SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7400F + Intel Arc A750

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7400F

32,750 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A750

20,582 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and Intel Arc A750 pairing represents a modern desktop build that combines a current-generation 6-core processor with a dedicated graphics card from Intel's Alchemist lineup. The dataset for this combination lacks any measured frame-rate data, so the gaming analysis that follows is estimated from the benchmark scores of each component rather than derived from direct testing of the pair together. The CPU and GPU scores paint a coherent picture of a system positioned near the 75th percentile overall among all desktop combinations, with the processor at the 83rd percentile against all CPUs and the graphics card at the 66th percentile against all GPUs.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU-GPU combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame-rate expectations below are estimates based on the individual benchmark scores of the Ryzen 5 7400F and Arc A750. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 12534 places it in the 66th percentile among all GPUs, which suggests it can handle 1080p gaming at high settings in most titles, though 1440p ultra settings would likely push it to its limits. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2612 is a modern DirectX 12 workload that indicates solid rasterization performance, while the Geekbench Vulkan score of 85631 shows the card is capable in compute-heavy graphics APIs.

For 1080p ultra settings, the data suggests this combination would deliver playable frame rates in esports and moderately demanding titles, but the GPU's 8 GB of VRAM and 17.20 TFLOPS of FP32 compute put a ceiling on performance in the most graphically intensive releases. The CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3072 is strong enough to avoid bottlenecking the GPU at lower resolutions, where frame rates are often CPU-limited. At 1440p, the GPU becomes the primary constraint, and the 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth helps maintain consistent throughput, but the 66th percentile GPU ranking means ultra settings at this resolution would likely require settings adjustments.

The lack of measured FPS data means these are estimates derived from the PassMark DirectX scores, where the card scores 70 in DX12, 72 in DX11, and 65 in DX10. These results indicate the card performs consistently across different DirectX versions, though none of these scores are exceptionally high. For ray tracing workloads, the 28 RT cores provide hardware support, but the overall GPU performance level suggests ray tracing at high settings would be challenging at 1440p or above.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 5 7400F uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which is the current generation of AMD desktop processors and remains in active production. The socket supports DDR5 memory through a dual-channel interface with a theoretical bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and the platform includes ECC memory support as a feature. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes, which is the latest PCIe standard and offers headroom for future storage and graphics upgrades.

The processor has a TDP of 65 watts, which is modest for a desktop CPU, and the GPU has a TDP of 225 watts with a suggested PSU rating of 550 watts. This power combination leaves reasonable headroom for a system with a single graphics card and standard peripherals, though the GPU's power connectors (1x 6-pin plus 1x 8-pin) must be accommodated by the power supply. The CPU's 65-watt TDP means a capable air cooler is sufficient for thermal management, and the AM5 socket has a clear upgrade path within the same generation.

A sensible next upgrade for this system would be a higher-tier AM5 processor, as the socket supports the full Ryzen 7000 series lineup. The PCIe Gen 5 interface ensures that future graphics cards or NVMe drives will not be bandwidth-limited by the platform. The DDR5 memory support is current, and the dual-channel configuration is standard for desktop systems. The GPU is end-of-life per the data, which means users looking for more graphical performance would replace the Arc A750 with a newer card, and the PCIe 4.0 x16 interface on the GPU side is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on the Zen 4 architecture with the Raphael codename, manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC. The chip contains 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die, and its base clock is 3.70 GHz with a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache, which is typical for a mainstream 6-core part.

The benchmark scores show a processor that excels in multi-threaded workloads relative to its single-thread performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21765 is strong for a 6-core chip, while the single-core score of 3072 is respectable but not class-leading. The PassMark multithread score of 25645 and single-thread score of 3689 reinforce this pattern. The data compression score of 289999 is particularly high, indicating strong performance in tasks that use the full core count, while the integer math score of 74745 and floating point math score of 45799 show balanced execution across different instruction types.

The CPU's nearest rivals are all within 0.3% of its average benchmark score of 32750, which means it sits in a tightly contested performance tier. The Intel Core i5-14600T is 0.1% ahead, the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H is 0.2% ahead, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H is 0.2% behind, and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is 0.3% ahead. This clustering indicates that the 7400F delivers competitive multi-threaded performance for its core count, but the differences between these processors are negligible in real-world use. The 83rd percentile ranking against all CPUs confirms it is a strong mainstream processor, though not a top-tier enthusiast part.

Balance and Bottleneck

The combined percentile of 75 for this CPU-GPU pairing indicates a balanced system where neither component is severely mismatched to the other. The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking against all CPUs is notably higher than the GPU's 66th percentile against all GPUs, which suggests that in CPU-intensive workloads, the processor can outperform the graphics card's capabilities. However, the GPU is not a weak performer, and the gap is not extreme enough to create a significant bottleneck in most scenarios.

In gaming workloads, the balance shifts depending on the game and resolution. At 1080p, the CPU's strong single-thread score of 3072 in Cinebench R23 and 3689 in PassMark single-thread ensures it can feed the GPU adequately, but the GPU's 66th percentile position becomes the limiting factor for frame rates in GPU-bound scenes. At higher resolutions like 1440p, the GPU becomes even more dominant as the bottleneck, since the rendering load increases without a corresponding increase in CPU demand. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for most 1080p workloads but may cause stuttering or texture pop-in at 1440p in VRAM-hungry titles.

For productivity workloads, the CPU is the primary driver, and its high multi-core scores (Cinebench R23 multi-core of 21765, PassMark multithread of 25645) mean it can handle compiling, rendering, and data processing without being held back by the GPU. The GPU's compute scores, such as the Geekbench OpenCL score of 98554 and the PassMark GPU compute score of 5368, are moderate and would not accelerate GPU-accelerated tasks as effectively as a higher-tier card. The data indicates that this system is well-balanced for mixed use, with the CPU leading in non-graphics tasks and the GPU handling graphics but not excelling in compute-heavy workloads.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A750 is built on the DG2-512 chip with the Xe-HPG architecture, part of the Alchemist generation, manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC. The GPU contains 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die, with a transistor density of 53.4 million per square millimeter. It has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s with an effective memory clock of 16 Gbps. The GPU operates at a base clock of 2050 MHz with a boost clock of 2400 MHz, and its memory runs at 2000 MHz.

The compute resources include 3584 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output units, along with 28 ray tracing cores. The pixel rate is 268.8 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 537.6 GTexel/s, with FP32 performance rated at 17.20 TFLOPS and FP16 at 34.41 TFLOPS. These specifications place the card in the mid-range segment, and the benchmark scores confirm this positioning. The PassMark G3D score of 12534 is the primary gaming performance indicator, placing the card at the 66th percentile, while the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2612 shows modern API performance.

The GPU's nearest rivals are all within 0.5% of its average benchmark score of 20582, indicating a tight competitive grouping. The Intel Arc B570 is 0.1% ahead, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile is 0.2% ahead, the AMD Radeon R9 M390X is 0.4% behind, and the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M is 0.5% behind. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 85631 is notably higher than the OpenCL score of 98554 relative to expectations, suggesting the card performs well in Vulkan-based games and applications. The PassMark DirectX scores (DX9: 181, DX10: 65, DX11: 72, DX12: 70) show that the card is strongest in legacy DirectX 9 workloads, which is unusual and suggests driver overhead in newer APIs.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, this system can deliver frame rates above 60 FPS in most titles based on the GPU's 66th percentile ranking, but the 8 GB VRAM may limit texture quality in newer games. The CPU's strong single-core performance ensures that frame times remain consistent in CPU-bound scenarios, though the GPU will be the limiting factor in graphically demanding scenes.

Streaming while gaming is feasible because the CPU's 12 threads provide enough headroom for encoding overhead, and the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21765 indicates solid multitasking capability. The GPU's lack of dedicated tensor cores means that hardware-accelerated AI features are not available, so streaming would rely on CPU encoding or alternative methods.

Video editing in software like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve benefits from the CPU's multi-threaded performance, with the PassMark multithread score of 25645 handling timeline rendering and export. The GPU's compute scores (Geekbench OpenCL 98554, Vulkan 85631) can accelerate effects and color grading, though the 8 GB VRAM may be limiting for large 4K projects.

3D rendering workloads would rely primarily on the CPU for CPU-based renderers, and the Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 9141 and R15 multi-core score of 2193 indicate strong performance for a 6-core part. GPU-based renderers would see moderate acceleration from the Arc A750's 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 performance, but the 66th percentile ranking suggests it is not a top-tier rendering GPU.

Software development tasks like compiling and testing benefit from the CPU's 12 threads and high integer math score of 74745, while the 32 MB L3 cache helps with frequently accessed data. The PassMark data compression score of 289999 is excellent for build processes that involve archive extraction or code distribution.

Student and office work is more than adequately served by this system, as the CPU's single-thread score of 3689 handles everyday applications with ease, and the GPU is far more capable than needed for productivity software. The 65-watt CPU TDP means the system runs efficiently in idle and light loads, which is ideal for a shared or dorm-room environment.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1080p high refresh rates will find this system well-matched, as the GPU's 66th percentile ranking and the CPU's strong single-core performance keep frame rates high in competitive titles. Those gaming at 1440p should expect to adjust settings to medium or high, given the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and mid-range compute power. Content creators working with video or 3D rendering will appreciate the CPU's multi-threaded capabilities, with Cinebench R23 multi-core of 21765 handling export times, while the GPU provides moderate acceleration for effects and previews.

Developers building and testing software will benefit from the CPU's 12 threads and high integer math score, making compilation times reasonable. Students and small business users with general productivity needs will find the system more than sufficient, with the CPU's 83rd percentile ranking ensuring responsive performance in office applications. The AM5 platform's upgrade path means users can later move to a higher-core-count Ryzen processor without changing the motherboard, which is a strategic advantage for those planning incremental upgrades. The GPU is end-of-life, so users who anticipate wanting more graphical performance in the future should factor in a GPU replacement as their first major upgrade.

FAQ

Q: What is the processor's socket and does it support DDR5 memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F uses the AMD Socket AM5 interface and supports DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, which provides a theoretical bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s.

Q: How many cores and threads does the CPU have, and what is its boost clock?

A: The Ryzen 5 7400F has 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz.

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM capacity and memory bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc A750 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a memory bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s with an effective memory clock of 16 Gbps.

Q: Does the GPU support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Arc A750 includes 28 ray tracing cores, which provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced workloads.

Q: What is the suggested power supply rating for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the Intel Arc A750 is 550 watts, and the GPU has a TDP of 225 watts with power connectors requiring 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in benchmark scores?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 32750, with the nearest rival being the Intel Core i5-14600T at a 0.1% higher score, and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H at a 0.2% lower score.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking against all GPUs?

A: The Intel Arc A750 ranks at the 66th percentile against all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 20582.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 32750 places it at the 83rd percentile against all CPUs, with Cinebench R23 multi-core scoring 21765 and single-core scoring 3072. The PassMark suite shows a multithread score of 25645 and a single-thread score of 3689, with strong results in data compression (289999) and integer math (74745). The GPU's average benchmark score of 20582 places it at the 66th percentile against all GPUs, with a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2612 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 85631. The PassMark G3D score of 12534 is the primary gaming metric, while the GPU compute score of 5368 indicates moderate compute capability.

The combined percentile for this pairing is 75, meaning this system outperforms roughly three-quarters of all desktop configurations in the database. The CPU's nearest rivals are all within 0.3% of its score, and the GPU's nearest rivals are all within 0.5%, which shows that both components sit in competitive performance tiers. The CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers, with an 83rd percentile ranking versus the GPU's 66th percentile, suggesting that the processor has more headroom for future GPU upgrades without becoming a bottleneck. The overall picture is a balanced mid-range desktop system that excels in CPU-heavy productivity tasks while providing solid, though not exceptional, gaming performance at 1080p.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7400F + Intel Arc A750

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 7400F

Intel Arc A750

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds