ATI Xbox 360 GPU 80nm
AMD graphics card specifications and benchmark scores
At a Glance
AMDATI Xbox 360 GPU 80nm Specifications
ATI Xbox 360 GPU 80nm GPU Core
Shader units and compute resources
The ATI Xbox 360 GPU 80nm GPU core specifications define its raw processing power for graphics and compute workloads. Shading units (also called CUDA cores, stream processors, or execution units depending on manufacturer) handle the parallel calculations required for rendering. TMUs (Texture Mapping Units) process texture data, while ROPs (Render Output Units) handle final pixel output. Higher shader counts generally translate to better GPU benchmark performance, especially in demanding games and 3D applications.
ATI Xbox 360 GPU 80nm Clock Speeds
GPU and memory frequencies
Clock speeds directly impact the ATI Xbox 360 GPU 80nm's performance in GPU benchmarks and real-world gaming. The base clock represents the minimum guaranteed frequency, while the boost clock indicates peak performance under optimal thermal conditions. Memory clock speed affects texture loading and frame buffer operations. The ATI Xbox 360 GPU 80nm by AMD dynamically adjusts frequencies based on workload, temperature, and power limits to maximize performance while maintaining stability.
AMD's ATI Xbox 360 GPU 80nm Memory
VRAM capacity and bandwidth
VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory for storing textures, frame buffers, and shader data. The ATI Xbox 360 GPU 80nm's memory capacity determines how well it handles high-resolution textures and multiple displays. Memory bandwidth, measured in GB/s, affects how quickly data moves between the GPU and VRAM. Higher bandwidth improves performance in memory-intensive scenarios like 4K gaming. The memory bus width and type (GDDR6, GDDR6X, HBM) significantly influence overall GPU benchmark scores.
ATI Xbox 360 GPU 80nm Theoretical Performance
Compute and fill rates
Theoretical performance metrics provide a baseline for comparing the ATI Xbox 360 GPU 80nm against other graphics cards. FP32 (single-precision) performance, measured in TFLOPS, indicates compute capability for gaming and general GPU workloads. FP64 (double-precision) matters for scientific computing. Pixel and texture fill rates determine how quickly the GPU can render complex scenes. While real-world GPU benchmark results depend on many factors, these specifications help predict relative performance levels.
TeraScale Architecture & Process
Manufacturing and design details
The ATI Xbox 360 GPU 80nm is built on AMD's TeraScale architecture, which defines how the GPU processes graphics and compute workloads. The manufacturing process node affects power efficiency, thermal characteristics, and maximum clock speeds. Smaller process nodes pack more transistors into the same die area, enabling higher performance per watt. Understanding the architecture helps predict how the ATI Xbox 360 GPU 80nm will perform in GPU benchmarks compared to previous generations.
AMD's ATI Xbox 360 GPU 80nm Power & Thermal
TDP and power requirements
Power specifications for the ATI Xbox 360 GPU 80nm determine PSU requirements and thermal management needs. TDP (Thermal Design Power) indicates the heat output under typical loads, guiding cooler selection. Power connector requirements ensure adequate power delivery for stable operation during demanding GPU benchmarks. The suggested PSU wattage accounts for the entire system, not just the graphics card. Efficient power delivery enables the ATI Xbox 360 GPU 80nm to maintain boost clocks without throttling.
ATI Xbox 360 GPU 80nm by AMD Physical & Connectivity
Dimensions and outputs
Physical dimensions of the ATI Xbox 360 GPU 80nm are critical for case compatibility. Card length, height, and slot width determine whether it fits in your chassis. The PCIe interface version affects bandwidth for communication with the CPU. Display outputs define monitor connectivity options, with modern cards supporting multiple high-resolution displays simultaneously. Verify these specifications against your case and motherboard before purchasing to ensure a proper fit.
AMD API Support
Graphics and compute APIs
API support determines which games and applications can fully utilize the ATI Xbox 360 GPU 80nm. DirectX 12 Ultimate enables advanced features like ray tracing and variable rate shading. Vulkan provides cross-platform graphics capabilities with low-level hardware access. OpenGL remains important for professional applications and older games. CUDA (NVIDIA) and OpenCL enable GPU compute for video editing, 3D rendering, and scientific applications. Higher API versions unlock newer graphical features in GPU benchmarks and games.
ATI Xbox 360 GPU 80nm Product Information
Release and pricing details
The ATI Xbox 360 GPU 80nm is manufactured by AMD as part of their graphics card lineup. Release date and launch pricing provide context for comparing GPU benchmark results with competing products from the same era. Understanding the product lifecycle helps evaluate whether the ATI Xbox 360 GPU 80nm by AMD represents good value at current market prices. Predecessor and successor information aids in tracking generational improvements and planning future upgrades.
ATI Xbox 360 GPU 80nm Benchmark Scores
No benchmark data available for this GPU.
About ATI Xbox 360 GPU 80nm
The ATI Xbox 360 GPU 80nm is an AMD-manufactured console GPU in the Microsoft console generation, built around the Xenos Falcon chip and TeraScale architecture. TSMC fabricated the die on an 80 nm process, with 232 million transistors in a 156 mm² package and a transistor density of 1.5M / mm². The compute core contains 240 shading units, 16 texture mapping units, and 8 raster operation units. Its listed throughput ceiling is 240.0 GFLOPS FP32, 8.000 GTexel/s texture fill, and 4.000 GPixel/s pixel fill. Memory is 512 MB of GDDR3 across a 128-bit bus, with 22.40 GB/s of bandwidth and a memory clock of 700 MHz, listed with an effective data rate of 1400 Mbps. The board is 310 mm long, 269 mm high, and 79 mm wide, dissipates 175 W under the listed TDP, and offers an HDMI 1.2 display output. The API support is DirectX 9.0c (9_3), while OpenGL and Vulkan are null.
Benchmark Performance
The data set contains no benchmark entries: the benchmarks array is empty, and the average benchmark score field is 0. The nearestRivals array is also empty, so there are no rival names and no deltaPct values to use in percentage comparisons. The only positional data point is percentileVsAllGpus, which is 50. That value places the GPU at the median of the database's GPU distribution. In other words, the catalogued rank sits at the midpoint, but this is a percentile position, not a measured benchmark score.
Without nearestRivals, no exact statements such as "ahead of" or "behind" a specific product can be made. The record does not support those claims. What can be described is the raw resource envelope: 240 shader units, 16 TMUs, and 8 ROPs, with an FP32 rate of 240.0 GFLOPS, a texture rate of 8.000 GTexel/s, and a pixel rate of 4.000 GPixel/s. These are the numbers that would feed any benchmark-like estimate, but the database provides no actual game or compute scores. The benchmark performance section is therefore necessarily descriptive: the data shows a fixed-function and shader configuration with modest fill rates and no measured results. The zero average score should be read as an empty placeholder rather than as evidence of a specific performance level. If the benchmarks field were populated, the nearestRivals deltaPct values would be the basis for comparison; in this record, no such comparison exists.
Who Should Consider It
Because no benchmark scores are present, a recommendation grounded in measured frames per second is impossible. The only defensible approach is to reason from the specification fields that are present. The memory subsystem offers 512 MB of GDDR3, a 128-bit bus, and 22.40 GB/s of bandwidth. The rendering pipeline consists of 240 shader units, 16 TMUs, and 8 ROPs. The pixel fill rate is 4.000 GPixel/s and the texture fill rate is 8.000 GTexel/s. The FP32 throughput is 240.0 GFLOPS. These figures bound the workload that this GPU can address.
Given the 512 MB capacity, the data suggests a constrained memory environment; no larger memory option is listed. The 8 ROPs and 4.000 GPixel/s pixel rate are the only pixel-output data available, so any settings recommendation must respect that ceiling. The 22.40 GB/s bandwidth is the single memory-throughput number in the record. Consequently, high-resolution, high-detail rendering expectations find no supporting evidence in this data set. The most accurate statement is that the GPU sits at the 50th percentile in the database, with no measured score to refine that placement. It is an end-of-life part, so the production status points to a device that is no longer in active manufacturing.
Ray Tracing and Feature Set
The record lists no ray tracing cores: the rtCores field is null. It also lists no tensor cores, with tensorCores null. The architecture is TeraScale, and the only API entry is DirectX 9.0c (9_3). OpenGL and Vulkan are both null. This means the feature set is defined by the shader, texture, and ROP resources already enumerated: 240 shading units, 16 TMUs, and 8 ROPs. There is no hardware-accelerated ray tracing information in the record, and no tensor core count is listed.
The display output is a single HDMI 1.2 port. No bus interface is specified, and no power connectors or suggested PSU are listed. The physical dimensions are 310 mm by 269 mm by 79 mm. The GPU is built by TSMC on an 80 nm process, with a die size of 156 mm² and 232 million transistors, resulting in a transistor density of 1.5M / mm². The production status is end-of-life, and the release date is 2007-10-26. The TDP is 175 W. Together, these data points describe a fixed console feature set: one display output standard, DirectX 9.0c (9_3) as the listed API, and no RT or tensor blocks in the specification.
FAQ
Q: What process node is used for the ATI Xbox 360 GPU 80nm?
A: TSMC fabricated the chip on an 80 nm process, with 232 million transistors on a 156 mm² die and a density of 1.5M / mm².
Q: Does this GPU include ray tracing cores or tensor cores?
A: No. The record lists rtCores as null and tensorCores as null, so no RT or tensor core counts are provided.
Q: What is the memory configuration?
A: It uses 512 MB of GDDR3 with a 128-bit bus, 22.40 GB/s bandwidth, and a memory clock of 700 MHz with an effective data rate of 1400 Mbps.
Q: Which APIs are supported?
A: DirectX 9.0c (9_3) is listed as the only API; OpenGL and Vulkan are null.
Q: What are the pixel and texture fill rates?
A: The pixel rate is 4.000 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 8.000 GTexel/s, based on 8 ROPs and 16 TMUs.
Q: What is the production status and release date?
A: The production status is end-of-life, and the release date is 2007-10-26. Its launch MSRP was 479 USD.
Memory Subsystem
The memory subsystem is documented as 512 MB of GDDR3 connected over a 128-bit bus. The listed bandwidth is 22.40 GB/s, and the memory clock is 700 MHz, expressed as a 1400 Mbps effective data rate. For high-resolution workloads, the framebuffer and scene data must fit inside 512 MB; no larger memory configuration is present in the record. The 128-bit bus width is the only interface width supplied, and 22.40 GB/s is the sole bandwidth number available.
The interaction between memory and rendering resources can be examined through the listed pixel and texture throughput. The GPU can output 4.000 GPixel/s and sample textures at 8.000 GTexel/s. A 128-bit GDDR3 bus delivering 22.40 GB/s is the channel through which those pixels and textures must flow. Because there are no benchmark scores, the precise effect on high-resolution frame rates cannot be measured from this record. However, the data set is consistent: 512 MB capacity, 128-bit bus, and 22.40 GB/s bandwidth, paired with a pixel rate of 4.000 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 8.000 GTexel/s. The percentileVsAllGpus value of 50 does not change that memory picture; it is a global rank, not a memory benchmark. The absence of memory-related benchmark entries leaves high-resolution analysis to these specifications alone.
The NVIDIA Equivalent of ATI Xbox 360 GPU 80nm
Looking for a similar graphics card from NVIDIA? The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 offers comparable performance and features in the NVIDIA lineup.
Popular ATI Xbox 360 GPU 80nm Comparisons
See how the ATI Xbox 360 GPU 80nm stacks up against similar graphics cards from the same generation and competing brands.
Compare ATI Xbox 360 GPU 80nm with Other GPUs
Select another GPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.
Browse GPUs