Valorant

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X and Intel Arc B570 combination delivers a compelling performance profile in Valorant, a game that is heavily dependent on both CPU and GPU capabilities. The data shows this pairing is capable of extremely high frame rates across all tested resolutions and settings, positioning it well for competitive play. The following analysis breaks down the specific performance metrics, the role of each component, and how this combo compares to other tested configurations.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X is a desktop processor built on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Granite Ridge, and manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC. It features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. The CPU has a TDP of 65 W and supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. Its cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 32 MB L3 cache.

In Valorant, the CPU's role is critical because the game engine primarily relies on single-thread performance for game logic, physics, and rendering draw calls. The 9700X's high boost clock of 5.50 GHz is particularly relevant here. Benchmark results show a 3dmark_single_thread score of 1280 and a geekbench_singlecore score of 3023, indicating strong single-core capabilities. This translates directly into high average frame rates, especially at lower resolutions where the CPU is less likely to become a bottleneck.

The CPU's multi-threaded performance is also robust, as evidenced by a cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore score of 20485 and a passmark_multithread score of 37161. However, in Valorant, the impact of multi-threading is less pronounced than in heavily threaded applications. The game's core engines are typically optimized for a few threads, so the 9700X's 8-core, 16-thread design provides ample headroom for background tasks without affecting frame pacing. The 3dmark_8_threads score of 8184 and 3dmark_max_threads score of 9771 suggest that even when all cores are active, the CPU can maintain high throughput, which is beneficial for maintaining consistent frame times in intense team fights.

The CPU's percentileVsAllCpus is 86, meaning it outperforms 86% of all tested CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i9-14901E with an avgScore of 37911 and a deltaPct of 0.1, and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 with an avgScore of 37904 and a deltaPct of 0.1. This indicates that the 9700X sits in a performance tier very close to these competitors, with differences of less than half a percent in aggregate benchmark scores.

In Valorant specifically, the CPU's high single-core performance allows the measured average FPS to reach 508 at 1080p Low settings, which is the highest recorded in the dataset. At 4K Ultra, the average FPS drops to 207, but this is largely due to GPU limitations rather than CPU constraints. The data shows that the CPU can sustain very high frame rates even at lower resolutions, confirming its role as a capable performer for this game.

FAQ — 4-6 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded for this combo in Valorant?

A: The highest average FPS is 508, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings. This is the only configuration in the dataset that exceeds 500 FPS, highlighting the combo's ability to push extremely high frame rates at the most common competitive resolution.

Q: How does the CPU's single-core performance compare to its multi-core performance in relation to Valorant?

A: The CPU shows a geekbench_singlecore score of 3023 and a geekbench_multicore score of 17906, indicating a ratio of roughly 1:6 for single to multi-core performance. In Valorant, the single-core performance is more critical, and the benchmark data reflects this: at 1080p, average FPS drops from 508 on Low to 304 on Ultra, showing that the CPU can maintain high frame rates even as GPU load increases.

Q: What is the combo's rank among all tested combinations in Valorant?

A: The combo ranks 2872 out of 3708 tested combinations in this game, placing it in the lower-middle range of all tested combos. This rank is based on measured FPS data, not just theoretical component performance, and reflects the specific pairing's results in Valorant.

Q: Does the GPU have enough VRAM for Valorant at high resolutions?

A: The Intel Arc B570 has 10 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 160-bit bus and 380.0 GB/s bandwidth. Valorant is not a memory-intensive title, and the measured FPS at 4K Ultra is 207, which is still well above playable thresholds. The VRAM capacity is more than sufficient for this game at any settings.

Q: How does the GPU's performance compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Arc B570 has an avgBenchmarkScore of 20556 and a percentileVsAllGpus of 65. Its nearest rival is the Intel Arc A750 with an avgScore of 20582 and a deltaPct of -0.1, meaning the B570 is only 0.1% slower. It also compares closely to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, which has an avgScore of 20534 and a deltaPct of 0.1, showing the B570 is 0.1% faster.

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded in the dataset?

A: The only minFps values provided are for Medium settings: at 4K, the minFps is 194; at 1440p, it is 243; and at 1080p, it is 285. These values indicate that the combo maintains frame rates above 190 FPS even in the most demanding tested configuration, with higher minimums at lower resolutions.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The comboRankInGame for this specific pairing is 2872 out of 3708 tested combinations. This rank places it in the 77th percentile of all combos tested in Valorant, meaning it performs better than 77% of the tested configurations. This ranking is based on measured FPS data across all resolutions and settings, providing a holistic view of performance.

To contextualize this rank, consider that the combo achieves an average FPS of 508 at 1080p Low, which is a very high number. However, the rank is not solely determined by peak FPS; it also accounts for consistency across different settings and resolutions. The data shows that at 4K Ultra, the average FPS drops to 207, which is a significant reduction from 1080p Low. This variation in performance across settings likely contributes to the combo's mid-tier ranking.

The rank of 2872 suggests that there are many combos that achieve higher average FPS, particularly those with more powerful GPUs or CPUs. However, the 9700X and Arc B570 combination is still capable of delivering competitive frame rates for Valorant, especially at lower resolutions where the CPU's strong single-core performance shines. The rank also implies that the combo is not at the very top of the performance spectrum, but it is well above average, making it a viable option for players who prioritize high frame rates without needing the absolute best hardware.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The measured FPS data provides a detailed look at how this combo performs across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the average FPS ranges from a low of 304 on Ultra to a high of 508 on Low. The Medium preset yields an average of 335 FPS with a minimum of 285 and a maximum of 385. The High preset produces an average of 319 FPS. This shows a clear trend: as settings increase, the average FPS decreases, but the drop is relatively modest, with only a 204 FPS difference between Low and Ultra.

Moving to 2560x1440, the average FPS drops across all settings compared to 1080p. The Low preset achieves 434 FPS, which is still very high, while Ultra drops to 259 FPS. The Medium preset yields an average of 286 FPS with a minimum of 243 and a maximum of 329. High settings produce an average of 272 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra at this resolution is 175 FPS, which is smaller than at 1080p, indicating that the GPU is starting to become more of a limiting factor.

At 3840x2160 (4K), the average FPS decreases further. The Low preset achieves 347 FPS, while Ultra drops to 207 FPS. Medium settings yield an average of 228 FPS with a minimum of 194 and a maximum of 263. High settings produce an average of 217 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at 4K is 140 FPS, showing that even at this high resolution, the combo can maintain playable frame rates, though the GPU is clearly the bottleneck at higher settings.

These numbers reveal that the combo is capable of exceptional performance at 1080p, with even Ultra settings exceeding 300 FPS. At 1440p, all settings remain above 250 FPS, which is excellent for competitive play. At 4K, the combo still delivers over 200 FPS on most settings, making it a viable option for high-refresh-rate monitors at this resolution, though the gap between Low and Ultra suggests that players may need to lower settings to maximize frame rates.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The resolution scaling behavior provides insight into which component is limiting performance. From 1080p to 1440p, the average FPS drops by approximately 74 FPS on Low settings (from 508 to 434), 47 FPS on Medium (from 335 to 286), 47 FPS on High (from 319 to 272), and 45 FPS on Ultra (from 304 to 259). This represents a percentage drop ranging from 14.6% on Low to 15.5% on Ultra. The relatively consistent percentage drop across settings suggests that the GPU is becoming more of a limiting factor as resolution increases, but the CPU still has enough headroom to keep frame rates high.

From 1440p to 4K, the FPS drops are more pronounced. On Low settings, the average FPS falls from 434 to 347, a drop of 87 FPS or 20%. On Medium, it drops from 286 to 228, a decrease of 58 FPS or 20.3%. High settings drop from 272 to 217, a reduction of 55 FPS or 20.2%. Ultra settings drop from 259 to 207, a decrease of 52 FPS or 20.1%. This consistent drop of around 20% across all settings from 1440p to 4K indicates that the GPU is now the primary bottleneck, as the workload on the GPU scales directly with pixel count.

The data shows that the CPU's impact is most visible at 1080p and 1440p, where the FPS is still extremely high, but the GPU's limitations become apparent at 4K. The Arc B570's performance, with a pixel rate of 200.0 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 360.0 GTexel/s, is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p but struggles to maintain the same frame rates at 4K. This is typical behavior for a mid-range GPU paired with a high-end CPU, where the CPU can push more frames than the GPU can render at higher resolutions.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings preset depends on the resolution and the player's priorities. At 1080p, the Low preset delivers the highest average FPS at 508, which is ideal for competitive play where maximum frame rates are crucial for reducing input lag and improving responsiveness. However, the Medium preset at 335 FPS still offers a very high frame rate while providing better visual quality, and it has a minimum FPS of 285, ensuring smooth gameplay. The High preset at 319 FPS and Ultra at 304 FPS are also viable, but the difference in FPS between Low and Ultra is significant, so players seeking a balance between visuals and performance should consider Medium.

At 1440p, the Low preset achieves 434 FPS, which is still exceptionally high. The Medium preset at 286 FPS is a good middle ground, with a minimum of 243 FPS. High and Ultra presets yield 272 and 259 FPS, respectively, which are still above 250 FPS, making them suitable for high-refresh-rate monitors. For the best experience, Medium or High is recommended at this resolution to balance visual fidelity with performance, as the FPS drop from Low to Medium is less than 150 FPS.

At 4K, the Low preset delivers 347 FPS, which is the highest in this resolution. The Medium preset at 228 FPS is still playable, with a minimum of 194 FPS, but the drop from Low to Medium is 119 FPS. High and Ultra presets yield 217 and 207 FPS, respectively, which are above 200 FPS but lower than Medium. For the best experience at 4K, the Low preset is recommended to maximize frame rates, as the visual difference between Low and Medium may not justify the significant FPS loss. Alternatively, Medium can be used if the player prioritizes visual quality over maximum FPS.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Arc B570 is a desktop GPU based on the Xe2-HPG architecture, codenamed Battlemage, manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC. It has a base and boost clock of 2500 MHz, with memory clocked at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective). The GPU features 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s. It has 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 80 raster operation pipelines, along with 18 ray tracing cores. The GPU's FP32 performance is 11.52 TFLOPS, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

In Valorant, the GPU's role is to render the game's graphics, including textures, lighting, and effects. The Arc B570's performance is adequate for this task, as evidenced by the measured FPS data. At 1080p, the GPU can handle all settings with average FPS above 300, indicating that it is not a bottleneck at this resolution. At 1440p, the GPU still delivers over 250 FPS on all settings, showing its capability to handle higher resolutions. At 4K, the GPU becomes more of a limiting factor, but it still manages to produce over 200 FPS on most settings.

The GPU's 10 GB VRAM is more than sufficient for Valorant, which does not require large amounts of video memory. The 380.0 GB/s bandwidth ensures that textures and assets can be loaded quickly, contributing to smooth frame times. The GPU's benchmark scores, including a passmark_g3d score of 14195 and a geekbench_vulkan score of 96844, indicate solid performance for a mid-range card. Its percentileVsAllGpus is 65, meaning it outperforms 65% of all tested GPUs.

The GPU's nearest rival is the Intel Arc A750, with an avgScore of 20582 and a deltaPct of -0.1, showing that the B570 is essentially on par with its predecessor. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile also shows a deltaPct of 0.1, indicating a near-identical performance level. This context suggests that the Arc B570 is a competitive mid-range GPU, and its performance in Valorant is consistent with its overall benchmark results. The GPU's role in this combo is to complement the CPU's high single-core performance, and the measured FPS data confirms that the pairing works well together, especially at lower resolutions where the CPU can push frame rates to their maximum.