SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7400 + Intel Arc A750

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7400

42,055 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A750

20,582 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 5 7400 + Intel Arc A750

This pairing combines AMD's 6-core Zen 4 desktop processor with Intel's Arc A750 graphics card, creating a mid-range desktop build aimed at 1080p gaming and productivity work. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the database, so all frame rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than direct game testing.

Gaming Performance

The database contains no measured FPS figures for this CPU+GPU combination across any game title or resolution. All gaming expectations must therefore be derived from the synthetic benchmark scores of each component. The Intel Arc A750 produces a Passmark G3D score of 12534, placing it at the 66th percentile of all GPUs, which indicates solid 1080p-class performance. Its DirectX 12 score of 70 and Vulkan score of 85631 in Geekbench suggest modern API titles will run reasonably well, though the aging DirectX 9 score of 181 highlights potential compatibility concerns with older games.

For the CPU side, the Ryzen 5 7400's Passmark single-thread score of 3248 and physics score of 1150 indicate it can keep up with the Arc A750 in most gaming scenarios without becoming a bottleneck at 1080p. The 16 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR5 memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s provide adequate data throughput for gaming workloads. Estimated frame rates at 1080p ultra settings would likely land in the playable 60-90 FPS range for most modern titles, based on the GPU's overall performance tier relative to its nearest rivals.

At 1440p, the 8 GB GDDR6 memory with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth will become the limiting factor, with estimated frame rates dropping to 40-60 FPS in demanding titles. The GPU's 66th percentile standing means it outperforms roughly two-thirds of all GPUs, but it sits well below high-end cards that would be needed for consistent 1440p high-refresh gaming. Given the lack of measured data, these figures should be treated as estimates derived from benchmark scores rather than verified results.

Benchmark Performance

The Ryzen 5 7400 achieves an average benchmark score of 42055, placing it at the 88th percentile of all CPUs. This is a strong result for a 6-core processor, and the nearest rival data confirms its positioning: it sits just 0.2% above the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS (41963), 0.3% above the Intel Core i7-14700T (41914), and 0.7% above the Intel Core i7-12850HX (41779). Meanwhile, it trails the Intel Core i9-12900K (42335) by 0.7%, meaning the Ryzen 5 7400 effectively trades blows with a previous-generation flagship desktop CPU.

Looking at individual CPU benchmarks, the multithread score of 21712 reflects the 6-core/12-thread configuration, while the integer math score of 64733 and floating-point math score of 40784 show balanced computational throughput. The data compression score of 261749 is particularly strong, and the encryption score of 14865 indicates capable security workloads. The single-thread score of 3248 confirms solid per-core performance for the Zen 4 architecture.

The Intel Arc A750's average benchmark score of 20582 places it at the 66th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals show extremely tight competition: it is 0.1% above the Intel Arc B570 (20556), 0.2% above the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (20534), 0.5% above the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M (20480), and 0.4% below the AMD Radeon R9 M390X (20662). This clustering indicates the Arc A750 sits in a highly competitive performance band where small benchmark variations separate cards.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 77, reflecting a system that is stronger on the CPU side (88th percentile) than the GPU side (66th percentile). This asymmetry matters for workload planning, as the processor has more headroom relative to its peers than the graphics card does.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 5 7400 uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which represents AMD's current desktop socket and supports DDR5 memory exclusively. The dual-channel memory controller provides 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth, and ECC memory support is included, making this platform suitable for workstation-style builds that require data integrity. The CPU offers PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the processor itself, ensuring ample bandwidth for modern NVMe storage and future GPU upgrades.

The integrated Radeon Graphics in the Ryzen 5 7400 provides a fallback display output if the discrete GPU is removed or fails, though it is not intended for gaming. The CPU's 65 W TDP is modest, and the Arc A750's suggested PSU of 550 W means a reasonably sized power supply can handle the full system. The GPU uses one 6-pin and one 8-pin power connector, which is standard for this performance class.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU, as the CPU's 88th percentile standing leaves headroom for a more powerful graphics card without creating a significant processor bottleneck. The AM5 platform supports future Ryzen 7000-series and later processors, so CPU upgrades are also possible without changing the motherboard. The 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes ensure that even the fastest current storage and GPU options will not be bandwidth-limited.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a clear imbalance in this pairing: the CPU sits at the 88th percentile while the GPU sits at the 66th percentile. This means the Arc A750 is the limiting component in graphics-intensive workloads, while the Ryzen 5 7400 has substantial headroom for compute-heavy tasks. In gaming at 1080p, the CPU's strong single-thread score of 3248 suggests it can feed the GPU adequately, but the GPU's 66th percentile position will cap maximum frame rates.

In CPU-bound scenarios like physics simulation or data compression, the Ryzen 5 7400's scores (1150 physics, 261749 data compression) indicate the processor will not be the bottleneck. The GPU becomes the constraint in gaming and GPU-compute workloads, as evidenced by its Passmark GPU compute score of 5368, which is modest compared to the CPU's compute capabilities. For mixed workloads like streaming while gaming, the CPU's 12 threads provide enough parallelism for encoding tasks without starving the game.

The FPS scaling evidence, though estimated rather than measured, suggests that lowering resolution from 1440p to 1080p would yield diminishing returns because the GPU is already near its performance ceiling. Conversely, increasing resolution would degrade frame rates more steeply than on a more balanced system, since the GPU would be pushed further beyond its comfortable operating range.

FAQ

Q: Is the Ryzen 5 7400 a good match for the Intel Arc A750?

A: The CPU at the 88th percentile outpaces the GPU at the 66th percentile, meaning the Arc A750 will be the limiting factor in most gaming scenarios. The processor has enough headroom to support a future GPU upgrade without needing replacement.

Q: What resolution is this build best suited for?

A: Based on the GPU's performance tier and 8 GB memory capacity, 1080p gaming is the sweet spot. The Arc A750's bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s and Passmark G3D score of 12534 suggest playable frame rates at 1080p ultra, with 1440p being more demanding than the card can comfortably handle.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 5 7400 has an unlocked multiplier, allowing overclocking on compatible AM5 motherboards. The base clock of 3.30 GHz can be raised, though the 65 W TDP may limit thermal headroom without adequate cooling.

Q: Can this system handle content creation workloads?

A: The CPU's multithread score of 21712 and floating-point math score of 40784 indicate solid performance for video editing and 3D rendering, but the GPU's Passmark compute score of 5368 means GPU-accelerated rendering will be less impressive. CPU-heavy tasks will fare better than GPU-accelerated ones.

Q: What are the memory requirements for this build?

A: The platform exclusively supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, providing 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth. ECC memory is supported, which is unusual for consumer desktop platforms and benefits data-integrity-sensitive workloads.

Q: Is the Intel Arc A750 still a viable purchase?

A: The GPU is marked as end-of-life production, with its successor Battlemage already announced. However, its benchmark scores remain competitive, sitting within 0.5% of several current alternatives, so it can still deliver adequate 1080p performance if available at a suitable price.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 7400 compare to older high-end CPUs?

A: It performs within 0.7% of the Intel Core i9-12900K in average benchmark score, meaning this 6-core processor effectively matches a previous-generation flagship in overall throughput while consuming less power at 65 W TDP.

Who Should Build It

This system targets gamers who prioritize 1080p resolution and are comfortable with estimated performance rather than verified frame rates. The CPU's 88th percentile standing makes it an excellent choice for users who also engage in productivity work like software development, where the multithread score of 21712 and encryption score of 14865 provide tangible benefits.

Content creators working primarily with CPU-based workflows—such as video encoding that uses the integer math score of 64733—will find the processor capable, though GPU-accelerated tasks will be limited by the Arc A750's compute score of 5368. Students and small business users running office applications, web development, or data analysis will benefit from the CPU's strong single-thread performance of 3248 and the platform's ECC memory support for data integrity.

The GPU's 66th percentile makes this build less suitable for enthusiasts seeking high-refresh 1440p gaming or 4K experiences. Instead, it fits users who want a balanced desktop for everyday computing, moderate gaming, and occasional creative work, with the CPU providing a solid foundation for future GPU upgrades. The AM5 platform's longevity—supporting DDR5 and PCIe Gen 5—makes this a forward-looking investment for users who plan incremental upgrades over several years.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400 is a 6-core, 12-thread desktop processor built on the Zen 4 architecture (codenamed Raphael) using TSMC's 5 nm process node. It packs 6,570 million transistors into a 71 mm² die, which is remarkably dense for a mainstream desktop chip. The base clock of 3.30 GHz boosts to 4.30 GHz, and the unlocked multiplier allows manual overclocking for users with adequate cooling.

Cache configuration includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. This layout provides low-latency access to frequently used data, which is reflected in the single-thread score of 3248 and physics score of 1150. The Passmark extended instructions score of 19924 and find prime numbers score of 79 indicate strong AVX-512 and general math capabilities, respectively.

The CPU's 65 W TDP is modest for a desktop processor, making it easy to cool with standard air coolers. Memory support is limited to DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, with 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth and optional ECC support. The 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide ample connectivity for storage and expansion cards. Released in September 2025, this processor is still in active production, and its average benchmark score of 42055 places it at the 88th percentile of all CPUs.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing AMD's Ryzen 5 7400 with Intel's Arc A750 graphics card. The CPU represents the mainstream tier of the 7000 series, while the GPU is an end-of-life product from Intel's Alchemist generation. The combined percentile of 77 indicates a system that sits above the median but below high-end configurations.

The pairing is characterized by a significant CPU advantage: the processor ranks at the 88th percentile while the GPU ranks at the 66th. This makes the build compute-heavy rather than graphics-heavy, which suits productivity workloads more than gaming. The Arc A750's launch MSRP was 289 USD, though this figure is historical and does not reflect current market pricing.

For a desktop system, this configuration offers a strong foundation with the AM5 platform's future upgrade potential. The CPU's 88th percentile standing means it will remain relevant for years, while the GPU can be swapped for a higher-tier card when needed. The overall tier is mid-range, with the CPU punching above its class and the GPU performing at a solid but unremarkable level.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the Arc A750's G3D score of 12534 and 66th percentile position suggest frame rates that can exceed 60 FPS in less demanding titles, but sustained 144 Hz gaming is unlikely without lowering settings. The CPU's single-thread score of 3248 ensures the processor won't hold back frame delivery.

Streaming: The 12 threads of the Ryzen 5 7400 provide enough parallelism for software encoding while maintaining game performance, given the multithread score of 21712. The GPU's modest compute score of 5368 means hardware encoding is less capable, so CPU-based streaming is the better option.

Video editing: CPU-based timeline editing and export will benefit from the processor's integer math score of 64733 and multithread score of 21712, making this a viable system for 1080p video work. GPU-accelerated effects and rendering will be slower due to the Arc A750's compute limitations.

3D rendering: CPU rendering in applications that use the processor's floating-point math score of 40784 will perform reasonably well for a 6-core chip. GPU rendering will be constrained by the Arc A750's 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, which is adequate for previews but slow for final renders.

Software development: The CPU's data compression score of 261749 and encryption score of 14865 make compilation and cryptography tasks efficient. The 88th percentile CPU standing ensures build times are competitive with higher-core-count rivals.

Student and office work: The processor's single-thread score of 3248 handles everyday applications smoothly, while the integrated Radeon Graphics provides a fallback if the discrete GPU is not needed. The 65 W TDP keeps power consumption low for long working sessions.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7400 + Intel Arc A750

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 7400

Intel Arc A750

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds