SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5700 + Intel Arc B570

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

89 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
87%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 5700

25,517 Benchmark Score
Top 13% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B570

20,556 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 and Intel Arc B570 combination represents a pragmatic desktop pairing that targets the mainstream performance tier. The CPU, built on the mature Zen 3 architecture, delivers 8 cores and 16 threads with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. This is a 7 nm TSMC part with a 65 W TDP, making it an efficient workhorse. The Arc B570 is Intel’s Battlemage-generation GPU, built on a 5 nm process with 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die. The data indicates this is a balanced mid-range setup: the CPU sits at the 78th percentile against all CPUs, while the GPU holds the 65th percentile against all GPUs, giving the combined build a 72nd percentile ranking. The measured average FPS across a wide game suite is 86 frames per second at 1920x1080, which suggests strong 1080p capability.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 7 5700 is an 8-core, 16-thread processor using AMD’s Zen 3 architecture, specifically the Cezanne die. Its 3.70 GHz base and 4.60 GHz boost clocks are competitive for the socket, and the 7 nm process node from TSMC keeps power draw modest at 65 W. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a 16 MB L3 pool. This configuration directly supports the benchmark scores: the Cinebench R23 multi-core result of 20655 points and single-core result of 2916 points place it as a capable multi-tasking chip, though not a top-tier performer. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 6628 and max-thread score of 6617 confirm that scaling is nearly linear up to the full thread count, which is typical for a well-balanced 8-core design.

In real-world workloads, the data shows a strong showing in productivity. The Geekbench multi-core score of 9959 and single-core score of 1907 indicate that both heavily threaded and lightly threaded applications will run smoothly. The Passmark multi-thread score of 24303 and single-thread score of 3296 reinforce this pattern. More specific tests reveal strengths: Passmark data encryption scores 20096, and extended instructions score 21945, suggesting the CPU handles AES-NI and AVX2 workloads competently. The floating-point math score of 51427 and integer math score of 90091 are healthy, implying good performance for scientific computing and general number crunching. The CPU’s percentile rank of 78 means it outperforms roughly three-quarters of all CPUs in the database, putting it ahead of the average but not near the enthusiast tier.

When compared to its nearest rivals, the Ryzen 7 5700 is essentially a statistical tie. It trails the Intel Xeon D-2752TER by only 0.1% in average score, while leading the AMD Ryzen 5 7640U by 0.1% and the Ryzen 7 5825U by 0.3%. This means that for most applications, the choice between these CPUs will not produce perceptible differences. The Ryzen 7 5700’s advantage lies in its 8 cores and 16 threads, which provide a consistent baseline for multi-threaded tasks, but the benchmark deltas indicate that newer or more efficient designs have closed the gap.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 7 5700 uses the AMD Socket AM4, which is a mature platform with a long lifecycle. Memory support is limited to DDR4 in a dual-channel configuration, with a theoretical bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. ECC memory is supported, which is a notable feature for users running workstations or servers that require error correction. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 3 with 20 lanes, which is older than the Gen 4 or Gen 5 standards found on newer platforms, but it remains sufficient for the Arc B570, which uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. The x8 link on a Gen 3 slot will operate at reduced bandwidth, but the practical impact depends on the workload.

The PSU headroom is straightforward. The CPU has a 65 W TDP, and the GPU has a 150 W TDP. The suggested PSU for the build is 450 W, which provides adequate margin for the components plus typical system peripherals. The GPU requires a single 8-pin power connector, which is common on mainstream power supplies. The CPU’s 65 W draw means that even with the GPU at full load, the total system power will remain well within the 450 W suggested rating, leaving room for a few drives and fans.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be a CPU with more cores or higher clocks within the AM4 socket, as the motherboard and memory can be retained. However, the data shows that the Ryzen 7 5700 already sits at the 78th percentile, so the gains from a lateral CPU change would be minimal. The more impactful upgrade path would be a GPU change, given that the Arc B570’s 65th percentile is lower than the CPU’s percentile, suggesting the GPU is the more limiting factor in gaming scenarios. Moving to a higher-tier GPU would require a PSU upgrade beyond the 450 W suggested, but the platform itself is stable.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1920x1080, the average FPS across games is 86, which is playable but not always high-refresh territory. In esports titles, the data shows strong results: Valorant runs at 304 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 293 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 at 133 FPS. These figures support 144 Hz or even 240 Hz monitors in competitive shooters. However, AAA titles are more demanding; Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 39 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 36 FPS, which would require lowering settings or enabling upscaling for smooth play.

Streaming: The 8-core, 16-thread CPU is well-suited for encoding while gaming. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20655 indicates that the CPU can handle x264 encoding on spare threads without crippling frame rates. The Passmark multi-thread score of 24303 reinforces this. For games like Call of Duty: Warzone, which runs at 128 FPS at 1080p, the headroom for streaming overhead is present. The Arc B570’s lack of a dedicated NVENC equivalent is not a concern for CPU-based encoding, and the 16 threads provide the necessary parallelism.

Video editing: The Geekbench multi-core score of 9959 and Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 8675 suggest that timeline scrubbing and export tasks will be responsive. The Passmark data compression score of 316699 is exceptionally high, indicating fast archive operations, which is relevant for media asset management. The GPU’s OpenCL score of 83514 provides acceleration for effects that are GPU-accelerated, though the 10 GB VRAM may limit the size of preview buffers on very large projects.

3D rendering: The CPU’s 16 threads are directly applicable to CPU-based renderers. The Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 2082 and R23 score of 20655 show strong scaling. The GPU’s Vulkan score of 96844 suggests that GPU-based renderers will also perform decently, but the Arc B570 is not a top-tier compute card. For a hobbyist renderer, this pairing will produce acceptable results for scenes that fit within the 10 GB VRAM, but complex scenes will require patience.

Software development: The Passmark integer math score of 90091 and find prime numbers score of 58 indicate that the CPU handles integer-heavy workloads like compilation efficiently. The 16 threads allow for parallel builds, and the single-thread score of 3296 ensures that IDE responsiveness is solid. The GPU is less relevant here, but the OpenCL score of 83514 can be used for compute tasks in scientific computing. The ECC memory support is a bonus for development servers or long-running test suites.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread performance is more than adequate for web browsing, document editing, and spreadsheet tasks. The Passmark single-thread score of 3296 is high enough for smooth UI interactions. The GPU’s G2D score of 661 is modest, but it is sufficient for 2D desktop acceleration. The 65 W CPU TDP means the system runs cool and quiet, which is ideal for a dorm room or shared office. The average FPS of 86 at 1080p means even light gaming is possible during breaks.

Who Should Build It

This build targets gamers who primarily play at 1920x1080 and are willing to adjust settings for AAA titles. The data shows that esports titles like Valorant (304 FPS) and CS:GO (293 FPS) run at extreme frame rates, making this ideal for competitive players who want high refresh rates without spending on a flagship GPU. For single-player gamers, the 1080p average of 86 FPS across all games means that most titles will run at medium to high settings, with demanding games like Cyberpunk 2077 (39 FPS) requiring compromises.

Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering will find the CPU’s 16 threads useful. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20655 and Passmark multi-thread score of 24303 indicate that render times will be acceptable for hobbyist projects. The 10 GB VRAM on the GPU is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p editing timelines, though 4K projects may need to rely on proxies. Developers and students will appreciate the ECC memory support and the CPU’s strong integer performance for compilation and data analysis.

Small business workstations can leverage this build for office productivity, with the CPU’s high single-thread score of 3296 ensuring quick application launches. The GPU’s compute scores, such as the OpenCL 83514, can accelerate certain professional workloads like CAD or light simulation. The system’s overall 72nd percentile ranking means it is above average for general use, and the 65 W CPU TDP keeps operational costs low over time.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates that the GPU is the primary bottleneck for gaming workloads. The CPU’s percentile rank of 78 is significantly higher than the GPU’s 65, meaning the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU more data than the GPU can process in many scenarios. For example, at 1920x1080, the average FPS across games is 86, but in CPU-heavy titles like Counter-Strike 2 (133 FPS), the CPU’s single-thread performance is the limiter. In GPU-heavy titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (39 FPS), the Arc B570 is clearly the constraint.

The FPS scaling across resolutions confirms this. For most games, the frame rate drops by roughly 30-40% when moving from 1080p to 1440p, and another 40-50% when moving to 4K. This is typical of a GPU-bound system. However, there are exceptions. In Valorant, the FPS drops from 304 at 1080p to 259 at 1440p, but still holds 207 at 4K, showing that the CPU can sustain high frame rates even at lower resolutions. With 8 cores and 16 threads, the CPU is unlikely to bottleneck in modern titles, but the data shows that single-thread performance (score 901 in 3DMark single-thread) can be a factor in very high-refresh scenarios.

The pairRankByFps data places this combination at rank 3057 out of 3732 pairs, with an average FPS of 86. This ranking suggests that while the build is not at the top, it is far from the bottom, and the bottleneck is more pronounced at higher resolutions where the GPU’s 380.0 GB/s bandwidth and 10 GB VRAM become limiting. At 4K, many games drop below 30 FPS, such as Red Dead Redemption 2 (18 FPS) and Cyberpunk 2077 (19 FPS), which indicates the GPU is not suitable for 4K gaming without significant settings reductions.

FAQ

Q: How many cores and threads does the AMD Ryzen 7 5700 have?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What is the GPU’s VRAM capacity and memory bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc B570 has 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the average FPS at 1080p across all tested games?

A: The average FPS across all measured games at 1920x1080 is 86 frames per second.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 7 5700 supports ECC memory.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 7 5825U?

A: The Ryzen 7 5700 is 0.3% faster in average benchmark score than the Ryzen 7 5825U.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for this build?

A: The suggested PSU for the Intel Arc B570 is 450 W.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile rank among all GPUs?

A: The Intel Arc B570 is at the 65th percentile against all GPUs.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B570 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture, code-named Battlemage, and uses the BMG-G21 chip. It has 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output pipelines. The GPU operates at a base clock of 2500 MHz and a boost clock of 2500 MHz, which is a modest clock speed but is complemented by the architecture’s efficiency. The memory subsystem is 10 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s. This is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but the 160-bit bus can limit performance at higher resolutions where bandwidth is more critical.

Ray tracing is handled by 18 dedicated RT cores, and the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The FP32 performance is 11.52 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 23.04 TFLOPS (2:1), which positions it as a mid-range compute card. The pixel rate is 200.0 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 360.0 GTexel/s, both of which are respectable for the segment. The GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 14195 and DirectX 12 score of 72 indicate that it performs well in modern APIs, though the DirectX 10 score of 65 and DirectX 9 score of 164 show some legacy performance inconsistencies.

In benchmark terms, the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2649, and the Geekbench Vulkan score is 96844. The OpenCL score of 83514 suggests that compute workloads using this API will see moderate performance. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 20556, placing it at the 65th percentile. Compared to its nearest rivals, the Arc B570 is essentially identical to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (0.1% faster) and the Intel Arc A750 (0.1% slower). This means that in a desktop context, the Arc B570 offers performance similar to a previous-generation laptop GPU, which is a notable achievement for the price tier but not a class leader.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the AMD Ryzen 7 5700 and Intel Arc B570. The CPU is an 8-core, 16-thread Zen 3 part with a 65 W TDP, and the GPU is a 150 W Battlemage card with 10 GB of VRAM. The combined system holds the 72nd percentile ranking against all builds, which indicates it is above average for general computing and gaming. The pairRankByFps data shows this combination ranks 3057 out of 3732 pairs, with an average FPS of 86 at 1080p. This places it in the upper-middle tier of performance, capable of handling most tasks but not pushing the boundaries of high-end gaming or rendering.

The class is clearly desktop, and the overall tier is mainstream. The CPU’s 78th percentile is the stronger component, while the GPU’s 65th percentile is the weaker link. This is a balanced system for users who want a capable all-rounder without investing in top-tier components. The 450 W suggested PSU keeps the build accessible to a wide range of power supplies, and the AM4 platform offers upgrade potential for the CPU within the same socket.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark scores are as follows: Cinebench R23 multi-core at 20655 and single-core at 2916, Geekbench multi-core at 9959 and single-core at 1907, and Passmark multi-thread at 24303 with single-thread at 3296. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 25517, placing it at the 78th percentile. Its nearest rival, the Intel Xeon D-2752TER, scores 25530, which is a 0.1% difference. The AMD Ryzen 5 7640U scores 25485, also a 0.1% difference, making these CPUs statistically identical in overall performance.

The GPU’s benchmark scores include a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2649, Geekbench OpenCL of 83514, and Geekbench Vulkan of 96844. The Passmark G3D score is 14195, and the GPU compute score is 7281. The average benchmark score for the GPU is 20556, placing it at the 65th percentile. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, scores 20534, a 0.1% difference, while the Intel Arc A750 scores 20582, also a 0.1% difference.

Combined, the build’s performance is characterized by the average FPS of 86 across games at 1080p. In specific titles, the GPU shows strengths in esports: Valorant at 304 FPS, CS:GO at 293 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 at 133 FPS. In demanding titles, it struggles: Cyberpunk 2077 at 39 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 36 FPS. The CPU’s 16 threads ensure that multi-threaded workloads like video editing (Cinebench R23 20655) and data encryption (Passmark 20096) are handled efficiently. The combined picture is a system that excels at competitive gaming and productivity, but requires settings adjustments for the latest AAA games at higher resolutions.