SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 5500 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

88 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
84%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 5500

19,593 Benchmark Score
Top 16% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

23,172 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

AMD Ryzen 5 5500 pairs with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 to create a desktop build that sits at the 71st percentile overall, a figure that reflects a strong but not top-tier combination of CPU and GPU capabilities. The processor, a 6-core/12-thread Zen 3 part, anchors the system with a 73rd percentile ranking among all CPUs, while the RTX 3080, an Ampere-generation graphics card, holds a 68th percentile position among all GPUs. This pairing produces a measured average of 153.7 FPS across a broad game library at ultra settings, placing the configuration at rank 1104 out of 3732 tracked pairs, indicating a system that consistently delivers high frame rates but is not at the absolute frontier of performance.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a system where the CPU and GPU are reasonably well matched, but the balance shifts depending on the workload and resolution. In synthetic benchmarks, the CPU’s 3DMark scores scale from 836 in single-thread to 5411 in max-threads, showing a 6.5x scaling factor that indicates good multi-core utilization. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 25086 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 152423 place it firmly in the high-performance tier, and the pair’s combined percentile of 71 suggests neither component is dramatically holding the other back in most scenarios.

Bottleneck analysis from the FPS data shows the CPU becomes more of a limiting factor at lower resolutions. At 1920x1080, games like Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hit 537.6 FPS and Valorant reaches 386.2 FPS, figures that far exceed what the GPU can produce at higher resolutions, indicating the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU at these settings. However, at 3840x2160, the same titles drop to 220.1 FPS and 335.9 FPS respectively, showing the GPU’s workload increases and the CPU has more headroom. The shift is more pronounced in demanding titles: Cyberpunk 2077 drops from 71.6 FPS at 1080p to 34.1 FPS at 4K, a 53% reduction that clearly points to the GPU becoming the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions.

The CPU’s 3DMark 16-thread score of 5386 versus its max-threads score of 5411 indicates only a marginal gain from additional threads beyond 16, suggesting the 12-thread processor is well-utilized in multi-threaded tasks but does not have significant untapped parallel headroom. In contrast, the GPU’s PassMark DirectX 12 score of 100 relative to its DirectX 11 score of 207 suggests the card’s performance is more dependent on API optimization than raw compute, which can create imbalances in older or poorly optimized titles. Overall, at 1080p and 1440p, the system exhibits a CPU-leaning balance where the Ryzen 5 5500 can keep pace with the RTX 3080 in most titles, but at 4K, the GPU’s rendering demands dominate and the CPU’s role diminishes.

Benchmark Performance

The AMD Ryzen 5 5500 delivers a multi-threaded Cinebench R23 score of 16429 and a single-core score of 2319, numbers that place it in the upper-middle tier of desktop processors. Its average benchmark score of 19593 puts it at the 73rd percentile, with nearest rivals including the AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 (scoring 19617, a -0.1% delta) and the Intel Core i5-12500 (scoring 19668, a -0.4% delta). The CPU trails the Intel Core i5-11600KF (19723, -0.7%) but leads the Intel Core i7-10700F (19499, +0.5%), showing it sits in a competitive band where performance differences are within 1%. In Geekbench, the processor scores 7976 multi-core and 1730 single-core, while PassMark multithread reaches 19330, confirming consistent performance across different benchmark suites.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 posts an average benchmark score of 23172, placing it at the 68th percentile among all GPUs. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4407 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 33620 highlight its DirectX 12 and Vulkan capabilities. The card’s nearest rivals are notably lower-tier parts: the NVIDIA P106-100 (23249, -0.3%), AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 (23250, -0.3%), AMD Radeon RX 6600M (23273, -0.4%), and AMD Radeon R9 M290X (23276, -0.4%). This clustering of rivals within 0.4% of the RTX 3080’s score is unusual and suggests the average benchmark score may not fully capture the card’s strengths in specific workloads, as the PassMark G3D score of 25086 is substantially higher than its average.

The combined picture from these benchmarks shows a system where the CPU and GPU are both above the 50th percentile, with the CPU slightly outperforming the GPU in relative standing. The CPU’s 73rd percentile versus the GPU’s 68th percentile indicates the processor is marginally stronger relative to its peers, which can be advantageous in CPU-bound scenarios like esports titles at high frame rates. The average benchmark scores of 19593 (CPU) and 23172 (GPU) suggest that when both components are stressed simultaneously, the system performs well above entry-level configurations but does not approach the top 10% of systems, which typically feature higher-end CPUs like the Ryzen 9 or Core i9 series alongside RTX 4080-class GPUs.

Gaming Performance

Measured FPS data at ultra settings across a wide range of games shows this build is capable of high-refresh gaming at 1080p and solid 60+ FPS at 1440p, with 4K performance varying significantly by title. At 1920x1080, the system excels in esports and lighter titles: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hits 537.6 FPS, Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege X reaches 292.6 FPS, and Valorant achieves 386.2 FPS, all well above the 144Hz threshold for competitive play. Roblox runs at 313.3 FPS and Minecraft at 240 FPS, showing strong performance in popular multiplayer games.

At 2560x1440, the system still delivers high frame rates, with Counter-Strike 2 at 160.1 FPS, Call of Duty: Warzone at 106 FPS, and Control at 77 FPS. Heavier titles begin to show strain: Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 52.4 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 48.9 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended to 24.6 FPS, indicating that 1440p ultra settings are only playable at 60+ FPS in less demanding games. The 1080p to 1440p scaling shows an average reduction of about 35-40% in frame rate, consistent with the increase in pixel count.

At 3840x2160, 4K ultra gaming is achievable but often at lower frame rates. Call of Duty: Warzone manages 90 FPS, Minecraft runs at 79 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 hits 90.6 FPS, which are playable, but Cyberpunk 2077 falls to 34.1 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 31.8 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended to 13.1 FPS, making these titles unplayable at ultra settings. The data shows a clear pattern: this build is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with 4K viable only in less demanding or well-optimized titles. All figures are measured, as the dataIsMeasured field confirms, providing reliable expectations for real-world performance.

Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU pairing is aimed at gamers who prioritize high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p resolutions. The measured FPS data shows 1080p performance exceeds 100 FPS in nearly all tested titles, with many exceeding 200 FPS, making it ideal for competitive gamers using 144Hz or 240Hz monitors. At 1440p, the system maintains 60+ FPS in most games, though demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (52.4 FPS) and Red Dead Redemption 2 (48.9 FPS) require settings adjustments for smooth play. For 4K gaming, the build is only suitable for esports and lighter titles, so gamers with 4K displays should look elsewhere.

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s strong multi-threaded performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16429 and PassMark multithread score of 19330 indicate capable performance for rendering tasks, while the GPU’s CUDA cores (8704 shading units) and 10 GB of GDDR6X memory support GPU-accelerated workflows. Software developers will appreciate the CPU’s 12 threads for compilation tasks, and the PassMark data encryption score of 14851 suggests reasonable performance for cryptographic workloads. Students and small business workstations can rely on this build for office productivity, though the high GPU power draw (320W TDP) and suggested 700W PSU make it more expensive to run than typical office systems.

The build is not intended for users seeking maximum performance at 4K ultra settings, as the data shows significant frame rate drops in demanding titles. It is also not suitable for those needing high-core-count CPUs for heavy parallel workloads, as the 6-core/12-thread configuration, while capable, is outclassed by 8-core or 16-core alternatives in multi-threaded benchmarks. The target user is a gamer or content creator who wants a balanced system for 1080p and 1440p gaming with occasional productivity work, without paying for top-tier components.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 5500 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, built on TSMC’s 7nm process node. It features a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.20 GHz, with a 65W TDP that makes it relatively power-efficient. The CPU uses the Cezanne codename, which is notable because this architecture is typically associated with APUs, and the die size of 180 mm² with 10,700 million transistors reflects a compact design. The processor supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, and it operates on the AMD Socket AM4 platform with PCIe Gen 3 connectivity.

Benchmark scores show the CPU’s strengths and weaknesses. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16429 is competitive for a 6-core part, placing it within 0.7% of the Intel Core i5-11600KF and 0.4% of the Intel Core i5-12500. The single-core score of 2319 is more modest, reflecting the 4.20 GHz boost clock, which is lower than many rivals. The 3DMark scores illustrate scaling: single-thread at 836, 2-thread at 1645, 4-thread at 3151, 8-thread at 4593, and max-threads at 5411. The scaling from 8 to 16 threads (4593 to 5386) shows a 17% improvement, indicating that the 12 threads are well-utilized but there is diminishing returns beyond 8 threads.

Real-world workloads benefit from this performance profile. Video encoding and 3D rendering tasks, which use multiple threads, will see strong results from the Cinebench R23 score of 16429. The PassMark integer math score of 65001 and floating point math score of 36815 indicate solid computational throughput for general-purpose tasks. Data compression (245533) and encryption (14851) scores suggest the CPU handles these workloads competently, though not exceptionally. The absence of integrated graphics means a discrete GPU is mandatory, which is already present in this build. The unlocked multiplier allows overclocking, potentially improving the modest single-thread performance, but the 4.20 GHz boost clock limits headroom.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, this build delivers excellent frame rates, with CS:GO at 537.6 FPS and Valorant at 386.2 FPS, easily supporting 240Hz+ monitors. At 1440p, the system still provides high refresh rates in esports titles, with Rainbow Six Siege X at 191.3 FPS and CS2 at 160.1 FPS, making it a strong choice for competitive gamers.

Streaming: The CPU’s 12 threads and 3DMark max-threads score of 5411 provide enough headroom for x264 encoding while gaming, though the 6 cores may struggle with very demanding games simultaneously. The GPU’s NVENC encoder (not explicitly benchmarked but implied by the architecture) can offload streaming tasks, and the measured FPS in games like Warzone (119 FPS at 1080p) suggests acceptable performance with a stream running.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16429 and Geekbench multi-core score of 7976 indicate capable performance for 1080p and some 1440p video editing. The GPU’s 10 GB of VRAM and 29.77 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerate effects and rendering, though 4K editing may require proxy workflows.

3D rendering: The CPU’s PassMark multithread score of 19330 and the GPU’s PassMark GPU compute score of 14397 provide a solid foundation for rendering. Blender or similar software would utilize the CPU’s 12 threads and the GPU’s CUDA cores, but the 6-core CPU may become a bottleneck in scenes with heavy geometry.

Software development: The CPU’s 12 threads and PassMark data compression score of 245533 support fast code compilation and data processing. The 16 MB L3 cache helps with frequently accessed data, and the 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth is adequate for development workloads. The build is well-suited for web development, game development, and general programming tasks.

Student and office work: The system’s performance is overkill for typical productivity tasks like word processing and spreadsheets, but the fast storage and GPU acceleration benefit tasks like data analysis and presentations. The 65W CPU TDP keeps idle power low, while the 320W GPU TDP means the system draws significant power under load, which may be a consideration for dorm rooms or small offices.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 5 5500 uses the Socket AM4 platform, which supports a wide range of Ryzen processors from the 1000 to 5000 series. Users can upgrade to higher-core-count CPUs like the Ryzen 7 or Ryzen 9 5000 series, which would provide more threads for multi-threaded workloads. The platform supports DDR4 memory, and the dual-channel configuration with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth can be expanded by adding more DIMMs, though the memory speed is limited by the CPU’s memory controller. The PCIe Gen 3 interface is a limitation compared to newer platforms with PCIe Gen 4 or Gen 5, but it does not significantly impact gaming performance with the RTX 3080.

The GPU upgrade path is straightforward, as the RTX 3080 uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is backward compatible with PCIe Gen 3. Users could upgrade to a newer GPU like the RTX 40 series (the successor to the 30 series) for better performance, but the CPU may become a bottleneck at lower resolutions. The suggested PSU of 700W provides headroom for the 320W GPU and 65W CPU, and users could potentially upgrade to a higher-end GPU within this power budget if they choose a model with similar power requirements. The 1x 12-pin power connector on the GPU requires an adapter for most PSUs, which is a minor consideration.

A sensible next upgrade for this build would be a CPU upgrade to an 8-core or 12-core Ryzen 5000 series processor, which would improve multi-threaded performance and reduce potential CPU bottlenecks in CPU-bound games. The 16 MB L3 cache on the current CPU is relatively small for Zen 3, and a higher-end CPU with more cache could improve gaming performance. Alternatively, users could upgrade the GPU to a newer model with more VRAM, as the 10 GB on the RTX 3080 may be limiting at 4K in future titles. The platform is mature, so users should consider whether to invest in AM4 or plan a platform upgrade to AM5 or Intel’s newer sockets for long-term growth.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs the AMD Ryzen 5 5500, a 6-core/12-thread Zen 3 processor, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, an Ampere-generation GPU with 8704 shading units and 10 GB of GDDR6X memory. The combination targets the 71st percentile overall, with the CPU at the 73rd percentile and the GPU at the 68th percentile among their respective categories. The system is designed for high-performance gaming at 1080p and 1440p resolutions, with measured average FPS of 153.7 across all tested games at ultra settings.

The build’s overall tier is upper-midrange, as indicated by the 71st combined percentile. It outperforms the majority of systems in the database, but does not reach the top tier occupied by flagship CPUs and GPUs. The CPU’s 73rd percentile ranking places it above average, while the GPU’s 68th percentile is slightly below the CPU’s standing, suggesting the graphics card is the weaker link relative to peers. The pair’s rank of 1104 out of 3732 in the FPS-based ranking confirms this position, with the system delivering frame rates that are higher than about 70% of tracked configurations.

The build class is desktop, indicating it is intended for stationary use with a dedicated monitor. The RTX 3080 is a dual-slot card measuring 285 mm in length, 112 mm in height, and 40 mm in width, requiring a case with adequate clearance. The 320W GPU TDP and 700W suggested PSU indicate this is a power-hungry system, and the 65W CPU TDP contributes minimally to overall power draw. The combination is well-suited for enthusiasts who want high-refresh gaming without the cost of top-tier components, and the measured data provides confidence in the system’s capabilities.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s multi-threaded performance compared to its rivals?

A: The Ryzen 5 5500 scores 16429 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, placing it 0.4% behind the Intel Core i5-12500 (19668) and 0.7% behind the Intel Core i5-11600KF (19723), but 0.5% ahead of the Intel Core i7-10700F (19499).

Q: How does the RTX 3080’s benchmark score compare to similar GPUs?

A: The RTX 3080 has an average benchmark score of 23172, which is within 0.4% of the NVIDIA P106-100 (23249), AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 (23250), AMD Radeon RX 6600M (23273), and AMD Radeon R9 M290X (23276).

Q: What is the best resolution for gaming with this build?

A: The measured FPS data shows the best performance at 1920x1080, with most games exceeding 100 FPS, including CS:GO at 537.6 FPS and Valorant at 386.2 FPS. At 2560x1440, the system still delivers 60+ FPS in most games, but 3840x2160 is only playable in lighter titles.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming at ultra settings?

A: Some 4K gaming is possible, with Call of Duty: Warzone at 90 FPS and Minecraft at 79 FPS, but demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (34.1 FPS) and Red Dead Redemption 2 (31.8 FPS) are not playable at ultra settings.

Q: What is the CPU’s power consumption and overclocking capability?

A: The CPU has a 65W TDP and an unlocked multiplier, allowing overclocking. The base clock is 3.60 GHz and boost clock is 4.20 GHz, with the 7nm Zen 3 architecture providing efficiency.

Q: What memory and storage support does the platform offer?

A: The CPU supports DDR4 memory in dual-channel configuration with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth, and uses PCIe Gen 3 for storage and GPU connectivity. The Socket AM4 platform supports a wide range of Ryzen processors.

Q: How does the system perform in productivity tasks?

A: The CPU’s PassMark multithread score of 19330 and data encryption score of 14851 indicate strong performance in multi-threaded tasks, while the GPU’s 29.77 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerates compute-heavy workloads like rendering and video encoding.