its impact on such tasks is unclear from the data.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around AMD Socket AM5, which supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes, allowing for high-bandwidth NVMe storage or future PCIe Gen 5 GPUs, though the current GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. The CPU’s 65 W TDP is low for a 12-core part, and the GPU’s TDP is 75 W, with a suggested PSU of 250 W, indicating that the system has substantial power headroom for upgrades. The GPU is single-slot, 254 mm long, 127 mm high, and 20 mm wide, with no power connectors required, drawing all power from the PCIe slot.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the Intel Arc A380E with a higher-performing GPU, as the CPU’s 90th-percentile ranking can support much faster graphics cards without bottlenecking. The 70th combined percentile means the system is currently held back by the GPU; upgrading to a GPU in the 80th or 90th percentile would raise the overall tier significantly. The motherboard’s AM5 socket is forward-compatible with newer Ryzen processors, and the PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide future-proofing for storage and expansion. The 250 W PSU suggestion leaves ample room for a GPU with higher power draw, though the current GPU draws no external power. Memory can be expanded or upgraded to higher-capacity DDR5 kits, as the dual-channel controller supports standard modules. The CPU’s unlocked multiplier also allows overclocking to extract more performance, though the 65 W TDP may limit headroom without a better cooler.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize CPU performance over graphics. Gamers at 1080p with modest settings will find the GPU adequate for older or less demanding titles, but the CPU ensures that even if they upgrade the GPU later, the processor will not hold them back. Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or large data sets will benefit from the 12-core, 24-thread CPU, as Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24776 and passmark multithread score of 48347 indicate strong parallel throughput. Software developers compiling large codebases will see significant speedups from the CPU’s multi-threaded capabilities, while students and small business workstations handling office tasks will appreciate the fast single-thread performance (Geekbench single-core 2495) for responsive applications.

The GPU, while entry-level, supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it suitable for basic CAD, light photo editing, or hardware-accelerated web browsing. The system is not well-suited for high-end gaming at 1440p or 4K, as the GPU’s 6 GB VRAM and 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 will struggle with modern titles at those resolutions. For users whose primary workload is GPU-accelerated rendering, 3D modeling, or machine learning, this build would be mismatched, as the CPU’s power would be wasted. The ideal user is someone who needs a fast CPU for productivity and occasional light gaming, with a clear upgrade path for the GPU when budget allows.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK. Therefore, all frame rate discussions here are estimates based on the benchmark scores, and the figures should be treated as approximations rather than verified results. The GPU’s 50th-percentile ranking and 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggest it is capable of 1080p gaming at low to medium settings in many titles, but demanding games will require reduced settings to maintain playable frame rates. The CPU’s single-thread performance is strong enough to avoid bottlenecking at any resolution, so frame rates will be dictated by the GPU.

For competitive titles like esports shooters, the GPU might deliver playable frame rates at 1080p with high settings, given its 128.0 GTexel/s texture rate and 64.00 GPixel/s pixel rate. For AAA single-player games at 1080p ultra settings, the GPU will likely fall short, with frame rates dipping below 30 FPS in the most demanding scenes. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU’s 6 GB VRAM and 186.0 GB/s bandwidth will be severe limitations, and users should expect to lower settings significantly or reduce resolution. The CPU’s 90th-percentile performance means that even at low resolutions where CPU load is highest, the processor will not be the limiting factor, so any FPS issues are entirely attributable to the GPU. The lack of measured data means these are qualitative estimates; users should refer to GPU-specific reviews for more precise numbers.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 CPU with the Intel Arc A380E GPU. The CPU is a high-end 12-core, 24-thread processor from the 7000 series, based on Zen 4 (Raphael), and ranks at the 90th percentile among all CPUs. The GPU is an entry-level to mid-range card from Intel’s Arc 3 line, based on the Xe-HPG architecture (DG2-128 chip), and ranks at the 50th percentile among all GPUs. The combined percentile is 70, placing this system in the upper-midrange tier of desktop configurations. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 49228, with nearest rivals within 1.1% of its performance, indicating a well-established processor. The GPU has no benchmark scores in the data, so its position is based solely on its percentile ranking. The build is heavily weighted toward CPU performance, making it a productivity-first system with gaming as a secondary consideration.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU’s 50th-percentile ranking and 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 performance will limit frame rates to lower levels, making high-refresh (144 Hz or higher) gaming unlikely except in very light titles. The CPU’s fast single-thread score of 1069 in 3DMark would support high frame rates, but the GPU cannot deliver them.

Streaming: The CPU’s multi-threaded performance (Cinebench R23 multi-core 24776) can handle encoding and gameplay simultaneously, but the GPU’s limited rendering power may struggle with modern games while streaming. The CPU’s 24 threads provide ample headroom for software encoding.

Video editing: The CPU’s passmark multithread score of 48347 and data compression score of 577847 indicate strong performance for video encoding and timeline scrubbing. The GPU’s 6 GB VRAM and 8.192 TFLOPS FP16 may accelerate some effects, but the CPU will do most of the heavy lifting.

3D rendering: Cinebench R23 multi-core of 24776 and 3DMark max-thread score of 10953 show the CPU excels at ray tracing and rendering tasks that use CPU-based engines. The GPU’s 8 RT cores and 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 can assist in GPU-accelerated rendering, but its low VRAM limits scene complexity.

Software development: The CPU’s 12 cores and 24 threads, with a passmark integer math score of 164075, compile code quickly. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, making this a strong choice for developers.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread score of 4130 in Passmark and Geekbench single-core of 2495 deliver responsive application performance for word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The GPU’s support for modern APIs ensures smooth desktop compositing and hardware-accelerated video playback.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A380E is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, using the DG2-128 chip, manufactured on TSMC’s 6 nm process. It contains 7,200 million transistors across a 157 mm² die, with a transistor density of 45.9M per mm². The GPU has 1024 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, along with 8 RT cores for ray tracing. There are no tensor cores listed. The base and boost clocks are both 2000 MHz, with memory clocked at 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective). The memory configuration is 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 96-bit bus, providing 186.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The pixel rate is 64.00 GPixel/s and texture rate is 128.0 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 4.096 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 8.192 TFLOPS (at a 2:1 ratio). The TDP is 75 W, with a suggested PSU of 250 W, and the card is single-slot with no power connectors, drawing power from the PCIe slot. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, and display outputs include 4x DisplayPort 2.0. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

At the 50th percentile among all GPUs, the A380E sits at the midpoint of graphics performance. Its 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 is modest, placing it below most discrete gaming GPUs from the last few years, but its support for modern APIs and ray tracing (8 RT cores) makes it capable of rendering effects that older cards cannot. The 6 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p gaming with medium textures, but will limit higher resolutions or texture-heavy workloads. The 186.0 GB/s bandwidth is low, which will impact performance in bandwidth-sensitive scenarios like high-resolution textures or compute tasks. The GPU’s end-of-life status means no further driver optimizations are expected, though the listed APIs are current. For rendering, the FP32 and FP16 performance suggest it can handle basic 3D modeling and GPU-accelerated effects, but complex scenes will exceed its capabilities. The lack of benchmark scores in the data means its real-world performance is inferred from its percentile ranking and specifications, making it a suitable entry-level card for light gaming and general-purpose GPU tasks, but not for demanding workloads.