SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 9600X + Intel Arc B570

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
89%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 9600X

29,713 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B570

20,556 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 9600X and Intel Arc B570 pairing represents a mid-range desktop configuration built around AMD’s latest Zen 5 architecture and Intel’s new Battlemage GPU generation. The combination delivers a 73rd-percentile combined performance ranking, with the CPU sitting at the 81st percentile and the GPU at the 65th percentile among their respective component classes. Measured frame rate data across 51 titles provides a detailed picture of what this system can achieve at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K resolutions with ultra graphics settings.

Gaming Performance

Measured FPS data at ultra settings shows this pairing is most comfortable at 1080p, with many titles exceeding 100 FPS. The system hits 304 FPS in Valorant at 1920x1080, 293 FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, and 178 FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone, making it well-suited for competitive esports at high refresh rates. At 1440p, those numbers drop to 259 FPS in Valorant, 201 FPS in CS:GO, and 158 FPS in Warzone, still comfortably above 144Hz thresholds for most competitive play.

For AAA titles, the picture becomes more varied. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 39 FPS at 1080p, 29 FPS at 1440p, and 19 FPS at 4K, placing it below the 60 FPS smoothness target even at the lowest tested resolution. Red Dead Redemption 2 shows similar constraints at 36 FPS (1080p), 27 FPS (1440p), and 18 FPS (4K). Microsoft Flight Simulator achieves 48 FPS at 1080p, 39 FPS at 1440p, and 28 FPS at 4K, indicating that demanding simulation titles will require settings reductions for playable performance.

Lighter and mid-weight titles perform substantially better. Minecraft reaches 131 FPS at 1080p and 82 FPS at 1440p, while Roblox runs at 171 FPS and 114 FPS respectively. The system averages 87 FPS across all tested games, with a pair rank of 3020 out of 3732 tracked CPU-GPU combinations, placing it in the lower-middle portion of tracked configurations. The data indicates that 1080p is the primary gaming resolution for this build, with 1440p viable for less demanding titles but requiring compromises in the most graphically intensive games.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B570 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture, manufactured on a 5 nm TSMC process with 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die. It features 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, delivering 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU operates at a fixed 2500 MHz for both base and boost clocks, with memory running at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective). The B570 includes 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, 80 render output units, and 18 dedicated ray tracing cores.

Compute performance is rated at 11.52 TFLOPS for FP32 operations and 23.04 TFLOPS for FP16 with a 2:1 ratio. The GPU achieves pixel and texture rates of 200.0 GPixel/s and 360.0 GTexel/s respectively. Benchmark results show a Passmark G3D score of 14195 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 83514, with the Vulkan result reaching 96844. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2649 reflects its DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) capability, which includes full support for hardware ray tracing and mesh shaders.

The GPU’s 65th percentile ranking places it just above the RTX 3070 Mobile (deltaPct of 0.1) and essentially tied with the Intel Arc A750 (deltaPct of -0.1). The 18 RT cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects, though the measured FPS in ray-traced-heavy titles like Cyberpunk 2077 suggests that enabling such features will require significant resolution or quality trade-offs. The 10 GB VRAM capacity is adequate for 1080p ultra textures in most current titles, but the 160-bit bus limits memory bandwidth compared to wider implementations.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU demonstrates strong single-thread performance with a 3DMark single-thread score of 1253 and a Cinebench R23 single-core result of 2183.5. Multi-threaded results show a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17528.5 and a Geekbench multi-core score of 14438. The Passmark suite reveals specific workload characteristics: integer math scores 89918, floating point math reaches 60081, and extended instructions hit 28023. Data compression performance is particularly strong at 341021, while encryption scores 16638.

The GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 14195 places it at the 65th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 20556. Its nearest competitor, the RTX 3070 Mobile, scores 20534 (0.1% delta), while the Arc A750 scores 20582 (-0.1% delta). The combined system percentile of 73 indicates that the CPU outperforms the GPU in relative standing, with the processor at the 81st percentile versus the graphics card at the 65th.

In terms of raw CPU benchmarks, the 9600X’s average benchmark score of 29713 puts it within 0.2% of the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE (29656) and 0.5% below the Ryzen 7 7840H (29868). The 3DMark thread scaling shows progression from 2456 at 2 threads to 6726 at 8 threads and 7590 at max threads, indicating efficient multi-threading capability up to the 12-thread limit. The single-thread Passmark score of 4570 underscores the Zen 5 architecture’s strength in lightly-threaded applications.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a clear asymmetry: the CPU’s 81st percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 65th percentile suggests the graphics card is the limiting factor in most gaming scenarios. FPS scaling across resolutions confirms this, as many titles show proportionally larger drops when moving from 1080p to 1440p than from 1440p to 4K, indicating the GPU hits compute or bandwidth limits before the CPU becomes a constraint.

For example, Counter-Strike 2 drops from 133 FPS at 1080p to 88 FPS at 1440p (34% reduction), but only from 88 to 49 FPS at 4K (44% reduction). Similarly, Valorant scales from 304 to 259 to 207 FPS across the three resolutions, showing the GPU becomes progressively more dominant as resolution increases. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance ensures that even at 1080p, where CPU overhead is highest, frame rates remain competitive in esports titles.

In CPU-intensive workloads, the balance shifts. The Ryzen 5 9600X’s 6-core, 12-thread configuration with a 5.40 GHz boost clock handles multi-threaded tasks effectively, as shown by the 17528.5 Cinebench R23 multi-core score. However, the GPU’s compute performance (Passmark GPU Compute score of 7281) may lag in GPU-accelerated rendering tasks, where the B570’s 11.52 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is a limiting factor. The data suggests that for gaming, the Arc B570 is the bottleneck; for productivity, the system’s 6-core CPU could be the constraint in heavily-threaded workloads.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for gaming with this build?

A: Measured data shows 1080p is the most viable resolution, with an average of 87 FPS across all games. At 1440p, many titles fall below 60 FPS, while 4K performance is consistently under 40 FPS in demanding games.

Q: How does the Arc B570 compare to its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The B570’s average benchmark score of 20556 is 0.1% above the RTX 3070 Mobile (20534) and 0.1% below the Arc A750 (20582), placing it at the 65th percentile of all GPUs.

Q: Can this system handle ray tracing?

A: The B570 includes 18 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, but measured performance in ray-traced titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (39 FPS at 1080p) suggests enabling ray tracing will require significant quality reductions.

Q: What is the CPU’s multi-threaded performance?

A: The Ryzen 5 9600X scores 17528.5 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 14438 in Geekbench multi-core, placing it at the 81st percentile of all CPUs.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have and is it sufficient?

A: The Arc B570 has 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus with 380.0 GB/s bandwidth, which is adequate for 1080p ultra textures in most current titles but may limit 4K performance.

Q: What is the system’s overall performance ranking?

A: The combined percentile is 73, with the CPU at 81 and GPU at 65, placing this build in the upper-mid range of tracked configurations.

Q: Does the CPU bottleneck the GPU in gaming?

A: Benchmark data indicates the GPU is the limiting factor in most games; the CPU’s single-thread score of 1253 in 3DMark and 4570 in Passmark ensures it can keep up with the B570 at 1080p.

Who Should Build It

This configuration suits gamers targeting 1080p high-refresh play, particularly in competitive titles where the measured 304 FPS in Valorant and 293 FPS in CS:GO provide a clear advantage. Esports enthusiasts playing Call of Duty: Warzone will benefit from the 178 FPS at 1080p, while those who prefer lighter titles like Minecraft (131 FPS) or Roblox (171 FPS) will find plenty of headroom.

For content creators, the CPU’s strong multi-threaded scores (17528.5 Cinebench R23 multi-core) support video editing workflows, but the GPU’s 65th percentile ranking means GPU-accelerated rendering will be a limiting factor. Software developers will appreciate the CPU’s data compression score of 341021 and integer math performance of 89918, which aid compilation and data processing tasks. Students and small business users running office applications will find the system more than adequate, though the 65W TDP CPU and 150W GPU are modest power consumers.

The build is less suitable for 4K gaming or heavy 3D rendering workloads, where the measured FPS in titles like Red Dead Redemption 2 (18 FPS at 4K) and Cyberpunk 2077 (19 FPS at 4K) fall well below playable thresholds. Users requiring high-end ray tracing performance or large-scale GPU compute should look to higher-tier graphics options.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Socket AM5 platform provides a clear upgrade path, with the Ryzen 5 9600X being part of the 9000 series on the Zen 5 architecture. The motherboard supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration and 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, along with PCIe Gen 5 with 24 CPU lanes. The CPU includes integrated Radeon Graphics, providing a fallback display output if the discrete GPU is removed.

The Arc B570 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The GPU’s suggested PSU is 450 W, and the CPU’s TDP is 65 W, so most quality power supplies in the 500-650 W range will provide sufficient headroom for the current configuration. The GPU requires a single 8-pin power connector and occupies a dual-slot form factor measuring 272 mm in length.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU, as the current B570 is the primary gaming bottleneck. The CPU’s 81st percentile ranking means it can support significantly more powerful graphics cards before becoming a constraint. Users could also consider adding more DDR5 memory or upgrading to a higher-core-count Ryzen 9000 series processor, though the 6-core/12-thread configuration with 5.40 GHz boost is already strong for gaming. The AM5 socket’s longevity suggests future CPU upgrades will be possible without changing the motherboard.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X and Intel Arc B570, representing a mid-range configuration in the current market. The CPU, a 6-core/12-thread Zen 5 processor on the 4 nm TSMC node, ranks at the 81st percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU, based on Intel’s Xe2-HPG Battlemage architecture on 5 nm, ranks at the 65th percentile. The combined system percentile of 73 places it in the upper-mid tier of tracked configurations.

The system’s average FPS across 51 tested games is 87, with a pair rank of 3020 out of 3732, indicating that while the individual components are competent, the combination does not push into top-tier performance territory. The 6-core CPU with 32 MB of L3 cache and the 10 GB GPU with 380.0 GB/s bandwidth form a balanced mid-range pairing, though the data consistently shows the GPU as the limiting factor in gaming workloads.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 9600X is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the 9000 series, built on the Zen 5 architecture with the Granite Ridge codename. It uses a 4 nm TSMC process with 8,315 million transistors on a 70.6 mm² die, featuring a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports DDR5 memory with ECC capability and dual-channel configuration, delivering 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth.

Benchmark results show exceptional single-thread performance with a 3DMark single-thread score of 1253 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2183.5. The Geekbench single-core result of 2923 further confirms the architecture’s efficiency. Multi-threaded scores scale well from 2456 at 2 threads to 7590 at max threads in 3DMark, though the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17528.5 indicates the 6-core limit becomes apparent in heavily threaded workloads.

The CPU’s 81st percentile ranking places it within 0.2% of the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE (29656) and 0.5% above the Ryzen 7 7840H (29868). Passmark results show strong integer math (89918) and floating point (60081) performance, with particularly notable data compression (341021) and extended instruction (28023) scores. The 65W TDP with unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking headroom, and the integrated Radeon Graphics provides basic display capabilities without a discrete GPU.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1080p, the system delivers 304 FPS in Valorant, 293 FPS in CS:GO, and 178 FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone, making it ideal for competitive play on 144Hz or 240Hz monitors. The 133 FPS in Counter-Strike 2 and 158 FPS in Rainbow Six Siege further support this use case.

Streaming: The CPU’s 6-core/12-thread configuration with a 5.40 GHz boost clock can handle game capture and encoding overhead, though the 17528.5 Cinebench R23 multi-core score suggests moderate streaming settings are appropriate. The GPU’s 11.52 TFLOPS FP32 performance may offload some encoding tasks, but dedicated hardware encoders are not specified in the data.

Video Editing: The CPU’s strong multi-threaded performance (14438 Geekbench multi-core) supports timeline editing and export tasks, while the GPU’s 65th percentile ranking means effects and rendering will be slower than with higher-tier graphics cards. The 10 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p editing timelines.

3D Rendering: The CPU’s 60081 Passmark floating point score aids CPU-based rendering, but the GPU’s 7281 Passmark compute score and 11.52 TFLOPS FP32 throughput limit GPU-accelerated renderers. Expect longer render times compared to higher-tier GPUs.

Software Development: The CPU’s 89918 integer math score and 341021 data compression score accelerate compilation and data processing tasks. The 12 threads handle parallel builds effectively, while the 32 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency for frequently accessed code.

Student and Office Work: The system’s 65W CPU TDP and 150W GPU TDP make it energy-efficient for daily use. Productivity applications will run smoothly given the single-thread score of 4570 in Passmark, while the integrated Radeon Graphics provides a backup display option if the discrete GPU is not needed.