SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 5600 + Intel Arc B580

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

88 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
85%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 5600

20,468 Benchmark Score
Top 15% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B580

23,021 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600 and Intel Arc B580 pairing represents a modern mid-range desktop build that combines a proven Zen 3 processor with Intel’s latest Battlemage graphics architecture. The data shows a combination that sits at the 71st percentile among all CPU-GPU pairings, with a strong emphasis on 1080p and 1440p gaming performance. This analysis breaks down the individual component strengths, their measured performance across a wide range of titles, and the practical implications for building and upgrading such a system.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The Intel Arc B580 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture, marking Intel's second generation of discrete graphics under the Battlemage (Arc 5) moniker. The chip, designated BMG-G21, is fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process and packs 19,600 million transistors into a 272 mm² die. This density of 72.1M transistors per mm² allows for a substantial feature set. The GPU operates at a fixed clock speed of 2670 MHz for both base and boost, with memory running at 2375 MHz, translating to 19 Gbps effective. This feeds a 192-bit memory bus connected to 12 GB of GDDR6 memory, yielding a bandwidth of 456.0 GB/s. This memory configuration is a significant asset; the 12 GB capacity at this bandwidth level provides ample headroom for high-resolution textures and modern game assets, which is a key differentiator in its class.

The compute core is comprised of 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 80 render output units (ROPs). This configuration results in a pixel rate of 213.6 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 427.2 GTexel/s. For raw compute, the card delivers 13.67 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 27.34 TFLOPS of FP16 performance at a 2:1 ratio. The graphics card also includes 20 dedicated ray tracing cores, which is the hardware foundation for DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) support, alongside OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4. The presence of these RT cores is crucial for enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported titles, a feature that the benchmark scores suggest has a measurable impact on frame rates.

In synthetic benchmarks, the Arc B580 achieves a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3068. Its performance in compute-oriented tests is notable, with a Geekbench OpenCL score of 92821 and a Vulkan score of 109672. The PassMark G3D score of 15748 places the GPU at the 68th percentile among all GPUs. The data shows it is a tightly clustered competitor with other cards; its average benchmark score of 23021 is nearly identical to the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP, which scores 23061 (a 0.2% difference). It is also competitive with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (22895, a 0.6% delta) and the RTX 3080 (23172, a -0.7% delta). This indicates that the B580's rendering performance is positioned in the same tier as these established cards, offering similar raw throughput in these specific tests. For rendering workloads, the combination of 12 GB VRAM, high memory bandwidth, and dedicated RT cores suggests it can handle complex scenes and modern rendering APIs effectively, though the PassMark DirectX 10 and DirectX 12 scores of 76 and 76 respectively show a performance profile that is not uniformly strong across all legacy API tests.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The combined system percentile is 71, placing it in the upper-midrange of all tested hardware configurations. The CPU, an AMD Ryzen 5 5600, achieves an average benchmark score of 20468, which puts it at the 74th percentile among all CPUs. The GPU, as mentioned, holds the 68th percentile. This near-parity in percentile ranking suggests a balanced pairing where neither component is drastically outclassing the other in overall capability.

Looking at the CPU's specific scores, its multi-threaded performance is strong. In Cinebench R23, it scores 18309 points in multicore and 2584 in single-core. The Geekbench scores are 9158 for multicore and 1936 for single-core. Its 3DMark results scale from 1737 for 2 threads up to 5641 for 16 threads and 5659 for max threads, showing healthy scaling with thread count. The PassMark multithread score is 21541, with a single-thread score of 3256. These figures depict a processor that is capable in both lightly-threaded tasks and heavily parallelized workloads.

For the GPU, the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3068 and the PassMark G3D score of 15748 are the primary indicators of gaming performance. The pair's combined rank by FPS is 2799 out of 3732 pairs, with an average FPS across all tested games of 99.1. This is a key metric; it shows that while the individual components are in the top 30% of their respective categories, the overall system's gaming performance is slightly lower, ranking in the 25th percentile of pairs. This suggests that the combination, while capable, does not consistently push into the top tier of frame rates, likely due to a combination of CPU and GPU limits depending on the game. The measured data (dataIsMeasured is true) confirms these are real-world frame rates, not estimates.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Vermeer. It is manufactured on TSMC's 7 nm process and contains 4,150 million transistors on a 74 mm² die. It has a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. The cache hierarchy is substantial: 64 KB of L1 and 512 KB of L2 per core, plus a shared 32 MB of L3 cache. This large L3 cache is a hallmark of the Zen 3 design and is critical for gaming performance, as it reduces memory latency for frequently accessed data. The CPU supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a theoretical memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, and it also supports ECC memory.

In real-world workloads, the benchmark scores translate to strong performance for a 6-core part. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 18309 indicates proficiency in rendering tasks, such as video editing and 3D modeling, where all cores are utilized. The single-core score of 2584 is equally important for applications that are not well-threaded, such as many legacy games or office productivity suites. The PassMark scores provide further granularity: an integer math score of 68396 and a floating point math score of 38778 show solid arithmetic performance, while the data compression score of 251687 and encryption score of 15531 highlight its capability in file archiving and security tasks.

The CPU's percentile ranking at 74% of all CPUs, and its average benchmark score of 20468, places it just ahead of rivals like the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (20454, a 0.1% delta) and the AMD Ryzen 5 8500G (20425, a 0.2% delta). It is also comparable to server-class parts like the AMD EPYC 9454P (20422, a 0.2% delta) and EPYC 7713 (20363, a 0.5% delta) in these aggregate tests. This shows that the Ryzen 5 5600, despite being a mainstream desktop part, offers compute throughput that rivals much more expensive processors in certain synthetic benchmarks, making it a highly competent foundation for a variety of tasks beyond gaming.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive look at real-world gaming performance across three resolutions on ultra settings. The data is measured, not estimated, giving a clear picture of what to expect.

At 1920x1080, the pairing is capable of high frame rates in many titles. Competitive shooters like Valorant (344 FPS) and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (330.4 FPS) run exceptionally well, far exceeding the requirements of high-refresh-rate monitors. Other esports titles also perform strongly, with Counter-Strike 2 at 149.7 FPS and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege at 178 FPS. Heavier AAA titles show playable frame rates; Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 128.9 FPS, while Microsoft Flight Simulator achieves 56 FPS and Cyberpunk 2077 hits 43.1 FPS. The most demanding game in the dataset, Ark: Survival Ascended, only manages 22 FPS at 1080p, indicating a title that pushes the hardware to its limits.

At 2560x1440, performance scales down as expected. Valorant drops to 293 FPS, and CS:GO to 227.5 FPS, still excellent for competitive play. Call of Duty: Warzone remains smooth at 115.1 FPS. More demanding titles see greater drops; Cyberpunk 2077 falls to 32.9 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 to 28.5 FPS. The 1440p results show that this system is best suited for esports and less demanding AAA titles at this resolution, while the most graphically intensive games will require lowering settings to maintain smooth frame rates.

At 3840x2160 (4K), the system is clearly not a high-refresh-rate powerhouse. Valorant still manages 235 FPS, and CS:GO runs at 136.4 FPS. However, most AAA titles drop below 30 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 19.4 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at only 7 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone is a notable exception at 93.3 FPS. This data clearly shows that the 4K resolution is the limit of this pairing, suitable only for less demanding games or those with significant upscaling.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform is built around the AMD Socket AM4, which supports the Ryzen 5 5600. This socket is mature and offers a clear upgrade path for the CPU. Users can move to higher-tier 5000 series processors to gain more cores and threads within the same platform, provided their motherboard BIOS supports them. The memory support is limited to DDR4 in a dual-channel configuration, which is the standard for this generation. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, which is sufficient for a modern graphics card and an NVMe SSD.

For the GPU, the Intel Arc B580 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. This is a key consideration; while it provides ample bandwidth for the card, it is a x8 link, so users should ensure their motherboard supports PCIe 4.0 to get the full performance. The card draws a TDP of 190 W and requires a single 8-pin power connector. The suggested PSU for this GPU is 450 W, which gives a baseline for system power requirements. When paired with the 65 W TDP CPU, the total system draw is manageable, meaning a quality 450 W PSU will provide enough headroom for this specific pairing, though a higher-wattage unit would offer more room for future upgrades or overclocking.

A sensible next upgrade for this system would be a more powerful GPU, as the AM4 socket is a dead-end for CPU upgrades beyond the 5000 series. However, the 6-core CPU is still very capable, so moving to a higher-end graphics card would likely provide a significant boost in gaming performance, particularly at 1440p and 4K. The PCIe 4.0 x8 slot is compatible with most modern graphics cards, so this is a viable path. The CPU is also unlocked, allowing for overclocking to extract additional performance without changing the hardware.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries

This build is a versatile desktop solution that targets a broad range of users. The measured performance data makes it clear who will benefit most.

  • 1080p and 1440p Gamers: This is the primary audience. The system delivers high frame rates in competitive titles like Valorant and Counter-Strike 2 at 1080p, and it handles most AAA games at 1440p with playable frame rates. Gamers who prioritize esports and are willing to adjust settings for the most demanding titles will find this pairing ideal.
  • Content Creators and Developers: The Ryzen 5 5600's strong multi-threaded performance, as shown by its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 18309, makes it capable for compiling code, running virtual machines, and handling moderate video and photo editing workloads. The Arc B580's 12 GB of VRAM is also beneficial for GPU-accelerated rendering and machine learning tasks.
  • Students and Small Business Workstations: The combination of a capable CPU and GPU provides a smooth experience for productivity applications, web development, and general office work. The system's strong single-thread performance (Geekbench single-core score of 1936) ensures responsive day-to-day use.
  • Value-Oriented Enthusiasts: Users looking for a balanced system that can do a bit of everything without breaking the bank on a flagship CPU or GPU will find this configuration appealing, as the performance data shows it competes with much older high-end parts like the RTX 2080 and RTX 3080.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The pairing (AMD Ryzen 5 5600 + Intel Arc B580) has a combined percentile of 71 among all CPU-GPU pairings.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B580's performance compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080?

A: The Arc B580 has an average benchmark score of 23021, which is 0.6% higher than the RTX 2080's score of 22895, indicating very similar overall performance in these tests.

Q: What is the measured average FPS across all tested games for this system?

A: The average FPS across all games in the dataset is 99.1, at a rank of 2799 out of 3732 pairs.

Q: What is the maximum memory bandwidth of the AMD Ryzen 5 5600?

A: The Ryzen 5 5600 supports dual-channel DDR4 memory with a theoretical maximum bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for the Intel Arc B580?

A: The suggested PSU for the Intel Arc B580 is 450 W, given its 190 W TDP.

Q: What is the boost clock speed of the AMD Ryzen 5 5600?

A: The Ryzen 5 5600 has a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, with a base clock of 3.50 GHz.

Q: Does the Intel Arc B580 have dedicated ray tracing hardware?

A: Yes, the Arc B580 includes 20 dedicated ray tracing cores, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2).

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the AMD Ryzen 5 5600 CPU and the Intel Arc B580 GPU. It represents a modern, balanced mid-range configuration. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread part from the 5000 series, based on the Zen 3 architecture. The GPU is Intel's Battlemage-generation card, built on the Xe2-HPG architecture with 12 GB of GDDR6 memory. The system's overall tier is defined by its 71st combined percentile, indicating it performs better than the majority of tested hardware. The CPU's individual percentile is 74, and the GPU's is 68, showing a well-matched pair. The average benchmark score for the CPU is 20468, and for the GPU it is 23021. This pairing is a strong contender for a primary gaming and productivity system, with its performance characteristics closely matching those of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 and RTX 3080 in aggregate GPU benchmarks.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a well-balanced system where the bottleneck shifts depending on the workload. In terms of aggregate performance, the CPU and GPU are closely matched in their respective percentile rankings (74th vs 68th). This balance is confirmed by the GPU's nearest rivals, which include the RTX 2080 and RTX 3080, cards that were often paired with more powerful CPUs. The CPU's nearest rivals are all within a 0.5% delta in average score, showing it is in a performance class with other strong mid-range and server processors.

However, the gaming data reveals where the bottleneck lies. The system's average FPS rank is 2799 out of 3732, which is lower than the individual component percentiles would suggest. This indicates that in many gaming scenarios, neither component is the clear, singular bottleneck; rather, the combination's overall performance is constrained by the game's engine and its utilization of the hardware. For example, in CPU-light games like Valorant, the system achieves 344 FPS at 1080p, showing the GPU is the limiting factor at that point. Conversely, in a highly demanding title like Cyberpunk 2077 (43.1 FPS at 1080p), the load is more balanced, but the GPU is likely the primary constraint due to its rendering workload. The data suggests that for the most graphically intensive games, the GPU will be the limiting factor, while in esports titles at lower resolutions, the CPU can keep up with the GPU's output, leading to very high frame rates. The 12 GB VRAM of the GPU helps prevent memory capacity from being a bottleneck in most scenarios, but the GPU's raw compute power will be the ceiling for maximum visual fidelity.