SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7600X + Intel Arc B570

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

89 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
88%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7600X

27,636 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B570

20,556 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600X and Intel Arc B570 pairing represents a modern mid-range desktop build that targets 1080p and 1440p gaming with a strong emphasis on CPU-driven performance. The data shows a combined percentile rank of 72, placing this duo above the majority of tested configurations, with an average FPS of 86.6 across a wide range of titles at ultra settings.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 72, indicating the build outperforms 72% of all tested pairs. It ranks 3030 out of 3732 pairs by average FPS.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 7600X compare to its nearest rival in average benchmark score?

A: The Ryzen 5 7600X has an average benchmark score of 27636, which is 0.2% higher than both the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X and Intel Core i5-12600K, and 0.4% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 5800.

Q: What is the GPU's position relative to the Intel Arc A750?

A: The Intel Arc B570 has an average benchmark score of 20556, which is 0.1% lower than the Arc A750's 20582 score, making them statistically equivalent in overall performance.

Q: What memory bandwidth does the GPU provide for data-intensive tasks?

A: The Intel Arc B570 features 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the CPU's single-threaded performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The Ryzen 5 7600X scores 1965 points in Cinebench R23 single-core, which is a strong result for a 6-core desktop processor.

Q: What power supply is recommended for the GPU?

A: The Intel Arc B570 has a TDP of 150 W, and the suggested PSU is 450 W.

Q: What is the measured FPS for Counter-Strike 2 at 1080p?

A: The build achieves 133 FPS in Counter-Strike 2 at 1920x1080 with ultra settings.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B570 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture (Battlemage generation) using a 5 nm process at TSMC. The GPU die contains 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die. It operates with a base and boost clock of 2500 MHz. The memory subsystem is a 10 GB GDDR6 configuration on a 160-bit bus, providing 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth. With 2304 shading units, 144 TMUs, and 80 ROPs, the card delivers a texture rate of 360.0 GTexel/s and a pixel rate of 200.0 GPixel/s. The FP32 compute is rated at 11.52 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 23.04 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio).

In terms of ray tracing, the B570 includes 18 RT cores, while the API support extends to DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6. Benchmark results show the GPU sits at the 65th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 20556. This places it in a tight cluster with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (20534, 0.1% slower) and the Intel Arc A750 (20582, 0.1% faster). The PassMark G3D score of 14195 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 96844 illustrate the card's compute and graphics capabilities. For rendering workloads, the 18 RT cores and 11.52 TFLOPS of FP32 performance indicate a mid-range part capable of handling modern effects, but the measured FPS in demanding titles suggests it is better suited to 1080p and 1440p rather than 4K ultra settings.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 5 7600X uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which is the current desktop standard for AMD's 7000 series processors. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, offering a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. It also provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU, ensuring compatibility with high-speed NVMe storage and future peripherals. The platform supports ECC memory, a feature valuable for workstation reliability. The CPU's TDP is 105 W, while the GPU's TDP is 150 W, and the suggested PSU for the graphics card is 450 W. This suggests a system power draw that is manageable with a mid-range power supply, leaving headroom for additional drives or fans. The CPU has an unlocked multiplier, allowing overclocking on compatible AM5 motherboards.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data indicates a strong foundation. The AM5 socket has a long lifecycle, so a future CPU upgrade within the same socket is possible without changing the motherboard. The PCIe Gen 5 support also future-proofs the system for faster SSDs. The GPU, with its 10 GB VRAM and PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, is a limiting factor for high-resolution textures, so upgrading the GPU to a higher-tier card would be the most impactful change for 4K gaming. The CPU's 32 MB of L3 cache and 6 cores are sufficient for current games, but for heavy multi-threaded workloads, a move to an 8-core or 12-core AM5 processor would be a logical upgrade path.

Who Should Build It

This build targets gamers who prioritize 1080p and 1440p high-refresh-rate play. The measured FPS shows strong performance in competitive titles: 293 FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive and 304 FPS in Valorant at 1080p, and 161 FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. These figures make it ideal for esports enthusiasts. For content creators, the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15236 and Geekbench multi-core score of 13858 provide solid video editing and 3D rendering capability, while the GPU's 83514 OpenCL score assists with GPU-accelerated tasks. Software developers will benefit from the CPU's PassMark data encryption score of 18543 and integer math score of 84749, which are indicative of compiling and data processing efficiency. Students and small business workstations would find the build capable for office tasks, given the single-thread performance of 4135 in PassMark, though the GPU is overkill for basic productivity. The build is less suited for 4K ultra gaming, where titles like Cyberpunk 2077 drop to 19 FPS, so users aiming for that should look elsewhere.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a balanced pairing with the CPU often being the limiting factor in lighter titles, while the GPU becomes the constraint in demanding games. In esports titles, the high FPS numbers (e.g., 304 in Valorant at 1080p) suggest the GPU is keeping up with the CPU's single-thread performance. However, in graphically intensive games like Cyberpunk 2077 at 1080p, the 39 FPS demonstrates a GPU bottleneck, as the CPU's single-core score of 1965 in Cinebench R23 is more than capable of driving higher frame rates. The CPU's percentile rank of 79 is higher than the GPU's rank of 65, indicating the CPU has more headroom relative to its peers. In multi-core heavy workloads, the CPU's PassMark multi-thread score of 28390 shows it can handle parallel tasks, but the GPU's compute score of 7281 may limit OpenCL-based rendering. The FPS scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a typical pattern: for example, in Red Dead Redemption 2, FPS drops from 36 to 27, a 25% reduction, which is consistent with the GPU being the primary limiter at higher resolutions. Conversely, in lighter games like Barony, the drop from 112 to 71 FPS (37%) indicates the CPU is keeping up, but the GPU's pixel rate is the binding constraint.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data (dataIsMeasured: true) provides a comprehensive view of ultra-settings performance. At 1920x1080, the build excels in competitive shooters: Valorant hits 304 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 293 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone 161 FPS. Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege achieves 158 FPS. For single-player titles, Doom runs at 99 FPS, Assetto Corsa at 78 FPS, and Thief at 73 FPS. However, demanding AAA games struggle: Cyberpunk 2077 is 39 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 is 36 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended is just 19 FPS. At 2560x1440, performance scales down proportionally: Valorant drops to 259 FPS, Warzone to 143 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 to 88 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077 falls to 29 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended to 12 FPS. At 3840x2160, the GPU is clearly overmatched; only lighter titles remain playable, with Valorant at 207 FPS and Roblox at 65 FPS, but Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 19 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 to 18 FPS. The average FPS across all games is 86.6, with the pair ranking 3030 out of 3732.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600X is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the 7000 series, built on the Zen 4 architecture (codenamed Raphael) using TSMC's 5 nm process. It has a base clock of 4.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, with a TDP of 105 W. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 and 1 MB of L2 per core, plus 32 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus, providing 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth. It has an integrated Radeon Graphics solution, though the discrete GPU is the primary display adapter.

Benchmark results show a single-thread score of 1060 in 3DMark and 1965 in Cinebench R23, indicating excellent per-core performance for gaming and lightly-threaded applications. Multi-threaded scores include 6879 in 3DMark 16-thread and 15236 in Cinebench R23 multi-core. The PassMark multi-thread score of 28390 and Geekbench multi-core of 13858 confirm strong parallel performance. The CPU's percentile rank of 79 puts it above average, with its average benchmark score of 27636 being nearly identical to rivals like the Ryzen 7 5700X (27578) and Core i5-12600K (27578). For real workloads, the data suggests it handles video encoding, compiling, and 3D rendering efficiently, while the high single-thread score ensures responsive day-to-day use. The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads are sufficient for modern games, but the PassMark physics score of 1824 indicates it may be a slight bottleneck in physics-heavy simulations.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X and Intel Arc B570. The CPU is a 6-core Zen 4 part, while the GPU is a Battlemage-generation card with 10 GB of VRAM. The combined percentile rank is 72, placing this configuration in the upper-mid tier of all tested pairs. The average FPS across the game suite is 86.6, which is strong for 1080p and acceptable for 1440p. The CPU's percentile of 79 is notably higher than the GPU's 65, suggesting the processor has more relative headroom. This pairing is best described as a balanced mid-range desktop that excels in esports and moderate AAA gaming, but is not designed for 4K ultra settings. The build class is desktop, and the data indicates it is a sensible choice for users building a new system on the AM5 platform with a focus on high refresh rates at 1080p.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 27636, placing it at the 79th percentile. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X, scores 27578 with a delta of 0.2%, meaning the 7600X is slightly faster. The Intel Core i5-12600K also scores 27578, showing parity. The AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE scores 27712, which is 0.3% higher, and the Ryzen 7 5800 scores 27535, 0.4% lower. The GPU's average benchmark score is 20556, at the 65th percentile. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, scores 20534 (0.1% slower), while the Intel Arc A750 scores 20582 (0.1% faster). The AMD Radeon R9 M390X scores 20662 (0.5% faster). The combined picture shows a CPU that is slightly above average for its class and a GPU that is also above average, but with the CPU having a higher relative standing. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2649 for the GPU and Cinebench R23 multi-core of 15236 for the CPU highlight the discrete strengths. The PassMark G3D score of 14195 for the GPU and PassMark multi-thread of 28390 for the CPU provide a balanced performance profile, where the system is capable of both high-FPS gaming and productivity tasks, but the GPU is the component most likely to be upgraded first for better 4K performance.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The build delivers exceptional frame rates in competitive titles, with 304 FPS in Valorant and 293 FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 1080p. At 1440p, these drop to 259 and 201 FPS respectively, still exceeding the refresh rates of most high-end monitors.

Streaming: The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads can handle encoding while gaming, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15236. However, in demanding games like Cyberpunk 2077 (39 FPS at 1080p), streaming may push the system to its limits, and a dedicated encoder or lower settings would be advisable.

Video editing: The PassMark floating point math score of 51025 and the GPU's OpenCL score of 83514 indicate solid performance for rendering effects and exporting video. The 10 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p timelines.

3D rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 2517 and the GPU's 11.52 TFLOPS FP32 performance provide a capable foundation for Blender or similar software. However, the 18 RT cores suggest ray-traced scenes will be slower than on higher-tier GPUs.

Software development: The PassMark data encryption score of 18543 and integer math score of 84749 indicate efficient code compilation and data processing. The 32 MB L3 cache helps with frequently accessed data, making this a responsive development machine.

Student and office work: The single-thread PassMark score of 4135 ensures snappy application launches and spreadsheet calculations. The GPU is overkill for this use case, but the overall system will handle multitasking with ease, given the 12 threads and 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth.