SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7600 + Intel Arc B580

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

87%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7600

26,324 Benchmark Score

Top 13% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B580

23,021 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 and Intel Arc B580 pairing is a formidable 1080p and 1440p desktop combination, delivering high frame rates in competitive titles and solid performance in demanding AAA games, with the primary bottleneck shifting decisively to the GPU at higher resolutions. Benchmark data confirms this is a measured, not estimated, performance profile, with the pair achieving an average of 98.3 FPS across a wide range of titles at ultra settings. The build’s overall combined percentile of 73 places it well above the majority of systems, making it a versatile choice for gamers and content creators alike.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

The data from this build is based on measured FPS, providing a concrete picture of its gaming capabilities. At 1920x1080, the system excels in competitive and esports titles, delivering exceptionally high frame rates. For instance, Valorant hits 339.1 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive reaches 330.1 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege achieves 178 FPS. These figures are far beyond the refresh rate of standard 144Hz monitors, ensuring a maximally smooth experience in fast-paced shooters. Similarly, Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 153.1 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 manages a solid 147.3 FPS, confirming that the pair is more than capable of high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p.

Moving to 2560x1440, performance remains strong, though the GPU becomes more of a limiting factor. Valorant still leads with 287.2 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone remains highly playable at 133.8 FPS. Counter-Strike 2 drops to 99.3 FPS, which is still smooth, while Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege X maintains 113.5 FPS. Heavier titles like Cyberpunk 2077 produce 35.4 FPS at this resolution, and Red Dead Redemption 2 yields 32.6 FPS, indicating that while the system can handle these games, users seeking higher fidelity may need to adjust settings from ultra to achieve higher frame rates. The 1440p resolution appears to be the sweet spot for balancing visual quality and performance in most titles.

At 3840x2160 (4K), the system’s limitations become apparent. The average FPS across games drops significantly, with few titles maintaining playable frame rates. Call of Duty: Warzone is a notable exception at 115.2 FPS, and Roblox runs at 73.3 FPS, but most AAA games fall below 30 FPS. For example, Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 24.1 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 20.3 FPS. This suggests that 4K gaming is not a primary strength for this pairing, and users should expect to rely on upscaling technologies or lower presets to achieve smoother performance. The data clearly indicates that this build is optimized for 1080p and 1440p gaming rather than 4K.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform is built on AMD Socket AM5, which provides a clear and robust upgrade path for the future. The Ryzen 5 7600 supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, offering a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The CPU also supports ECC memory, which is a boon for users who prioritize system stability in compute-heavy tasks. Furthermore, the processor provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes (CPU only), ensuring that the system is ready for the fastest current and next-generation storage and expansion cards.

The Intel Arc B580 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 lanes, though the GPU is limited to Gen 4 speeds. The system’s total power draw is manageable, with the CPU’s TDP at 65 W and the GPU’s TDP at 190 W. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 450 W, which leaves ample headroom for the rest of the system components. This makes the build efficient and easy to power with a standard mid-range power supply.

Looking at a sensible next upgrade, the AM5 socket is the most recent platform from AMD, meaning users can upgrade to a higher-core-count CPU from the same generation without changing the motherboard. The data shows the Ryzen 5 7600 has a 78th percentile ranking among all CPUs, and its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, has a deltaPct of 0.2, indicating a potential upgrade path to a more powerful processor. The GPU, however, is the more likely candidate for an upgrade, as games at higher resolutions show a clear GPU bottleneck. A user could move to a more powerful graphics card in the future to unlock more performance at 1440p and 4K, while the existing CPU and platform would remain relevant.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data (format: Q: ... A: ...)

Q: What is the average frame rate of this system across all tested games?

A: The build achieves an average of 98.3 FPS across all games tested, ranking 2825 out of 3732 pairs.

Q: Is this system suitable for 4K gaming?

A: While some titles like Call of Duty: Warzone run at 115.2 FPS in 4K, most AAA games are below 30 FPS (e.g., Cyberpunk 2077 at 24.1 FPS), making 1080p and 1440p the primary resolutions for this build.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rivals in terms of average benchmark score?

A: The Ryzen 5 7600 has an average benchmark score of 26324. It is 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (26274) and 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core i9-11900KF (26212).

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile of the Ryzen 5 7600 and Intel Arc B580 is 73, indicating it outperforms 73% of all recorded system pairs.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 5 7600 includes Radeon Graphics as its integrated GPU, which can be useful for troubleshooting or basic display output without a discrete graphics card.

Q: What is the TDP of the GPU and what power supply is suggested?

A: The Intel Arc B580 has a TDP of 190 W, and the suggested power supply is 450 W.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the CPU?

A: The Ryzen 5 7600 supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The benchmark data reveals a clear and expected bottleneck structure for this system. In CPU-intensive workloads, the Ryzen 5 7600 is the stronger component, with a percentile ranking of 78 vs all CPUs. Its multi-threaded performance is strong, as evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12735 and a Geekbench multicore score of 13413. For tasks like data encryption (Passmark score of 17704) and integer math (Passmark score of 80581), the CPU is the driving force. This suggests that in content creation and productivity tasks, the CPU is the primary performer.

However, in gaming, the balance shifts. The FPS scaling from 1080p to 1440p and then to 4K shows a significant drop in performance as resolution increases. For example, in Counter-Strike 2, the FPS drops from 147.3 at 1080p to 99.3 at 1440p, a 33% decrease. This pattern is consistent across many titles, indicating that the GPU is the limiting factor at higher resolutions. The Intel Arc B580 has a percentile of 68 vs all GPUs, which is lower than the CPU’s 78th percentile, confirming that the GPU is the weaker link in the chain for gaming. The data shows that the GPU is the bottleneck in most games, especially at 1440p and 4K, while the CPU has more headroom to spare.

In some specific cases, the game’s engine may be more CPU-bound. For instance, Valorant’s FPS remains exceptionally high even at 4K (229.2 FPS), suggesting that the game is heavily CPU-bound and the GPU is not the limiting factor. Similarly, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive shows a high 135.7 FPS at 4K. This indicates that in esports titles with lower graphical demands, the CPU’s performance is the key to achieving high frame rates. Overall, the system is well-balanced for 1080p, but the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck for more demanding resolutions.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on the Zen 4 architecture (codenamed Raphael). It has a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, and it is manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The CPU has a total L3 cache of 32 MB (shared), with 1 MB of L2 cache per core and 64 KB of L1 cache per core. This configuration is designed to deliver strong single-threaded and multi-threaded performance, making it a versatile choice for both gaming and productivity.

The benchmark scores confirm this versatility. The single-thread score in Geekbench is 2521, and in Cinebench R23 it is 1852, which are solid numbers that translate to snappy responsiveness in everyday tasks and good performance in lightly-threaded applications. The multi-threaded scores are even more impressive for a 6-core part. With a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12735 and a 3dmark max_threads score of 6503, the CPU can handle demanding workloads like video encoding and 3D rendering. The Passmark integer math score of 80581 and floating-point math score of 48107 further illustrate its capability in calculation-heavy tasks.

For real-world workloads, this CPU is a strong performer for its class. It will handle software compilation, office productivity, and even moderate video editing with ease. The 12 threads allow for efficient multitasking and parallel processing. The CPU’s low TDP of 65 W also makes it an efficient choice, especially when paired with the 190 W GPU. In terms of its market position, the CPU’s average benchmark score of 26324 places it in the 78th percentile, with its nearest rival being the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, which it beats by a slim 0.2%. This shows that the Ryzen 5 7600 is a competitive high-end mid-range processor that offers performance close to some older high-end mobile chips.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This build is ideally suited for gamers who primarily play at 1080p and 1440p resolutions. The measured FPS data shows that it can achieve over 100 FPS in most competitive and popular titles at these resolutions, such as Valorant (339.1 FPS at 1080p) and Call of Duty: Warzone (153.1 FPS at 1080p). For users with 144Hz or 165Hz monitors, this system will deliver the necessary frame rates to take full advantage of the display. Gamers who prefer visually demanding AAA titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (44.8 FPS at 1080p) will still be able to play, but may need to tweak settings for a smoother experience.

Content creators and developers will also find this build compelling. The CPU’s strong multi-threaded performance, as shown by its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12735, makes it suitable for video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The GPU’s 12 GB of VRAM and 456.0 GB/s of bandwidth can handle large textures and complex models in creative applications. Software developers will benefit from the fast compile times and the ability to run multiple virtual machines or containers, thanks to the 12 threads. Students and small business workstations will find the system more than adequate for office productivity, web browsing, and data analysis, with the CPU’s Passmark single-thread score of 3910 ensuring snappy application performance.

For users who prioritize a future-proof platform, the AM5 socket is a major selling point. It allows for a direct upgrade path to more powerful Ryzen processors without needing to change the motherboard. The support for DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 5 also ensures that the system will remain relevant for years to come. This build is not targeted at users who demand 4K gaming, as the data shows it struggles to maintain high frame rates at that resolution, but for the vast majority of users gaming at 1080p or 1440p, it is an excellent choice.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-Refresh Gaming: This is the primary use case. With an average of 98.3 FPS across all games and specific high scores like 339.1 FPS in Valorant and 330.1 FPS in CS:GO at 1080p, the system is built for high-refresh-rate monitors. At 1440p, it still delivers over 100 FPS in many competitive titles, ensuring a fluid and responsive gaming experience.

Streaming: Streaming demands both CPU and GPU resources. The Ryzen 5 7600’s 6-core/12-thread configuration and its 3dmark_16_threads score of 6499 provide enough processing power to encode video while gaming. The Intel Arc B580’s support for modern APIs like DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4 also helps maintain game performance during a stream, though users may need to lower game settings to keep both tasks running smoothly.

Video Editing: The CPU’s multi-core performance is the key here. A Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12735 and a Geekbench multicore score of 13413 indicate that timeline scrubbing and export times will be reasonable, especially for 1080p and 1440p footage. The GPU’s 12 GB of VRAM can also help with effects and color grading, though it may not be as fast as a higher-end GPU for complex GPU-accelerated effects.

3D Rendering: For CPU-based rendering, the Ryzen 5 7600 is a capable workhorse. Its Passmark multithread score of 27058 shows it can handle tasks like ray tracing in Blender or rendering in Cinema 4D, albeit not with the speed of a high-core-count Threadripper. The GPU can assist with real-time viewport rendering, and its 13.67 TFLOPS of FP32 performance will help with interactive previews.

Software Development: Developers will benefit from the fast single-threaded and multi-threaded performance. The Geekbench single-core score of 2521 ensures a responsive IDE, while the 12 threads and strong multi-core scores allow for faster compilation and testing. The 32 MB of L3 cache helps with frequently accessed data, and the support for ECC memory is an added bonus for ensuring data integrity during long build sessions.

Student and Office Work: This system is overkill for standard office tasks, but this is a positive. The Passmark single-thread score of 3910 ensures that applications like word processors, spreadsheets, and web browsers feel instant. The high memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s and the fast NVMe support via PCIe Gen 5 make loading large documents or databases quick. It is a system that will not need an upgrade for many years, even as software requirements grow.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop-class build, combining the AMD Ryzen 5 7600 processor with the Intel Arc B580 graphics card. The pairing represents a high-mid-range to upper-mid-range system, positioning itself firmly in the performance segment. The CPU’s 78th percentile ranking against all CPUs and the GPU’s 68th percentile ranking against all GPUs place this system well above average. The combined percentile of 73 indicates that this system outperforms 73% of all other CPU and GPU pairings in the database, marking it as a solidly above-average performer.

The combination is a strategic one. The Ryzen 5 7600 provides a robust and efficient foundation with its 6-core/12-thread Zen 4 architecture and a 65 W TDP. The Intel Arc B580, with its 12 GB of GDDR6 memory and 2560 shading units, offers substantial graphics horsepower for its class. This pairing is designed to deliver a balanced experience, avoiding a severe bottleneck in most scenarios. The data on pairRankByFps confirms this, with the build ranking 2825 out of 3732 pairs, placing it in the top 25% of all recorded system configurations.

This build is not an entry-level or budget option, nor is it an extreme enthusiast platform. It targets the sweet spot of performance per dollar, offering a compelling mix of gaming and productivity capabilities. It is a system that can handle almost any task thrown at it at 1080p and 1440p, and it has the platform longevity of the AM5 socket to support future upgrades. For those looking for a powerful, well-rounded desktop that is ready for modern games and applications, this pairing is a strong contender.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 demonstrates strong synthetic performance. In 3dmark, it scores 6499 in the 16-thread test and 999 in the single-thread test. Its Cinebench R23 scores are 12735 for multicore and 1852 for single-core. The Geekbench results show a multicore score of 13413 and a single-core score of 2521. In Passmark, the CPU achieves a multithread score of 27058 and a single-thread score of 3910. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 26324, which places it in the 78th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (0.2% faster), AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS (0.3% slower), and Intel Core i9-11900KF (0.4% faster), showing it is closely matched with these chips.

The Intel Arc B580’s benchmark results are equally telling. It scores 3068 in the 3dmark Steel Nomad DX12 test, and in Geekbench, it achieves 92821 in OpenCL and 109672 in Vulkan. The Passmark G3D score is 15748, and the GPU compute score is 7729. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 23021, placing it in the 68th percentile of all GPUs. Its closest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP, which is 0.2% faster, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 is 0.6% slower. This indicates the Arc B580 performs at a level comparable to older high-end cards.

The combined picture is one of a balanced system with a slightly stronger CPU. The CPU’s higher percentile (78 vs 68) suggests it has more performance headroom than the GPU. This means that in CPU-bound tasks, the system will be very capable, but in GPU-bound scenarios like gaming at high resolutions, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The system’s combined percentile of 73 encapsulates this, showing that overall, it is a high-performing system. The average FPS of 98.3 across all games confirms that the pair is well-matched for its intended purpose, delivering a smooth and powerful experience for most users.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7600 + Intel Arc B580

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 7600

Intel Arc B580

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Valorant

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data (format: Q: ... A: ...)

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds