Control

Control

AVERAGE FPS
61
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 61 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 31 35 39 56
1440p QHD 46 53 59 83
1080p Full HD 63 69 84 115

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 56
3840x2160 Medium 39
3840x2160 High 35
3840x2160 Ultra 31
2560x1440 Low 83
2560x1440 Medium 59
2560x1440 High 53
2560x1440 Ultra 46
1920x1080 Low 115
1920x1080 Medium 84
1920x1080 High 69
1920x1080 Ultra 63

Control with AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D + Intel Arc B580, In-Depth Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D paired with the Intel Arc B580 produces a 1080p-centric experience in Control, with performance scaling that clearly exposes the GPU as the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions. While the CPU is more than capable of feeding the graphics card at 1080p, the B580’s frame rates at 4K suggest this combo is best suited for 1440p and below. Benchmark data shows this pairing ranks in the 21st percentile of all tested combos for this title, indicating that while it is not a top-tier configuration, it delivers playable results at mainstream settings.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a steep performance cliff as resolution increases. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo averages 115.3 FPS, which drops to 83.2 FPS at 1440p and further to 56 FPS at 4K. This represents a 51.4% reduction in frame rate from 1080p to 4K at Low settings, a pattern that strongly suggests the Intel Arc B580’s rendering throughput is the limiting factor. The GPU’s 13.67 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 456.0 GB/s memory bandwidth are simply insufficient to maintain high frame rates at 4K.

The scaling becomes even more pronounced at higher quality presets. At Ultra settings, the frame rate falls from 63 FPS at 1080p to 46.4 FPS at 1440p, a 26.3% drop, and then to 31.4 FPS at 4K, which is a 50.2% reduction from the 1080p baseline. This non-linear degradation indicates that the B580’s 12 GB of GDDR6 memory and 192-bit bus width are being saturated by the increased pixel count and texture detail. The data shows that 4K Ultra is essentially unplayable at 31.4 FPS, while 4K Low at 56 FPS is borderline playable but far from smooth.

What is particularly telling is the difference between 1080p and 1440p at the same settings. At High, the drop is from 69.4 FPS to 53.1 FPS, a 23.5% decrease. At Medium, the drop is from 83.5 FPS to 59.3 FPS, a 29.0% decrease. These consistent double-digit percentage drops across all presets confirm that the GPU is the primary bottleneck, as a CPU-bound scenario would show much smaller frame rate differences when resolution changes. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D’s 96 MB of shared L3 cache and 8 cores are clearly not the constraint here.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D is a desktop processor with 8 cores and 16 threads, based on the Zen 4 architecture on a 5 nm process. Its base clock is 4.20 GHz with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, and it carries a TDP of 120 W. In synthetic benchmarks, it scores 29,149 points in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 4,115 points in single-core, placing it in the 87th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-12700F, has an average score of 31,543, putting the 7800X3D only 0.1% ahead, which indicates this CPU is not a differentiator in most scenarios.

In Control, the CPU’s role appears to be secondary given the frame rates observed. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 115.3 FPS, which is high enough that the CPU’s 3DMark 16-thread score of 7,980 and 2-thread score of 1,887 are likely providing sufficient headroom. The game’s action-adventure nature, with its physics-heavy environments and destructible objects, does benefit from the CPU’s strong multi-threaded performance, as evidenced by the PassMark multi-thread score of 34,293. However, the fact that frame rates scale so dramatically with resolution proves that the CPU is not the limiting factor.

The 7800X3D’s 96 MB of L3 cache is a notable asset for gaming, but the measured data shows it does not compensate for the GPU’s limits. At 1440p High, the combo only manages 53.1 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. Even at 1080p Ultra, the frame rate drops to 63 FPS, suggesting that the CPU’s capabilities are being underutilized because the Intel Arc B580 cannot keep up with the rendering demands. The CPU’s 5.00 GHz boost clock and 16 threads are more than adequate for this title, but the data indicates that upgrading the GPU would yield far greater performance gains than any CPU change.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B580 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture with a 5 nm process and features 2,560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 80 ROPs. It has a base and boost clock of 2670 MHz, 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, and a memory bandwidth of 456.0 GB/s. The GPU’s FP32 performance is 13.67 TFLOPS, and it has 20 ray tracing cores. In synthetic tests, it scores 15,748 in PassMark G3D and 92,821 in Geekbench OpenCL, placing it in the 66th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, has an average score of 23,181, which is 0.7% higher, showing the B580 is competitive at its level.

The VRAM and bandwidth are the critical factors in Control at higher resolutions. The 12 GB frame buffer is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p, but the 4K results tell a different story. At 4K Ultra, the average FPS is 31.4, which is barely playable. At 4K High, it improves to 34.6 FPS, and at 4K Medium, it is 38.9 FPS. These numbers suggest that the GPU’s memory bandwidth is being overwhelmed by the 3840x2160 resolution, as the 456.0 GB/s bandwidth is not enough to feed the 80 ROPs at that pixel count.

The GPU’s clock speed of 2670 MHz is consistent across base and boost, which is a sign of stable power delivery, but it does not help at 4K. The texture rate of 427.2 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 213.6 GPixel/s are respectable for a mid-range card, yet the measured FPS shows that Control’s demanding effects, such as particle physics and real-time reflections, tax the GPU heavily. At 1080p, the GPU can achieve 83.5 FPS at Medium and 69.4 FPS at High, which are playable, but the 4K numbers indicate that this combo is not designed for 4K gaming.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of 1,636 tested combos for Control, this pairing of AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Intel Arc B580 ranks 1,298th. This puts it in the bottom 21% of all configurations, which is a significant finding given the individual component scores. The CPU is in the 87th percentile, and the GPU is in the 66th percentile, yet the combination underperforms relative to other pairings. This suggests that the B580 is the weak link in this pairing, as its average benchmark score of 23,021 is only 0.1% higher than the AMD Radeon 760M, which is an integrated GPU.

The rank indicates that many other combos with more balanced CPU-GPU pairings achieve better results in this specific game. For example, the GPU’s nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, is 0.7% faster in average score, and that small margin translates to meaningful FPS differences in practice. The data shows that this combo is best suited for 1080p gaming, where it ranks reasonably well, but it falls behind at higher resolutions. The 4K Low result of 56 FPS is the only 4K score above 40 FPS, and even that is below the 60 FPS target most gamers prefer.

The combo’s rank also reflects the CPU’s overqualification relative to the GPU. The 7800X3D’s 3DMark max threads score of 7,967 is high, but the B580’s PassMark DirectX 12 score of 76 is low, indicating that the GPU cannot translate the CPU’s headroom into frames. This is a classic case of a CPU that would pair better with a higher-tier GPU, but in this configuration, the data shows a 1080p-focused setup that struggles beyond that resolution.

Settings Recommendations

For the best experience with this combo, the measured FPS data points to 1080p with Medium settings as the optimal balance. At this setting, the combo achieves 83.5 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. High settings at 1080p yield 69.4 FPS, which is also playable, but the jump to Ultra drops to 63 FPS, indicating diminishing returns. For players prioritizing visual fidelity, 1080p High is the sweet spot, as it offers a 10.6% FPS improvement over Ultra while maintaining high-quality textures.

At 1440p, the data suggests Medium settings are the minimum for a playable experience. The 59.3 FPS at Medium is close to 60 FPS, but High drops to 53.1 FPS, and Ultra falls to 46.4 FPS. For 4K, the situation is more challenging. Low settings produce 56 FPS, which is playable, but Medium drops to 38.9 FPS, and High and Ultra are below 35 FPS. Therefore, the recommendation is to stick to 1080p for the best experience, with 1440p Medium as an acceptable compromise if a higher resolution is required. 4K should only be attempted at Low settings, and even then, the frame rate is marginal.

The data also shows that the performance difference between Low and Medium is significant at all resolutions. At 1080p, the difference is 31.8 FPS (from 115.3 to 83.5), while at 4K, it is 17.1 FPS (from 56 to 38.9). This indicates that Medium settings provide a substantial visual upgrade over Low for a moderate FPS cost, making it the recommended preset for most users.

Measured FPS Breakdown

1920x1080:

  • Low: 115.3 FPS
  • Medium: 83.5 FPS
  • High: 69.4 FPS
  • Ultra: 63.0 FPS

2560x1440:

  • Low: 83.2 FPS
  • Medium: 59.3 FPS
  • High: 53.1 FPS
  • Ultra: 46.4 FPS

3840x2160:

  • Low: 56.0 FPS
  • Medium: 38.9 FPS
  • High: 34.6 FPS
  • Ultra: 31.4 FPS

FAQ

*Q: Is this combo capable of 4K gaming in Control?*

A: Only at Low settings, where it averages 56 FPS. At Medium, the frame rate drops to 38.9 FPS, and at High and Ultra, it falls below 35 FPS, making those presets unsuitable for smooth gameplay.

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo?

A: The data shows 1080p is the optimal resolution, with Medium settings providing 83.5 FPS and High settings providing 69.4 FPS. At 1440p, only Medium settings approach 60 FPS at 59.3 FPS.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D has an average benchmark score of 31,580, which is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core i7-12700F’s score of 31,543. This indicates near-identical CPU performance.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The Intel Arc B580 has an average benchmark score of 23,021, which is 0.7% lower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060’s score of 23,181. The B580 is also 0.1% higher than the AMD Radeon 760M’s score of 22,999.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra at 1080p?

A: At 1080p, the difference is 52.3 FPS, from 115.3 FPS at Low to 63.0 FPS at Ultra. This represents a 45.4% reduction in performance when using the highest preset.

Q: Does this combo rank well among all tested configurations?

A: No, it ranks 1,298th out of 1,636 combos, placing it in the bottom 21% of all tested pairings for Control. This is despite the CPU ranking in the 87th percentile and the GPU in the 66th percentile individually.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D

Cores / Threads 8 / 16
Base Clock 4200 MHz
Boost Clock 5000 MHz
TDP 120W
Socket AMD Socket AM5
View Full CPU Details →

Intel Arc B580

VRAM 12 GB GDDR6
Base Clock
Boost Clock 2670 MHz MHz
TDP 190 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D + Intel Arc B580 in Control

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 56.0
3840x2160 Medium 38.9
3840x2160 High 34.6
3840x2160 Ultra 31.4
2560x1440 Low 83.2
2560x1440 Medium 59.3
2560x1440 High 53.1
2560x1440 Ultra 46.4
1920x1080 Low 115.3
1920x1080 Medium 83.5
1920x1080 High 69.4
1920x1080 Ultra 63.0

Control with Ryzen 7 7800X3D + Other GPUs

See how Control performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Control with Arc B580 + Other CPUs

See how Control performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 7 7800X3D + Arc B580

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.