SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 8600G + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

82 Score

Top 18% Ranking

82 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 18% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

86%

GPU

79%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 8600G

24,089 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

2,690 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 8600G paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER is a desktop build that presents a stark contrast in performance potential between its two core components. The CPU is a solid mid-range performer with a strong single-thread showing, while the GPU, based on its benchmark score, appears to be a significant outlier, landing in a very low performance percentile. This analysis will examine the data for both components, explain the implications for various workloads, and provide a clear picture of what users can realistically expect from this combination, noting upfront that no measured FPS data exists for this exact pairing, making all gaming frame rate discussions estimates derived from component scores.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 8600G is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on the Zen 4 architecture, specifically the Phoenix codename, using TSMC's 4 nm process node. It is a desktop-class chip for the AMD Socket AM5 platform, featuring a base clock of 4.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. With a 65 W TDP and an unlocked multiplier, it offers headroom for overclocking. The cache hierarchy is structured with 64 KB of L1 and 1 MB of L2 per core, alongside a shared 16 MB L3 cache. It supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s and provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU.

Benchmark results indicate a processor that excels in single-threaded tasks while holding its own in multi-threaded workloads. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 3035 points in single-core and 21503 points in multi-core, a ratio that shows strong per-core efficiency. The Geekbench scores follow a similar pattern, with a single-core score of 2433 and a multi-core score of 10850. The 3DMark tests show a clear scaling trend from 985 points (single-thread) to 1869 (2-thread), 3510 (4-thread), 5187 (8-thread), and peaking at 6199 for 16-thread and 6161 for max-thread tests. This progression suggests the CPU leverages its 12 threads effectively, with diminishing returns after 8 threads, which is typical for a 6-core, 12-thread part.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 24089 places it in the 76th percentile of all CPUs, indicating it outperforms the majority of processors in the database. Its nearest rivals, according to the data, are the AMD Ryzen 5 7540U (avg score 24188, delta -0.4%), the AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (avg score 23982, delta +0.4%), and the Intel Core i5-13400 (avg score 24280, delta -0.8%). These deltas are minimal, showing the 8600G sits in a highly competitive performance band. The PassMark multi-thread score of 25294 and single-thread score of 3878 further confirm its balanced capability. For real workloads, this means the 8600G delivers snappy responsiveness for everyday applications, strong performance in lightly-threaded software, and sufficient power for moderate multi-threaded tasks like video encoding or compiling, without matching the output of higher-core-count processors.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture for this build is defined by a significant performance gap. The CPU is a robust component, ranking in the 76th percentile, while the GPU's benchmark score places it in a drastically lower position. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER, based on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture and the GB205 chip, has only one benchmark score in the data: 2690 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. This score results in an 18th percentile ranking for the GPU. The nearest rivals listed are the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M (score 2664, delta 1%), the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (score 2662, delta 1.1%), and the Intel Arc Pro B50 (score 2660, delta 1.1%), which are all far lower-tier products than the 5070 SUPER name implies.

The combined percentile for the entire build is 47, which is a direct reflection of the GPU's low performance dragging down the overall average. While the CPU's average benchmark score is 24089, the GPU's average is a mere 2690. This massive disparity suggests a highly unbalanced system where the GPU is the definitive bottleneck for graphics-intensive tasks. The data indicates that for CPU-bound workloads, the system will perform admirably, but for any GPU-accelerated application, the RTX 5070 SUPER will severely limit the experience, potentially underperforming even the integrated graphics of many modern CPUs.

FAQ

Q: What is the performance tier of the AMD Ryzen 5 8600G based on its benchmark scores?

A: The Ryzen 5 8600G's average benchmark score of 24089 places it in the 76th percentile of all CPUs, indicating it is a solid mid-to-high-tier performer.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The data shows it is within 1% of the AMD Ryzen 5 7540U (delta -0.4%), the AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (delta +0.4%), and the Intel Core i5-13400 (delta -0.8%), making it a directly competitive part.

Q: What is the single-thread performance of the CPU?

A: The Ryzen 5 8600G scores 3035 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 3878 in PassMark single-thread, indicating strong performance for tasks that rely on few cores.

Q: What is the performance percentile of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER?

A: The GPU has an 18th percentile ranking among all GPUs, based on its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2690.

Q: Which GPUs does the RTX 5070 SUPER perform closest to?

A: Its nearest rivals in the database are the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M (delta 1%), the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (delta 1.1%), and the Intel Arc Pro B50 (delta 1.1%).

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for the build is 47, reflecting the significant performance imbalance between the high-scoring CPU and the low-scoring GPU.

Q: Does the data support high-end 4K gaming with this GPU?

A: No. The GPU's 18th percentile ranking and score of 2690 in 3DMark Steel Nomad suggest it is not suited for demanding high-resolution gaming, as this score is comparable to entry-level GPUs.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this build is not recommended. The GPU's score is far too low to drive high frame rates at 1080p or 1440p in modern titles, making it the limiting factor for this scenario. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 3035 in Cinebench R23 is irrelevant if the GPU cannot render frames fast enough.

In streaming scenarios, the CPU's 6-core, 12-thread configuration, with a multi-thread score of 21503 in Cinebench R23, can handle encoding and game capture, but the GPU's low performance will make gaming and streaming simultaneously a poor experience due to low frame rates.

For video editing, the CPU provides a decent foundation. Its multi-threaded scores, such as 10850 in Geekbench multicore and 25294 in PassMark multithread, can assist with timeline processing and rendering, but the GPU's weak 3DMark score will significantly slow down effects, encoding, and any GPU-accelerated exports.

In 3D rendering, the scenario is heavily GPU-bound. The RTX 5070 SUPER's score of 2690 in 3DMark Steel Nomad suggests it will struggle with modern renderers that rely on GPU compute, making this build a poor choice for professional 3D work. The CPU's 21503 Cinebench R23 multicore score is less relevant in this context.

For software development, the CPU is the star. Compilation tasks benefit from the multi-thread performance (6161 in 3DMark max-threads), while the strong single-thread score (3035 in Cinebench R23) ensures fast responses in IDEs and code analysis tools. The GPU's performance is irrelevant for most development tasks, making this a viable, if oddly specified, workstation.

For student and office work, this build is overkill for the CPU but severely underpowered on the GPU side. The CPU's 76th percentile performance ensures smooth multitasking with office suites and browsers, but the GPU offers no benefit for these tasks, meaning the user pays for a component that does not improve the experience.

Gaming Performance

Note: No measured FPS data exists for this CPU+GPU combination. The following is an estimate based on the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2690, which places it in the 18th percentile.

Based on the GPU's benchmark score, gaming performance is expected to be extremely poor. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2690 is comparable to the scores of the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 and Intel Arc Pro B50, which are entry-level and professional 2D-oriented cards, respectively. These are not capable of running modern AAA games at acceptable frame rates, even at 1080p with low settings.

At 1080p resolution with ultra settings, the estimate is that the RTX 5070 SUPER would struggle to maintain 30 FPS in most modern titles. At 1440p, the frame rates would be even lower, likely making games unplayable. At 4K resolution, the performance would be well below playable thresholds. The CPU's strong single-thread performance cannot compensate for the GPU's inability to render frames. The data suggests this GPU is not designed for contemporary gaming, and users should expect a very poor gaming experience across all resolutions.

Who Should Build It

The target user for this specific build is difficult to define due to the extreme performance mismatch. The data does not support recommending this system to gamers at any resolution, as the GPU's 18th percentile score indicates it cannot handle modern gaming workloads. Content creators in video editing or 3D rendering would also be poorly served, as their workflows are increasingly GPU-accelerated, and the RTX 5070 SUPER would be a significant bottleneck.

The only sensible target for this pairing is a user who requires a high-performance CPU for tasks like software development, 3D modeling (CPU-based), or heavy multitasking, and who has no need for GPU acceleration. The Ryzen 5 8600G's 76th percentile performance and 12 threads can handle compilation and productivity tasks efficiently. However, the inclusion of the RTX 5070 SUPER makes no sense in this context, as the CPU's integrated graphics (Radeon 760M) would be sufficient for basic display output. Therefore, this build is only recommended for a developer or office worker who mistakenly or intentionally prioritizes the CPU and has no GPU-dependent workload.

Balance and Bottleneck

This build is severely unbalanced, and the data clearly identifies the GPU as the primary bottleneck in all graphics-related workloads. The CPU's average benchmark score of 24089 is nearly nine times higher than the GPU's average score of 2690. In gaming or GPU-accelerated applications, the RTX 5070 SUPER will limit the system's performance to the 18th percentile, regardless of the CPU's 76th percentile capability. The CPU will be left waiting for the GPU to finish rendering frames.

Conversely, in CPU-bound workloads like software compilation or database operations, the CPU will perform to its full potential, and the GPU will be idle. The FPS scaling, if any games could run, would be flat across resolutions because the GPU is already at its maximum output at the lowest settings. The bottleneck is not a question of resolution scaling; it is a fundamental compute limitation of the GPU. The CPU is not the limiting factor in any scenario where the GPU is active; the GPU is the limiting factor in every scenario where it is active.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the AMD Ryzen 5 8600G with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER. The CPU is a capable 6-core Zen 4 processor with a 76th percentile ranking, making it a strong mid-range component. The GPU is a 50-series card with a very low 18th percentile ranking, indicating it is a performance outlier on the low end. The combined percentile for the build is 47, which accurately reflects the potential of the system as a whole. This pairing is not a coherent gaming or workstation platform, but rather a combination of a high-performing CPU with a GPU that benchmark results suggest is severely underpowered.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using the GB205 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It features 6400 shading units, 200 texture mapping units, and 80 raster operation units. The GPU is equipped with 50 RT cores and 200 tensor cores, which are designed to accelerate ray tracing and AI tasks respectively. It has a base clock of 2325 MHz and a boost clock of 2512 MHz. The memory subsystem is substantial on paper, with 18 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s.

However, the performance data for this GPU is starkly inconsistent with its specifications. The only benchmark score available is 2690 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, which places it in the 18th percentile of all GPUs. This score is nearly identical to the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M (2664), the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (2662), and the Intel Arc Pro B50 (2660). These are all low-end or legacy parts, which suggests that despite its 50-series branding and 18 GB of VRAM, the RTX 5070 SUPER's rendering performance is extremely limited. The FP32 compute is rated at 32.15 TFLOPS, but this does not translate into real-world performance based on the benchmark. For rendering tasks, this GPU would be a severe bottleneck, failing to deliver the performance expected from a modern graphics card. The data indicates that while the hardware specifications are modern, its actual computational output, as measured by 3DMark, is comparable to entry-level components.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 8600G + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 8600G

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds