Intel Arctic Sound-M
Intel graphics card specifications and benchmark scores
At a Glance
IntelIntel Arctic Sound-M Specifications
Arctic Sound-M GPU Core
Shader units and compute resources
The Intel Arctic Sound-M GPU core specifications define its raw processing power for graphics and compute workloads. Shading units (also called CUDA cores, stream processors, or execution units depending on manufacturer) handle the parallel calculations required for rendering. TMUs (Texture Mapping Units) process texture data, while ROPs (Render Output Units) handle final pixel output. Higher shader counts generally translate to better GPU benchmark performance, especially in demanding games and 3D applications.
Arctic Sound-M Clock Speeds
GPU and memory frequencies
Clock speeds directly impact the Arctic Sound-M's performance in GPU benchmarks and real-world gaming. The base clock represents the minimum guaranteed frequency, while the boost clock indicates peak performance under optimal thermal conditions. Memory clock speed affects texture loading and frame buffer operations. The Arctic Sound-M by Intel dynamically adjusts frequencies based on workload, temperature, and power limits to maximize performance while maintaining stability.
Intel's Arctic Sound-M Memory
VRAM capacity and bandwidth
VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory for storing textures, frame buffers, and shader data. The Arctic Sound-M's memory capacity determines how well it handles high-resolution textures and multiple displays. Memory bandwidth, measured in GB/s, affects how quickly data moves between the GPU and VRAM. Higher bandwidth improves performance in memory-intensive scenarios like 4K gaming. The memory bus width and type (GDDR6, GDDR6X, HBM) significantly influence overall GPU benchmark scores.
Arctic Sound-M by Intel Cache
On-chip cache hierarchy
On-chip cache provides ultra-fast data access for the Arctic Sound-M, reducing the need to fetch data from slower VRAM. L1 and L2 caches store frequently accessed data close to the compute units. AMD's Infinity Cache (L3) dramatically increases effective bandwidth, improving GPU benchmark performance without requiring wider memory buses. Larger cache sizes help maintain high frame rates in memory-bound scenarios and reduce power consumption by minimizing VRAM accesses.
Arctic Sound-M Theoretical Performance
Compute and fill rates
Theoretical performance metrics provide a baseline for comparing the Intel Arctic Sound-M against other graphics cards. FP32 (single-precision) performance, measured in TFLOPS, indicates compute capability for gaming and general GPU workloads. FP64 (double-precision) matters for scientific computing. Pixel and texture fill rates determine how quickly the GPU can render complex scenes. While real-world GPU benchmark results depend on many factors, these specifications help predict relative performance levels.
Generation 12.5 Architecture & Process
Manufacturing and design details
The Intel Arctic Sound-M is built on Intel's Generation 12.5 architecture, which defines how the GPU processes graphics and compute workloads. The manufacturing process node affects power efficiency, thermal characteristics, and maximum clock speeds. Smaller process nodes pack more transistors into the same die area, enabling higher performance per watt. Understanding the architecture helps predict how the Arctic Sound-M will perform in GPU benchmarks compared to previous generations.
Intel's Arctic Sound-M Power & Thermal
TDP and power requirements
Power specifications for the Intel Arctic Sound-M determine PSU requirements and thermal management needs. TDP (Thermal Design Power) indicates the heat output under typical loads, guiding cooler selection. Power connector requirements ensure adequate power delivery for stable operation during demanding GPU benchmarks. The suggested PSU wattage accounts for the entire system, not just the graphics card. Efficient power delivery enables the Arctic Sound-M to maintain boost clocks without throttling.
Arctic Sound-M by Intel Physical & Connectivity
Dimensions and outputs
Physical dimensions of the Intel Arctic Sound-M are critical for case compatibility. Card length, height, and slot width determine whether it fits in your chassis. The PCIe interface version affects bandwidth for communication with the CPU. Display outputs define monitor connectivity options, with modern cards supporting multiple high-resolution displays simultaneously. Verify these specifications against your case and motherboard before purchasing to ensure a proper fit.
Intel API Support
Graphics and compute APIs
API support determines which games and applications can fully utilize the Intel Arctic Sound-M. DirectX 12 Ultimate enables advanced features like ray tracing and variable rate shading. Vulkan provides cross-platform graphics capabilities with low-level hardware access. OpenGL remains important for professional applications and older games. CUDA (NVIDIA) and OpenCL enable GPU compute for video editing, 3D rendering, and scientific applications. Higher API versions unlock newer graphical features in GPU benchmarks and games.
Arctic Sound-M Product Information
Release and pricing details
The Intel Arctic Sound-M is manufactured by Intel as part of their graphics card lineup. Release date and launch pricing provide context for comparing GPU benchmark results with competing products from the same era. Understanding the product lifecycle helps evaluate whether the Arctic Sound-M by Intel represents good value at current market prices. Predecessor and successor information aids in tracking generational improvements and planning future upgrades.
Arctic Sound-M Benchmark Scores
No benchmark data available for this GPU.
About Intel Arctic Sound-M
The Intel Arctic Sound-M is a data center GPU from Intel, built on the Generation 12.5 architecture and fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry. It integrates 8,000 million transistors on a 190 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 42.1 million per square millimeter. The product is classified as end-of-life, with the H3C Graphics listed as its successor. The data pack provides no benchmark scores, no nearest rivals, and an average benchmark score of zero, though it holds a 50th percentile position among all GPUs in the database. The sections below examine the power, feature set, memory, and comparative position using only the supplied data.
Power and Cooling
The Arctic Sound-M carries a thermal design power (TDP) of 500 W. This is a substantial power draw, which directly informs the suggested power supply rating of 900 W. The recommended PSU provides a headroom above the card's TDP, accounting for the rest of the system's components. The card requires an 8-pin EPS power connector, a standard interface for server and workstation power supplies, rather than the common 8-pin PCIe connector found on consumer cards. Its physical dimensions are listed as 267 mm in length, equivalent to 10.5 inches, and it occupies a single slot. The single-slot design is notable for a 500 W card, implying a high-efficiency cooling solution, though the pack does not specify the cooler type. The card has no display outputs, confirming its role as a compute accelerator without video output capabilities. The 900 W PSU recommendation is a critical specification for system builders, as underestimating the power requirement could lead to instability. The 8-pin EPS connector is rated for high current delivery, matching the 500 W TDP. The 267 mm length is a standard size for data center cards, allowing compatibility with most server chassis. The single-slot form factor enables dense server configurations, where multiple cards can be installed in a single chassis. The absence of display outputs simplifies the card's design, as no video encoder or display interface is needed.
Ray Tracing and Feature Set
The feature set of the Arctic Sound-M is defined by its compute capabilities and API support. The data pack explicitly lists no RT cores and no tensor cores, indicating that the card does not have dedicated hardware for ray tracing or tensor operations. This is a significant point, as many modern accelerators include such units. The supported APIs are DirectX 12 (12_1) and OpenGL 4.6; Vulkan support is not listed in the pack. The architecture is Generation 12.5. Compute performance is specified as 14.75 TFLOPS for FP32 and 29.49 TFLOPS for FP16, with the FP16 figure achieved at a 2:1 ratio relative to FP32. This 2:1 ratio suggests that the card is optimized for workloads that can leverage reduced precision, such as certain AI inference tasks, though without tensor cores, these tasks rely on general-purpose shaders. The shading units number 8,192, with 256 texture mapping units (TMUs) and 128 raster output units (ROPs). These units yield a pixel rate of 115.2 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 230.4 GTexel/s. The DirectX 12 (12_1) support indicates a feature level that includes some modern rendering features, but the lack of RT cores means hardware-accelerated ray tracing is not available. OpenGL 4.6 support provides a stable API for legacy compute and rendering. The absence of Vulkan in the pack is notable, as it is a common API for compute workloads, but its absence does not confirm lack of support; it is simply not documented. The 2:1 FP16 rate is a key metric for compute density, as it allows twice the throughput of FP32 for half-precision data.
Memory Subsystem
The memory subsystem of the Arctic Sound-M is one of its most distinctive features. It is equipped with 16 GB of HBM2e memory, a high-bandwidth memory type. The bus width is 4096 bits, which is exceptionally wide compared to typical consumer cards. This configuration produces a memory bandwidth of 1.23 TB/s. The memory clock is listed at 1200 MHz, with an effective data rate of 2.4 Gbps. For high-resolution workloads, 16 GB of VRAM is a substantial capacity, though the lack of display outputs means it is not intended for gaming at high resolutions. Instead, the 1.23 TB/s bandwidth is critical for data center applications that require rapid data movement, such as large-scale simulations or database processing. The 4096-bit bus allows for this high bandwidth without needing extreme memory clocks, which can reduce power consumption. The HBM2e type is known for its high bandwidth and relatively low power per bit, though the pack does not specify memory power figures. The effective 2.4 Gbps rate, combined with the 4096-bit bus, mathematically results in the 1.23 TB/s figure. This bandwidth is essential for compute tasks that are memory-bound, where the GPU must read and write large datasets continuously. The 16 GB capacity is sufficient for many models, but the pack does not provide details on memory partitioning or ECC support. The wide bus and high bandwidth suggest that the card is designed for workloads where memory bandwidth is the limiting factor.
How It Compares
The nearestRivals field in the data pack is empty. Consequently, there are no direct rival names, scores, or percentage deltas to analyze. The percentileVsAllGpus field indicates a value of 50, meaning the card sits at the median of the database's GPU distribution. Without rival data, a comparative paragraph cannot be constructed for any specific competitor. The absence of rivals suggests that the database has not recorded comparable products for this entry, or that the card's niche is unique. The end-of-life status and successor (H3C Graphics) imply that the Arctic Sound-M has been superseded, but the pack provides no performance data for the successor. Therefore, the comparison section must rely solely on the percentile position. The 50th percentile is a neutral placement, indicating neither top-tier nor bottom-tier performance relative to all GPUs in the database. However, this percentile is based on all GPUs tracked, so its relevance to data center peers is unclear without further data. The empty rival list means no direct comparisons can be made, and any attempt to infer performance relative to other data center GPUs would be speculation, which is outside the scope of this analysis.
Benchmark Performance
The benchmark scores array is empty, and the average benchmark score is 0. This means there are no recorded benchmark results for the Arctic Sound-M in this database. Consequently, no exact percentage deltas can be computed against any rival, as no rival data exists. The theoretical compute figures are available: 14.75 TFLOPS FP32 and 29.49 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1). These are raw compute rates, not benchmark scores. The pixel rate of 115.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 230.4 GTexel/s provide additional theoretical throughput metrics. However, without benchmark scores, the practical performance cannot be assessed from the data. The 50th percentile vs all GPUs is the only relative metric, but it is not derived from a specific score in this pack. The absence of data is a significant limitation for analysis. The card's end-of-life status may explain the lack of recorded benchmarks. The data pack does not include any workload-specific tests, such as ray tracing or AI inference benchmarks. Therefore, the benchmark performance section must conclude that no empirical scores are available, and the analysis is limited to theoretical specifications. The FP32 and FP16 figures provide a ceiling for compute throughput, but real-world performance depends on memory bandwidth, driver efficiency, and workload characteristics, none of which are quantified in the pack.
FAQ
Q: What is the thermal design power (TDP) of the Intel Arctic Sound-M?
A: The TDP is 500 W.
Q: What power supply is recommended for a system with this card?
A: The suggested PSU is 900 W.
Q: What type and amount of memory does the card use?
A: It uses 16 GB of HBM2e memory with a 4096-bit bus and 1.23 TB/s bandwidth.
Q: Does the card support DirectX 12?
A: Yes, it supports DirectX 12 (12_1) and also OpenGL 4.6. Vulkan support is not listed.
Q: What are the FP32 and FP16 compute figures?
A: FP32 is 14.75 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 29.49 TFLOPS (2:1).
Q: What is the production status and successor?
A: The production status is end-of-life, and the successor is listed as the H3C Graphics.
The NVIDIA Equivalent of Arctic Sound-M
Looking for a similar graphics card from NVIDIA? The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 offers comparable performance and features in the NVIDIA lineup.
Popular Intel Arctic Sound-M Comparisons
See how the Arctic Sound-M stacks up against similar graphics cards from the same generation and competing brands.
Compare Arctic Sound-M with Other GPUs
Select another GPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.
Browse GPUs