SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5700 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

88 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
87%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 5700

25,517 Benchmark Score
Top 13% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

16,129 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti pairing represents a distinctly upper-midrange desktop configuration, with the combined percentile ranking at 69 indicating it outperforms a majority of all recorded CPU-GPU pairings. The data shows this is a system built for high-refresh 1080p gaming and capable 1440p play, with the CPU’s 78th percentile standing against all CPUs and the GPU’s 59th percentile against all GPUs creating a balanced foundation that prioritizes frame rate consistency over raw resolution pushing.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on the Ampere architecture using the GA104 chip, manufactured on Samsung’s 8 nm process with 17,400 million transistors across a 392 mm² die. The GPU operates with a base clock of 1410 MHz and a boost clock of 1665 MHz, paired with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. This memory configuration is sufficient for 1080p ultra settings and most 1440p titles, though the 8 GB capacity becomes a limiting factor at 4K where the measured FPS drops sharply in VRAM-intensive titles.

The GPU’s compute resources are substantial for its tier: 4864 shading units, 152 TMUs, and 80 ROPs. More importantly for modern workloads, it includes 38 RT cores and 152 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS support. The FP32 throughput of 16.20 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1), indicates capable compute performance for the class. The pixel rate of 133.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 253.1 GTexel/s provide the raw fill rates needed for high-detail rendering at 1440p.

Benchmark results confirm the GPU’s positioning. The PassMark G3D score of 20349 places it at the 59th percentile among all GPUs, while its average benchmark score of 16129 shows it trading blows with the AMD Radeon RX 9060 (0.7% higher) and sitting 1.4% behind both the Radeon Pro 5600M and Radeon RX 5700 XT. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 78927 and Vulkan score of 47784 demonstrate strong compute and API utilization. In DirectX workloads, the PassMark scores of 132 (DX10), 163 (DX11), and 78 (DX12) reveal a pattern where the GPU excels in older APIs but sees reduced efficiency in DX12-specific tests.

For rendering, the data shows the RTX 3060 Ti handles 1080p ultra settings admirably across most titles. Counter-Strike 2 runs at 152.9 FPS, Valorant at 413 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege at 227 FPS, indicating the GPU is far from being a bottleneck in esports scenarios. However, demanding titles reveal its limits: Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 48.8 FPS at 1080p ultra, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 40.2 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended to a marginal 30.5 FPS. The RT and tensor cores provide the necessary hardware for ray tracing and AI-accelerated features, but the measured data suggests that enabling these features requires either a resolution drop or settings reduction to maintain playable frame rates.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-Refresh Gaming: This system is engineered for 1080p high-refresh gaming, evidenced by Valorant hitting 413 FPS at 1080p, Counter-Strike 2 at 152.9 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege at 227 FPS. Even at 1440p, competitive titles remain fluid with Valorant at 374 FPS and CS2 at 104.2 FPS, while the average FPS across all measured games stands at 111.5, confirming widespread capability for 144Hz monitors.

Streaming: The 8-core, 16-thread Ryzen 7 5700 provides ample CPU headroom for simultaneous game capture and encoding, as evidenced by its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20655 and PassMark multithread score of 24303. The GPU’s NVENC capabilities via the Ampere architecture, combined with these CPU resources, allow for seamless 1080p streaming while maintaining the 69.6 FPS seen in Allods Online or the 94.2 FPS in Fivem.

Video Editing: The combination of the CPU’s strong multicore performance and the GPU’s compute capabilities makes this a viable 1080p video editing machine. The Geekbench multicore score of 9959 and the GPU’s PassMark GPU Compute score of 10006 indicate that timeline rendering and effect processing will be responsive, though the 8 GB VRAM may require proxy workflows for long 4K timelines.

3D Rendering: The CPU’s Cinebench R20 multicore score of 8675 and R15 multicore of 2082 show solid multi-threaded rendering performance, while the GPU’s FP32 throughput of 16.20 TFLOPS supports hardware-accelerated renderers. The 38 RT cores provide ray-traced rendering acceleration, but the 59th GPU percentile suggests this is not a primary workstation for heavy offline rendering.

Software Development: The CPU’s PassMark data encryption score of 20096 and integer math score of 90091 indicate strong compilation and code processing capability. The 16 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, and the single-thread score of 3296 in PassMark ensures responsive IDE interaction, making this a comfortable development machine.

Student and Office Work: The 65W TDP CPU keeps the system efficient, while the 16 threads handle multitasking with ease. The PassMark multithread score of 24303 ensures smooth operation across office suites, browsers, and communication tools simultaneously, and the GPU’s G2D score of 989 confirms fast 2D interface rendering for productivity applications.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 is a desktop processor from the 5000 series, built on the Zen 3 architecture with the Cezanne codename. It features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The CPU is manufactured on TSMC’s 7 nm process, packing 10,700 million transistors into a 180 mm² die. Cache configuration includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3, providing ample data locality for compute-heavy workloads.

The CPU’s 65W TDP is notably efficient for an 8-core part, making it suitable for air-cooled builds without exotic cooling solutions. Memory support includes DDR4 with dual-channel configuration, providing 51.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth, and ECC memory is supported for workstation reliability. The socket is AMD Socket AM4 with PCIe Gen 3 (20 lanes from the CPU), which is a generation behind current standards but adequate for the GPU’s PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which will run at Gen 3 speeds in this pairing.

Benchmark data shows a well-rounded performer. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20655 and single-core score of 2916 indicate strong both multi-threaded and single-threaded performance. The Geekbench multicore score of 9959 and single-core of 1907 confirm this balance. The 3DMark tests show scaling from 901 (single-thread) to 6628 (16-threads), with an 8-thread score of 5585, indicating the CPU maintains efficiency as thread count increases.

Real-world implications are clear. The PassMark integer math score of 90091 and floating-point math of 51427 show robust number-crunching capability for scientific and engineering applications. Data compression at 316699 and random string sorting at 33138 demonstrate strong data manipulation performance. The physics score of 984 in PassMark supports gaming physics calculations. With the nearest rivals being the Intel Xeon D-2752TER (-0.1%), AMD Ryzen 5 7640U (+0.1%), and AMD Ryzen 5 6600H (-0.1%), the 5700 sits in a tightly contested performance band, though it offers more cores than its Ryzen 5 rivals.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

This pairing suits gamers who prioritize high-refresh 1080p gaming, as the measured FPS in Valorant (413), CS2 (152.9), and Rainbow Six Siege (227) at 1080p ultra far exceeds 144Hz monitor requirements. For 1440p gaming, the system remains viable with esports titles like Valorant at 374 FPS and CS2 at 104.2 FPS, though AAA titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (32.8 FPS) and Red Dead Redemption 2 (30.7 FPS) require settings adjustments.

Content creators working with 1080p footage will benefit from the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20655 and the GPU’s OpenCL score of 78927, enabling smooth preview and export workflows. 3D artists using GPU-accelerated renderers can leverage the 16.20 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 38 RT cores, though the 8 GB VRAM limits scene complexity.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 16 threads and integer math score of 90091, reducing build times. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running processes. Students and office workers handling document processing, spreadsheets, and web applications will find the PassMark multithread score of 24303 ensures fluid multitasking, while the 65W TDP keeps power costs low.

Small business workstations handling data analysis can utilize the data compression score of 316699 for database operations and the encryption score of 20096 for secure transactions. The system’s 78th CPU percentile and 69th combined percentile place it above most general-purpose machines, making it a robust single-system solution for mixed workloads.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU achieves a 78th percentile ranking against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 25517. Its nearest rival, the Intel Xeon D-2752TER, scores 25530 (0.1% higher), while the AMD Ryzen 5 7640U scores 25485 (0.1% lower) and the Ryzen 5 6600H scores 25550 (0.1% higher). The CPU’s strongest results include Cinebench R23 multicore at 20655, Geekbench multicore at 9959, and PassMark multithread at 24303.

The GPU sits at the 59th percentile against all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 16129. It slightly trails the AMD Radeon RX 9060 by 0.7%, and sits 1.4% behind the Radeon Pro 5600M and Radeon RX 5700 XT. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 20349 and Geekbench OpenCL of 78927 are its strongest compute indicators.

The combined percentile for this pairing is 69, placing it above 69% of all recorded CPU-GPU combinations. The pair ranks 2278 out of 3861 pairs by FPS performance, with an average FPS across all measured games of 111.5. This average FPS figure is the key indicator: it shows the system delivers smooth gameplay across a broad game library, with the distribution spanning from esports titles at 400+ FPS to demanding AAA titles in the 30-50 FPS range at 1080p ultra.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the CPU’s socket and memory type?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 uses the AMD Socket AM4 and supports DDR4 memory in dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 3060 Ti have, and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: What is the average FPS across all measured games for this CPU-GPU pair?

A: The pair achieves an average of 111.5 FPS across all measured games, ranking 2278 out of 3861 pairs.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking on compatible AM4 motherboards.

Q: What is the GPU’s power connector requirement?

A: The RTX 3060 Ti uses a single 12-pin power connector, with a suggested PSU of 550 W.

Q: What is the CPU’s process node and foundry?

A: The CPU is manufactured on a 7 nm process by TSMC, with 10,700 million transistors.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking against all GPUs?

A: The RTX 3060 Ti sits at the 59th percentile against all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 16129.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform is built on AMD Socket AM4, which supports a range of Ryzen processors. The CPU’s 65W TDP and the GPU’s 200W TDP combine for a total of 265W, leaving significant headroom within the 550W suggested PSU for additional components like drives and fans. The power connectors for the GPU require one 12-pin, which may need an adapter depending on PSU availability.

Memory support is DDR4 with dual-channel configuration, delivering 51.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 3 lanes, while the GPU is a PCIe 4.0 x16 card; in this configuration, the GPU operates at Gen 3 speeds, which has minimal impact on gaming performance but is a potential bottleneck for future upgrades. The platform supports ECC memory, which is a differentiator for workstation use.

The most sensible next upgrade would be the GPU, as the CPU’s 78th percentile shows it has more headroom than the GPU’s 59th percentile. Moving to a higher-tier GPU would immediately improve the measured FPS in GPU-bound scenarios like Cyberpunk 2077 (48.8 FPS at 1080p) and Red Dead Redemption 2 (40.2 FPS), though the PCIe Gen 3 interface would slightly limit a modern Gen 4/5 GPU. Alternatively, adding more RAM or faster DDR4 would improve the memory bandwidth beyond the current 51.2 GB/s.

The CPU’s unlocked multiplier and 65W TDP suggest overclocking headroom, but the Cezanne architecture’s boost clock of 4.60 GHz is already high. The AM4 socket’s end-of-life status means CPU upgrades are limited to existing Ryzen 5000-series parts, making the GPU the primary upgrade vector for extending this system’s gaming lifespan.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 7 5700 (8 cores, 16 threads, Zen 3 architecture) with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (Ampere, 8 GB GDDR6). The pairing’s combined percentile of 69 places it above 69% of all recorded CPU-GPU combinations, signaling a solidly above-average gaming and productivity machine. The CPU’s 78th percentile is notably stronger than the GPU’s 59th percentile, meaning the CPU has more performance headroom relative to its peers than the GPU does.

The measured FPS data confirms this is a 1080p-focused build. The average of 111.5 FPS across all games indicates smooth gameplay in the majority of titles at 1080p ultra, with esports titles reaching 343.6 FPS (CS:GO) and 413 FPS (Valorant). At 1440p, the system remains playable in competitive titles (Valorant at 374 FPS, Warzone at 116.6 FPS) but struggles in AAA single-player games (Cyberpunk at 32.8 FPS, Red Dead at 30.7 FPS). This is not a 4K machine, with most titles falling below 60 FPS at 3840x2160.

The build’s 2278 rank out of 3861 pairs by FPS places it in the upper 59% of all pairs, aligning with the GPU’s percentile. The CPU’s stronger percentile suggests that users upgrading from a lesser GPU will see immediate FPS gains, while those upgrading the CPU alone would see minimal improvement in gaming. This is a balanced pairing with a slight CPU advantage, making it ideal for users who want a single system for both gaming and productivity.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The data shows a system where the GPU is the primary limiting factor in gaming workloads. The GPU’s 59th percentile versus the CPU’s 78th percentile indicates the CPU can feed the GPU faster than the GPU can render, creating a GPU-bound scenario in most games. This is confirmed by the FPS scaling across resolutions: at 1080p the average is 111.5 FPS, but the CPU’s single-thread score of 901 in 3DMark and 3296 in PassMark shows it can keep up with fast-paced esports titles that hit 413 FPS in Valorant.

In CPU-bound scenarios, the 8-core/16-thread configuration prevents bottlenecks. The PassMark multithread score of 24303 and 3DMark 16-thread score of 6628 show the CPU handles heavily threaded workloads without becoming the limiting factor. However, in games that are poorly multi-threaded, the single-thread score of 901 in 3DMark could become a constraint at very high frame rates, though the measured 1080p performance in CS2 (152.9 FPS) and Valorant (413 FPS) suggests this is rarely an issue.

For productivity workloads, the CPU is the stronger component. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20655 demonstrates the CPU outpaces the GPU’s compute capabilities for tasks like video encoding, where the GPU’s OpenCL score of 78927 is competitive but not dominant. The bottleneck shifts to the GPU when tasks leverage CUDA cores or RT cores, as evidenced by the 38 RT cores for ray tracing and 152 tensor cores for AI workloads, where the 59th percentile ranking limits performance.

The FPS data across resolutions reveals the GPU bottleneck clearly. At 1080p, games like Fortnite hit 76 FPS, but at 1440p this drops to 44.5 FPS and at 4K to 25.7 FPS — a scaling pattern that indicates the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are the limiting factors. The CPU’s performance does not degrade similarly, confirming it has headroom for a future GPU upgrade. The combined percentile of 69 reflects this balance: not a bottleneck-heavy pairing, but one where the GPU is the first component to reach its limits.