SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 9500F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

87 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
79%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 9500F

52,873 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

2,690 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 9500F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER form a desktop build that sits at the 55th combined percentile. The CPU ranks in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score places it in the 18th percentile of all GPUs. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 9500F has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER has 18 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s.

Q: What are the CPU's base and boost clocks?

A: The base clock is 3.80 GHz, and the boost clock is 5.00 GHz.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the Ryzen 5 9500F has no integrated graphics (N/A).

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU TDP is 65 W, and the GPU TDP is 275 W.

Q: What is the CPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

Q: What is the build's overall percentile?

A: The combined percentile is 55, meaning the system ranks above 55% of all CPU+GPU pairings in the database.

Gaming Performance

Because the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this CPU+GPU pairing, the following discussion is entirely estimated from the benchmark scores. The CPU's single-thread Passmark score is 4258, and its multithread score is 28312, both of which are strong for a six-core desktop part. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2690, which places it in the 18th percentile of all GPUs. These numbers indicate a large imbalance: the CPU is capable of high frame generation, but the GPU is not.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the GPU's low pixel rate (201.0 GPixel/s) and texture rate (502.4 GTexel/s) would likely limit the frame rate to a level that the CPU could easily exceed. The GPU's FP32 throughput of 32.15 TFLOPS is modest, and its 3DMark score is only 1–1.7% higher than that of older entry-level cards like the Quadro K1100M or GT 1030. Therefore, even at 1080p, the GPU would be the bottleneck in most graphically intensive games. At 1440p or 4K, the situation worsens because the GPU must push more pixels, and its 18th-percentile ranking suggests it cannot maintain high frame rates at those resolutions. The CPU's high single-thread and integer math scores (84198) would support high physics and game logic, but the GPU's low output would cap the actual experience. Consequently, the estimated frame rates for this build are expected to be low, especially in modern titles. All numbers here are estimates, not measured results.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 9500F is a desktop processor built on the Zen 5 architecture (Granite Ridge) using TSMC's 4 nm process. It contains 8,315 million transistors on a 70.6 mm² die. The CPU has 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 32 MB L3 cache. It supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and ECC memory is enabled. The CPU provides 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, and it has no integrated graphics, requiring a discrete GPU. Its TDP is 65 W, and it is unlocked for overclocking.

The Passmark benchmark suite shows an average score of 52873, placing the CPU in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. The single-thread score is 4258, the multithread score is 28312, and the integer math score is 84198. The floating-point math score is 56570, and the data encryption score is 15716. These numbers indicate strong performance in both lightly threaded and heavily threaded workloads. The nearest rivals are all higher-end parts: the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 (52901, -0.1%), Intel Xeon 634 (52974, -0.2%), AMD EPYC 7313P (53206, -0.6%), and AMD Ryzen 9 7900X (53288, -0.8%). The 9500F trails these parts by less than 1%, even though they have more cores or are server-focused. This suggests the CPU has excellent per-core efficiency and is a capable choice for single-threaded tasks like gaming, but its 6-core/12-thread design will be outmatched by 8-core or 16-core CPUs in heavily threaded workloads such as video encoding or 3D rendering. The CPU's memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s is typical for dual-channel DDR5, and the unlocked multiplier allows further performance tuning.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket AM5, which is a desktop platform that supports DDR5 memory. The memory controller supports dual-channel DDR5 with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and ECC memory is enabled. The CPU provides 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, so a PCIe 5.0 GPU and NVMe SSDs can run at full speed. The CPU's TDP of 65 W means it does not require an extreme cooling solution, but the GPU's TDP of 275 W must be accounted for when selecting a power supply. The suggested PSU is not provided in the data, but the combined TDP of CPU and GPU is 340 W, plus other components, so a power supply with a high wattage headroom would be prudent. The CPU is unlocked, so overclocking can increase its power draw beyond 65 W, but the base TDP is low.

The AM5 socket is current, and future CPU upgrades on the same socket are possible, provided the motherboard supports them. The CPU does not have integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is mandatory. The GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, which matches the CPU's lanes. The platform also supports ECC memory, which is useful for workstation and server tasks. The GPU's display outputs are 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b, which are compatible with modern monitors. The CPU's launch MSRP is $219, though this is not the only cost of the platform.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average Passmark score is 52873, placing it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2690, which places it in the 18th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile is 55, which is the overall rank of the build. The CPU's nearest rivals in the database are the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 (52901, -0.1%), Intel Xeon 634 (52974, -0.2%), AMD EPYC 7313P (53206, -0.6%), and AMD Ryzen 9 7900X (53288, -0.8%). The CPU's score is 52873, so it is within 0.8% of these parts, all of which have higher core counts or are server chips. The GPU's nearest rivals are the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M (2664, +1%), NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (2662, +1.1%), Intel Arc Pro B50 (2660, +1.1%), and NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 (2645, +1.7%). The RTX 5070 SUPER's score of 2690 is 1–1.7% higher than those older or entry-level GPUs.

The combined picture is one of extreme imbalance. The CPU is a top-10% performer, while the GPU is in the bottom 20%. The combined percentile of 55 reflects the midpoint of these two extremes. In a system where the CPU and GPU are equally matched, the combined percentile would be near the average of the two percentiles (91+18)/2 = 54.5, which is close to 55. This indicates that the build's overall rank is exactly what the two components would predict. The CPU's high single-thread and multithread scores are useful for productivity, but the GPU's low 3DMark score means any GPU-accelerated workload will be severely limited.

Usage Scenarios

  • High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-thread score of 4258 is excellent for game logic and physics, but the GPU's 18th percentile and 3DMark score of 2690 will prevent high frame rates at any resolution. At 1080p low settings, the GPU might manage moderate frame rates, but high-refresh displays would not be saturated. This build is not suitable for high-refresh gaming.
  • Streaming: The CPU has 12 threads, and its multithread score of 28312 suggests it can handle encoding tasks alongside gaming. However, the GPU's low performance would force the stream to be rendered at low settings, and the GPU may not have enough horsepower for real-time encoding. The CPU could handle software encoding, but the overall system would be limited by the GPU.
  • Video editing: The CPU's high multithread score and integer math score (84198) support video editing workflows, especially timeline scrubbing and export tasks. The GPU's 18 GB of VRAM could be used for effects and rendering, but its low compute performance will slow down GPU-accelerated effects. The CPU would be the main driver, but the GPU would be a bottleneck in final render passes.
  • 3D rendering: For CPU-based renderers, the CPU's 12 threads and 91st percentile will provide good performance. For GPU-based renderers, the GPU's 3DMark score is low, and its FP32 throughput of 32.15 TFLOPS is not competitive. The GPU will be the limiting factor.
  • Software development: The CPU's single-thread score of 4258 and integer math score of 84198 are excellent for compilation and code analysis. The GPU is not needed for most development tasks, so this build is a strong choice for developers.
  • Student and office work: The CPU is overkill for basic productivity, but it handles multitasking efficiently. The GPU's low performance is irrelevant for office tasks, so the build is functional but power-hungry for a simple desktop.

Who Should Build It

This build is for users who prioritize CPU performance over GPU performance. The CPU's 91st percentile and its near-parity with the Ryzen 9 7900X and EPYC 7313P (within 0.8%) make it a strong candidate for software development, data analysis, and CPU-heavy scientific computing. The 18 GB GPU could be used for machine learning or AI inference, but its low 3DMark score means it is not a dedicated GPU for large-scale training. The build could also serve as a small business workstation for tasks like accounting, document processing, and database management, where the CPU's multithread score of 28312 is beneficial. Gamers who play at 1080p with low settings might get playable frame rates, but the GPU's 18th percentile is not a gaming grade. Content creators who rely on CPU-based rendering will find the CPU excellent, but the GPU will not accelerate GPU-based effects. The CPU's TDP of 65 W is efficient, but the GPU's 275 W TDP means the system consumes power, making it less ideal for a low-power office machine. The build is not a balanced gaming or workstation system; it is a CPU-centric workstation with a placeholder GPU.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build (class: desktop) that pairs the AMD Ryzen 5 9500F with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER. The CPU is a high-end part, ranking in the 91st percentile, while the GPU is in the 18th percentile. The combined percentile is 55, which is the median of the two components. The build is therefore a mid-tier overall, but the components are mismatched. The CPU is a 6-core/12-thread processor with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and boost of 5.00 GHz, and the GPU has 18 GB of GDDR7 memory and 6400 shading units. The CPU is designed for compute-heavy workloads, while the GPU is more of an entry-level part in the database. The build is not a high-performance gaming machine; it is a CPU-first workstation.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU and GPU are extremely imbalanced. The CPU is at the 91st percentile, and the GPU is at the 18th percentile. In any workload that uses both components, the GPU will be the bottleneck. For gaming, the CPU's single-thread score of 4258 can feed frames, but the GPU's low 3DMark score of 2690 will cap the output. The CPU's high integer math score (84198) and floating-point score (56570) are irrelevant when the GPU cannot render. In CPU-only tasks, the CPU will perform well, but in GPU-accelerated tasks (e.g., ray tracing, CUDA compute, video encoding with NVENC), the GPU's low performance will dominate. The combined percentile of 55 is the average of the two components, but the practical performance in a mixed workload is determined by the weakest link. The GPU's pixel rate of 201.0 GPixel/s and texture rate of 502.4 GTexel/s are low, so the GPU will limit all graphics-related tasks. The CPU can be overclocked to gain more performance, but that will not help the GPU. The system is a clear example of a CPU-heavy configuration.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture (chip GB205) using TSMC's 5 nm process. It contains 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die. The GPU has 18 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s. The base clock is 2325 MHz, the boost clock is 2512 MHz, and the memory clock is 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). The GPU has 6400 shading units, 200 texture mapping units, and 80 ROPs. It also includes 50 ray tracing cores and 200 tensor cores. The pixel rate is 201.0 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 502.4 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 32.15 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 32.15 TFLOPS (1:1). The GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface and has a TDP of 275 W, with a single 16-pin power connector. It measures 245 mm in length, 115 mm in height, and 40 mm in width, and is a dual-slot card.

The only benchmark available is 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, with a score of 2690. This places the GPU in the 18th percentile of all GPUs, meaning it is slower than 82% of the GPU pool. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M (2664, +1%), NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (2662, +1.1%), Intel Arc Pro B50 (2660, +1.1%), and NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 (2645, +1.7%). The RTX 5070 SUPER is only 1–1.7% faster than these older, entry-level cards. This indicates that the GPU's actual performance is not competitive with modern GPUs. The 18 GB of VRAM is a large capacity, but the bandwidth of 672 GB/s is not enough to sustain high-frame-rate gaming. The 32.15 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is moderate, but the low 3DMark score suggests that the GPU is not efficient in real-world rendering. The 50 RT cores and 200 tensor cores are present, but their performance is not reflected in the low score. For rendering, the GPU will struggle with high-resolution textures and complex shaders. The GPU is a low-performance part, and its benchmark confirms that it is not suitable for modern gaming or GPU compute.