Control
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 68 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 35 | 40 | 45 | 63 |
| 1440p QHD | 52 | 59 | 67 | 94 |
| 1080p Full HD | 68 | 78 | 88 | 124 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Control with AMD Ryzen 5 8400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050, In-Depth Analysis
Control is a demanding action-adventure title that stresses both the CPU and GPU, and the pairing of the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 produces a balanced but resolution-sensitive experience. The benchmark data for this combo shows a system that is clearly capable of high-refresh-rate 1080p gaming, but which begins to show its limits as the resolution climbs toward 4K. This analysis breaks down the measured performance, how the components interact, and where the optimal settings lie for this specific hardware combination.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data reveals a steep performance curve as resolution increases, highlighting where the RTX 5050 becomes the primary bottleneck. At 1080p with High settings, the combo delivers a solid 78 FPS average. Moving to 1440p at the same High preset drops the average to 59 FPS, a decrease of roughly 24%. The jump to 4K High is more punishing, with the average falling to 40 FPS—a 49% drop from the 1080p figure. This pattern clearly indicates that the GPU is the limiting component at higher resolutions, as the CPU has more than enough headroom at 1080p but cannot compensate for the increased pixel-pushing workload.
The scaling from Low to Ultra settings further illustrates this dynamic. At 1080p Low, the system hits 124 FPS, but Ultra drops that to 68 FPS—a 45% reduction. At 1440p, the same settings span from 94 FPS down to 52 FPS, a 45% reduction. At 4K, Low yields 63 FPS while Ultra falls to 35 FPS, a 44% reduction. The consistency of this performance drop across resolutions suggests that the RTX 5050's compute and memory resources are being saturated in a predictable manner, reinforcing that the GPU is the deciding factor for frame rates in this title.
What is particularly telling is the relationship between the 1080p and 1440p results. The 1440p High score of 59 FPS is nearly identical to the 4K Low score of 63 FPS, indicating that the card's performance is closely tied to the total pixel count and shading complexity rather than any specific resolution quirk. The data suggests that for a locked 60 FPS experience, players should target 1440p with Medium settings (67 FPS) or 1080p with High settings (78 FPS), as both configurations provide comfortable margins above the 60 FPS threshold.
GPU Role
The RTX 5050 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with a 5 nm process and packs 2,560 shading units. Its boost clock of 2572 MHz and 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus deliver a memory bandwidth of 320.0 GB/s. In Control, this configuration proves sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but the 8 GB VRAM capacity and the 128-bit bus become noticeable constraints at 4K, where the Ultra preset only manages 35 FPS.
The GPU's 13.17 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is a modest figure in the current landscape, yet the benchmark results show it handles this game's physics-heavy combat and destructible environments well at lower resolutions. The 80 texture mapping units and 32 ROPs contribute to a texture rate of 205.8 GTexel/s and a pixel rate of 82.30 GPixel/s, which are adequate for the game's visual effects but not exceptional. The card's 20 RT cores are present, but the measured data does not isolate ray tracing performance; the standard rasterization results are what we see here.
The percentile ranking for this GPU stands at 66, meaning it outperforms roughly two-thirds of all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL (0.6% higher score) and the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (1.6% lower score). This places the RTX 5050 in a mid-range tier, consistent with the observed frame rates. The 130 W TDP and 300 W suggested PSU indicate an efficient card, though those figures are not directly reflected in the gaming metrics. The memory clock runs at 2500 MHz with 20 Gbps effective speed, and the 8 GB capacity is the most likely culprit for the 4K Ultra results, as the game's high-resolution textures can exceed that allocation, causing the frame rate to drop to 35 FPS.
How This Combo Ranks
Within the benchmark database, this specific CPU-GPU combination achieves a combo rank of 1756 out of 2888 tested combinations for Control. This places it in the 39th percentile of all combos, which is a lower position than the individual component percentiles might suggest. The CPU ranks in the 77th percentile among all processors, and the GPU sits in the 66th percentile among all graphics cards, yet the pairing results in a sub-40th percentile performance ranking for this game. This discrepancy indicates that Control is particularly demanding on the GPU, and the RTX 5050's mid-range positioning drags the overall combo down despite the CPU's relative strength.
The CPU's nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F (0.2% higher average score) and the Intel Core i7-13620H (0.4% higher), showing that the 8400F is a competitive performer in synthetic benchmarks. However, in real-world gaming, the GPU becomes the limiting factor. The RTX 5050's nearest rivals, such as the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL (0.6% higher) and the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile (1.6% higher), confirm that the GPU sits in a crowded mid-range segment. The fact that the combo ranks lower than either component's individual percentile suggests that Control's engine does not scale perfectly with this hardware pairing, and the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and limited bandwidth are likely bottlenecks at higher settings.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the data shows a full range of playable settings. Low settings produce an average of 124 FPS, providing a high-refresh-rate experience for competitive play. Medium settings yield 88 FPS with a minimum of 75 and a maximum of 101, offering a balanced experience. High settings drop to 78 FPS, and Ultra falls to 68 FPS. All 1080p configurations remain above the 60 FPS threshold, making this resolution the most flexible for the combo.
At 2560x1440, the performance becomes more constrained. Low settings achieve 94 FPS, which is still excellent. Medium settings hit 67 FPS with a minimum of 57 and a maximum of 77, which is borderline for a locked 60 FPS experience but generally playable. High settings drop to 59 FPS, and Ultra falls to 52 FPS. The 1440p Medium preset is the only configuration in this resolution that stays above 60 FPS on average, though its minimum of 57 FPS indicates occasional dips below that target.
At 3840x2160, the RTX 5050 struggles. Low settings manage 63 FPS, which is playable but requires significant visual compromises. Medium settings drop to 45 FPS with a minimum of 38 and a maximum of 52, which is not ideal for smooth gameplay. High settings fall to 40 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 35 FPS. The 4K results are the weakest link, and the data suggests that 4K gaming is only viable with Low settings, and even then the frame rate is not consistently smooth.
Settings Recommendations
For the best balance of visual quality and performance, the 1080p High preset is the sweet spot. It delivers 78 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS target, and the visual fidelity at High is substantially better than Low or Medium. Players with 1440p monitors should select the Medium preset, which averages 67 FPS but has a minimum of 57 FPS; this is acceptable for most gamers, though those sensitive to frame dips may prefer to drop to 1080p High for a more stable experience. For 4K displays, the Low preset is the only option that maintains a playable frame rate at 63 FPS, but the visual quality will be noticeably reduced. The Ultra preset is not recommended at any resolution, as it only exceeds 60 FPS at 1080p (68 FPS), and the performance gains over High are marginal relative to the frame rate cost.
The data supports a strategy of prioritizing resolution over settings. A 1440p Medium experience at 67 FPS is smoother than a 4K Low experience at 63 FPS, and the visual difference between 1440p Medium and 4K Low is often negligible on smaller displays. Conversely, 1080p High at 78 FPS offers the best combination of fluidity and detail, making it the default recommendation for this hardware pairing. Players with high-refresh-rate monitors (144 Hz or higher) should consider the 1080p Low preset at 124 FPS, though this sacrifices significant visual quality for frame rate headroom.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Control?
A: 1080p is the most reliable resolution, with all four settings presets averaging above 60 FPS. The High preset at 78 FPS offers the best balance, while 1440p Medium at 67 FPS is the only 1440p option that stays above the 60 FPS average threshold.
Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Control?
A: Yes, but only with the Low preset, which averages 63 FPS. Medium settings at 4K drop to 45 FPS, and High/Ultra fall to 40 FPS and 35 FPS respectively, making them unsuitable for smooth gameplay.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its direct rivals?
A: The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F scores within 0.4% of the Intel Core i7-13620H and within 0.2% of the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F in average benchmark scores, showing near-identical synthetic performance. However, in Control, the GPU is the limiting factor, so these small CPU differences are unlikely to affect in-game frame rates.
Q: Is the 8 GB VRAM on the RTX 5050 sufficient for Control?
A: The measured data suggests it is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, as all presets at these resolutions produce playable frame rates. At 4K, the performance drops significantly, and the 8 GB capacity is likely a contributing factor to the sub-45 FPS results at Medium and above.
Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile?
A: The RTX 5050 ranks in the 66th percentile among all GPUs, meaning it outperforms approximately 66% of graphics cards in the database. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL and the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT, both within 1.6% of its average benchmark score.
Q: Does the Ultra preset provide a better experience than High?
A: At 1080p, Ultra averages 68 FPS compared to High's 78 FPS, a 13% performance cost. At 1440p, the difference is 52 FPS versus 59 FPS, and at 4K, it is 35 FPS versus 40 FPS. The visual gains from Ultra are typically marginal in Control, so High is generally the better choice for maintaining higher frame rates.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 8400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 in Control
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 63.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 45.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 40.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 35.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 94.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 67.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 59.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 52.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 124.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 88.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 78.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 68.0 |
Control with Ryzen 5 8400F + Other GPUs
See how Control performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Control with RTX 5050 + Other CPUs
See how Control performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 8400F + RTX 5050
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.