SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 8400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

83 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 17% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
86%
VS
GPU
79%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 8400F

25,005 Benchmark Score
Top 14% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

3,075 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER pairing presents an unusual combination of a 6-core entry-level processor with a top-tier graphics card. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination, so all frame rate discussions below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and architectural characteristics, not empirical results. The CPU sits at the 77th percentile of all processors, while the GPU sits at the 19th percentile — a wide gulf that shapes every workload outcome.

Gaming Performance

Since no measured FPS rows exist in the FACT PACK for this pairing, frame rates must be inferred from the benchmark scores rather than reported as tested values. The RTX 5080 SUPER’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3075 places it at the 19th percentile of all GPUs, meaning it outperforms roughly 81% of the database’s tracked graphics cards. The Ryzen 5 8400F’s 3DMark single-thread score of 951 and 2-thread score of 1874 indicate modest per-core throughput, which will limit frame generation in CPU-bound scenarios.

At 1080p resolution, the estimated gaming experience is heavily constrained by the processor. The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 3685 and 3DMark 2-thread score of 1874 suggest it can maintain high frame rates in less demanding esports titles, but the 6-core/12-thread configuration with a 4.70 GHz boost clock will become the limiting factor in modern AAA games that scale beyond eight threads. The 3DMark 8-thread score of 5275 and max-thread score of 6165 show that multi-threaded scaling exists but plateaus quickly.

At 1440p and 4K resolutions, the GPU assumes a larger role in determining frame rates. The RTX 5080 SUPER’s 24 GB GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus delivering 1.02 TB/s bandwidth provides ample headroom for high-resolution texture streaming. The 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 293.1 GPixel/s pixel rate indicate strong raw rendering capability, but the GPU’s 19th percentile ranking relative to all GPUs means it sits below many flagship cards in the database. The estimated FPS at 4K ultra settings would be high in most titles, though the exact figures remain unmeasured.

Frame pacing is the primary concern at lower resolutions. The CPU’s 3DMark single-thread score of 951 ranks at the 77th percentile of processors, which is solid but not elite. The estimated frame rates at 1080p will show noticeable CPU bottlenecks in titles like competitive shooters where per-core performance dominates. At 4K, the GPU becomes the binding constraint, and the CPU’s limitations become less apparent.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 5080 SUPER is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using a GB203 chip manufactured on TSMC’s 5 nm process. The die contains 45,600 million transistors across a 378 mm² area, yielding a transistor density of 120.6M per mm². The GPU operates at a base clock of 2295 MHz and boosts to 2617 MHz, with memory running at 2000 MHz for 32 Gbps effective speed.

Memory configuration consists of 24 GB of GDDR7 across a 256-bit bus, producing 1.02 TB/s of bandwidth. This is a substantial capacity for rendering workloads, allowing large texture sets and high-resolution assets to reside entirely in VRAM. The 10752 shading units, 336 TMUs, and 112 ROPs deliver a pixel rate of 293.1 GPixel/s and texture rate of 879.3 GTexel/s. FP32 compute reaches 56.28 TFLOPS, with FP16 matching at a 1:1 ratio.

Ray tracing hardware includes 84 RT cores, while 336 tensor cores handle AI-accelerated workloads. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, covering the full modern graphics API stack. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3075 places it at the 19th percentile, with nearest rivals including the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 at 3163 (-2.8%), Intel Arc Pro B60 at 3182 (-3.4%), NVIDIA GeForce 820A at 2983 (+3.1%), and GTX 860M at 2967 (+3.6%). These deltas show the 5080 SUPER clustering with mid-range workstation and older mobile GPUs in this specific benchmark, which is surprising given its modern architecture.

For rendering and compute tasks, the 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 24 GB VRAM make this GPU well-suited for 3D scene rendering, video encoding, and AI inference tasks that fit within memory constraints. The 1.02 TB/s bandwidth supports large data transfers without stalling.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 25005, placing it at the 77th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals show remarkably tight clustering: the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F scores 24964 (0.2% delta), the Intel Core i7-11850H scores 24935 (0.3%), the Intel Core i7-13620H scores 24911 (0.4%), and the AMD EPYC 9474F scores 25103 (-0.4%). This places the 8400F in a dense pack where performance differences are within statistical noise.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 3075, at the 19th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 at 3163 (-2.8%), the Intel Arc Pro B60 at 3182 (-3.4%), the NVIDIA GeForce 820A at 2983 (+3.1%), and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M at 2967 (+3.6%). The GPU is between 2.8% and 3.6% away from these rivals, indicating that the 3DMark Steel Nomad score places it in a specific performance tier that does not align with its modern specifications.

The combined percentile for this pairing is 48, meaning the system sits near the median of all tracked desktop combinations. The CPU’s 77th percentile and GPU’s 19th percentile produce a combined score that lowers the overall ranking, reflecting the mismatched performance classes. In CPU-heavy workloads like Cinebench R23, the 8400F scores 20851 multi-core and 2943 single-core, showing strong multi-threaded performance for a 6-core chip. In GPU-heavy workloads, the 3DMark score indicates the graphics card is the weaker link relative to the database.

Balance and Bottleneck

The 19th percentile GPU combined with a 77th percentile CPU creates a system where the graphics card is the limiting factor in most GPU-bound workloads, but the CPU becomes the constraint in CPU-bound scenarios. The data shows a clear imbalance: the CPU outperforms approximately 77% of tracked processors, while the GPU outperforms only 19% of tracked graphics cards. This means the GPU is the bottleneck when rendering complex scenes, but the CPU will bottleneck when frame generation requires high per-thread throughput.

Evidence from FPS scaling supports this analysis. At high resolutions, the GPU’s 24 GB VRAM and 1.02 TB/s bandwidth can sustain high frame rates, but the 19th percentile GPU score suggests it cannot match the CPU’s 77th percentile capability. The CPU’s 3DMark single-thread score of 951 and PassMark single-thread score of 3685 indicate decent per-core performance, yet the 6-core limit means heavily threaded games will not fully utilize the system.

The CPU’s PassMark multithread score of 24389 and 3DMark max-thread score of 6165 show that multi-threaded scaling is limited by the 6-core/12-thread configuration. The GPU’s 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 293.1 GPixel/s pixel rate suggest it can push high frame rates, but the 19th percentile ranking indicates it falls behind in the specific 3DMark Steel Nomad workload. This creates a system where neither component fully saturates the other across all workloads, but the GPU is the weaker link in the database’s ranking.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F belongs to the 8000 series, built on the Zen 4 architecture with the Phoenix codename. It features 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 4.20 GHz and boost clock of 4.70 GHz. The 65W TDP keeps power requirements modest. Manufactured on TSMC’s 4 nm process, the die measures 178 mm² and contains 25,000 million transistors.

Cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3. Memory support is DDR5 with dual-channel configuration, delivering 83.2 GB/s bandwidth. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes and has no integrated graphics. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking. The launch MSRP is $170.

Benchmark results show strong multi-threaded performance for a 6-core part. Cinebench R23 multi-core scores 20851, R20 scores 8757, and R15 scores 2101. Single-core results are 2943, 1236, and 296 respectively for R23, R20, and R15. PassMark tests show integer math at 74021, floating point at 46217, data compression at 288158, data encryption at 16646, extended instructions at 22175, prime numbers at 89, physics at 1332, random string sorting at 34604, and multithread at 24389. The 3DMark tests show single-thread at 951, 2-thread at 1874, 4-thread at 3563, 8-thread at 5275, 16-thread at 6091, and max-thread at 6165.

Real workload performance benefits from the Zen 4 architecture’s efficiency. The 4 nm process and 65W TDP mean the CPU runs cool and draws little power, making it suitable for compact builds. The 16 MB L3 cache is modest for modern standards, but the dual-channel DDR5 memory at 83.2 GB/s bandwidth provides adequate throughput for most applications. The 77th percentile ranking places it above the median, with rivals within 0.4% including the Ryzen 5 7500F, Core i7-11850H, and Core i7-13620H.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket AM5, which provides a current-generation platform. Memory support is DDR5 with dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 5.0 x16. The system has no integrated graphics, requiring a discrete GPU. The 65W CPU TDP combined with the 415W GPU TDP means the total system power draw is substantial, though the FACT PACK does not include a suggested PSU rating.

The GPU requires a 1x 16-pin power connector and measures 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 40 mm in width, fitting a dual-slot configuration. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. The GPU has a 415W TDP, which is high and requires adequate cooling and power delivery.

A sensible next upgrade path depends on workload priorities. For CPU-bound scenarios, moving to a higher-core AM5 processor would improve multi-threaded performance, though the FACT PACK does not specify which AM5 processors are compatible. For GPU-bound scenarios, the 5080 SUPER’s 19th percentile ranking suggests that upgrading to a higher-performing graphics card would yield gains, though the specific options are not listed. The AM5 socket provides longevity, and the DDR5 memory support ensures compatibility with current memory standards.

The system’s PCIe 5.0 x16 GPU interface and PCIe Gen 4 CPU lanes provide adequate bandwidth for current components. The 1x 16-pin power connector on the GPU requires a compatible power supply, and the 415W TDP demands robust cooling solutions. The CPU’s 65W TDP is modest, allowing for smaller coolers, but the GPU’s 415W TDP is substantial and will generate significant heat.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who need strong CPU performance for productivity tasks but are willing to accept a GPU that ranks at the 19th percentile. Gamers playing at 4K resolution will benefit from the GPU’s 24 GB VRAM and 1.02 TB/s bandwidth, which handle high-resolution textures well, though the 19th percentile score suggests frame rates will be lower than top-tier GPUs. The CPU’s 77th percentile ranking ensures smooth gameplay in most titles, with the 6-core configuration sufficient for current game engines.

Content creators working with video editing will find the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20851 useful for rendering timelines, while the GPU’s 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 compute accelerates effects and color grading. The 24 GB VRAM supports large project files. Software developers benefit from the CPU’s strong multi-threaded performance, with PassMark multithread at 24389 and data compression at 288158, which speed up compilation and testing. The 65W TDP keeps power costs low during long build sessions.

Students and small business workstations will appreciate the CPU’s efficiency and the system’s ability to handle office tasks, spreadsheets, and light content creation. The 77th percentile CPU ranking ensures responsiveness in daily use. The GPU’s 19th percentile ranking is less relevant for office workloads, where the 24 GB VRAM and ray tracing capabilities go unused. The system’s AM5 platform provides upgrade options, and the 65W CPU TDP allows for compact builds.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s benchmark percentile ranking?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F is at the 77th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 25005. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F, scores 24964 with a 0.2% delta.

Q: What is the GPU’s benchmark percentile ranking?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER is at the 19th percentile of all GPUs, with a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3075. The nearest rival, the NVIDIA Quadro P1000, scores 3163 with a -2.8% delta.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have and what is its bandwidth?

A: The RTX 5080 SUPER has 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 1.02 TB/s bandwidth. Memory runs at 2000 MHz with 32 Gbps effective speed.

Q: What is the CPU’s core configuration and clock speed?

A: The Ryzen 5 8400F has 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 4.20 GHz and boost clock of 4.70 GHz. It uses the Zen 4 architecture on a 4 nm process with a 65W TDP.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the Ryzen 5 8400F has no integrated graphics (N/A), so a discrete GPU is required for display output.

Q: What memory type does the system support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, delivering 83.2 GB/s bandwidth. The system uses AMD Socket AM5.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking for this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 48, placing the system near the median of all tracked desktop combinations. The CPU’s 77th percentile and GPU’s 19th percentile produce this balanced overall ranking.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s 77th percentile ranking and 3DMark single-thread score of 951 support high frame rates in esports and less demanding titles. The GPU’s 19th percentile ranking and 56.28 TFLOPS compute will deliver solid frame rates, but the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3075 suggests it cannot sustain extreme refresh rates at high resolutions. The 24 GB VRAM prevents texture popping in competitive shooters.

Streaming: The CPU’s PassMark multithread score of 24389 and 3DMark 8-thread score of 5275 provide enough headroom for game capture and encoding while maintaining playable frame rates. The GPU’s 336 tensor cores could accelerate encoding workloads, though the 19th percentile ranking indicates limited overall performance relative to other GPUs. The 65W CPU TDP keeps thermal headroom for sustained streaming sessions.

Video editing: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20851 and PassMark integer math score of 74021 accelerate timeline rendering and export. The GPU’s 24 GB VRAM holds large video project files, and the 293.1 GPixel/s pixel rate supports real-time preview. The 1.02 TB/s bandwidth moves frames quickly between memory and compute units.

3D rendering: The GPU’s 84 RT cores and 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 compute handle ray-traced scenes, while the 24 GB VRAM accommodates complex geometry and textures. The CPU’s 16 MB L3 cache and 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth feed the render pipeline. The 19th percentile GPU score indicates it will be slower than top-tier cards in final frame production.

Software development: The CPU’s PassMark data compression score of 288158 and multithread score of 24389 speed up compilation, testing, and data processing. The 6-core/12-thread configuration handles parallel builds, while the 4.70 GHz boost clock reduces single-thread latency. The 65W TDP keeps power costs low during prolonged development sessions.

Student and office work: The CPU’s 77th percentile ranking ensures responsive performance in word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The 65W TDP and 4 nm process keep the system quiet and cool. The GPU’s 24 GB VRAM is unnecessary for office tasks, but the system handles them without strain. The AM5 platform provides upgrade potential for future needs.