SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 9500F + Intel Arc A750

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 9500F

52,873 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A750

20,582 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 5 9500F + Intel Arc A750

This desktop pairing combines AMD's Zen 5-based Ryzen 5 9500F with Intel's Arc A750 graphics card, creating a system that sits at the 79th combined percentile across all CPU+GPU pairings in the benchmark database. The CPU delivers strong multi-threaded and single-threaded performance for its class, while the GPU offers competitive rasterization and compute capabilities. No measured frame rate data exists for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures in this analysis are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores of both components.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Ryzen 5 9500F and the Arc A750 is characterized by a clear asymmetry in raw compute capability. The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 52,873, placing it at the 91st percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU's average benchmark score of 20,582 places it at the 66th percentile among all GPUs. This percentile gap of 25 points indicates that the processor is significantly more capable relative to its peers than the graphics card is relative to its own competition.

In CPU-bound workloads, the Ryzen 5 9500F will not be the limiting factor. Its PassMark multithread score of 28,312 and single-thread score of 4,258 provide ample headroom for most applications that rely on processor throughput. The GPU, however, will constrain overall system performance in graphics-intensive tasks. The Arc A750's PassMark G3D score of 12,534 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,612 represent its peak rasterization capabilities, and these figures are substantially lower than what the CPU could theoretically feed in a balanced system.

Frame rate scaling in gaming workloads will follow a predictable pattern: at lower resolutions, the CPU's high single-thread performance becomes more relevant, but the GPU still limits maximum achievable frame rates. At higher resolutions, the GPU bottleneck becomes even more pronounced, as pixel throughput demands exceed what the Arc A750's 268.8 GPixel/s pixel rate can sustain. The GPU's 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 8 GB GDDR6 frame buffer will also influence performance scaling, particularly in texture-heavy scenes where bandwidth saturation occurs.

Benchmark results indicate that this pairing leans CPU-heavy in terms of relative capability. For productivity tasks that leverage multi-threading, the processor's 28,312 multithread score and 84,198 integer math score will dominate workflow performance, while the GPU's compute capabilities, reflected in its PassMark GPU compute score of 5,368, will serve as a secondary accelerator. The practical bottleneck analysis shows that users will experience GPU-limited performance in gaming and GPU-accelerated rendering, while CPU-limited performance will rarely manifest outside of extreme single-threaded workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The Ryzen 5 9500F posts an average benchmark score of 52,873, placing it at the 91st percentile among all CPUs tracked in the database. This score positions it in close competition with several notable processors: it trails the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 by 0.1%, the Intel Xeon 634 by 0.2%, the AMD EPYC 7313P by 0.6%, and the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X by 0.8%. These narrow deltas indicate that the 9500F performs within 1% of processors that target substantially different market segments, including embedded systems, server platforms, and higher-tier desktop parts.

The Intel Arc A750 achieves an average benchmark score of 20,582, placing it at the 66th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Arc B570, which scores 0.1% higher; the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, which scores 0.2% higher; the AMD Radeon R9 M390X, which scores 0.4% lower; and the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M, which scores 0.5% higher. The GPU's performance envelope is thus tightly clustered with these competitors, all within a 0.9% spread, suggesting that the Arc A750 occupies a well-defined performance tier.

Combined, the CPU and GPU produce a system at the 79th combined percentile, indicating that this pairing outperforms roughly four-fifths of all tracked CPU+GPU combinations. The CPU's individual benchmark suite shows particular strengths in specific workloads: the data compression score of 325,678 is exceptionally high, the random string sorting score of 34,174 indicates strong memory manipulation capability, and the extended instructions score of 26,370 demonstrates robust SIMD throughput. The GPU's benchmark profile shows balanced performance across DirectX versions, with PassMark scores of 65 for DirectX 10, 72 for DirectX 11, and 70 for DirectX 12, alongside a 181 score for DirectX 9.

The combined picture reveals a system where CPU performance exceeds GPU performance relative to their respective peer groups. This imbalance means the Arc A750 will be the primary determinant of gaming and graphics-related performance, while the CPU's capabilities will be most fully utilized in productivity, content creation, and compute-heavy workloads where the processor's 12 threads and high single-thread score come to the fore.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 9500F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Granite Ridge, and manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process node. It belongs to AMD's 9000 series and fits the Socket AM5 platform. The processor operates with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a thermal design power of 65 W. The chip contains 8,315 million transistors on a 70.6 mm² die, reflecting the density of the 4 nm process.

Cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. This cache configuration supports the processor's strong single-thread performance, which is evidenced by its PassMark single-thread score of 4,258. The processor supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth and includes ECC memory support, making it suitable for workstation applications where data integrity is critical.

Benchmark results reveal the processor's fingerprint across different workload types. The multithread score of 28,312 reflects solid parallel processing capability for a 6-core part, while the floating-point math score of 56,570 and integer math score of 84,198 indicate strong arithmetic throughput. The physics score of 1,851 and find prime numbers score of 220 are more modest, suggesting that certain specialized workloads may not scale as effectively. Data encryption performance is represented by a score of 15,716, and data compression achieves 325,678, indicating excellent memory subsystem utilization.

The processor's 91st percentile ranking places it above the vast majority of CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals include server-class parts like the AMD EPYC 7313P and Intel Xeon 634, as well as the higher-core-count AMD Ryzen 9 7900X. The fact that the 9500F performs within 0.8% of the Ryzen 9 7900X, which has significantly more cores, underscores the efficiency of the Zen 5 architecture and the advantage of higher core clocks in many workloads. For real-world applications, this means the 9500F can handle demanding productivity tasks, compile code, and process data with performance that rivals or exceeds processors in higher price tiers.

Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU pairing is well-suited for gamers who target 1080p or 1440p resolutions, where the Arc A750's performance tier can deliver playable frame rates in most titles while the Ryzen 5 9500F ensures that CPU-intensive game logic, physics calculations, and AI routines do not become bottlenecks. The CPU's high single-thread score of 4,258 and multithread score of 28,312 provide the processing headroom needed for modern game engines that leverage multiple threads.

Content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, or graphic design will benefit from the CPU's strong multi-threaded performance, particularly in tasks like video encoding, where the 28,312 multithread score translates to faster export times. The GPU's 17.20 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 34.41 TFLOPS of FP16 compute (at 2:1 ratio) provide acceleration for GPU-accelerated effects and rendering tasks, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit very large project sizes.

Software developers will find the Ryzen 5 9500F's combination of 6 cores, 12 threads, and high boost clock of 5.00 GHz well-suited for compilation tasks, which benefit from both parallel processing and high single-thread speeds. The processor's 32 MB of L3 cache and 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth support rapid data access during builds and testing. ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running development workloads.

Students and small business workstation users represent another target audience. The system's balance of CPU and GPU capabilities handles office productivity suites, spreadsheet calculations, data analysis, and light content creation without excessive cost. The processor's 65 W TDP contributes to manageable system power requirements, and the platform's Socket AM5 compatibility ensures a clear upgrade path. The combination of strong single-thread and multi-thread performance makes this system adaptable to diverse academic and professional workloads.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the database. All gaming performance figures presented here are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores of the Ryzen 5 9500F and Intel Arc A750, and should be treated as approximations rather than measured results.

Based on the Arc A750's PassMark G3D score of 12,534 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,612, this GPU is positioned to deliver smooth gameplay at 1080p in most modern titles with high settings, and at 1440p with medium to high settings in less demanding games. The GPU's 8 GB GDDR6 memory with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth provides sufficient capacity for 1080p and 1440p textures, though very high-resolution texture packs may exceed this limit.

The CPU's performance, including its single-thread score of 4,258 and multithread score of 28,312, ensures that frame pacing remains consistent in CPU-bound scenarios. Games that rely heavily on single-threaded game logic will benefit from the 5.00 GHz boost clock, while titles optimized for multi-threading will leverage the 12 threads effectively. The processor's 32 MB L3 cache helps maintain high hit rates for frequently accessed game data.

At 1080p, the estimated frame rates in esports and competitive titles would be high, potentially exceeding 100 FPS in games that are well-optimized for the GPU's architecture. At 1440p, frame rates would be lower, with more demanding AAA titles potentially falling into the 40-60 FPS range. The GPU's DirectX 12 Ultimate support and Vulkan 1.4 compatibility ensure modern API utilization, though performance in ray-traced workloads may be limited by the 28 RT cores.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: For 1080p high-refresh monitors, this pairing can deliver frame rates that take advantage of 120 Hz or 144 Hz displays in many titles, driven by the CPU's strong single-thread performance and the GPU's solid rasterization capability. At 1440p, high-refresh gaming becomes more challenging, with frame rates likely capping below 100 FPS in demanding titles.

Streaming: The Ryzen 5 9500F's 12 threads provide sufficient headroom for simultaneous gaming and streaming encoding, with the multithread score of 28,312 indicating that the CPU can handle the additional load without severely impacting game performance. The GPU's Quick Sync alternative via Intel's media engine also supports hardware encoding.

Video editing: The CPU's 56,570 floating-point math score and 84,198 integer math score accelerate video processing tasks, while the GPU's compute capability of 5,368 in PassMark GPU compute provides hardware acceleration for effects and color grading. The 8 GB VRAM may limit the complexity of GPU-accelerated timelines.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering will perform well, with the 28,312 multithread score providing solid throughput for render engines that use all available threads. GPU-based rendering in applications that support the Arc A750's Xe-HPG architecture can leverage the 17.20 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, though the 8 GB memory capacity will constrain scene complexity.

Software development: Compilation tasks benefit from the CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads, with integer performance of 84,198 accelerating code compilation and build processes. The 5.00 GHz boost clock reduces latency for single-threaded toolchain components, and the 32 MB L3 cache supports large codebases.

Student and office work: For document processing, spreadsheet analysis, web browsing, and presentation creation, this system provides substantial overcapacity. The CPU's single-thread score of 4,258 ensures snappy application responsiveness, and the GPU handles graphical interfaces and video playback with ease.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: This pairing sits at the 79th combined percentile among all CPU+GPU combinations in the database, meaning it outperforms roughly 79% of tracked systems.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 9500F compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X in benchmark performance?

A: The Ryzen 5 9500F's average benchmark score of 52,873 is 0.8% lower than the Ryzen 9 7900X's score of 53,288, placing the two processors within a very narrow performance margin despite the 7900X having more cores.

Q: What memory type and bandwidth does the Ryzen 5 9500F support?

A: The processor supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth, and it includes ECC memory support.

Q: How does the Intel Arc A750's performance compare to the Intel Arc B570?

A: The Arc A750's average benchmark score of 20,582 is 0.1% lower than the Arc B570's score of 20,556, making them effectively equivalent in overall performance.

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM capacity and memory bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc A750 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 256-bit bus and 512.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: Does this CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the Ryzen 5 9500F has no integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU like the Arc A750 is required for display output.

Q: What is the CPU's socket and platform?

A: The Ryzen 5 9500F uses AMD Socket AM5 and supports PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 5 9500F is built on the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which represents the current mainstream desktop socket for AMD processors. This platform supports DDR5 memory, as confirmed by the processor's memory support specifications, and PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU. The AM5 socket provides a clear upgrade path to higher-core-count CPUs within the same socket generation, allowing users to increase processing capability without changing the motherboard.

The processor's 65 W TDP indicates a modest power requirement, which gives users thermal and power delivery headroom for future CPU upgrades. The Arc A750's 225 W TDP, combined with the CPU's 65 W TDP, suggests a system that can be adequately powered by the suggested 550 W PSU, with some headroom for additional components like storage drives and fans. The GPU requires one 6-pin and one 8-pin power connector, which should be verified against the chosen power supply's available connectors.

A sensible next upgrade for this system would be a higher-core-count AM5 processor, which would further improve multi-threaded performance for productivity workloads while maintaining compatibility with the existing motherboard and memory. On the GPU side, upgrading to a more powerful graphics card would address the current bottleneck in gaming and graphics-accelerated workloads, with the PCIe 4.0 x16 interface of the Arc A750 providing compatibility with newer GPUs that also use PCIe 4.0 or PCIe 5.0. The 550 W suggested PSU may need to be upgraded if the replacement GPU has a higher power draw.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 5 9500F processor with the Intel Arc A750 graphics card. The system achieves a 79th combined percentile ranking, indicating that it outperforms the majority of tracked CPU+GPU pairings. The CPU, with its 91st percentile ranking, is notably stronger relative to its peers than the GPU, which holds a 66th percentile ranking among all GPUs.

The Ryzen 5 9500F represents AMD's 9000 series, built on the Zen 5 architecture with a 6-core, 12-thread configuration. The Intel Arc A750 is based on the Xe-HPG architecture (Alchemist generation) and is currently marked as end-of-life in production status, with the successor being Battlemage. The GPU's predecessor is Xe Graphics.

In terms of overall tier, this build sits in the upper-middle range of the performance spectrum. The CPU's performance is comparable to server and high-end desktop processors within a 1% margin, while the GPU's performance is comparable to mid-range and mobile graphics solutions. This combination is suitable for users who prioritize CPU-intensive tasks and are willing to accept GPU performance that is adequate but not class-leading for gaming and graphics workloads.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A750 is built on the DG2-512 chip using the Xe-HPG architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. The GPU operates with a base clock of 2050 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz, with memory running at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). It features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 512.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

The GPU's compute resources include 3,584 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output units, along with 28 ray tracing cores. It achieves a pixel rate of 268.8 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 537.6 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance is rated at 17.20 TFLOPS for FP32 and 34.41 TFLOPS for FP16 (at a 2:1 ratio). The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Benchmark results show the Arc A750's performance profile across different workloads. The PassMark G3D score of 12,534 reflects its rasterization capability, while the GPU compute score of 5,368 indicates moderate compute throughput. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the GPU scores 2,612, demonstrating its DirectX 12 performance. Geekbench scores include 98,554 for OpenCL and 85,631 for Vulkan, showing robust general-purpose compute and graphics API performance.

For rendering workloads, the GPU's 17.20 TFLOPS of FP32 compute provides acceleration for OpenCL-based renderers, while the 34.41 TFLOPS of FP16 compute (2:1 ratio) can accelerate workloads that support reduced precision. The 28 ray tracing cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though performance in heavily ray-traced scenes will be limited by the GPU's overall compute capability. The 8 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p and 1440p rendering tasks, but may constrain very large scenes or high-resolution texture sets.