SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 8600G + Intel Arc A750

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

89 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
86%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 8600G

24,089 Benchmark Score
Top 14% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A750

20,582 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 8600G and Intel Arc A750 pairing represents a desktop build centered on a modern AM5 processor with integrated graphics, paired with a dedicated Intel discrete GPU. The CPU, a 6-core/12-thread Zen 4 part, delivers strong multi-threaded performance, while the GPU offers solid 1080p and 1440p capabilities. The data provided contains no measured FPS results for this specific combination, so all gaming performance figures discussed below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of each component.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination. This is a critical caveat: every frame rate figure presented here is an estimate based on the component benchmark scores, not a direct measurement. The data clearly indicates this is a capable 1080p gaming platform, with the Intel Arc A750’s PassMark G3D score of 12534 placing it in the 66th percentile of all GPUs. For reference, the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2612 suggests it can handle modern DirectX 12 titles at high settings, though the lack of measured data means we cannot confirm absolute frame rates.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the estimated performance is strong. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21503 and single-core score of 3035 indicate it will not bottleneck the GPU in most titles. The Arc A750’s 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus provides 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is sufficient for 1080p ultra textures in most games. Expect playable frame rates in the 60-90 FPS range for AAA titles like Cyberpunk 2077 or Assassin’s Creed Mirage, though esports titles like Valorant or CS2 could push well beyond 144 FPS.

Moving to 1440p, the picture changes. The GPU’s bandwidth remains the same, but the pixel load increases by 78%. The Arc A750’s 268.8 GPixel/s pixel rate and 537.6 GTexel/s texture rate suggest it can handle 1440p, but frame rates will drop to approximately 40-60 FPS on ultra settings in demanding titles. The CPU’s single-thread score of 985 in 3DMark and 3878 in PassMark single-thread indicate it will keep up with the GPU’s frame pacing, but the GPU becomes the limiting factor at this resolution.

At 4K, the data suggests this pairing is not ideal. The GPU’s percentile rank of 66 and its modest FP32 throughput of 17.20 TFLOPS mean that 4K ultra settings will likely produce frame rates below 30 FPS in most modern games. The CPU’s multi-threaded performance is not the issue; the GPU simply lacks the raw compute and memory bandwidth for 4K gaming. Users targeting 4K would need to lower settings significantly or use upscaling technologies, which the Arc A750 supports via DirectX 12 Ultimate.

FAQ

Q: Does this build support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 5 8600G supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel memory bus, providing a theoretical memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s.

Q: Can the CPU handle modern multi-threaded workloads?

A: The 6-core, 12-thread processor achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21503 and a PassMark multithread score of 25294, placing it in the 76th percentile of all CPUs. This is sufficient for video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have, and is it enough?

A: The Intel Arc A750 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory. This is adequate for 1080p ultra textures and most 1440p scenarios, but it may limit texture quality in future games that require more than 8 GB at 1440p or 4K.

Q: What is the power requirement for this build?

A: The CPU has a 65W TDP, and the GPU has a 225W TDP. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 550W, which should provide headroom for the entire system.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 5 8600G has an unlocked multiplier, allowing for overclocking within the AM5 platform’s power limits.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the CPU?

A: The CPU’s launch MSRP is $229. The GPU’s launch MSRP is 289 USD, but the data does not include pricing for the combined build.

Q: What PCIe interface does the GPU use?

A: The Arc A750 uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, while the CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 5 8600G uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which is the current mainstream desktop socket. This provides a clear upgrade path to higher-tier Ryzen processors within the same generation or future generations, as AM5 is designed to support multiple processor generations. The CPU’s architecture is Zen 4, codenamed Phoenix, manufactured on TSMC’s 4 nm process. With 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die, this is a modern, efficient chip.

Memory support is limited to DDR5, which is the current standard. The dual-channel memory bus provides 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth, which is sufficient for the CPU’s 6-core design. The platform does not support ECC memory, so this is not a workstation feature. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, which is enough for a single GPU and one or two NVMe drives.

The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s lanes. The Arc A750 requires a 550W PSU suggestion, and its TDP is 225W. This means a 550W power supply is the minimum recommendation, and users should consider a higher wattage unit if they plan to add more storage or peripherals. The GPU has a 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin power connector configuration, so the PSU must have these connectors available.

For a sensible next upgrade, the CPU is the stronger component relative to the GPU. The CPU’s percentile rank of 76 is higher than the GPU’s 66, meaning the GPU is more likely to be the bottleneck. Upgrading the GPU to a higher-tier model with more VRAM and compute power would be the most impactful change. Alternatively, users could upgrade the CPU to a higher-core-count AM5 processor if their workloads are heavily multi-threaded, but the current CPU is already well-suited for gaming.

Who Should Build It

This build targets gamers and content creators who prioritize 1080p gaming with high settings. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth are well-matched to 1080p ultra textures, and the CPU’s single-thread performance ensures smooth frame pacing. Esports gamers will find this pairing excellent, as the CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 3878 and the GPU’s high pixel rate will drive very high frame rates in less demanding titles.

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s multi-threaded capabilities. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21503 is competitive with many desktop processors, and the PassMark floating point math score of 47919 indicates strong performance in compute-heavy tasks. The GPU’s OpenCL score of 98554 and Vulkan score of 85631 suggest it can accelerate rendering workloads, though its 8 GB VRAM may limit very large scenes.

Developers and students will find this a capable workstation. The CPU’s 12 threads handle compilation and virtualization tasks well, and the platform’s DDR5 support ensures fast memory access. Small business workstations could use this build for productivity applications, where the CPU’s PassMark integer math score of 77042 and data compression score of 293306 indicate strong performance in office workloads.

The integrated Radeon 760M graphics in the CPU provide a fallback display output if the discrete GPU is removed, making troubleshooting easier. However, the dedicated Arc A750 is the primary display driver, and its 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0 outputs support multiple monitors.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a clear imbalance: the CPU is the stronger component relative to the GPU. The CPU ranks in the 76th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU ranks in the 66th percentile of all GPUs. This means the GPU is more likely to be the bottleneck in gaming workloads, particularly at higher resolutions.

Evidence from the CPU’s nearest rivals confirms this. The Ryzen 5 8600G’s average benchmark score of 24089 is nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen 5 7540U (24188, delta -0.4%), the AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (23982, delta 0.4%), and the Intel Core i5-13400 (24280, delta -0.8%). This suggests the CPU is performing at a level typical for mid-range desktop and high-end mobile processors. In gaming, this CPU will not limit frame rates in most titles.

The GPU’s nearest rivals tell a different story. The Arc A750’s average score of 20582 is within 0.5% of the Intel Arc B570 (20556, delta 0.1%), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (20534, delta 0.2%), and the AMD Radeon R9 M390X (20662, delta -0.4%). This places the GPU in a performance tier that is adequate for 1080p but not exceptional for 1440p or 4K.

In gaming workloads, the CPU will be the limiting factor in low-resolution, high-frame-rate scenarios. The CPU’s 3DMark single-thread score of 985 is modest compared to newer processors, and its PassMark single-thread score of 3878 is mid-range. At 1080p with a powerful GPU, the CPU could bottleneck frame rates above 144 FPS. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the bottleneck due to its limited VRAM and compute throughput.

For CPU-intensive workloads like video encoding or 3D rendering, the GPU provides compute acceleration via its 3584 shading units. The GPU’s PassMark GPU compute score of 5368 is moderate, so the CPU will still carry most of the load in these tasks.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A750 is based on the Xe-HPG architecture, codenamed DG2-512, manufactured on TSMC’s 6 nm process. It contains 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 53.4M / mm². The GPU has 3584 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output units. It also includes 28 ray tracing cores, though it lacks dedicated tensor cores.

Memory is 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, providing 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 2000 MHz, with 16 Gbps effective data rate. This bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p ultra textures but may become a limitation at higher resolutions or with high-resolution texture packs.

The GPU clocks are 2050 MHz base and 2400 MHz boost. These clocks, combined with the 3584 shading units, yield 17.20 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 34.41 TFLOPS of FP16 (2:1). The pixel rate is 268.8 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 537.6 GTexel/s. These figures place the GPU in the mid-range tier.

The benchmark scores reflect this positioning. The PassMark G3D score of 12534 is solid, and the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2612 indicates good DirectX 12 performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 98554 and Vulkan score of 85631 show strong compute capabilities. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern APIs.

For rendering workloads, the GPU’s ray tracing cores (28) provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the modest FP32 throughput means ray-traced scenes will be demanding. The lack of tensor cores means no dedicated AI acceleration, so machine learning tasks will rely on the GPU’s general compute units.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark scores are consistently strong. In Cinebench R23, it scores 21503 multi-core and 3035 single-core. In Cinebench R20, it scores 9031 multi-core and 1274 single-core. The Geekbench scores are 10850 multi-core and 2433 single-core. The PassMark multithread score is 25294, and the single-thread score is 3878.

The CPU’s 3DMark scores show scaling with thread count: 1869 for 2 threads, 3510 for 4 threads, 5187 for 8 threads, 6161 for max threads, and 6199 for 16 threads. This indicates good scaling up to 8 threads, with diminishing returns beyond that. The single-thread score of 985 is modest.

The GPU’s benchmark scores are more varied. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2612. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 98554, and the Vulkan score is 85631. The PassMark G3D score is 12534, with a G2D score of 732. The DirectX scores are low (65 for DX10, 72 for DX11, 70 for DX12, 181 for DX9), which may indicate driver overhead or benchmark-specific issues.

Combined, the CPU ranks in the 76th percentile and the GPU in the 66th percentile. The combined percentile for the build is 71. This places the system in the upper-mid-range tier for desktop builds. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 24089, and the GPU’s is 20582.

The combined picture is a system that excels in CPU-bound tasks like productivity and content creation, while the GPU provides adequate but not exceptional gaming performance. The data suggests this build is better suited for 1080p gaming than 1440p or 4K.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build (buildClass: desktop) consisting of the AMD Ryzen 5 8600G and the Intel Arc A750. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Phoenix, with a base clock of 4.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. It has a TDP of 65W and supports DDR5 memory.

The GPU is the Intel Arc A750, based on Xe-HPG architecture with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory. It has a TDP of 225W and requires a 550W PSU suggestion. The GPU is dual-slot and requires a 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin power connector.

The combined percentile for this build is 71, placing it in the upper-mid-range tier. This is a balanced system for 1080p gaming and productivity, with the CPU being the stronger component. The build is best suited for users who want a modern AM5 platform with upgrade potential, paired with a capable mid-range GPU.

The CPU’s integrated Radeon 760M graphics provide a backup display output, but the Arc A750 is the primary GPU. The system supports PCIe Gen 4 for both the GPU and NVMe storage, ensuring fast data transfer.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 8600G is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the 8000 series, using the Zen 4 architecture with the Phoenix codename. It is manufactured on TSMC’s 4 nm process, with 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The base clock is 4.30 GHz, and the boost clock is 5.00 GHz. The TDP is 65W, and the processor has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking.

The cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3 cache. This is a modest L3 cache size, but it is sufficient for the 6-core design. The CPU supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus, providing 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth. ECC memory is not supported.

The CPU’s benchmark scores are strong for its class. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21503 is competitive with many desktop processors, and the single-core score of 3035 is above average. The Geekbench multi-core score of 10850 and single-core score of 2433 confirm this. The PassMark multithread score of 25294 places it in the 76th percentile of all CPUs.

The nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 5 7540U (average score 24188, delta -0.4%), the AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (23982, delta 0.4%), the Intel Core i5-13400 (24280, delta -0.8%), and the Intel Core i7-1360P (24344, delta -1%). These deltas are all within 1%, indicating that the 8600G performs at a level nearly identical to these competitors.

For real-world workloads, the CPU excels in multi-threaded tasks. The PassMark data compression score of 293306 and integer math score of 77042 indicate strong performance in data processing. The floating point math score of 47919 shows good compute capability. The extended instructions score of 22610 suggests solid performance in SIMD-heavy workloads.

The PassMark physics score of 1450 is modest, and the find prime numbers score of 96 is low, which may indicate weaker performance in certain single-threaded integer tasks. However, the overall picture is a well-rounded CPU that can handle gaming, content creation, and productivity tasks without being the bottleneck in most scenarios.