SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5700 + Intel Arc B580

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

89 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
87%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 5700

25,517 Benchmark Score
Top 13% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B580

23,021 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 and Intel Arc B580 form a desktop pairing that targets a specific performance tier, combining an 8-core Zen 3 processor with a modern 12 GB graphics card. The CPU sits at the 78th percentile among all processors, while the GPU occupies the 68th percentile, placing this build in the 73rd combined percentile overall. Benchmark data indicates this is a capable 1080p and 1440p gaming system with solid productivity credentials, though it carries distinct platform limitations from the aging AM4 socket and PCIe Gen 3 interface.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 is a desktop processor built on the Zen 3 architecture, specifically the Cezanne die, manufactured on TSMC's 7 nm process. It packs 8 cores and 16 threads with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The chip contains 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die, with a 65 W TDP reflecting its efficiency focus. Cache structure includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a 16 MB L3 cache. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking potential, and it supports DDR4 memory in dual-channel configuration with a theoretical bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. ECC memory support is present, a feature rarely found in consumer desktop processors.

Benchmark scores reveal a clear thread-scaling pattern. The 3DMark results show 2-thread performance at 1762, 4-thread at 3382, 8-thread at 5585, and max-thread at 6617 — the progression demonstrates that the processor extracts meaningful gains from additional cores, with the jump from 8 to 16 threads adding roughly 18% more score. Cinebench R23 results are particularly informative: a multicore score of 20655 against a single-core score of 2916. The ratio between these scores indicates strong multi-core scaling, making this CPU well-suited for heavily threaded workloads like rendering and compilation. Geekbench results reinforce this picture with a multicore score of 9959 versus a single-core score of 1907.

The PassMark suite provides workload-specific performance data. The multithread score of 24303 pairs with a single-thread score of 3296, placing it in a competitive band. Integer math scores 90091, while floating-point math reaches 51427, suggesting balanced arithmetic capability. Data compression scores 316699, and encryption reaches 20096, indicating strong throughput for file archiving and security-related tasks. The extended instructions score of 21945 shows the CPU handles modern SIMD workloads competently. The physics score of 984 in PassMark's gaming-related test is modest, but this reflects the test's specific load rather than overall gaming capability.

The average benchmark score of 25517 places this chip in the 78th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are remarkably close: the Intel Xeon D-2752TER scores 25530 (0.1% higher), the AMD Ryzen 5 7640U scores 25485 (0.1% lower), the AMD Ryzen 5 6600H scores 25550 (0.1% higher), and the AMD Ryzen 7 5825U scores 25446 (0.3% lower). This cluster of scores indicates the Ryzen 7 5700 delivers performance essentially equivalent to several mobile and server variants, making its desktop positioning notable — it punches at a level that competes with chips from other segments.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 7 5700 uses the AMD Socket AM4, which represents a mature platform with a well-established ecosystem. Memory support is limited to DDR4 in dual-channel mode, with a measured bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 3 with 20 lanes — this is a critical limitation to understand for the GPU pairing. The Arc B580 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, but when installed in a Gen 3 slot, it will operate at Gen 3 x8 speeds. The benchmark data reflects this configuration, so the measured performance includes any bandwidth penalty.

For the PSU requirement, the GPU has a TDP of 190 W and the suggested PSU rating is 450 W. The CPU's 65 W TDP is modest, so the combined power draw remains manageable for a mid-range power supply. The GPU requires a single 8-pin power connector and occupies a dual-slot width, measuring 272 mm in length, 115 mm in height, and 45 mm in width. These dimensions require a case with adequate clearance but no unusual specifications.

A sensible next upgrade path depends on the workload. For CPU-bound scenarios, the AM4 socket could accommodate higher-tier Ryzen 5000 series processors, though the data does not specify which ones. For GPU-bound scenarios, the Arc B580's PCIe 4.0 x8 interface would benefit from a platform with native Gen 4 support, but the measured performance already accounts for the Gen 3 limitation. The 12 GB VRAM provides headroom for higher resolution textures, so the GPU itself has longevity. The 65 W TDP of the CPU means cooling is not demanding, and the 450 W suggested PSU leaves room for moderate upgrades without requiring a new power supply.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 25517 places it in the 78th percentile, while the GPU's average score of 23021 places it in the 68th percentile. The combined percentile for this pairing is 73rd, indicating the CPU is relatively stronger than the GPU in this specific combination. The pair's rank by FPS across all tested games is 2790 out of 3732 pairs, with an average FPS of 99.2 across the game suite.

The CPU benchmark suite shows particular strengths in multi-threaded workloads. Cinebench R23 multicore reaches 20655, while the single-core score is 2916 — the multicore result is roughly 7 times higher, demonstrating the benefit of the 8-core/16-thread configuration. The 3DMark results show a similar pattern: max-thread at 6617 versus single-thread at 901, a ratio of about 7.3 times. These ratios indicate that the processor scales well with thread count, making it suitable for rendering, encoding, and other parallel workloads.

The GPU benchmarks show a different profile. PassMark G3D scores 15748, with DirectX 11 scoring 128, DirectX 12 scoring 76, and DirectX 9 scoring 183 — the variation across API versions suggests the architecture performs differently depending on the graphics API. Geekbench OpenCL scores 92821, and Vulkan scores 109672, indicating strong compute capability in modern APIs. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3068 provides a modern gaming workload reference point. The GPU's nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP (23061, 0.2% higher), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (22895, 0.6% lower), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (23172, 0.7% higher), and the NVIDIA P106-100 (23249, 1% higher). This clustering places the Arc B580 near older high-end cards in average benchmark terms.

Who Should Build It

The measured performance profile points to specific user groups. Gamers targeting 1920x1080 resolution will find the strongest results, with many titles exceeding 60 FPS at ultra settings. The data shows 1080p average FPS across the test suite at 99.2, which comfortably covers competitive gaming and most AAA titles. At 2560x1440, performance drops but remains playable in many games, while 3840x2160 is marginal for demanding titles.

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s 8-core/16-thread configuration. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20655 indicates solid rendering throughput, and the PassMark integer and floating-point scores (90091 and 51427 respectively) suggest capable general compute. The GPU's 12 GB VRAM supports larger textures and complex scenes, making this a viable entry-level workstation.

Software developers compiling code will find the CPU's multithreaded performance useful, particularly the 3DMark max-thread score of 6617 and Geekbench multicore score of 9959. The data encryption score of 20096 also supports cryptography-related workloads. Students and small business users building general-purpose systems will find this pairing handles office productivity, web development, and light content creation without issue, though the platform's DDR4 memory and PCIe Gen 3 limitations should be considered.

Gaming Performance

The data is measured, not estimated, and reflects actual FPS at ultra settings across a range of titles. At 1920x1080, the pairing delivers strong performance in competitive titles: Valorant averages 341.9 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive reaches 332 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 hits 150 FPS. Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege averages 178 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege X reaches 177.7 FPS. Roblox runs at 194 FPS, and Minecraft achieves 148 FPS (145.5 FPS for Java Edition).

At 2560x1440, performance scales down predictably. Valorant still delivers 287.2 FPS, CS:GO drops to 228 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 falls to 99 FPS. Rainbow Six Siege averages 117 FPS, Roblox reaches 129 FPS, and Minecraft holds at 93 FPS. These results show 1440p is viable for competitive and lighter titles, though AAA games begin to strain.

At 3840x2160, the pairing is limited. Valorant still manages 232.3 FPS, and Roblox reaches 73 FPS, but demanding titles fall below playable thresholds. Cyberpunk 2077 averages 22.2 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 hits 18.6 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended drops to 4.6 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone is an exception at 95.4 FPS, but most AAA titles at 4K require significant settings reduction.

The 1080p data shows some titles below 60 FPS, indicating the GPU is the limiting factor in those cases. Red Dead Redemption 2 averages 42.3 FPS, Cyberpunk 2077 hits 45.6 FPS, and Microsoft Flight Simulator reaches 54 FPS. These results suggest that ultra settings at 1080p are not universally achievable, and some games will require medium or high settings for smooth gameplay.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The pairing excels in competitive titles at 1080p. Valorant's 341.9 FPS and CS:GO's 332 FPS easily drive 240 Hz monitors, while Counter-Strike 2's 150 FPS and Rainbow Six Siege's 178 FPS support 144 Hz displays. At 1440p, Valorant still reaches 287.2 FPS, but Counter-Strike 2 drops to 99 FPS, making 144 Hz a stretch for that title.

Streaming: The 8-core/16-thread CPU handles encoding and game capture simultaneously. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20655 provides enough headroom for x264 encoding at reasonable presets, while the GPU's 12 GB VRAM supports game rendering without memory pressure. The PassMark multithread score of 24303 reinforces the CPU's capacity for concurrent workloads.

Video editing: The CPU's multicore performance drives timeline rendering and export. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20655 and Geekbench multicore score of 9959 support 1080p and some 1440p editing workflows. The GPU's compute scores, particularly Vulkan at 109672, accelerate effects and color grading.

3D rendering: The CPU's 8 cores/16 threads provide solid CPU-based rendering performance. The 3DMark max-thread score of 6617 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20655 indicate reasonable render times for Blender or similar software. The GPU's 12 GB VRAM supports GPU-accelerated rendering of moderately complex scenes.

Software development: The CPU's balanced performance supports compilation and testing. The PassMark integer math score of 90091 indicates strong arithmetic throughput for code execution, and the data compression score of 316699 helps with build artifacts and version control. The 16 threads handle parallel builds effectively.

Student and office work: This pairing is overkill for basic productivity. The single-thread performance, evidenced by Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2916 and PassMark single-thread score of 3296, handles spreadsheet calculations and document processing easily. The GPU's 12 GB VRAM is irrelevant for office tasks, but the overall system provides smooth multitasking.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B580 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture, codenamed Battlemage, using TSMC's 5 nm process. The BMG-G21 chip contains 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 72.1 million per mm². The GPU has 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 80 render output units. It features 20 ray tracing cores, though tensor core count is not specified. The clock operates at a base and boost of 2670 MHz, with memory clocked at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective).

Memory configuration includes 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, providing 456.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This bandwidth is substantial for the GPU's class and supports high-resolution textures. The pixel rate is 213.6 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 427.2 GTexel/s. Floating point performance is rated at 13.67 TFLOPS for FP32 and 27.34 TFLOPS for FP16 (2:1 ratio). The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

In benchmark terms, the GPU's average score of 23021 places it in the 68th percentile. The PassMark G3D score of 15748 indicates solid rasterization performance, while the compute score of 7729 shows moderate compute capability. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 109672 versus OpenCL score of 92821 suggests the architecture performs better in Vulkan workloads. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3068 provides a modern gaming benchmark reference. The GPU's nearest rivals include the RTX 2080 (0.6% lower) and RTX 3080 (0.7% higher) in average score, indicating the Arc B580 sits between these two older high-end cards in overall benchmark terms.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 has 8 cores and 16 threads, based on the Zen 3 architecture with a 7 nm process.

Q: How much VRAM does the Intel Arc B580 have, and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 456.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What socket does the Ryzen 7 5700 use, and what memory type does it support?

A: It uses AMD Socket AM4 and supports DDR4 memory in dual-channel configuration with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking for this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 73rd, with the CPU at 78th and the GPU at 68th percentile individually.

Q: What is the average FPS across all tested games for this pairing?

A: The pair ranks 2790 out of 3732 pairs with an average FPS of 99.2 across the game suite.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Intel Arc B580 has 20 ray tracing cores, based on the Xe2-HPG architecture.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the Intel Arc B580 is 450 W, with the GPU having a 190 W TDP.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals where the bottleneck lies for different workloads. The CPU's 78th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 68th percentile indicates the GPU is the relative weak point in this pairing. In gaming, this manifests as GPU-limited performance at lower resolutions in competitive titles, but CPU limitations appear at 1080p in lighter games where the GPU could push higher frame rates. The average FPS of 99.2 at 1080p suggests the GPU often caps performance, particularly in esports titles where the CPU could potentially drive higher frame rates.

The FPS scaling across resolutions provides evidence of the bottleneck distribution. At 1080p, the average FPS is 99.2, but this drops significantly at higher resolutions. For example, Cyberpunk 2077 goes from 45.6 FPS at 1080p to 33.4 FPS at 1440p to 22.2 FPS at 4K — this scaling pattern indicates GPU limitation, as CPU-bound workloads would show less resolution sensitivity. Conversely, the CPU's strong single-thread score of 3296 in PassMark suggests it can handle high frame rate scenarios, but the GPU's performance in DirectX 12 (score of 76) may limit modern game performance.

In productivity workloads, the CPU is the primary driver. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20655 and Geekbench multicore score of 9959 define rendering and compilation performance, while the GPU's compute score of 7729 in PassMark is secondary. The CPU's 65 W TDP versus the GPU's 190 W TDP also indicates the GPU draws significantly more power, reinforcing the GPU as the performance limiter in gaming scenarios.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the AMD Ryzen 7 5700 with the Intel Arc B580. The CPU represents the 5000 series on the AM4 platform, while the GPU is from Intel's Battlemage generation (Arc 5 class). The combined percentile ranking of 73rd places this system in the upper-mid tier of all builds. The CPU's 78th percentile and GPU's 68th percentile indicate a slight CPU-favored balance, with the processor providing more relative strength than the graphics card.

The pairing is well-suited for 1080p gaming with high refresh rates in competitive titles, and it handles 1440p in many games with reduced settings. The 12 GB VRAM provides future-proofing for texture-heavy games, while the CPU's 8 cores/16 threads support productivity workloads. The platform's DDR4 memory and PCIe Gen 3 interface are aging, but the measured performance demonstrates this configuration remains competitive. The average FPS of 99.2 across the game suite confirms this is a capable gaming system, with the CPU providing a solid foundation and the GPU delivering adequate graphics performance for the target resolutions.