SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D + Intel Arc B580

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D

33,079 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B580

23,021 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Intel Arc B580 pairing represents a fascinating convergence of AMD's advanced 3D V-Cache technology with Intel's newest Battlemage GPU architecture. This desktop build combines a CPU designed for exceptional gaming responsiveness with a graphics card that targets strong 1440p performance. The data indicates a system that performs well above the median, with the CPU placing at the 83rd percentile among all processors and the GPU at the 68th percentile, resulting in a combined percentile of 76. This is a desktop configuration that offers a balanced approach for high-refresh 1080p and capable 1440p gaming, underpinned by a robust multi-threaded processor.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D is built on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael, and manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC. It houses 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 4.20 GHz that can boost up to 5.00 GHz. The processor's defining feature is its massive 96 MB of shared L3 cache, layered on top of 1 MB per-core L2 cache and 64 KB per-core L1 cache. This enormous cache capacity is the key to its exceptional performance in gaming and certain workloads, as it dramatically reduces the latency of memory access.

The benchmark data shows a strong scaling of performance as thread count increases. In 3DMark tests, the CPU scores 1,887 points with 2 threads, 3,684 points with 4 threads, 6,539 points with 8 threads, and 7,980 points with 16 threads. The near-plateau between the 8-thread score of 6,539 and the 16-thread score of 7,980 suggests that the 8 physical cores are the primary source of processing power, with the additional threads providing a modest but real improvement. The data from Cinebench R23 reinforces this: a multi-core score of 16,817 versus a single-core score of 1,713 demonstrates substantial multi-threaded capability, though the single-core performance is respectable. This positions the CPU as a strong performer for workloads that can utilize multiple cores, such as video encoding and 3D rendering, while still offering excellent responsiveness for tasks that rely on single-thread speed.

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D's average benchmark score is 33,079, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are remarkably close, with the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G, Intel Core i7-13650HX, and AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX all matching its average score with a delta of 0%. The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H is slightly behind, with a delta of -0.4%. This tight clustering indicates that while the 7800X3D is a high-end chip, its average benchmark score places it in the same performance echelon as these other top-tier processors, making the 3D V-Cache advantage something that emerges more in gaming-specific tests rather than in these general-purpose benchmarks. The processor's TDP is 120 W, and it supports ECC memory, which adds to its appeal for workstation tasks.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's average benchmark score and how does it compare to its closest rivals?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D has an average benchmark score of 33,079. This places it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. Its closest rivals, the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G and Intel Core i7-13650HX, have an average score of 33,089, a delta of 0%. The AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX also matches with a 33,091 score, while the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H is slightly lower at 33,201 with a delta of -0.4%.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile rank and average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Arc B580 has an average benchmark score of 23,021, placing it in the 68th percentile of all GPUs. This puts it in a competitive position, with its nearest rivals including the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP (23,061, -0.2%), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (22,895, +0.6%), and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (23,172, -0.7%).

Q: What are the key specifications of the CPU's cache?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D features a large L3 cache of 96 MB shared across all cores. It also has 1 MB of L2 cache per core and 64 KB of L1 cache per core. This substantial L3 cache is a defining characteristic of the processor, contributing to its performance in gaming.

Q: What are the memory specifications of the GPU?

A: The Intel Arc B580 comes with 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, resulting in a memory bandwidth of 456.0 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 2375 MHz, effective speed of 19 Gbps.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its closest rivals?

A: The Intel Arc B580's average score of 23,021 is very close to its nearest rivals. It is 0.2% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP and 0.6% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080. It is also 0.7% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, showing a tight performance bracket.

Q: What is the CPU's architecture and process node?

A: The CPU is based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael, and is manufactured by TSMC using a 5 nm process. This advanced process node contributes to its power efficiency and performance capabilities.

Q: What is the GPU's suggested power supply unit (PSU) requirement?

A: The Intel Arc B580 has a TDP of 190 W, and the suggested PSU for the system is 450 W. This is a crucial consideration for system builders planning the overall power delivery.

Gaming Performance

The gaming performance data is measured, providing concrete FPS figures for a wide range of titles. At 1080p, the build demonstrates strong performance, achieving high frame rates in competitive shooters. For instance, Valorant reaches 339.9 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 330.6 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege 178 FPS. These high figures indicate the pairing is excellent for high-refresh-rate esports gaming. In more demanding AAA titles, the results are also solid. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 43.8 FPS at 1080p, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 37.9 FPS, and Control at 63 FPS, showing that the combination can handle heavy games, though settings may need to be adjusted for very high frame rates.

Moving to 1440p, the performance scales as expected. Valorant drops to 289.2 FPS, and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive to 224.9 FPS, which are still very high. However, more graphically intensive games see a more significant frame rate drop. Cyberpunk 2077 falls to 35.6 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 28.8 FPS, and Control to 46.4 FPS. This indicates that while the system is capable of 1440p gaming, for the most demanding titles, one might have to lower settings to achieve a stable 60 FPS. At 4K, the system struggles with the latest titles. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 20.2 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 17.6 FPS, and Control at 31.4 FPS, clearly showing that this pairing is not designed for 4K gaming in most modern, graphically demanding games. The data shows the system's sweet spot is 1080p, with 1440p being a viable option for many games, particularly those that are less demanding.

Who Should Build It

This system is designed for gamers who prioritize high-refresh-rate 1080p gaming. The measured FPS in esports titles like Valorant (339.9 FPS) and Counter-Strike 2 (149.8 FPS) at 1080p make this a compelling choice for competitive gamers. It also suits those who want to play visually rich AAA games at 1440p, with many titles exceeding 60 FPS, such as Assetto Corsa at 61.3 FPS and Undisputed at 61 FPS. Users who are willing to adjust settings for a better frame rate in the most demanding games will also find this build capable.

Content creators and developers who use multi-threaded applications will benefit from the 7800X3D's 8 cores and 16 threads. Tasks like video editing and 3D rendering, which are heavily threaded, will see strong performance in Cinebench R23 multi-core score (16,817). Similarly, software developers compiling code will see the benefits of the high multi-threaded Capabilities, as seen in the Geekbench multi-core score of 15,610. Students and small business users with a mix of productivity and light gaming will find the system robust, but the focus is clearly on gaming and content creation.

Benchmark Performance

The complete benchmark picture shows a balanced system. The CPU's average benchmark score is 33,079, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. The GPU's average benchmark score is 23,021, which puts it in the 68th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile for the pair is 76. The CPU's single-threaded performance is also notable, with a Geekbench single-core score of 2,426 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,713. This strong single-core performance is crucial for gaming and many day-to-day tasks.

The combined picture is interesting because while the CPU is strong, it is not paired with a GPU that is in the same high percentile. The GPU, while a solid mid-range performer, is generally the limiting factor in high-resolution gaming. The system's overall average FPS across all tested games is 99.7, which places it in the 27th percentile of all 3,732 pairs tested. This indicates that while it is not the top performer for average FPS, it is a strong system that excels in specific games, particularly those that are CPU-bound.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The system is built on the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which is a forward-looking platform with support for DDR5 memory. The CPU provides 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, ensuring ample bandwidth for high-speed storage and future devices. The GPU, however, uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is its standard.

The suggested PSU for this build is 450 W, which provides some headroom. The CPU has a TDP of 120 W and the GPU has a TDP of 190 W. This means the total power draw is under 350 W, leaving room for the rest of the system components. A sensible next upgrade would be to increase the GPU, as it is the component that would benefit the most from an upgrade, given the CPU's higher percentile ranking. The CPU's robust performance suggests it can handle a more powerful GPU without bottlenecking.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a balanced system, but with a clear bottleneck in the GPU for gaming workloads. The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking versus the GPU's 68th percentile shows the processor is more capable relative to its peers. In most gaming scenarios, the GPU will be the limiting factor, especially at higher resolutions. For example, in Cyberpunk 2077 at 1440p, the FPS drops to 35.6, which is likely a GPU limitation. At 1080p, the CPU's high performance is more likely to be the limiting factor in some games, particularly at high frame rates with a low-demand GPU.

In multi-threaded, non-gaming workloads, the CPU is the primary driver. The CPU can handle a more powerful GPU for better gaming performance. The system is not perfectly balanced; the CPU is the stronger of the two components, but the GPU is strong enough to provide a satisfying gaming experience.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D with the Intel Arc B580. The CPU is a high-end processor with a large L3 cache, and the GPU is a new mid-range offering from Intel. The system's overall tier is strong, with a combined percentile of 76. It is a desktop-class system that is well-suited for high-refresh 1080p gaming and productivity tasks. The pair's performance is competitive, with the CPU being the highlight, while the GPU is a capable partner that allows the system to handle a wide range of games at 1080p and 1440p.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B580 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture, codenamed Battlemage, and is constructed on a 5nm process by TSMC. It has 2,560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 80 ROPs, along with 20 ray tracing cores. The GPU's base and boost clocks are both 2670 MHz, and the memory clock runs at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective). It has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 456.0 GB/s. The GPU's rendering capabilities are highlighted by its pixel rate of 213.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 427.2 GTexel/s.

The GPU's compute performance is substantial, with FP32 performance of 13.67 TFLOPS and FP16 performance of 27.34 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern titles. The B580's benchmark scores are competitive. Its Geekbench Vulkan score is 109,672, and OpenCL score is 92,821. In Passmark, its G3D score is 15,748. These scores place it in the 68th percentile, making it a solid mid-range GPU. The GPU's nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080, and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, showing that it competes with last-generation high-end cards.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The system excels at high-refresh 1080p gaming. Data shows Valorant at 339.9 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 330.6 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege at 178 FPS. These frame rates are ideal for 144Hz or 240Hz monitors, providing a smooth and competitive experience.

Streaming: While the data does not include specific streaming benchmarks, the CPU's 8-core/16-thread design provides sufficient multi-threading for gaming and encoding simultaneously. The high multi-threaded scores, such as a 3DMark 16-thread score of 7,980, indicate that the system can handle the overhead of streaming software alongside a game.

Video Editing: The CPU's strong multi-core performance, as seen in the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16,817, makes it well-suited for video editing. The 8 cores and 16 threads will handle rendering and exporting efficiently. The GPU also contributes to hardware acceleration in compatible software.

3D Rendering: The combination of the CPU's multi-threading and the GPU's compute capabilities makes this a viable system for 3D rendering. The CPU's high Cinebench scores and the GPU's FP32 performance of 13.67 TFLOPS suggest good performance for rendering workloads, though dedicated workstations may have higher-end components.

Software Development: The CPU's high multi-threaded performance, with a Geekbench multi-core of 15,610, is beneficial for compiling code. The 8-core/16-thread configuration ensures efficient parallel compilation, and the system's overall responsiveness is excellent for developer workflows.

Student and Office Work: For everyday tasks like word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing, the system is more than capable. The CPU's single-threaded performance is strong, and the system's overall balance ensures a smooth experience for such workloads. The GPU is also capable of handling any occasional graphics tasks.