SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 9700X + Intel Arc B570

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 9700X

37,943 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B570

20,556 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X and Intel Arc B570 combination delivers a balanced mid-range desktop experience, with the CPU ranking in the 86th percentile and the GPU in the 65th percentile among their respective categories. This pairing results in a combined percentile of 76, placing it in the upper tier of all tested system configurations, with an average frame rate of 87 FPS across a wide range of games at ultra settings.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data provides a detailed look at how this system handles modern titles across three resolutions. At 1920x1080, the system excels in competitive shooters, delivering 304 FPS in Valorant and 293 FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. Counter-Strike 2 runs at 133 FPS, while Call of Duty: Warzone achieves a robust 181 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege hits 158 FPS. These figures demonstrate that the combination is well-suited for high-refresh-rate esports gaming at 1080p.

Moving to more demanding AAA titles at 1080p, the system maintains playable performance. Assetto Corsa runs at 78 FPS, Doom at 99 FPS, and Minecraft at 131 FPS. However, heavier titles show the GPU's limitations; Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 39 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 36 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended drops to just 19 FPS. The Medium is particularly demanding, achieving only 28 FPS at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the frame rates scale down predictably. Competitive titles remain playable, with Valorant at 259 FPS and CS:GO at 201 FPS, but Call of Duty: Warzone drops to 161 FPS. Single-player experiences like Assetto Corsa (55 FPS) and Control (42 FPS) remain smooth, but Cyberpunk 2077 falls to 29 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 to 27 FPS, pushing the limits of comfortable gameplay.

At 3840x2160, the system struggles with modern AAA games. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 19 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 18 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at only 6 FPS. Even esports titles see significant drops, with Valorant at 207 FPS and CS:GO at 119 FPS. The data suggests 4K gaming is only viable for older or less demanding titles like Roblox (65 FPS) and Dave The Diver (55 FPS).

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The system delivers exceptional performance for competitive shooters at 1080p, with Valorant hitting 304 FPS and CS:GO at 293 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone at 181 FPS and Rainbow Six Siege at 158 FPS also support 144Hz and above monitors, making this a strong choice for esports enthusiasts.

Streaming: The 8-core, 16-thread Ryzen 7 9700X provides ample processing headroom for encoding while gaming. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20485 and Passmark multithread score of 37161 indicate strong parallel processing capabilities, though the GPU's 10 GB VRAM may limit simultaneous game capture at high resolutions.

Video editing: The CPU's Geekbench multicore score of 17906 and Cinebench R15 multicore result of 3178 suggest capable handling of export jobs and timeline scrubbing. The GPU's 11.52 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 360.0 GTexel/s texture rate assist with effects and color grading, though the 10 GB memory pool could constrain very large projects.

3D rendering: The combination of the CPU's Passmark floating point math score of 78999 and the GPU's compute capabilities (Passmark GPU compute score of 7281) provides a competent entry-level rendering workstation. The 8-core CPU with 32 MB L3 cache handles geometry processing, while the GPU's 18 ray tracing cores support hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported applications.

Software development: The CPU's Passmark integer math score of 120142 and data encryption score of 21815 indicate strong performance for compilation tasks and cryptographic operations. The 16 threads allow for parallel builds, and the system's 86th percentile CPU ranking ensures responsive development environments.

Student and office work: The system's single-thread performance, evidenced by a Geekbench single-core score of 3023 and Passmark single-thread score of 4654, ensures snappy application launches and smooth multitasking. The integrated Radeon Graphics provide a fallback display output, while the 65W TDP CPU keeps power consumption modest for long study sessions.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X is built on the Zen 5 architecture using TSMC's 4nm process node, with a die size of 70.6 mm² containing 8,315 million transistors. This 8-core, 16-thread processor operates with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, drawing just 65W TDP. The architecture features 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 32 MB L3 cache, totaling a substantial cache hierarchy for its class.

Benchmark results show the CPU's strengths. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20485 and single-core score of 2211 demonstrate balanced performance across workloads. The 3DMark multi-threaded tests reveal scaling from 2 threads (2525) to 16 threads (9824), indicating efficient utilization of additional cores with diminishing returns at the top end. The Passmark results further confirm this, with a multithread score of 37161 and a single-thread score of 4654.

The CPU's 86th percentile ranking places it above the majority of processors. Compared to its nearest rivals, it trades blows with the Intel Core i9-14901E, holding a 0.1% advantage in average score. It also leads the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 by 0.1%, the Intel Core 5 211E by 0.3%, and the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 by 0.4%. This puts it in a competitive position against both desktop and mobile flagship chips.

Real-world workloads benefit from the high boost clock of 5.50 GHz, which aids in single-threaded tasks like gaming and application launch times. The 65W TDP is notable for a processor with this performance level, offering efficiency that contributes to lower system power draw and cooling requirements. The dual-channel DDR5 memory support with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth provides ample data throughput for the 8-core design.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a system where the GPU is the primary bottleneck in most gaming scenarios. The CPU's 86th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 65th percentile indicates the processor has significant headroom over the graphics card. This is evident in the frame rate scaling across resolutions; the average FPS drops from 87 at 1080p to lower figures at 1440p and 4K, but the pattern varies by game.

In esports titles, the CPU's strength is apparent. Valorant at 304 FPS and CS:GO at 293 FPS at 1080p suggest the GPU is the limiting factor, as these frame rates are well below the CPU's potential. The CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 1280 and 2-thread score of 2525 indicate it can feed the GPU with sufficient data for high-frame-rate scenarios.

In contrast, GPU-heavy titles show the Arc B570 struggling to keep up. Cyberpunk 2077 at 39 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 36 FPS at 1080p are below the 60 FPS threshold, and these drop further at higher resolutions. The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 14195, while respectable, falls short of what the CPU can support, creating a bottleneck in graphically intensive scenes.

The resolution scaling provides clear evidence. At 4K, the GPU's 10 GB VRAM and 160-bit memory bus become limiting factors, with many titles seeing frame rates halved or worse compared to 1080p. The pair ranks 3017 out of 3732 configurations by average FPS, which places it in the bottom 19% of systems, suggesting that while the CPU is capable, the GPU holds back overall gaming performance.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B570 utilizes the Xe2-HPG architecture on a 5nm TSMC process, with a die size of 272 mm² housing 19,600 million transistors. The GPU operates at a fixed clock speed of 2500 MHz for both base and boost, with memory running at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective). It features 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 80 raster operation units, along with 18 dedicated ray tracing cores.

Memory configuration includes 10 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus, providing 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU achieves a pixel rate of 200.0 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 360.0 GTexel/s, with compute performance rated at 11.52 TFLOPS FP32 and 23.04 TFLOPS FP16. The 150W TDP requires a single 8-pin power connector and a suggested 450W power supply.

Benchmark results place the GPU in the 65th percentile of all graphics cards. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2649 indicates solid performance in modern APIs. The Geekbench scores show Vulkan performance (96844) outpacing OpenCL (83514), suggesting good driver optimization for Vulkan titles. Passmark results show a G3D score of 14195 and GPU compute score of 7281, with DirectX 11 performance (118) notably stronger than DirectX 12 (72) in this specific benchmark.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the Arc B570 sits in a tight competitive group. It matches the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile within 0.1% and trails the Intel Arc A750 by just 0.1%. It leads the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M by 0.4% and the AMD Radeon R9 M390X by 0.5%. This places it in a performance tier comparable to mid-range mobile and older desktop GPUs.

The 18 ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects in supported games, though the measured frame rates in titles like Cyberpunk 2077 suggest ray tracing at high settings may be challenging. The GPU's 10 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but the measured 4K performance indicates it is not suited for ultra-resolution textures.

Who Should Build It

This system is well-suited for gamers who prioritize esports and competitive titles at 1080p or 1440p. The measured performance in Valorant, CS:GO, and Call of Duty: Warzone at high frame rates makes it an excellent choice for players seeking a competitive edge without investing in flagship hardware. At 1440p, the system maintains playable frame rates in most games, making it a versatile option for mixed gaming.

Content creators working with video and 3D rendering will find the CPU's strong multicore performance valuable. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20485 and Passmark multithread score of 37161 support efficient rendering workflows, while the GPU's compute capabilities assist with effects and GPU-accelerated tasks. The 10 GB VRAM may require careful project management for large scenes.

Software developers benefit from the CPU's strong integer and encryption performance, with Passmark scores of 120142 and 21815 respectively. The 16 threads enable parallel compilation, and the system's overall responsiveness supports a productive development environment. Students and office workers will find the system more than adequate for everyday tasks, with the CPU's single-thread performance ensuring smooth operation of productivity suites.

Small business workstations focused on data processing, financial modeling, or light CAD work will appreciate the CPU's data compression score of 437140 and extended instructions score of 35318. The ECC memory support adds reliability for professional workloads. However, users requiring high-end 4K gaming or heavy GPU compute should look to a more powerful graphics card.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. The platform provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU, offering substantial bandwidth for future expansion. The 65W TDP of the CPU means power supply requirements are modest, and the system's suggested 450W PSU provides headroom for the 150W GPU.

The AM5 socket ensures a clear upgrade path within the same platform. Users can move to higher-core-count Ryzen processors in the 9000 series without changing motherboards, as the socket is designed for multi-generational support. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes enable future GPUs or NVMe storage that can utilize the increased bandwidth.

For the GPU, the Intel Arc B570 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slots. The 10 GB GDDR6 memory and 380.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for current games, but a GPU with more VRAM and a wider memory bus would be the most impactful upgrade for 4K gaming or heavy texture workloads. The 450W suggested PSU limits GPU upgrades to those with similar or lower power requirements without a PSU replacement.

Memory expansion is straightforward with dual-channel DDR5 support. Users can add more RAM as needed, and the ECC support is a bonus for professional applications. The integrated Radeon Graphics provide a basic display output, which is useful for troubleshooting or secondary displays.

FAQ

Q: What is the average frame rate across all tested games for this system?

A: The average FPS across all tested games is 87, with the system ranking 3017 out of 3732 configurations by this measure.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-14901E?

A: The Ryzen 7 9700X holds a 0.1% advantage in average benchmark score over the Intel Core i9-14901E.

Q: What is the GPU's performance relative to the Intel Arc A750?

A: The Arc B570 trails the Arc A750 by 0.1% in average benchmark score, making them effectively equivalent in performance.

Q: Can this system run Cyberpunk 2077 at 1080p with ultra settings?

A: Yes, it achieves 39 FPS at 1920x1080 with ultra settings, which is playable but below the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: What is the CPU's single-thread performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The Ryzen 7 9700X scores 2211 in Cinebench R23 single-core, indicating strong performance for single-threaded tasks.

Q: How much VRAM does the Intel Arc B570 have and what is its bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 10 GB of GDDR6 memory with 380.0 GB/s bandwidth on a 160-bit bus.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this CPU and GPU pair?

A: The combined percentile is 76, placing this system in the upper quarter of all tested configurations.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 37943, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs. This score is remarkably close to its nearest rivals: the Intel Core i9-14901E scores 37911 (0.1% behind), the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 scores 37904 (0.1% behind), the Intel Core 5 211E scores 37829 (0.3% behind), and the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 scores 37804 (0.4% behind). The CPU's strongest results include a Passmark multithread score of 37161 and a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20485.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 20556, placing it in the 65th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest competitors are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile at 20534 (0.1% behind), the Intel Arc A750 at 20582 (0.1% ahead), the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M at 20480 (0.4% behind), and the AMD Radeon R9 M390X at 20662 (0.5% ahead). The GPU's best results include a Geekbench Vulkan score of 96844 and a Passmark G3D score of 14195.

The combined picture shows a system with a strong processor and a mid-range graphics card. The CPU's 86th percentile ranking provides substantial processing headroom, while the GPU's 65th percentile position is the limiting factor in gaming performance. The pair's combined percentile of 76 reflects this imbalance, with the CPU capable of supporting a more powerful GPU if the user chooses to upgrade. The average FPS of 87 across all tested games, combined with the system's 3017th rank out of 3732 pairs, indicates solid 1080p and 1440p gaming performance with limitations at 4K.