SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7400F

32,750 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

21,035 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 form a desktop pairing built on modern platforms. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 4 part from the 7000 series, manufactured on TSMC’s 5 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, and it draws a 65 W TDP. The processor is based on the Raphael architecture and includes 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 32 MB L3 cache. With a percentile ranking of 83 among all CPUs, this chip sits firmly in the upper tier of desktop processors, meaning it outpaces the vast majority of installed CPUs in aggregate benchmark performance. Its average benchmark score of 32750 places it in a tight cluster with several rivals: it is statistically tied with the Intel Core i5-14600T (32707, 0.1% faster) and the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (32697, 0.2% faster), while trailing the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H by 0.2% (32812).

The CPU’s performance profile is well-rounded for both lightly-threaded and heavily-threaded tasks. In Cinebench R23, it scores 21765 points in multi-core and 3072 points in single-core. The single-core result is particularly strong, indicating excellent responsiveness in everyday applications and games that rely on a few fast threads. The multi-core score, while not class-leading, is substantial for a 65 W part and suggests capable throughput for rendering and compilation workloads. PassMark results reinforce this: the chip achieves 25645 in multithread, 3689 in single-thread, and strong sub-scores in integer math (74745) and floating-point math (45799). Data compression performance is a standout at 289999, while encryption hits 16712 and extended instructions reach 21747. These figures indicate a processor that handles compressed file operations and cryptographic workloads with ease, while the physics score of 1660 is modest but adequate for simulation tasks.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 5 7400F is built for AMD Socket AM5, which is the company’s current desktop platform. This socket supports DDR5 memory exclusively, and the CPU features a dual-channel memory bus with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. ECC memory is supported, which is a notable feature for small business workstations or users who prioritize data integrity. The platform also provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU, ensuring high-bandwidth connectivity for modern storage devices and expansion cards. The CPU does not include integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is mandatory for any display output.

The RTX 5050 GPU pairs with this platform via a PCIe 5.0 x8 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s lane allocation. The GPU has a TDP of 130 W and requires a single 8-pin power connector, with a suggested PSU rating of 300 W. This leaves considerable headroom for a system with the 65 W CPU, as the combined draw is modest by modern standards. For users looking to upgrade, the AM5 platform offers a clear path: because the socket is current and the CPU is unlocked (multiplier unlocked is true), users can either overclock the existing chip or drop in a higher-core-count Ryzen 7000-series part without changing the motherboard or memory. The DDR5 support and PCIe Gen 5 connectivity ensure that the platform will not be a bottleneck for several generations of components. The CPU’s production status is active, and its launch MSRP is $229, which positions it as an accessible entry point to the AM5 ecosystem.

Benchmark Performance

Benchmark results paint a clear picture of a balanced mid-range desktop build. The CPU’s 83rd percentile among all CPUs indicates that it outperforms roughly four out of five processors in the database. Its average score of 32750 is nearly identical to its nearest rivals, with deltas of less than 0.3% in either direction, meaning that in pure compute terms, the 7400F is interchangeable with the Intel Core i5-14600T, the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H. The GPU, meanwhile, sits at the 66th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 21035. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT, which scores 20713 (a 1.6% deficit), while the RTX 5050 trails the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL (21153) by 0.6% and the AMD Radeon HD 8970M (21237) by 1%. The NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile is 1.6% ahead at 21379.

The combined system percentile is 75, which places this build in the upper quarter of all desktop configurations. In terms of measured gaming performance, the pair achieves an average of 105.6 FPS across all tested games at ultra settings. This combination of CPU and GPU scores indicates that the system is well-matched: the CPU is strong enough to feed the GPU in most scenarios, and the GPU is capable enough to translate that into playable frame rates. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2502 and PassMark G3D score of 17326 are respectable, while its compute performance (PassMark GPU Compute 9184, Geekbench OpenCL 90334, Vulkan 89381) shows solid throughput for non-gaming acceleration tasks.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The system is well-suited for competitive titles at 1080p. In Valorant, it delivers 375 FPS at 1080p, and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hits 361 FPS. At 1440p, Valorant still maintains 320 FPS, and CS:GO runs at 249 FPS. These numbers support a 144Hz or even 240Hz monitor experience in esports titles.

Streaming: The 6-core CPU with a strong 21765 Cinebench R23 multi-core score handles encoding overhead adequately, while the GPU’s 20 RT cores and 80 tensor cores provide dedicated acceleration. The measured frame rates in Call of Duty: Warzone (143 FPS at 1080p, 127 at 1440p) indicate there is headroom for simultaneous gameplay and encoding without dropping below playable thresholds.

Video editing: The CPU’s 12 threads and 32 MB of L3 cache, combined with the GPU’s 13.17 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, make for a competent 1080p editing rig. The PassMark multithread score of 25645 suggests smooth timeline scrubbing and export times that are reasonable for a mid-range system, though not professional-grade.

3D rendering: Cinebench R23 multi-core of 21765 points places this CPU in a capable tier for occasional rendering tasks. The GPU’s 13.17 TFLOPS FP32 and 205.8 GTexel/s texture rate provide acceleration for viewport and GPU-render workloads, but the 8 GB memory capacity will limit very large scenes.

Software development: The strong single-thread score of 3072 in Cinebench R23 and PassMark single-thread of 3689 ensure fast compiler and IDE responsiveness. The data compression score of 289999 indicates rapid build artifact handling, while the 12 threads handle parallel compilation jobs efficiently.

Student and office work: This build is overkill for spreadsheets and document editing, but the 83rd percentile CPU ranking ensures no lag in any office suite. The GPU’s 1113 PassMark G2D score guarantees smooth 2D rendering and multi-display output via its HDMI 2.1b and three DisplayPort 2.1b connections.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a well-balanced pairing, with the CPU holding a higher percentile rank (83) than the GPU (66). This means the CPU is generally the stronger component relative to its peers, and in most gaming scenarios, the GPU will be the limiting factor at higher resolutions. The measured FPS scaling supports this: across the game list, the average FPS drops from 105.6 overall, with heavy titles like Cyberpunk 2077 falling from 48 FPS at 1080p to 24 FPS at 4K, which is classic GPU-bound scaling. Conversely, in CPU-light games like Valorant, the system achieves 375 FPS at 1080p, indicating the CPU is not a bottleneck even at extreme frame rates. In CPU-heavy titles like Ark: Survival Ascended, the system only manages 24 FPS at 1080p, which suggests a combination of GPU limitation and poor optimization, but the GPU’s 66th percentile ranking means it is the likely constraint. The CPU’s 0.1% delta with the Intel Core i5-14600T shows that it is not holding back performance relative to its compute class. For users seeking more GPU headroom, the AM5 platform allows a future GPU upgrade without changing the CPU, as the PCIe Gen 5 x8 interface will not bottleneck even high-end cards.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data, collected at ultra settings across three resolutions, shows a system that excels at 1080p and remains playable at 1440p for most titles. At 1080p, the system delivers over 100 FPS in a majority of tested games. Esports titles are exceptional: Valorant hits 375 FPS, CS:GO 361 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 achieves 163 FPS. Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege runs at 194 FPS, and Roblox reaches 211 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone is playable at 143 FPS, and Ready Or Not hits 132 FPS. For single-player games, Assetto Corsa runs at 97 FPS, Thief at 90 FPS, and Outriders at 86 FPS. Heavier titles show the GPU’s limits: Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 48 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 44 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at a stuttery 24 FPS. Microsoft Flight Simulator manages 59 FPS.

At 1440p, performance scales down predictably. Valorant still delivers 320 FPS, CS:GO 249 FPS, and Warzone 127 FPS. Rainbow Six Siege drops to 127 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 to 108 FPS. Single-player titles like Assetto Corsa (68 FPS), Control (52 FPS), and Cyberpunk 2077 (36 FPS) remain playable but not at high refresh. At 4K, the system is only suitable for less demanding games: Valorant hits 256 FPS, CS:GO 147 FPS, and Warzone 108 FPS. Most AAA titles fall below 40 FPS at 4K, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 24 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 22 FPS, and Ark at 8 FPS. The data shows that 1080p is the sweet spot, 1440p is viable for esports and lighter titles, and 4K is only for competitive shooters or older games.

Who Should Build It

This desktop build targets gamers who prioritize 1080p high-refresh play, particularly in competitive shooters. The measured 375 FPS in Valorant and 361 FPS in CS:GO at 1080p make it ideal for esports enthusiasts. It also suits gamers who play at 1440p with settings tuned down, as the 127 FPS in Warzone and 320 FPS in Valorant demonstrate. Content creators who do light video editing or 3D rendering will find the 21765 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 13.17 TFLOPS GPU sufficient for occasional workloads, though not for professional production. Software developers benefit from the strong single-thread performance (3072 Cinebench R23) and 12 threads for parallel builds. Students and small business users who need a responsive system for office work and web browsing are well served, and the ECC memory support adds reliability for data-sensitive tasks. The build is not suited for 4K gaming or heavy compute workloads, as the 8 GB GPU memory and 66th percentile GPU ranking limit those scenarios.

Build Overview

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 is a desktop-class build combining a 7000-series Zen 4 CPU with a GeForce 50-series Blackwell 2.0 GPU. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread part with a 65 W TDP on the AM5 socket, while the GPU is an 8 GB GDDR6 card with a 130 W TDP and a 128-bit memory bus. The combined system percentile is 75, meaning this build outperforms three-quarters of all recorded desktop configurations. The CPU’s 83rd percentile rank is notably higher than the GPU’s 66th, indicating the processor has more headroom than the graphics card. The pair achieves an average of 105.6 FPS across all measured games at ultra settings, with a rank of 2450 out of 3732 pairs by FPS, placing it in the top third of all CPU+GPU combinations. This is a mid-range to upper-mid-range build that excels at 1080p gaming and handles 1440p for esports, with sufficient compute power for content creation and development tasks.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the integrated graphics are listed as N/A, so a discrete GPU is required.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory size and type?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 320.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the system’s overall percentile ranking?

A: The combined system percentile is 75, meaning it outperforms 75% of all desktop configurations in the database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i5-14600T?

A: The Ryzen 5 7400F scores 32750 on average, which is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core i5-14600T’s 32707.

Q: What PSU wattage is suggested for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the RTX 5050 is 300 W.

Q: What is the average FPS across all measured games?

A: The pair achieves an average of 105.6 FPS across all games at ultra settings, with the best performance in Valorant (375 FPS at 1080p).

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 7400F

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Valorant

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds