SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 5600F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 5600F

36,945 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

43,223 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Balance and Bottleneck

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER form a pairing where the CPU and GPU occupy distinctly different performance tiers. The CPU sits at the 85th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU holds the 83rd percentile among all GPUs — a narrow gap that suggests a generally balanced system, but the nature of each component's workload determines where bottlenecks appear. The Ryzen 5 5600F delivers a single-thread score of 2872 and a multithread score of 19236, while the RTX 4070 SUPER produces a passmark G3D score of 29995. In gaming, the balance shifts depending on resolution: at 1920x1080, CPU-bound titles like Counter-Strike 2 reach 283 FPS, but at 3840x2160, the same game drops to 105 FPS, indicating that the GPU becomes the limiting factor as pixel count rises.

The data shows a clear pattern: at 1080p, many games exceed 200 FPS (Barony at 239, Roblox at 365, Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege at 336), which means the CPU is keeping up with the GPU’s output. At 1440p, frame rates drop by roughly 30-40% across most titles (e.g., Control from 118 to 89 FPS), and at 4K, the GPU is clearly the bottleneck — Cyberpunk 2077 falls to 41 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 37 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended to 14 FPS. The CPU’s percentile of 85 versus the GPU’s 83 is close enough that neither component consistently dominates, but the architecture suggests that in CPU-heavy scenarios (like 1080p e-sports), the Ryzen 5 5600F’s 6 cores and 12 threads at 3.00 GHz base / 4.00 GHz boost are sufficient, while in 4K AAA gaming, the RTX 4070 SUPER’s 12 GB GDDR6X memory and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth become the primary constraint.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 5 5600F is built on AMD’s Socket AM4 platform, which supports DDR4 memory in dual-channel configuration with a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. The CPU’s 65W TDP and the GPU’s 220W TDP (with a suggested PSU of 550W) provide clear headroom for future upgrades — a larger PSU would accommodate a more power-hungry GPU, but the current 550W threshold covers the RTX 4070 SUPER’s demands comfortably. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), and the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, so both are compatible without bandwidth limitations. The platform is mature, given that the CPU was released in September 2025 and the GPU in January 2024, but it is not forward-looking in terms of DDR5 memory — the memory support is strictly DDR4, which caps the system’s long-term upgrade path unless a new motherboard is chosen.

The sensible next upgrade would be to increase GPU performance first, since the data shows that at 4K, the GPU is the limiting factor — for example, at 3840x2160, the RTX 4070 SUPER delivers only 41 FPS in Cyberpunk 2077, whereas at 1920x1080 it achieves 71 FPS. Alternatively, upgrading the CPU to a higher-core-count AM4 part (like a Ryzen 9) would only benefit multithreaded workloads, since the current CPU’s multithread score of 19236 is already near rivals like the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 (deltaPct 0) and AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D (deltaPct -0.2). The motherboard’s PCIe Gen 4 support also means any future GPU that uses PCIe 4.0 x16 will slot in without issue. A PSU upgrade beyond 550W would only be necessary if the user plans to install a GPU with higher TDP, but the current configuration’s headroom is sufficient for a balanced system.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture (Vermeer codename), built at TSMC with a 7nm process node. It has a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.20 GHz, with a TDP of 65W. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB per core of L1, 512 KB per core of L2, and 32 MB of shared L3, which is large enough to benefit single-threaded tasks that rely on cache locality. The CPU’s benchmark scores show strong single-thread performance (2872 in passmark_single_thread) and moderate multithread performance (19236 in passmark_multithread), but its prime number finding score of 120 and integer math score of 59339 suggest that it excels in workloads that are not heavily parallelized.

The average benchmark score is 36945, placing it at the 85th percentile. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 (avgScore 36938, deltaPct 0), the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D (avgScore 37018, deltaPct -0.2), and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 (avgScore 37093, deltaPct -0.4). This means the 5600F is statistically tied with these competitors, with a difference of less than 0.5% in either direction. For real workloads, the single-thread score of 2872 indicates that this CPU is well-suited for games that rely on high clock speeds and single-core IPC (e.g., Counter-Strike 2 at 283 FPS at 1080p). The multithread score of 19236 is moderate, so while it can handle streaming or light rendering, it is not a workstation powerhouse — the 12 threads are enough for background tasks, but 3D rendering or video encoding would be CPU-bound if the GPU is not used for acceleration.

Who Should Build It

This system is aimed at 1080p and 1440p gamers who want high refresh rates. The measured FPS data shows that at 1920x1080, the RTX 4070 SUPER delivers over 200 FPS in esports titles like Roblox (365 FPS), Valorant (351 FPS), and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege (336 FPS), while maintaining 100+ FPS in AAA titles like Control (118 FPS) and Call of Duty: Warzone (109 FPS). At 2560x1440, the FPS still stays above 60 in most games, e.g., Cyberpunk 2077 at 62 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 57 FPS. So, the target user is a gamer with a 144Hz or 240Hz monitor at 1080p or 1440p, who wants to play competitive shooters and occasional AAA games. Content creators who edit videos using GPU-based encoding (the RTX 4070 SUPER has tensor cores) will also benefit, as the GPU’s FP32 throughput of 35.48 TFLOPS helps with real-time previews, but the CPU’s multithread score of 19236 limits heavy CPU-only rendering.

For software developers, the CPU’s single-thread performance is sufficient for code compilation, and the 12 threads can handle multiple IDE instances. Students and small businesses that run office suites, spreadsheets, and web-based applications will find this system overkill but reliable, since the GPU can accelerate any 2D rendering tasks (passmark G2D score of 1184). The system is not intended for 4K gaming at ultra settings, as the data shows that many titles drop below 60 FPS at 3840x2160 (e.g., Cyberpunk 2077 at 41 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 37 FPS, Ark: Survival Ascended at 14 FPS). So, the target is the mainstream gamer who prioritizes high frames per second over maximum resolution.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is based on the AD104 chip, using the Ada Lovelace architecture with a 5nm process from TSMC. It features 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s. The GPU’s base clock is 1980 MHz, with a boost clock of 2475 MHz, and the memory runs at 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective). It has 7168 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 80 ROPs, plus 56 RT cores and 224 tensor cores, which are essential for ray tracing and AI-based features like DLSS. The pixel rate is 198.0 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 554.4 GTexel/s, indicating that the GPU can handle high-resolution textures and 4K texture maps without stuttering.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 43223, which places it at the 83rd percentile. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB (avgScore 43262, deltaPct -0.1) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile (avgScore 43268, deltaPct -0.1), so it is statistically tied with these competitors. The FP32 performance of 35.48 TFLOPS is impressive for a 12GB, and the FP16 performance (35.48 TFLOPS, 1:1) means that mixed precision workloads are not penalized. The 56 RT cores are 56 in number, which is adequate for ray tracing in games like Control (118 FPS at 1080p, 89 at 1440p, and 60 at 4K), but for 4K ray tracing, the GPU becomes more limited, as seen in Cyberpunk 2077’s 41 FPS at 3840x2160.

In rendering workloads, the GPU’s compute score of 17108 (passmark_gpu_compute) indicates strong performance for non-graphics compute tasks, such as machine learning or video encoding. The 12GB VRAM is sufficient for 1440p gaming and some 4K textures, but a heavy 4K modded game like Ark: Survival Ascended (14 FPS at 3840x2160) shows that the 12 GB limits ultra-high settings. The 224 tensor cores are the key to AI-accelerated features, but the GPU is now end-of-life, so it is a mature product that can be purchased at a reasonable price point (though the exact price is not in the data).

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1920x1080, this system excels, with esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 (283 FPS) and Valorant (351 FPS) achieving frame rates that saturate 240Hz monitors. At 2560x1440, the frame rates still exceed 60 FPS in most AAA games (e.g., Control at 89 FPS, Doom at 136 FPS), making it a viable 144Hz gaming machine at 1440p with lower settings.

Streaming: The CPU’s multithread score of 19236 is sufficient to run a streaming encoder on x264 at medium settings while gaming, but the GPU’s tensor cores can be used for NVENC encoding, keeping the CPU headroom. The 12GB VRAM does not hinder streaming, and the 550W PSU covers the system’s load.

Video Editing: In 1080p and 1440p editing, the GPU accelerates effects via CUDA, with an FP32 throughput of 35.48 TFLOPS, so timeline scrubbing and export times are short. For 4K multi-track edits, the GPU’s 12GB memory and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth are adequate, but the CPU’s multithread score is not a 12-core, so heavy encoding might be slower.

3D Rendering: The GPU’s passmark_g3d score of 29995 ensures high performance in real-time rendering, but for CPU-based ray tracing, the Ryzen 5 5600F’s 6 cores will be a bottleneck. The GPU’s 56 RT cores and 224 tensor cores help with denoising and AI-accelerated rendering, but the 12GB VRAM limits large 4K scenes.

Software Development: The CPU’s single-thread score of 2872 is above the 99th percentile for many compilers, and the 6 cores handle parallel builds reasonably. The GPU is not used heavily in IDEs, but the system’s 32 MB L3 cache and 0.4 GHz boost clock ensure responsive code completion.

Student and Office Work: For office suites and web browsing, the system is overkill, but the passmark G2D score of 1184 indicates 3D rendering of PDFs and presentations is fluid. The 65W CPU TDP and 220W GPU TDP mean the system runs cool and quiet, making it a reliable workstation.

FAQ

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F a good CPU for gaming in 2025?

A: Yes, the data shows it has a passmark single-thread score of 2872, which is high enough to drive 1080p gaming to 200+ FPS in esports titles and 100+ FPS in AAA games, as seen with Call of Duty: Warzone (109 FPS at 1080p) and Control (118 FPS at 1080p).

Q: Can the RTX 4070 SUPER handle 4K gaming?

A: It can handle 4K in less demanding games (e.g., Valorant at 309 FPS, Roblox at 138 FPS), but in AAA games, it falls below 60 FPS (e.g., Cyberpunk 2077 at 41 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 37 FPS). For 60+ FPS 4K, you would need to lower settings or use ray tracing upscaling.

Q: Is 12GB VRAM enough for future games?

A: At 1440p, 12GB is sufficient for most titles, but at 4K, games like Ark: Survival Ascended (14 FPS) and Cyberpunk 2077 (41 FPS) do not achieve playable frame rates, suggesting VRAM could be a limit for ultra-high settings.

Q: Does this system have a bottleneck at 1080p?

A: No, the CPU and GPU are nearly matched (85th and 83rd percentile). At 1080p, the CPU can keep up with the GPU, as evidenced by high frame rates in CPU-bound games like Counter-Strike 2 (283 FPS) and Minecraft (278 FPS).

Q: Can I upgrade this system later?

A:** The AM4 socket supports DDR4 memory, and the PSU’s 550W rating is sufficient for the current GPU, but upgrading to a more powerful GPU would require a higher PSU. The CPU and GPU are both PCIe 4.0, so you can carry over a new GPU.

Q: Is ray tracing performance good on this GPU?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER has 56 RT cores, and in Control (a ray tracing title), it achieves 118 FPS at 1080p and 89 FPS at 1440p, indicating playable ray tracing performance at these resolutions.

Q: What is the system’s class and overall tier?

A:** The build class is a desktop system, and the combined percentile is 84, which means it outperforms 84% of all CPU+GPU pairs in the database.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F (6-core, 12-thread, 7nm Zen 3) with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER (12 GB GDDR6X, 5nm Ada Lovelace) as a desktop configuration. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 36945, and the GPU’s is 43223, giving a combined percentile of 84, which indicates a high-performing system that is above the 80th percentile of all CPU+GPU combos. The CPU’s percentile is 85, and the GPU’s is 83, so they are well-matched, with the CPU slightly outperforming the GPU in relative standing. The system is a desktop class, and the GPU is at end-of-life, but the CPU is still active, meaning the CPU is a future-proof part while the GPU is a mature product.

The overall tier is that this is a high-mid-range system, capable of 1080p and 1440p gaming at ultra settings, with a solid base for content creation, but not a top-tier 4K machine. The pair’s average FPS across all games in the measured data is 163.5 FPS, which is above the median of the 3732 pairs (rank 840 out of 3732). This means it outperforms 77% of all CPU+GPU pairs in terms of average FPS, making it a strong candidate for a gaming build.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 36945, placing it at the 85th percentile of all CPUs. Its multithread score is 19236, and its single-thread score is 2872, which are both above the median for a 6-core part. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 43223, placing it at the 83rd percentile of all GPUs. Its passmark G3D score is 29995, and its GPU compute score is 17108. The GPU’s average score is higher than its nearest rival, the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB (avgScore 43262, deltaPct -0.1), so it is essentially tied with that professional GPU.

The combined picture is that the CPU and GPU have percentiles that are close, but the GPU has a slightly lower relative standing. However, the GPU’s raw compute score is higher in absolute terms, which suggests that in 3D rendering and gaming, the GPU will be the primary driver of performance. In CPU-bound tasks like physics (passmark_physics score of 1043), the CPU is the limiting factor, but in GPU-bound tasks like 4K gaming (as seen in the measured FPS), the GPU is the bottleneck. The system’s average FPS of 163.5 across games is a strong indicator of overall gaming performance.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data shows that this system is a 1080p and 1440p gaming powerhouse. At 1920x1080, the average FPS across all 60 games is 163.5, with many titles exceeding 200 FPS: Roblox (365), Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege (336), Valorant (351), and CS:GO (624). Even in demanding AAA titles, the frame rate remains high: Call of Duty: Warzone (109), Control (118), and Cyberpunk 2077 (71). At 2560x1440, the average frame rate drops to 163.5, but still, most games are above 60 FPS: Control (89), Cyberpunk 2077 (62), and Red Dead Redemption 2 (57). At 3840x2160, the system struggles, with many games below 60 FPS: Cyberpunk 2077 (41), Red Dead Redemption 2 (37), and Ark: Survival Astended (14), while lighter games like Valorant (309) and Minecraft (92) remain playable.

The data shows that the system is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where it achieves high frame rates. For 4K, the GPU’s 12GB VRAM and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth are enough for lighter games, but for AAA titles, it is not recommended. The system’s pair rank of 840 out of 3732 pairs confirms that it is in the top 22% of all CPU+GPU pairs in terms of gaming performance, with an average FPS of 163.5 across games. This is a solid choice for gamers who use 1080p or 1440p monitors and want to play the latest AAA games at high settings without dropping below 60 FPS.