SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 8400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

89 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
86%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 8400F

25,005 Benchmark Score
Top 14% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

21,035 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 form a modern desktop pairing built around AMD's Socket AM5 platform and NVIDIA's latest Blackwell architecture. The CPU, a 6-core/12-thread Zen 4 part, delivers strong single-threaded performance and respectable multi-threaded throughput, while the GPU offers a solid 1080p and 1440p experience with features like ray tracing and DLSS. Together, they occupy the 72nd percentile of all measured system pairings, indicating a balanced mid-range configuration that excels in competitive gaming and handles demanding AAA titles with adjustments.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Phoenix, and manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process. It features a base clock of 4.20 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The CPU has a 16 MB shared L3 cache and 1 MB L2 per core, with 64 KB of L1 per core. Its memory support is dual-channel DDR5, offering a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The chip uses the AMD Socket AM5 and provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU.

Benchmark data shows a single-thread score of 951 in 3DMark and 2943 in Cinebench R23 single-core, which places it in the 77th percentile of all CPUs. This indicates strong performance for tasks that rely on one or two threads, such as older games or lightly-threaded applications. Multi-threaded results are similarly competitive: a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20851 and a Passmark multithread score of 24389 show that the 6-core layout handles parallel workloads effectively. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 6091 and max-thread score of 6165 confirm that scaling is consistent across the chip's threads.

In comparison to its nearest rivals, the Ryzen 5 8400F is effectively tied with the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F, showing a delta of 0.2% in average benchmark score. It is also nearly identical to the Intel Core i7-11850H (0.3% delta) and the Intel Core i7-13620H (0.4% delta), while being only 0.4% slower than the AMD EPYC 9474F. These small deltas mean that in real-world use, the 8400F performs within a few percent of these alternatives, making it a versatile choice for both gaming and productivity. The Passmark integer math score of 74021 and floating-point math score of 46217 indicate solid performance in general computing and scientific workloads, while the data encryption score of 16646 and compression score of 288158 suggest it can handle encryption tasks and file compression without bottlenecks.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, the combination of the 8400F's strong single-thread score (2943 in R23) and the RTX 5050's measured FPS in competitive titles makes this a capable setup. Data shows Counter-Strike 2 running at 163 FPS at 1080p, and Valorant at 375 FPS, which easily exceeds 144 Hz display requirements.

Streaming and content creation benefit from the CPU's 12 threads and the GPU's NVENC hardware, though the data does not specify encoder performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20851 indicates the CPU can handle encoding tasks while gaming, though users may need to manage settings for demanding titles.

Video editing in applications like Premiere Pro relies on both CPU and GPU acceleration. The 8400F's 3DMark max-thread score of 6165 and the RTX 5050's Geekbench OpenCL score of 90334 suggest a balanced workload, with the CPU handling timeline operations and the GPU accelerating effects and exports.

3D rendering in Blender or similar software uses the GPU's CUDA cores heavily. The RTX 5050's FP32 performance of 13.17 TFLOPS and its Passmark GPU compute score of 9184 indicate it can render scenes at a moderate pace, while the CPU's Passmark multithread score of 24389 helps with scene preparation and physics calculations.

Software development tasks, including compilation and running virtual machines, benefit from the 6 cores and 12 threads. The Passmark data compression score of 288158 shows fast code archiving, and the CPU's 77th percentile ranking ensures smooth multitasking in IDEs and build tools.

For student and office work, the CPU's single-thread performance (Passmark single-thread score of 3685) and the GPU's 2D capabilities (Passmark G2D score of 1113) provide responsive web browsing, document editing, and spreadsheet handling. The low 65 W TDP also means the system stays cool and quiet under light loads.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 25005, placing it in the 77th percentile of all CPUs. This is a strong result for a 6-core part, driven by its high boost clock and efficient Zen 4 architecture. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core score is 8757 and single-core is 1236, while in R15 the scores are 2101 and 296 respectively. The 3DMark suite shows progressive scaling: 1874 for 2 threads, 3563 for 4 threads, 5275 for 8 threads, and 6091 for 16 threads, indicating that the CPU maintains efficiency across different thread counts.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 21035, placing it in the 66th percentile of all GPUs. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2502, and Geekbench scores are 90334 for OpenCL and 89381 for Vulkan. Passmark results show a G3D score of 17326 and a GPU compute score of 9184. The GPU's nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL (0.6% faster), the AMD Radeon HD 8970M (1% faster), and the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile (1.6% faster), while it is 1.6% faster than the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT.

The combined system percentile is 72, and the pair ranks 2448 out of 3732 pairs by average FPS across games. The average FPS across all measured games is 105.7, which indicates a capable 1080p gaming machine. The data shows that at 1080p, many games run above 60 FPS, but at 1440p and 4K, the frame rates drop, confirming that this is primarily a 1080p-oriented setup with some 1440p capability.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 5 8400F uses the AMD Socket AM5, which supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The platform provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, and the GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x8 interface. The CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 130 W TDP mean that the suggested PSU for the system is 300 W, which is modest for a discrete GPU setup.

A sensible next upgrade would be to increase the GPU to a higher-tier card within the same platform, as the AM5 socket is currently active and supports future Ryzen processors. However, the data does not specify which CPUs are compatible beyond the 8400F. The CPU's unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking, which could extend its lifespan, but the memory support is limited to DDR5, so users must have compatible modules.

The platform's PCIe 5.0 support on the GPU slot means that future graphics cards can take advantage of higher bandwidth, but the CPU's PCIe Gen 4 lanes for storage and other devices are still sufficient for current NVMe SSDs. The 8 GB GDDR6 memory on the GPU is a potential limitation for future games, but for the current generation, it is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU and GPU are well-matched for most workloads, as evidenced by the combined percentile of 72. The CPU's 77th percentile ranking is higher than the GPU's 66th percentile, suggesting the CPU has more headroom than the GPU in gaming scenarios. This is confirmed by the FPS data: at 1080p, the GPU is often the limiting factor in demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (48 FPS) and Red Dead Redemption 2 (44 FPS), while the CPU can push higher frame rates in lighter games like Valorant (375 FPS).

In multi-threaded workloads, the CPU's performance is the primary driver, but the GPU's compute capabilities (Passmark GPU compute score of 9184) can assist in tasks like rendering. The data does not show a significant bottleneck in either direction, as the CPU's 3DMark 16-thread score of 6091 and the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2502 indicate both components contribute to overall system performance.

The FPS scaling across resolutions shows that the GPU is the limiting factor at 1440p and 4K. For example, Counter-Strike 2 drops from 163 FPS at 1080p to 108 FPS at 1440p and 60 FPS at 4K, while the CPU's single-thread performance remains constant. This suggests that for higher resolutions, upgrading the GPU would yield more significant gains than upgrading the CPU.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's single-thread performance compared to its rivals?

A: The Ryzen 5 8400F scores 2943 in Cinebench R23 single-core, which is within 0.4% of the Intel Core i7-13620H and 0.3% of the Intel Core i7-11850H, making it effectively tied with these parts.

Q: How does the GPU perform in DX12 titles?

A: The RTX 5050 scores 2502 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, which places it in the 66th percentile of all GPUs, indicating solid performance for modern games.

Q: Is the system suitable for 4K gaming?

A: The data shows that at 3840x2160, most games run below 30 FPS, with exceptions like Valorant (256 FPS) and Call of Duty: Warzone (108 FPS). For demanding AAA titles, 4K is not practical without significant settings reductions.

Q: What is the power requirement for this build?

A: The CPU has a 65 W TDP and the GPU has a 130 W TDP, with a suggested PSU of 300 W for the entire system.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the memory support is DDR5 without ECC, as indicated in the specifications.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 5050 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 320.0 GB/s.

Q: How does the CPU handle data encryption tasks?

A: The Passmark data encryption score is 16646, which is above average, indicating it can handle encryption workloads efficiently.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, using the GB207 chip manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process. It has 2560 shading units, 80 texture mapping units, and 32 ROPs. The GPU features 20 ray tracing cores and 80 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI-based features like DLSS. Its base clock is 2317 MHz with a boost clock of 2572 MHz, and the memory runs at 2500 MHz (20 Gbps effective) across a 128-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 320.0 GB/s.

The GPU's FP32 performance is 13.17 TFLOPS, with a pixel rate of 82.30 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 205.8 GTexel/s. In benchmarks, it scores 90334 in Geekbench OpenCL and 89381 in Vulkan, indicating strong compute performance. The Passmark G3D score of 17326 places it in the 66th percentile, and its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (1.6% slower) and the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL (0.6% faster).

For rendering tasks, the GPU's compute capabilities are sufficient for 1080p and 1440p workloads. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for current games at these resolutions, but may be limiting for high-resolution texture packs or future titles. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern APIs. The 130 W TDP and dual-slot design make it a practical choice for mid-range builds, with a single 8-pin power connector.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050. The CPU is a 6-core part with a 77th percentile ranking, while the GPU sits in the 66th percentile. The combined system percentile is 72, indicating a balanced mid-range configuration. The CPU's launch MSRP was $170, and the GPU's was 249 USD. The system is designed for 1080p gaming and general productivity, with the data showing strong performance in esports titles and playable frame rates in most AAA games.

The pair ranks 2448 out of 3732 pairs by FPS, with an average of 105.7 FPS across all measured games. This suggests that while it is not a top-tier performer, it offers a solid experience for the majority of users. The CPU's 12 threads and the GPU's 8 GB VRAM make it suitable for a wide range of tasks, from gaming to content creation.

Who Should Build It

Gamers playing at 1080p will find this build ideal, as the data shows high frame rates in competitive titles like Valorant (375 FPS) and Counter-Strike 2 (163 FPS). For AAA games at 1080p, the system delivers playable frame rates, such as 78 FPS in Fortnite and 68 FPS in Control, though some titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (48 FPS) may require settings adjustments.

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's multi-threaded performance (Cinebench R23 multi-core of 20851) and the GPU's compute power (Geekbench OpenCL of 90334). The 12 threads handle multitasking efficiently, while the GPU accelerates effects and rendering tasks.

Software developers compiling code or running virtual machines will appreciate the CPU's 77th percentile ranking and the Passmark integer math score of 74021. The system's 65 W CPU TDP and 300 W PSU requirement make it an efficient choice for long coding sessions.

Students and office workers performing web browsing, document editing, and spreadsheets will find the system more than capable, with the CPU's Passmark single-thread score of 3685 ensuring responsive applications. Small business workstations that require occasional gaming or light video editing can also use this build, as it balances performance with a modest power footprint.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data, which is based on actual testing, shows the system's gaming capabilities at three resolutions. At 1920x1080, esports titles excel: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive runs at 361 FPS, Valorant at 375 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege at 194 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone achieves 144 FPS, and Minecraft runs at 161 FPS. Heavier titles see lower frame rates, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 48 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 44 FPS, and Microsoft Flight Simulator at 59 FPS.

At 2560x1440, performance drops by roughly 30-40% across most games. Valorant still runs at 320 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 at 108 FPS, but Cyberpunk 2077 falls to 36 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 to 33 FPS. The system remains playable for competitive games but struggles with demanding AAA titles.

At 3840x2160, the data shows that the system is not ideal for 4K gaming. Most games run below 30 FPS, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 24 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 22 FPS. Exceptions include Valorant (256 FPS) and Call of Duty: Warzone (108 FPS), but for the most part, 4K gaming is not viable without significant resolution scaling or settings reductions. The average FPS across all games is 105.7, confirming that this build is optimized for 1080p and can handle 1440p with some compromises.