SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D + Intel Arc B570

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

86%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D

24,709 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B570

20,556 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D and Intel Arc B570 form a desktop pairing that targets a specific performance niche, combining a high-core-count Zen 3 processor with a 10 GB Battlemage graphics card. The CPU, part of the 5000 series, is built on TSMC's 7 nm process and features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.10 GHz. The GPU, based on the Xe2-HPG architecture and the BMG-G21 chip, is fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC, packing 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die. This build sits in the 71st percentile overall for combined performance, indicating it is a mid-to-upper tier configuration for desktop workloads.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 7 5700X3D is a desktop processor with 8 cores and 16 threads, a configuration that provides solid parallelism for modern multitasking and threaded applications. Its architecture is Zen 3 under the Vermeer codename, a generation known for strong single-thread efficiency and high instructions per clock. The processor operates at a base clock of 3.00 GHz and can boost up to 4.10 GHz, though it is not multiplier-unlocked, meaning overclocking is not supported in the traditional sense. The cache hierarchy is notable: each core has 64 KB of L1 and 512 KB of L2, while the shared L3 cache is a substantial 96 MB, a feature that historically benefits gaming workloads by reducing memory latency.

Benchmark results illustrate the CPU's character. In 3DMark tests, the single-thread score is 804, while the 2-thread and 4-thread scores are 1575 and 3097, respectively. Scaling continues to 5357 for 8 threads and 6764 for 16 threads, showing near-linear gains as more cores are utilized. The max-thread score of 6755 is almost identical to the 16-thread result, confirming that all 16 threads are effectively engaged. Cinebench R23 scores are 22366 for multi-core and 3157 for single-core, a ratio of roughly 7:1, which is typical for an 8-core/16-thread chip. Geekbench results show 11086 multi-core and 1849 single-core, reinforcing the pattern of strong multithreaded performance relative to single-thread.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 24709, placing it in the 77th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X3D, which scores 24728, a delta of -0.1%, meaning the 5700X3D is essentially tied with it. The AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX averages 24822, putting the 5700X3D 0.5% behind, while the Intel Core i5-12450HX scores 24576, 0.5% ahead of the 5700X3D. The Intel Core i5-11600 scores 24563, which the 5700X3D beats by 0.6%. These tight margins suggest that in aggregate CPU performance, the 5700X3D sits in a crowded field, but its 96 MB L3 cache is the differentiator for specific workloads.

For real workloads, the 3DMark 16-thread score of 6764 and Cinebench R23 multi-core of 22366 indicate that video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation will be handled capably. The single-thread score of 804 in 3DMark and 3157 in Cinebench R23 are more modest, meaning the CPU is not a leader in lightly-threaded tasks like older games or simple office macros. The Passmark integer math score of 81257 and floating-point math score of 46492 show strong arithmetic throughput, while the data compression score of 307237 and encryption score of 18788 are high, pointing to efficient handling of file archiving and security tasks.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Ryzen 7 5700X3D and the Intel Arc B570 is workload-dependent, with the data showing that the CPU is often the stronger link in gaming scenarios but the GPU becomes the limiter at higher resolutions. The pairRankByFps metric places this combination at rank 3069 out of 3732 pairs, with an average FPS of 85.6 across all tested games. This rank, around the 82nd percentile of pairs, suggests that while the average frame rate is decent, the pair does not excel in pushing maximum frames, implying a bottleneck exists somewhere.

Looking at FPS scaling by resolution, the pattern is clear. For example, in Counter-Strike 2, the frame rate drops from 133 FPS at 1920x1080 to 88 FPS at 2560x1440, a 34% reduction, and then to 49 FPS at 3840x2160, a further 44% reduction. This steep scaling indicates that the GPU is the primary constraint as resolution increases, since the CPU's frame generation capability is not the limiting factor at lower settings. Conversely, in Call of Duty: Warzone, the FPS only drops from 115 at 1080p to 103 at 1440p (10% reduction) and then to 87 at 4K (16% reduction), a much gentler curve that suggests the CPU is more of a bottleneck at lower resolutions, preventing the GPU from being fully utilized.

The CPU's percentile of 77 versus the GPU's percentile of 65 further supports this asymmetry. In CPU-heavy workloads like physics calculations, the Passmark physics score is 2686, which is not exceptional, but the 3DMark 16-thread score of 6764 suggests decent multi-core headroom. The GPU's Passmark G3D score is 14195, which is moderate, and its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2649 is relatively low for modern titles. Therefore, in games that are not heavily GPU-bound, the CPU can deliver frames that the GPU cannot render quickly, leading to a CPU bottleneck at 1080p in some titles. However, at 4K, the GPU's pixel rate of 200.0 GPixel/s becomes the limiting factor, and the CPU's faster performance cannot compensate.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, the data shows mixed results. In esports titles, the pair performs well: Valorant reaches 304 FPS at 1920x1080 and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hits 293 FPS, easily exceeding 240 Hz refresh rates. However, in demanding AAA games, the frame rates are lower. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 39 FPS at 1080p, and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 36 FPS, which are below the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. The CPU's 96 MB L3 cache helps in games like Fortnite (64 FPS) and Apex-like titles, but the GPU's limits are clear in graphically intensive scenes.

Streaming is a viable workload for this build, as the CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads can handle encoding alongside gaming. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22366 provides enough headroom for software encoding, while the GPU's Xe2-HPG architecture supports hardware encoding as well. The Passmark data encryption score of 18788 and compression score of 307237 indicate that background tasks like streaming overlays and chat will not significantly impact performance. However, in games like Ark: Survival Ascended, which runs at only 19 FPS at 1080p, streaming would exacerbate the already low frame rates.

Video editing with software like Premiere Pro would benefit from the CPU's multithreaded strength. The 3DMark max-thread score of 6755 and Cinebench R23 multi-core of 22366 suggest that rendering timelines and exporting video will be efficient. The GPU's 10 GB VRAM and 380.0 GB/s bandwidth provide adequate memory for 1080p and 1440p editing, but the 160-bit bus width might limit 4K editing with multiple effects layers. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 83514 indicates that GPU acceleration in effects and color grading is possible, though not top-tier.

For 3D rendering, the CPU is the primary workhorse. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 9393 and Passmark floating-point math score of 46492 show strong performance in ray tracing and physics simulations. The GPU can assist in rendering via its 2304 shading units and 18 RT cores, but its FP32 performance of 11.52 TFLOPS is modest compared to high-end GPUs. In Blender or similar software, the CPU would handle most of the load, with the GPU providing supplementary acceleration. The 96 MB L3 cache helps keep rendering data close to the cores, reducing stalls.

Software development tasks like compiling and testing benefit from the CPU's core count. The Passmark integer math score of 81257 and find prime numbers score of 224 (which is low) suggest strong arithmetic and logic operations. The 3DMark 8-thread score of 5357 indicates that parallel builds will be faster than on quad-core systems. The memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s for DDR4 is sufficient for most development workflows, though not exceptional. The ECC memory support is a bonus for stability in long compilation sessions.

For student and office work, this build is overkill in many respects but handles it effortlessly. The single-thread score of 3157 in Cinebench R23 is more than enough for word processing and spreadsheets. The Passmark single-thread score of 2970 shows strong performance in legacy applications. The GPU's 10 GB VRAM is unused in office tasks, but the system's overall responsiveness will be high. The 7 nm CPU and 5 nm GPU are power-efficient, with the CPU at 105 W TDP and GPU at 150 W, so the build will not require excessive cooling in an office environment.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets gamers who play at 1080p or 1440p and prioritize esports titles over AAA single-player games. The measured FPS data shows that games like Valorant (304 FPS at 1080p), Roblox (171 FPS), and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege (158 FPS) run exceptionally well, making this a strong choice for competitive play. However, for those seeking 4K gaming, the GPU's limitations are apparent, with most AAA titles falling below 30 FPS at 3840x2160, so this build is not suited for that resolution.

Content creators who work with video editing and 3D rendering will find the CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads valuable. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22366 and 3DMark max-thread score of 6755 indicate that rendering and encoding tasks will be completed in reasonable time. The GPU's 10 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p video editing, and the 380.0 GB/s bandwidth handles multiple video streams. The Passmark data compression score of 307237 is useful for archiving large project files.

Developers and software engineers will appreciate the CPU's multithreaded performance for compiling and testing. The Passmark integer math score of 81257 and 3DMark 8-thread score of 5357 show that parallel builds will scale well. The ECC memory support is a significant advantage for workstations that require data integrity. The PCIe Gen 4, 20 lanes provide ample bandwidth for NVMe storage and the GPU, ensuring fast I/O for development tools.

Students and office workers in need of a reliable desktop for productivity will find this build more than capable. The single-thread performance, while not top-tier, is sufficient for daily tasks. The CPU's 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth and 96 MB L3 cache ensure smooth multitasking. The GPU's 10 GB VRAM is unnecessary for office work, but it does not hinder performance. The small business workstation use case is also valid, as the ECC memory support and stable platform make it suitable for financial or data-entry tasks.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B570 is based on the Xe2-HPG architecture, specifically the Battlemage generation, and is built on TSMC's 5 nm process. The chip, BMG-G21, contains 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die, with a transistor density of 72.1M per mm². The GPU has 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output processors, with 18 dedicated RT cores for ray tracing. The base and boost clocks are both 2500 MHz, and the memory clock runs at 2375 MHz, which translates to 19 Gbps effective on the GDDR6 memory.

The memory subsystem consists of 10 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s. This is a moderate amount of VRAM and bandwidth, sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming with high textures, but it may become a constraint at 4K with maximum settings. The pixel rate is 200.0 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 360.0 GTexel/s, which are mid-range figures. The FP32 performance is 11.52 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 23.04 TFLOPS (2:1), indicating that the GPU can handle compute tasks but is not a compute powerhouse.

Benchmark results show the GPU's position in the market. Its average benchmark score is 20556, placing it in the 65th percentile of all GPUs. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2649, which is a modern gaming benchmark. The Geekbench Vulkan score is 96844 and OpenCL is 83514, showing solid compute capability. The Passmark G3D score is 14195, but the Passmark DirectX 12 score is only 72, and DirectX 11 is 118, which are low numbers, though Passmark's gaming tests are not representative of real-world performance.

The GPU's nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, which scores 20534, a delta of 0.1% behind the B570. The Intel Arc A750 scores 20582, putting the B570 0.1% behind its predecessor. The NVIDIA Quadro M4000M scores 20480, which the B570 beats by 0.4%, and the AMD Radeon R9 M390X scores 20662, which is 0.5% ahead of the B570. These tight margins indicate that the B570 is comparable to older and mobile GPUs, but it does not compete with current high-end desktop cards.

For rendering, the 18 RT cores and 2304 shading units provide hardware ray tracing support, but the performance in games like Cyberpunk 2077 (39 FPS at 1080p) suggests that RT is not usable at high settings without upscaling. The GPU consumes 150 W TDP and requires a 450 W suggested PSU, with a single 8-pin power connector. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, which is sufficient for most games but may limit bandwidth in compute-heavy workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 7 5700X3D is built for the AMD Socket AM4, which is a mature platform with a wide range of compatible motherboards. The CPU supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a maximum bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, and it supports ECC memory, which is uncommon for consumer CPUs. The PCIe interface is Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which provides enough bandwidth for a modern GPU and NVMe drives.

The Intel Arc B570 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, which is compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 4 lanes. The GPU requires a 450 W power supply, and the CPU has a TDP of 105 W, so a quality 450 W PSU is sufficient for the entire system, though a higher wattage would provide more headroom for overclocking or additional drives. The GPU is dual-slot and 272 mm long (10.7 inches), so case compatibility is important.

A sensible next upgrade would be to increase system memory to the maximum supported, given the dual-channel DDR4 support. The CPU's TDP of 105 W suggests that a capable air cooler is sufficient for stock operation, and the socket AM4 platform supports a range of coolers. The GPU's 10 GB VRAM may become a bottleneck in future games, so upgrading to a GPU with more VRAM (if available) would be a logical step, but the CPU's performance would still be relevant.

The platform's long-term viability is limited by the AM4 socket, which is at the end of its life, but the 5700X3D's 96 MB L3 cache provides a unique advantage in gaming that newer CPUs without 3D V-Cache may not match. The ECC memory support is a rarity and adds value for workstation use. The PCIe Gen 4 support is adequate for current GPUs, but future GPUs may benefit from PCIe Gen 5, which this platform does not support.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 24709, placing it in the 77th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X3D, scores 24728, a delta of -0.1%, meaning the 5700X3D is effectively tied. The AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX scores 24822, 0.5% higher, while the Intel Core i5-12450HX scores 24576, 0.5% lower, and the Intel Core i5-11600 scores 24563, 0.6% lower. This indicates that in aggregate CPU performance, the 5700X3D is in a cluster with these chips, but its L3 cache gives it an edge in specific gaming scenarios.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 20556, placing it in the 65th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, which scores 20534, a delta of 0.1% behind the B570. The Intel Arc A750 scores 20582, 0.1% ahead of the B570, while the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M scores 20480, 0.4% behind, and the AMD Radeon R9 M390X scores 20662, 0.5% ahead. These small deltas show that the B570 is competitive with these last-generation or mobile parts.

The combined percentile for this build is 71, which is lower than the CPU's individual percentile of 77 but higher than the GPU's percentile of 65. This suggests that the GPU is the weaker component in the pairing, and that the overall system performance is dragged down by the GPU's limits. The pairRankByFps of 3069 out of 3732 pairs, with an average FPS of 85.6, further confirms that the system is not top-tier in gaming, but it is above average.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's cache configuration?

A: The Ryzen 7 5700X3D has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 96 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Intel Arc B570 has 18 dedicated RT cores, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4, which include ray tracing features.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the GPU?

A: The GPU's 10 GB GDDR6 memory is on a 160-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: No, the multiplier is unlocked, but the CPU is not multiplier-unlocked, so traditional overclocking is not supported.

Q: What is the GPU's TDP and recommended PSU?

A: The GPU has a TDP of 150 W, and the suggested PSU is 450 W.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X3D?

A: The 5700X3D has an average benchmark score of 24709, which is 0.1% lower than the 7600X3D's score of 24728, making them essentially equal.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile?

A: The Intel Arc B570 is in the 65th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 20556.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data, which is based on actual testing (dataIsMeasured is true), shows a wide range of performance across games and resolutions. At 1920x1080, the highest frame rates are achieved in esports titles: Valorant runs at 304 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 293 FPS, and Roblox at 171 FPS. Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege hits 158 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 reaches 133 FPS. These are excellent for high-refresh monitors.

At 2560x1440, the frame rates drop significantly. Valorant still runs at 259 FPS, and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 201 FPS, but more demanding games like Cyberpunk 2077 fall to 29 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 to 27 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone maintains 103 FPS, showing that optimized titles can still perform well.

At 3840x2160, the GPU's limits are evident. Valorant runs at 207 FPS, but most games fall below 30 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 19 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 18 FPS, and The Medium at 18 FPS. Even less demanding games like Minecraft drop to 43 FPS, and Fortnite to 21 FPS. The average FPS across all games and resolutions is 85.6, but this is heavily weighted by the high esports scores.

The pairRankByFps of 3069 out of 3732 pairs indicates that this combination is in the lower-mid range for gaming performance, with the average FPS of 85.6 being above the median but not exceptional. The data shows that for 1080p gaming, the pair is capable, but for 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the bottleneck, limiting the CPU's potential.

Build Overview

This build consists of an AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D CPU and an Intel Arc B570 GPU, both for a desktop class system. The CPU is a 5000 series processor with 8 cores and 16 threads, based on the Zen 3 architecture, and it features a 96 MB L3 cache, which is its defining characteristic. The GPU is part of the Battlemage generation, with 10 GB of GDDR6 memory and 2304 shading units, built on the Xe2-HPG architecture.

The combined percentile for this build is 71, meaning it performs better than 71% of all desktop pairs. The CPU's individual percentile is 77, while the GPU's is 65, showing a clear imbalance where the CPU is the stronger component. The pairRankByFps of 3069 out of 3732 pairs, with an average FPS of 85.6, places the build in the lower-mid tier of gaming performance.

In summary, this is a desktop build that excels in CPU-intensive tasks and esports gaming at 1080p, but it is limited by the GPU in AAA titles and higher resolutions. The CPU's 96 MB L3 cache makes it a unique choice for gaming, while the GPU's 10 GB VRAM and 380.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for mainstream use. The overall tier is mid-range, with the CPU punching above its weight and the GPU holding the system back from higher performance categories.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D + Intel Arc B570

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D

Intel Arc B570

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Valorant

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds