SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7400 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

86 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
79%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7400

42,055 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

2,690 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER pairing represents a fascinating study in contrast. The CPU is a modern 6-core desktop processor that sits at the 88th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU, despite its next-generation architecture and substantial memory pool, benchmarks in the 18th percentile in the available 3DMark test. This imbalance defines the entire character of this build, making it essential to understand which component drives performance in various scenarios before considering any purchase.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry between these two components is stark and data-driven. The Ryzen 5 7400 posts an average benchmark score of 42055, placing it just 0.7% behind the Intel Core i9-12900K and 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS. This is top-tier desktop processing power. In stark contrast, the RTX 5070 SUPER scores 2690 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, which places it merely 1.7% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 — a graphics card from a completely different era. The GPU's percentile rank of 18 means it outperforms only a small fraction of the database's GPU entries.

This configuration is unambiguously CPU-limited in almost every graphics-intensive scenario. The processor is capable of feeding frames at a rate the GPU simply cannot match. In CPU-bound workloads like data compression, the Ryzen 5 7400 scores an enormous 261749 in Passmark's compression test, while its floating-point math score of 40784 and integer math score of 64733 indicate a processor that will never be the limiting factor in a gaming or productivity system.

The bottleneck manifests differently across workload types. In gaming, the GPU will cap frame rates, particularly at higher resolutions where pixel throughput becomes the dominant constraint. In productivity tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the CPU's strong multi-threaded score of 21712 in Passmark's multithread test means it will handle physics calculations, scene management, and encoding pipelines while the GPU struggles with the visual output. The data suggests this pairing would benefit more from a significantly more powerful GPU, as the CPU has substantial headroom to support one.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmarks tell a story of consistent, high-level performance across diverse workloads. The Ryzen 5 7400 achieves a single-thread score of 3248, which is a strong result for a 6-core part and indicates excellent responsiveness in lightly-threaded applications. Its multithread score of 21712 confirms that the 12 threads are effectively utilized, giving it an average benchmark score of 42055 that places it at the 88th percentile of all CPUs in the database.

The nearest rival analysis puts this CPU's performance in perspective. It sits a mere 0.2% above the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS, which is a mobile processor with a higher core count, and 0.3% above the Intel Core i7-14700T. More impressively, it trails the Intel Core i9-12900K by only 0.7%, meaning this 6-core Zen 4 chip trades blows with a previous-generation flagship 16-core processor. The architecture's efficiency is evident: the 5 nm process node and 6,570 million transistors packed into a 71 mm² die deliver performance that rivals much larger and more power-hungry chips.

The GPU benchmark is a different story entirely. The single available result, 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at 2690 points, places the RTX 5070 SUPER at the 18th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M (1% slower), the GeForce GT 1030 (1.1% slower), and the GeForce GT 440 (1.7% slower). These are entry-level or legacy parts. The combined percentile for this system is 53, which reflects the average of a very strong CPU and a very weak GPU, resulting in a mid-pack overall position.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination — there are no rows in the measuredFpsUltraByGame field. Therefore, all frame rate expectations discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not empirical measurements. The GPU's 3DMark score of 2690 and its 18th percentile ranking suggest that gaming performance will be modest, and users should temper their expectations accordingly.

At 1080p resolution, the CPU's strong single-thread performance of 3248 should allow the GPU to reach its maximum potential, but that potential is limited. The RTX 5070 SUPER's 32.15 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 502.4 GTexel/s texture rate are respectable numbers on paper, but the benchmark data indicates real-world gaming performance will be closer to entry-level discrete GPUs than to modern mid-range or high-end cards. Esports titles and older games should run smoothly, but demanding modern AAA games at high settings will likely struggle.

At 1440p and 4K, the situation becomes more challenging. The GPU's memory bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s and 18 GB of GDDR7 memory are generous, but the underlying rendering power is insufficient for high-refresh-rate gaming at these resolutions. The 201.0 GPixel/s pixel rate suggests the card can handle basic rasterization, but ray tracing workloads, which require the 50 RT cores, will likely see significant performance drops. The CPU will sit largely idle in these scenarios, waiting on the GPU to produce frames.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This is not a suitable build for high-refresh-rate gaming. The GPU's 18th percentile ranking means it will struggle to push frame rates above 60 FPS in most modern titles at 1080p, let alone at higher resolutions. The CPU could easily support a much faster GPU for this purpose.

Streaming: The CPU's 12 threads and strong multithread score of 21712 provide enough headroom for software encoding while gaming, but the GPU's weak gaming performance means the overall stream quality will be limited by the game's frame rate. The 200 tensor cores could assist with NVENC encoding, but the primary bottleneck remains the GPU's rendering capability.

Video editing: The Ryzen 5 7400's 40784 floating-point math score and 64733 integer math score will handle timeline scrubbing, effect application, and export encoding efficiently. However, GPU-accelerated effects and preview rendering will be slow, and the GPU's limited compute power will extend render times for any GPU-dependent effects.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering will benefit from the processor's strong multithread score of 21712, which places it near the Core i9-12900K. GPU-based renderers like those using CUDA will be disappointing, as the RTX 5070 SUPER's FP32 throughput of 32.15 TFLOPS is not competitive with modern rendering GPUs.

Software development: This is a strong scenario for this build. The CPU's single-thread score of 3248 ensures fast compilation of single translation units, while the multithread score of 21712 accelerates parallel builds. The GPU is largely irrelevant for most development tasks, making this pairing acceptable for developers.

Student and office work: The CPU's 1150 physics score and strong general benchmark results make this an excellent office machine. The GPU's weakness is irrelevant for word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The 65 W TDP of the CPU means the system runs cool and quiet, ideal for a study environment.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael. It operates on the AMD Socket AM5 platform and is manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process, with a die size of just 71 mm² containing 6,570 million transistors. The base clock is 3.30 GHz with a boost clock of 4.30 GHz, and the TDP is rated at 65 W.

The cache hierarchy is substantial for a 6-core part: 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support includes dual-channel DDR5 with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported. The processor also includes integrated Radeon Graphics, which provides a basic display output and troubleshooting capability, though it is not intended for gaming.

Benchmark results show a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The single-thread score of 3248 places it among the top desktop CPUs, while the multithread score of 21712 demonstrates that the 12 threads are used effectively. The extended instructions score of 19924 and data encryption score of 14865 indicate strong performance in cryptography and SIMD-heavy workloads. The find prime numbers score of 79 is a more specialized result but still respectable.

The data compression score of 261749 is particularly noteworthy, suggesting excellent performance in archiving and compression tasks. The random string sorting score of 31110 adds to the picture of a well-rounded processor. The 88th percentile ranking among all CPUs confirms that this is a high-performing desktop processor that will serve most users well for years.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 7400 compare to the Intel Core i9-12900K?

A: The Ryzen 5 7400 trails the Core i9-12900K by only 0.7% in average benchmark score, despite having 6 cores versus the Intel chip's higher core count. This places them in the same performance tier.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER is at the 18th percentile among all GPUs in the database, based on its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2690.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 5 7400 includes Radeon Graphics as an integrated GPU, which provides basic display functionality but is not intended for gaming.

Q: What memory type does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the CPU's socket and platform?

A: The Ryzen 5 7400 uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which is the current desktop socket for AMD processors.

Q: How many PCIe lanes does the CPU provide?

A: The CPU provides 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is sufficient for a high-speed GPU and multiple NVMe drives.

Q: What is the transistor count of the GPU?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER contains 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die, manufactured on a 5 nm process.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Socket AM5 platform provides a clear and forward-looking upgrade path. The Ryzen 5 7400 is an active production processor, and the AM5 socket supports current and future AMD processors. The platform supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration and provides 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU, which is sufficient for the fastest available GPUs and storage devices.

The GPU's 275 W TDP requires a power supply with appropriate headroom, though the suggested PSU wattage is not provided in the data. The card uses a single 16-pin power connector, which is the modern standard for high-end GPUs. The dual-slot design and dimensions of 245 mm in length, 115 mm in height, and 40 mm in width mean it will fit in most standard ATX cases.

The most sensible upgrade for this system is the GPU. The CPU is performing at a high level, and the data clearly shows that a more powerful GPU would unlock the system's true potential. The CPU's performance relative to the Core i9-12900K indicates it can handle virtually any modern GPU without becoming a bottleneck. Replacing the RTX 5070 SUPER with a higher-performing graphics card would dramatically improve gaming and rendering performance.

Memory and storage upgrades are also straightforward. The platform supports dual-channel DDR5, and the 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes allow for high-speed NVMe storage. The CPU's integrated graphics provide a fallback display output during GPU troubleshooting or upgrade procedures.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the AMD Ryzen 5 7400 CPU with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER GPU. The system's combined percentile is 53, placing it in the middle of the database's performance distribution. The CPU is a high-performance 6-core processor at the 88th percentile, while the GPU is at the 18th percentile, creating a significant performance imbalance.

The overall tier of this build is defined by its weakest component. The CPU alone would qualify this as a high-end productivity system, capable of demanding workloads in development, content creation, and multitasking. The GPU, however, relegates the gaming and GPU-accelerated performance to entry-level status. The 18 GB of GDDR7 memory on the GPU is generous and future-proof, but the rendering power behind it is not competitive with modern mid-range cards.

This is a system that excels at CPU-intensive tasks and struggles at GPU-intensive ones. It is a workstation-class CPU paired with an entry-level gaming GPU, and the overall experience will vary dramatically depending on the workload. For productivity users who do not game, this is a strong system. For gamers, it is a disappointment.

Who Should Build It

Software developers and engineers will find this build highly suitable. The CPU's strong single-thread and multithread performance ensures fast compilation times, and the GPU's weakness is irrelevant for most development tasks. The 65 W CPU TDP keeps the system quiet and cool, ideal for office environments.

Students and small business users performing office work, web browsing, and light multitasking will also be well served. The CPU's benchmark scores indicate snappy responsiveness, and the integrated Radeon Graphics provide a backup display option. The system's overall performance in these workloads is excellent.

Content creators working primarily with CPU-based rendering or video encoding will appreciate the processor's capabilities, but they should not expect strong GPU-accelerated performance. The floating-point math score of 40784 and the multithread score of 21712 indicate solid CPU rendering performance.

Gamers at 1080p resolution with modest settings expectations may find the system acceptable for less demanding titles, but it is not recommended for this purpose. The GPU's 18th percentile ranking means modern AAA games will require significant settings reductions to achieve playable frame rates. High-refresh-rate gaming and 1440p or 4K gaming are not realistic expectations for this build.

The ideal user for this system is one who prioritizes CPU performance and does not depend on GPU acceleration. If gaming or GPU rendering is a primary use case, a different GPU should be chosen, as the Ryzen 5 7400 has substantial headroom to support a much more powerful graphics card.