SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5700X + Intel Arc B570

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

88%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 5700X

27,578 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B570

20,556 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X and Intel Arc B570 pairing is a desktop combination that sits at the 72nd combined percentile, indicating a system positioned above the median but with distinct performance characteristics that vary sharply by workload. The CPU is a solid mid-range performer, matching its nearest rival in average benchmark score, while the GPU delivers strong 1080p and 1440p gaming but trails in the most demanding titles at 4K. This is a balanced pairing for high-refresh 1080p gaming and productivity, but it shows clear bottlenecks in heavily threaded CPU tasks and in the most graphically intense games.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a system where the bottleneck shifts depending on the workload, but the GPU is the primary constraint in modern gaming at higher resolutions. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 27578 places it at the 79th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU’s average score of 20556 places it at the 65th percentile among all GPUs. This 14-percentile gap indicates the GPU is the weaker component in the pair, and in gaming, this is confirmed by the measured frame rates.

At 1920x1080, the system delivers playable results in most titles, but the GPU begins to limit performance in the most demanding games. For instance, Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 39 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 36 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at a very low 19 FPS. These are all GPU-bound scenarios where the Arc B570’s 65th percentile standing becomes evident. The CPU, with its 8 cores and 16 threads, is less of a factor here; its 3dmark_8_threads score of 5768 and max_threads score of 6850 show it can feed the GPU adequately in most games.

The bottleneck reverses in CPU-heavy scenarios. The 3dmark_single_thread score of 921 and the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1499 indicate modest single-thread performance. In games like Counter-Strike 2, which is often CPU-limited, the system hits 133 FPS at 1080p, but this is still below the 293 FPS seen in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, an older title. The single-thread weakness is also visible in Valorant, which hits 304 FPS at 1080p, a high number, but the CPU’s single-thread percentile is what keeps it from going higher in esports titles.

For productivity, the balance is more even. The CPU’s multi-threaded scores—Cinebench R23 multicore at 13184 and Geekbench multicore at 10779—are strong, but the GPU’s compute performance is also relevant. The PassMark GPU compute score of 7281 is significantly lower than the CPU’s PassMark multithread score of 26612, meaning that GPU-accelerated compute tasks will be limited by the Arc B570. In contrast, CPU-bound tasks like data compression (PassMark score of 323610) and integer math (92749) will run faster than GPU-accelerated equivalents.

The measured FPS data shows a clear scaling pattern. Across 51 games, the average FPS at 1080p is 86.1, but this drops significantly at higher resolutions. For example, Call of Duty: Warzone goes from 132 FPS at 1080p to 99 FPS at 4K, while Counter-Strike 2 drops from 133 to 49 FPS. This indicates that the GPU is the limiting factor as resolution increases, with the CPU maintaining its performance headroom. The pairRankByFps of 3053 out of 3732 pairs confirms that this combination is not among the top performers in gaming, but it is above the bottom quartile.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1920x1080, this system is capable of high-refresh gaming in many titles. Valorant hits 304 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive reaches 293 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege runs at 158 FPS. These are all above the 144 Hz threshold, making the pairing suitable for competitive esports. However, in more demanding games like Cyberpunk 2077 (39 FPS) or Red Dead Redemption 2 (36 FPS), a high-refresh monitor would be wasted, as the GPU cannot push beyond 60 FPS.

Streaming: The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 13184, provide enough headroom for software encoding while gaming. The PassMark multithread score of 26612 supports this, as it shows the CPU can handle parallel workloads. However, the GPU’s lack of dedicated tensor cores (listed as null in the data) means that any GPU-accelerated encoding or AI features will rely on the Xe2-HPG architecture’s general compute, which may be less efficient than dedicated hardware.

Video Editing: The CPU’s multi-threaded performance is adequate for video editing. The Geekbench multicore score of 10779 and Cinebench R23 multicore of 13184 indicate that timeline rendering and export tasks will complete reasonably quickly. The GPU’s 10 GB of GDDR6 memory with 380.0 GB/s bandwidth can handle 1080p and 1440p video processing, but the PassMark GPU compute score of 7281 suggests that effects-heavy workflows may see slower performance than a higher-tier GPU.

3D Rendering: This is a mixed scenario. The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads deliver a Cinebench R15 multicore score of 2329, which is solid for CPU-based rendering. However, the GPU’s FP32 performance of 11.52 TFLOPS is modest, and its 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 score of 2649 indicates that GPU-accelerated rendering in DirectX 12 will be limited. For Blender or similar software, the CPU would be the primary workhorse, but the GPU would not accelerate renders as effectively as a higher-tier card.

Software Development: The CPU’s performance is well-suited for compilation tasks. The PassMark data compression score of 323610 and integer math score of 92749 show strong throughput for code compilation and data processing. The 32 MB of L3 cache helps with frequently accessed data. The GPU is less relevant here, but its 3dmark_2_threads score of 1821 for the CPU indicates that single-threaded tasks like code linting will be adequate, not exceptional.

Student and Office Work: The system is overkill for basic office tasks. The CPU’s single-thread score of 3385 in PassMark and 2016 in Geekbench ensure snappy response in word processors and web browsers. The GPU’s 10 GB VRAM is unnecessary for office work, but the system’s overall 72nd percentile means it will handle any productivity suite without issue. The 65W TDP of the CPU also means it will run cool and quiet in an office environment.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X is a 5000-series desktop processor built on the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Vermeer. It has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The 65W TDP makes it an efficient choice, and it supports DDR4 memory with a dual-channel bus and a maximum bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. ECC memory support is included, which is a benefit for workstation use.

The CPU’s benchmark scores show a clear picture. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 13184 is strong for an 8-core chip, placing it in the upper tier of mid-range processors. The single-core score of 1499 is less impressive, indicating that the Zen 3 architecture, while efficient, does not match the absolute highest single-thread performance of newer designs. The 3dmark scores confirm this: single-thread is 921, 2-threads is 1821, 4-threads is 3512, 8-threads is 5768, and max-threads is 6850. The scaling from 8 to 16 threads is minimal (6850 vs 5768), which suggests that the 16 threads do not provide a linear benefit in all workloads, likely due to the shared L3 cache and memory bandwidth constraints.

The CPU’s nearest rival is the Intel Core i5-12600K, with an identical average score of 27578 and a deltaPct of 0. This means the two are statistically tied in overall performance. The AMD Ryzen 7 5800 is 0.2% behind, and the Ryzen 5 7600X is 0.2% ahead. This places the 5700X in a competitive position, but it is not a leader. The 79th percentile ranking means it outperforms about 79% of all CPUs, which is solid but not top-tier.

The 7 nm process node, with 4,150 million transistors on a 74 mm² die, indicates a mature and efficient design. The 32 MB of shared L3 cache is beneficial for gaming and productivity, as it reduces memory latency. The PCIe Gen 4 support with 20 lanes is adequate for a modern GPU and NVMe drives, though the GPU in this pairing uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is sufficient for the Arc B570’s bandwidth needs.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets the mid-range desktop market, specifically gamers who prioritize 1080p high-refresh gaming and professionals who need a capable multi-threaded CPU without a top-tier GPU. The 79th percentile CPU and 65th percentile GPU mean that this system is above average, but not a high-end enthusiast build.

For gamers at 1920x1080, this system delivers excellent performance in esports titles. Valorant at 304 FPS, CS:GO at 293 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege at 158 FPS are all well above the 144 Hz threshold. For 1440p gaming, the system is still viable, with Call of Duty: Warzone at 117 FPS and Counter-Strike 2 at 88 FPS, but the most demanding games like Cyberpunk 2077 (29 FPS) and Red Dead Redemption 2 (27 FPS) will require settings reductions.

Content creators who rely on CPU-based rendering will find the 5700X capable. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 13184 is sufficient for video encoding and 3D rendering tasks that are not GPU-accelerated. The 10 GB VRAM on the GPU can handle large textures and high-resolution video previews, but the GPU’s compute performance is a limiting factor for GPU-accelerated effects.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU’s multi-threaded performance for compilation and testing. The PassMark integer math score of 92749 and data compression score of 323610 indicate strong throughput for build processes. The ECC memory support is a plus for long-running servers or development machines.

Students and office workers will find this system more than adequate, but it is overkill for basic tasks. The CPU’s single-thread performance (PassMark single-thread of 3385) ensures smooth operation in everyday applications, and the GPU is entirely unnecessary for office productivity. This build is best suited for users who game at 1080p and also perform multi-threaded productivity tasks.

Small business workstations could benefit from the CPU’s 65W TDP and ECC memory support, which are desirable for reliable, always-on systems. However, the GPU’s 150W TDP and dual-slot design may require a larger chassis than a typical office PC.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 27578, which places it at the 79th percentile among all CPUs. This is a strong showing, but the nearest rivals show how close the competition is. The Intel Core i5-12600K has an identical score of 27578 with a deltaPct of 0, meaning they are exact equals. The AMD Ryzen 7 5800 is 0.2% behind at 27535, and the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X is 0.2% ahead at 27636. The Intel Core Ultra 5 125H is 0.3% ahead at 27507. This means the 5700X is in a tight cluster of mid-range processors, with no significant advantage over its direct competitors.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 20556, placing it at the 65th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, which scores 20534 with a deltaPct of 0.1%. The Intel Arc A750 is 0.1% behind at 20582, and the AMD Radeon R9 M390X is 0.5% behind at 20662. This shows that the Arc B570 is competitive with a previous-generation mobile GPU but does not match desktop mid-range cards.

The combined percentile of 72 indicates that this pairing is above average overall. The pairRankByFps of 3053 out of 3732 pairs means that in gaming, this system is in the bottom 20% of all possible pairings, which is a surprising result given the individual component percentiles. This is because the measured FPS data includes many demanding titles at ultra settings, where the GPU struggles. The average FPS across all games is 86.1, which is respectable but not impressive.

In specific benchmarks, the CPU excels in multi-threaded tasks. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 13184 and Geekbench multicore of 10779 are strong, while the PassMark multithread of 26612 confirms this. The GPU’s best result is in Geekbench Vulkan with a score of 96844, which is higher than its OpenCL score of 83514. The PassMark G3D score of 14195 is the most relevant for gaming, and it places the GPU in the mid-range category.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B570 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture, codenamed Battlemage, and is part of the Arc 5 generation. It uses a 5 nm process node from TSMC, with 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die. The GPU has 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 80 render output units. It includes 18 ray tracing cores, but the tensor cores are listed as null, meaning there is no dedicated AI acceleration hardware.

The GPU’s memory configuration is 10 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 2375 MHz, with an effective speed of 19 Gbps. This is a mid-range memory setup, sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but the 160-bit bus is narrower than higher-end cards, which limits bandwidth in memory-intensive tasks.

The clock speeds are 2500 MHz for both base and boost, which is a relatively low boost clock compared to some competitors. The pixel rate is 200.0 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 360.0 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 11.52 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 23.04 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. These numbers indicate a GPU that is capable of modern gaming but not at the highest end.

The GPU’s benchmark scores reflect this positioning. The 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 score of 2649 is a measure of DirectX 12 performance, and it is modest. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 83514 and Vulkan score of 96844 show that the GPU is more efficient in Vulkan than OpenCL. The PassMark G3D score of 14195 is the primary gaming metric, and it places the GPU at the 65th percentile.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it compatible with modern games. The display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1, which are current standards. The power requirement is a 150W TDP with a suggested PSU of 450W and a single 8-pin power connector. The GPU is dual-slot and measures 272 mm in length, which fits in most mid-tower cases.

The Arc B570’s nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, which scores 20534 with a deltaPct of 0.1%. This is a notable comparison, as the RTX 3070 Mobile is a laptop GPU, meaning the Arc B570 trades blows with a previous-generation mobile card. The Intel Arc A750 is 0.1% behind, indicating that the B570 is a modest improvement over its predecessor.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data, which is confirmed as measured (dataIsMeasured is true), shows a wide range of performance across 51 games at ultra settings. At 1920x1080, the system delivers playable frame rates in most titles, but there are notable exceptions. The best performers are esports titles: Valorant at 304 FPS, CS:GO at 293 FPS, and Roblox at 171 FPS. These are all well above the 144 Hz threshold for high-refresh monitors.

Mid-range titles also perform well at 1080p. Call of Duty: Warzone hits 132 FPS, Counter-Strike 2 runs at 133 FPS, and Minecraft reaches 131 FPS. These are all playable at high refresh rates. However, the most demanding games show the GPU’s limitations. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 39 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 36 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at just 19 FPS. These are below the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay, indicating that ultra settings are not viable in these titles.

At 2560x1440, the performance drops significantly. Call of Duty: Warzone is still playable at 117 FPS, but Counter-Strike 2 drops to 88 FPS, and Valorant falls to 259 FPS. The most demanding games suffer: Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 29 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 27 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 12 FPS. This resolution is only viable for esports and less demanding titles.

At 3840x2160, the system is largely unsuitable for modern gaming. Valorant hits 207 FPS, and CS:GO reaches 119 FPS, but these are exceptions. Call of Duty: Warzone drops to 99 FPS, Cyberpunk 2077 to 19 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 to 18 FPS. Most games fall below 60 FPS, making 4K gaming impractical for anything but the lightest titles.

The average FPS across all games is 86.1, but this is skewed by the high performance in esports titles. The pairRankByFps of 3053 out of 3732 pairs indicates that this system is in the bottom 20% of all CPU+GPU pairings for gaming, which is a sobering statistic. This is primarily due to the GPU’s inability to handle ultra settings in demanding games, while the CPU is not the limiting factor.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 72, meaning it outperforms 72% of all CPU+GPU pairings in the benchmark database.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 5700X compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-12600K?

A: The two have identical average benchmark scores of 27578, with a deltaPct of 0, indicating they are statistically tied in overall CPU performance.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth and VRAM size?

A: The Intel Arc B570 has 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s.

Q: Is this system suitable for 4K gaming?

A: No, at 3840x2160, most games fall below 60 FPS. For example, Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 19 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 18 FPS, making 4K gaming impractical except for light titles.

Q: What is the CPU’s TDP and socket type?

A: The CPU has a 65W TDP and uses the AMD Socket AM4.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Arc B570 has 18 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes ray tracing features.

Q: What is the average FPS across all measured games at 1080p?

A: The average FPS across all games at 1920x1080 is 86.1, but this figure is heavily influenced by high performance in esports titles.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X CPU with the Intel Arc B570 GPU. The CPU is a 5000-series Zen 3 processor with 8 cores and 16 threads, a base clock of 3.40 GHz, and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. It has a 65W TDP and uses the AMD Socket AM4. The GPU is an Intel Arc B570 based on the Xe2-HPG architecture, with 10 GB of GDDR6 memory and a 150W TDP.

The combined percentile of 72 places this system above average, but the individual components tell a more nuanced story. The CPU is at the 79th percentile, which is strong, while the GPU is at the 65th percentile, which is mid-range. This makes the GPU the weaker link in the pairing, particularly in demanding games at higher resolutions.

The build class is desktop, and it is designed for users who want a balanced system for 1080p gaming and productivity. The CPU’s multi-threaded performance is excellent for its price range, and the GPU can handle esports titles at high refresh rates. However, for 1440p and 4K gaming, or for GPU-accelerated compute tasks, this pairing will show its limitations. The overall tier is mid-range, suitable for gamers and professionals who do not require top-tier performance but want a capable, efficient system.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5700X + Intel Arc B570

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 5700X

Intel Arc B570

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Valorant

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds