SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 5600F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 5600F

36,945 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

16,129 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti pairing represents a mature desktop platform centered on a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 3 processor and an 8 GB Ampere graphics card. The CPU’s 85th percentile ranking against all processors and the GPU’s 59th percentile position place this build in a distinct performance tier. The combined system percentile of 72 indicates a balanced mid-range configuration, and the measured frame rates across a wide variety of titles provide concrete evidence of its real-world capabilities.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F is built on the Zen 3 architecture (codename Vermeer) using TSMC’s 7 nm process node, packing 4,150 million transistors into a 74 mm² die. It runs at a base clock of 3.00 GHz and boosts up to 4.00 GHz. This is a 6-core, 12-thread desktop processor with a 65 W TDP, designed for the AMD Socket AM4 platform. The cache hierarchy is substantial: 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache, which is a key asset for gaming and productivity workloads. The processor supports dual-channel DDR4 memory with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, and it includes ECC memory support, which is a notable feature for workstation-oriented tasks.

Benchmark data reveals a strong single-threaded performance profile. The PassMark single-thread score of 2872 places it in the upper echelon for its generation, and its multithread score of 19236 demonstrates solid scaling across its 12 threads. The average benchmark score of 36945 puts it at the 85th percentile of all CPUs, meaning it outperforms the vast majority of processors on the market. Its nearest rivals provide context: the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 scores 36938, a delta of 0%, indicating performance parity. The AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D is slightly ahead at 37018, a -0.2% delta from the 5600F’s perspective, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 and Intel Core i9-12900T score 37093 (-0.4%) and 37112 (-0.5%) respectively. These tiny deltas suggest that the 5600F is effectively in a dead heat with these competitors, offering no significant performance advantage or disadvantage in synthetic workloads.

For real workloads, the scores translate well. The high single-thread score of 2872 is critical for responsiveness in everyday tasks and for gaming, where frame pacing often depends on single-core performance. The multithread score of 19236 indicates that the processor can handle multi-threaded applications like video encoding or 3D rendering, though it is not a top-tier content creation chip. The floating-point math score of 34548 and integer math score of 59339 further break down its compute capabilities, suggesting strong arithmetic throughput for scientific or financial simulations. The data compression score of 232836 is particularly high, indicating very efficient handling of compression and archiving tasks, often an overlooked but common workload.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data clearly indicates that this build is a 1080p and 1440p gaming machine, with 4K performance being playable but often not at high refresh rates. Data confirms that all figures are measured, not estimated. At 1920x1080 with ultra settings, the system excels in esports titles. Counter-Strike 2 runs at 191 FPS, Valorant at 351 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege at 227 FPS. These numbers ensure a flawless experience on high-refresh-rate monitors. For demanding AAA titles, the performance remains strong: Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 56 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 51 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone at 109 FPS. The system handles the vast majority of games at 1080p ultra with ease, though exceptionally heavy titles like Ark: Survival Ascended (28 FPS) and The Medium (40 FPS) will require settings adjustments for a smooth experience.

Moving to 2560x1440, the picture changes slightly. Esports titles remain highly playable, with Valorant at 333 FPS and Counter-Strike 2 at 127 FPS, but the margins shrink. AAA games begin to test the GPU’s limits. Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 42 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 38 FPS, and Control to 60 FPS. These are playable but not optimal for high-refresh monitors. At 3840x2160, the system struggles to maintain high frame rates in modern games. Cyberpunk 2077 hits 28 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 hits 25 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended is essentially unplayable at 9 FPS. However, less demanding titles like Valorant (299 FPS) and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (172 FPS) still perform admirably. The data suggests that 4K gaming is only viable for esports or older titles, and players should target 1080p or 1440p for the best experience.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 36945, placing it in the 85th percentile of all processors. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 16129, placing it in the 59th percentile of all GPUs. The combined system percentile is 72. This discrepancy is important: the CPU is a significantly stronger component relative to its peers than the GPU. The CPU’s nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 225, has an average score of 36938, a delta of 0%, confirming the 5600F is a top-tier mid-range processor. In contrast, the GPU’s nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 9060 with an average score of 16014 (a 0.7% delta in the 3060 Ti’s favor) and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT with 16361 (a -1.4% delta), showing the 3060 Ti is competitive with older high-end cards but not a leader in its class.

Specific GPU benchmarks show a mixed bag. The PassMark G3D score of 20349 is respectable, but the DirectX 12 score of 78 and DirectX 11 score of 163 are low, suggesting potential driver or architectural bottlenecks in older APIs. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2626 is a more modern benchmark and indicates a moderate level of performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 78927 and Vulkan score of 47784 suggest strong compute capabilities for non-gaming tasks. The CPU’s PassMark multithread score of 19236 and single-thread score of 2872 are solid, but the G3D score of 20349 for the GPU is the more critical number for gaming. The combined picture is one of a CPU that punches above its weight class, paired with a GPU that is a solid mid-range performer, leading to a system that is CPU-limited in many scenarios.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built on the AMD Socket AM4, which is a mature and end-of-life socket. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), and the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. Memory support is dual-channel DDR4, and the system uses a standard 65 W TDP processor and a 200 W TDP GPU. The suggested PSU for this configuration is 550 W, which provides a specific headroom for the components as listed. The power connectors on the GPU are a single 12-pin, which is a consideration for older power supplies that may not have this connector natively, requiring an adapter.

Given the AM4 socket’s maturity, a sensible next upgrade would be within the same platform’s top-tier CPUs, though the data shows the 5600F is already performing at a high level. The nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D, which is only 0.2% faster, so a CPU upgrade would offer marginal gains in synthetic benchmarks. The real bottleneck is the GPU. Upgrading to a more powerful GPU would be the logical step, but the 550 W PSU suggestion would need to be re-evaluated. The CPU’s 65 W TDP leaves significant power budget headroom for a more power-hungry graphics card, but the system’s overall balance would shift. The platform supports DDR4, which is an older memory standard, and a new build would likely move to DDR5, but for this system, the existing memory infrastructure is sufficient.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This is the build’s primary strength. At 1080p, Counter-Strike 2 runs at 191 FPS and Valorant at 351 FPS, easily driving 144Hz or 240Hz monitors. At 1440p, Valorant still hits 333 FPS, and less demanding titles remain above 100 FPS. The CPU’s strong single-thread score of 2872 ensures minimal bottleneck in these scenarios.

Streaming: The 6-core/12-thread CPU with a multithread score of 19236 can handle encoding, but the lack of dedicated hardware encoding on the CPU (no iGPU) means reliance on the GPU’s NVENC encoder. The RTX 3060 Ti’s compute score of 10006 in PassMark suggests it can handle the encoding workload while gaming, though performance in CPU-intensive titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (56 FPS at 1080p) will drop.

Video editing: The CPU’s multithread score of 19236 and floating-point score of 34548 indicate it can handle 1080p and some 1440p video editing. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for most editing timelines, but the 59th percentile GPU ranking means effects-heavy work will be slow. The high data compression score of 232836 suggests fast export times for compressed formats.

3D rendering: This is a weaker scenario. The CPU’s multithread score is mid-range, and the GPU’s 16.20 TFLOPS FP32 performance is capable but not fast for rendering. The 8 GB VRAM will limit texture sizes and scene complexity. Expect reasonable performance for smaller scenes but long render times for complex projects.

Software development: The CPU excels here. The high single-thread score of 2872 speeds up compilation, and the 6 cores handle parallel builds. The 32 MB L3 cache is beneficial for repetitive tasks. The ECC memory support is a plus for data integrity during long builds.

Student and office work: This is more than sufficient. The single-thread performance ensures snappy application loading, and the system’s 85th percentile CPU ranking means it is faster than most office machines. The GPU is overkill for this scenario, but it provides headroom for any multimedia or light gaming use.

Who Should Build It

The target user is a gamer who plays at 1080p or 1440p and prioritizes high frame rates in esports and competitive titles. The measured FPS data shows that this build delivers over 100 FPS in most games at these resolutions. It is also a strong option for a content creator who works primarily with video editing and application development, given the CPU’s strong single-thread and multithread performance. The 85th percentile CPU ranking makes it a reliable choice for software engineers and data analysts who need fast compilation and data processing. Students will find it more than capable for all academic tasks, and small business workstations that require ECC memory support and fast data compression will benefit from the CPU’s capabilities. The GPU’s 59th percentile ranking means it is not for high-end 4K gaming or professional 3D rendering, but it is a solid choice for a mid-range gaming or productivity system.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F have integrated graphics?

A: No, the integrated graphics field is listed as "N/A", meaning it does not have an iGPU and requires a dedicated graphics card.

Q: What is the performance difference between the Ryzen 5 5600F and the Intel Core Ultra 5 225?

A: The average benchmark scores are 36945 for the 5600F and 36938 for the Ultra 5 225, resulting in a delta of 0%, indicating they are essentially equal in performance.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 3060 Ti have, and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the recommended power supply wattage for this system?

A: The suggested PSU for the GPU is 550 W.

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile ranking compared to all other CPUs?

A: The Ryzen 5 5600F is in the 85th percentile of all CPUs, indicating it is faster than 85% of processors.

Q: Can this system run Cyberpunk 2077 at 4K ultra settings?

A: The measured FPS at 3840x2160 is 28 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay.

Q: What is the GPU’s launch MSRP?

A: The launch MSRP for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is 399 USD.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build (buildClass: desktop) pairing a 6-core AMD Ryzen 5 5600F with an 8 GB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. The CPU’s 85th percentile and the GPU’s 59th percentile combine for a system-level percentile of 72. This places the build in the upper-mid range of overall performance. The pair ranks 1998 out of 3732 pairs by FPS, with an average of 119.5 FPS across all tested games. This data confirms that it is not a top-tier enthusiast system but rather a high-performing mainstream configuration that excels at 1080p and handles 1440p well.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data points to a CPU-heavy balance. The CPU is in the 85th percentile, while the GPU is in the 59th percentile. This significant gap suggests that the CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers. In gaming, this manifests as a CPU bottleneck in many scenarios. For example, at 1080p, Counter-Strike 2 runs at 191 FPS, which is likely limited by the GPU’s rendering ability, but the CPU’s high single-thread score of 2872 ensures it is not the limiting factor in most titles. However, the GPU’s lower percentile becomes apparent at higher resolutions. In Cyberpunk 2077, going from 1080p (56 FPS) to 1440p (42 FPS) shows a 25% drop, which is typical of a GPU-bound workload. The CPU bottleneck is more likely in esports titles where FPS is very high, such as Valorant at 351 FPS, where the CPU’s frame generation limit is reached before the GPU’s. The 8 GB VRAM on the GPU can also be a limiting factor in texture-heavy games at 1440p or 4K, as seen in the significant FPS drops in Ark: Survival Ascended (18 FPS at 1440p). Overall, the CPU is the more capable component, and the GPU will be the first part to be upgraded for higher resolutions or more demanding graphics settings.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on the Ampere architecture with a GA104 chip, fabricated on Samsung’s 8 nm process. It contains 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die. The GPU has 4864 shading units, 152 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output units. It also includes 38 RT cores and 152 tensor cores, which are essential for ray tracing and DLSS features. The base clock is 1410 MHz with a boost clock of 1665 MHz. Memory is 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. The GPU’s FP32 performance is 16.20 TFLOPS, and its pixel rate is 133.2 GPixel/s, with a texture rate of 253.1 GTexel/s.

In benchmarks, the GPU’s average score is 16129, placing it in the 59th percentile. Its PassMark G3D score of 20349 is strong, but its DirectX 12 score of 78 and DirectX 11 score of 163 are notably low, which may indicate performance issues with older APIs or specific driver states. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2626 is a more modern test and shows a moderate result. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 78927 and Vulkan score of 47784 are impressive for compute workloads, suggesting the GPU is capable in non-gaming tasks like machine learning or video encoding. For gaming, the measured FPS data is the most relevant. The GPU delivers excellent performance at 1080p and good performance at 1440p, but it is not suited for 4K gaming with modern titles. The 8 GB VRAM is a limitation for high-resolution textures, and the 59th percentile ranking indicates it is a mid-range card in the current market.