SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

79%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7400F

32,750 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

2,690 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER pairing represents a desktop combination that blends a modern 6-core processor with a current-generation graphics card. Benchmark data indicates that the CPU is a strong performer relative to the broader market, while the GPU’s measured scores are modest, creating an interesting dynamic for system builders. This analysis relies solely on the provided benchmark data, which does not include measured in-game frame rates.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on the Zen 4 architecture, known by the codename Raphael. It belongs to the 7000 series and is manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC, with the die containing 6,570 million transistors. The base clock is 3.70 GHz, which can boost up to 4.70 GHz, and the chip has a 65 W TDP. It uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform and supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, along with ECC memory support. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache.

Benchmark scores place this CPU in the 83rd percentile among all processors, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of CPUs in the database. Its average benchmark score is 32750. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score is 21765, while the single-core score is 3072. This multi-core result demonstrates substantial parallel processing capability for a 6-core chip, making it suitable for workloads that utilize all threads. The single-core score is robust, which is critical for tasks that rely on per-thread performance.

Looking at other benchmarks, the Passmark multi-thread score is 25645, and the single-thread score is 3689. The floating-point math score is 45799, and integer math reaches 74745, indicating strong arithmetic throughput for both general and scientific computing. Data compression scores are very high at 289999, while encryption scores are 16712, and extended instructions score 21747. These figures suggest the CPU handles a variety of compute-intensive tasks effectively.

Compared to rivals, the Ryzen 5 7400F is essentially neck-and-neck with the Intel Core i5-14600T, which has an average score of 32707, a delta of just 0.1%. It is also closely matched with the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (32697, 0.2% delta) and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 (32662, 0.3% delta). The only rival it trails slightly is the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H, which scores 32812, a delta of -0.2%. This means that in aggregate performance, these four CPUs are virtually indistinguishable, with differences well under a single percentage point.

For real workloads, the Ryzen 5 7400F’s 6-core, 12-thread configuration with a 4.70 GHz boost clock provides a balance between high single-thread responsiveness and respectable multi-core throughput. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 9141 and single-core score of 1290 reinforce this pattern. This makes the CPU well-suited for applications like compiling code, rendering images, and handling heavy multitasking, where the combination of core count and clock speed matters. The data shows a processor that is not a flagship but sits comfortably above average, delivering consistent performance across synthetic tests without any single obvious weakness.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s single-core performance, demonstrated by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3072 and a Passmark single-thread score of 3689, provides the foundation for high frame rates in games that are lightly threaded. The 83rd percentile ranking among all CPUs suggests it will not be a limiting factor in most gaming scenarios, allowing the GPU to drive display refresh rates.

Streaming: The 12 threads from 6 cores, alongside a Passmark multi-thread score of 25645, offer enough parallel capacity to handle game encoding and stream overlays simultaneously. The data compression score of 289999 indicates strong performance in data-heavy tasks, which is relevant for encoding video streams, though the GPU also plays a role here.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21765 and the floating-point math score of 45799 show that the CPU can handle timeline processing and effects rendering in editing software. The 32 MB of L3 cache helps with repeated data access patterns common in video workloads. The 83rd percentile position means it outperforms most other CPUs for these tasks.

3D rendering: The multi-threaded performance, evidenced by a Passmark multi-thread score of 25645 and a Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 2193, makes this CPU capable of handling CPU-based rendering tasks. While not a top-tier workstation chip, its position above 80% of all CPUs ensures it can complete render jobs in a reasonable timeframe.

Software development: The integer math score of 74745 and the extended instructions score of 21747 are strong indicators for code compilation and execution of algorithm-heavy applications. The balanced single and multi-thread scores allow for quick builds and responsive IDE performance, making it a solid choice for developers.

Student and office work: With a boost clock of 4.70 GHz and a single-thread score of 3689, the CPU handles everyday productivity applications with ease. The 65 W TDP means it runs efficiently in a desktop system, and the 83rd percentile ranking ensures it is faster than the majority of CPUs, so it will not struggle with spreadsheets, documents, or web browsing.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data presents an unusual balance situation. The CPU is in the 83rd percentile, while the GPU is in the 18th percentile. This significant gap suggests that the processor has far more performance headroom relative to the rest of the market than the graphics card does. In most workloads, the GPU is likely to be the limiting component, particularly in graphics-intensive tasks like gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering, because its relative standing is much lower.

The CPU’s nearest rivals include the Intel Core i5-14600T and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H, with delta percentages of 0.1% and -0.2% respectively. This tight grouping means that swapping between these CPUs would yield virtually no performance difference, confirming that the CPU is not a bottleneck in a system with a lower-percentile GPU. The CPU’s high single-thread score of 3072 in Cinebench R23 ensures it can feed frames to the GPU quickly, but the GPU’s own performance ceiling will cap the final output.

For gaming, the bottleneck will almost certainly be the GPU, as the CPU’s 83rd percentile position is far above the GPU’s 18th percentile. This means that at any resolution, the graphics card will be the first component to reach its limit. In contrast, for CPU-bound tasks like data encryption (score of 16712) or prime number finding (score of 191), the CPU will be the primary driver, and the GPU's role is minimal. The system is therefore imbalanced in favor of the CPU, which is the opposite of many typical gaming builds where the GPU is the stronger component.

Who Should Build It

This pairing is suited for users who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads over graphics performance. Gamers at 1080p or 1440p with lower graphical demands might find the CPU’s high percentile ranking ensures smooth frame pacing, but the GPU’s low percentile will limit maximum settings. Content creators who work with CPU-based rendering or video encoding will benefit from the processor’s strong multi-thread scores, such as the Cinebench R23 multi-core result of 21765, while using the GPU for less demanding display tasks.

Software developers and data scientists who run simulations or compile large codebases will appreciate the CPU’s integer math and extended instruction scores. Students and small business users building a workstation for general productivity, web development, or office applications will find the CPU more than adequate, and the GPU sufficient for basic visual output. The build is not ideal for high-end 4K gaming or GPU-accelerated 3D rendering, where the GPU’s 18th percentile ranking would be a clear liability.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER is based on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, using the GB205 chip manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC with 31,100 million transistors. It features 6400 shading units, 200 texture mapping units, and 80 raster operation units. The GPU has 50 ray tracing cores and 200 tensor cores, which support DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The base clock is 2325 MHz, with a boost clock of 2512 MHz, and the memory operates at 1750 MHz, effectively 28 Gbps.

Memory is a key feature, with 18 GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s. This large frame buffer is beneficial for high-resolution textures and complex scenes. The pixel rate is 201.0 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 502.4 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 32.15 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 32.15 TFLOPS (1:1). The GPU has a TDP of 275 W, uses a dual-slot cooler, and requires a single 16-pin power connector. It connects via PCIe 5.0 x16 and outputs through 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b.

The only benchmark score available is from 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, where the GPU scores 2690. This places it in the 18th percentile of all GPUs, which is a low ranking. The average benchmark score is 2690, and its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M (score 2664, delta 1%), the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (2662, delta 1.1%), the Intel Arc Pro B50 (2660, delta 1.1%), and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 (2645, delta 1.7%). These rivals are all older or entry-level graphics cards, indicating that the RTX 5070 SUPER’s measured performance in this particular test is surprisingly modest.

For rendering, the FP32 and FP16 scores of 32.15 TFLOPS suggest theoretical computational capability for shader and compute workloads. The 50 RT cores support ray-traced effects, and the 200 tensor cores enable AI-accelerated features. However, the low percentile ranking implies that in practice, the GPU may not deliver the expected performance for a modern card. The 18 GB VRAM and 672.0 GB/s bandwidth are high, but the benchmark score suggests that the processing throughput is not translating into top-tier results in this specific test.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, so all frame rate discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2690, which places it in the 18th percentile, suggests that gaming performance will be limited compared to higher-ranked GPUs. The CPU’s strong single-thread score of 3072 in Cinebench R23 indicates it can handle game logic and physics, but the GPU’s low percentile will cap the final FPS.

At 1080p, the CPU’s high percentile (83rd) ensures it is not a bottleneck, but the GPU’s 18th percentile means that frame rates in modern titles will likely be moderate, not high. At 1440p, the GPU’s workload increases, and its relatively low benchmark score suggests frame rates will drop further. At 4K, the GPU will be the clear limiting factor, and achieving playable frame rates may require significant graphical compromises. The 18 GB of VRAM is ample for high-resolution textures, but the raw rendering power, as measured by the 2690 Steel Nomad score, is not sufficient for ultra settings at high resolutions.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The CPU is in the 83rd percentile, indicating it performs better than 83% of all CPUs in the database.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking among all graphics cards?

A: The GPU is in the 18th percentile, meaning it outperforms only 18% of all GPUs.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i5-14600T?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 32750, while the Intel Core i5-14600T scores 32707, a delta of 0.1%, making them nearly identical in performance.

Q: What is the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score?

A: The GPU scores 2690 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 benchmark.

Q: How much memory does the GPU have and what type is it?

A: The GPU has 18 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock speed?

A: The CPU’s boost clock is 4.70 GHz.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the CPU has no integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is required for display output.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the 7000 series using the Zen 4 architecture on socket AM5. The GPU is a GeForce 50-series card with 18 GB of GDDR7 memory. The combined percentile is 51, which places this pairing in the middle of the overall performance distribution. The CPU’s high percentile (83) is offset by the GPU’s low percentile (18), resulting in a system that is stronger in processor-bound tasks than graphics-bound tasks.

The build class is desktop, indicating it is intended for a standard desktop PC. The overall tier, based on the percentiles, is a mixed bag: the CPU is above-average, while the GPU is below-average. This creates a system that could serve well as a workstation for CPU-intensive applications, but it is not a high-end gaming machine by the numbers. The pairing of a top-tier CPU with a low-tier GPU is an unusual configuration that will appeal to users with specific workload requirements.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 32750, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21765 and a single-core score of 3072. It sits in the 83rd percentile, and its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-14600T, is just 0.1% behind. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 2690, from the 3DMark Steel Nomad test, placing it in the 18th percentile. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M, is 1% behind.

The combined picture is one of imbalance. The CPU is a strong performer, ranking above the vast majority of processors, while the GPU is a weak performer, ranking below the vast majority of graphics cards. The combined percentile of 51 reflects this dichotomy, averaging out to a mid-tier system. In benchmark terms, the CPU delivers strong multi-threaded and single-threaded scores, as seen in the Cinebench and Passmark tests, while the GPU’s single 3DMark score is low. This indicates that the system will excel in CPU-heavy applications like compiling, rendering on the CPU, and data processing, but will lag in GPU-heavy applications like gaming or GPU rendering.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 7400F

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds