Valorant

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 combination delivers exceptional performance in Valorant, a competitive FPS where high frame rates are paramount. Benchmark data shows this pairing is capable of pushing frame rates well beyond the refresh rates of most high-end monitors, even at 4K resolution. The combination ranks in the 72nd percentile of tested systems for this title, indicating strong headroom for competitive play.

FAQ

Q: What is the average frame rate at 1080p with High settings?

A: The combination achieves an average of 338.9 FPS at 1920x1080 with High settings. This places the system well above the threshold for high-refresh-rate monitors.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 7700 compare to its closest rival in CPU benchmark scores?

A: The Ryzen 7 7700 has an average benchmark score of 40468, which is just 0.1% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H’s score of 40431. This puts the two processors in a statistical tie for multi-threaded performance.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking among all tested graphics cards?

A: The RTX 2060 sits in the 58th percentile of all GPUs, based on an average benchmark score of 16074. This places it in the mid-to-upper tier of graphics cards for overall compute performance.

Q: What is the maximum average FPS recorded in the benchmark data?

A: The highest recorded average frame rate is 547 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings. This demonstrates the significant headroom available when graphical fidelity is reduced.

Q: What is the difference in average FPS between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the average frame rate drops from 464.6 FPS on Low to 276.5 FPS on Ultra. This represents a performance reduction of approximately 40% when moving to the highest quality preset.

Q: Does the RTX 2060 support modern graphics APIs?

A: Yes, the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. This ensures compatibility with current and upcoming game engines.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 combination is ranked 1195 out of 1650 tested combos in Valorant. This places the pairing in the top 28% of all systems tested for this specific game, indicating a strong competitive standing. The ranking reflects the synergy between the 8-core, 16-thread Zen 4 processor and the Turing-architecture GPU, which together provide ample processing power for Valorant’s engine.

The CPU’s benchmark data reveals why this pairing excels. With a single-thread score of 4136 in Cinebench R23 and a max-thread score of 8479 in 3DMark, the Ryzen 7 7700 demonstrates the high-frequency performance Valorant relies on for its frame pacing. The CPU’s 91st percentile ranking among all processors, backed by an average benchmark score of 40468, shows it is a top-tier component. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-13905H, scores 40712, which is 0.6% higher, but the Ryzen 7 7700’s architecture offers a more balanced multi-threaded output. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 8484 and the 2-thread score of 2043 highlight the processor’s ability to handle both lightly-threaded game logic and heavier background tasks without causing bottleneck.

The GPU’s contribution to this ranking is equally important. The RTX 2060’s PassMark G3D score of 14111 and its 58th percentile placement among all GPUs show it is a solid performer. However, its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 7600S, scores 15996, which is a 0.5% difference, making the comparison very close. This indicates that the GPU is not the limiting factor in this combination; rather, the high FPS figures are a result of the CPU’s strength in pushing frame rates in a game like Valorant that is typically CPU-bound.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 plays a crucial role in rendering the game’s visuals, but its impact on average FPS is secondary to the CPU in Valorant. The GPU features 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 336.0 GB/s. This is sufficient for the game’s textures and effects, as evidenced by the high frame rates even at 4K resolution. The core clocks operate at a base of 1365 MHz and a boost of 1680 MHz, with the memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). These specifications allow the GPU to handle the geometry and shading required by the game’s environments.

In benchmark results, the RTX 2060 demonstrates its capabilities through scores like 14111 in PassMark G3D and 1242 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 71278 and Vulkan score of 67425 further illustrate its compute strength. Despite being an end-of-life product from the Turing generation, the GPU’s 1,920 shading units and 120 texture mapping units deliver consistent performance. The 48 ROPs ensure that pixel output remains high, which is essential for maintaining the frame rates seen in the measured data. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 16074 places it in the 58th percentile, and its nearest rivals—the AMD Radeon Pro 5700 and Pro 5600M—both score 16351, just 1.7% higher. This tight grouping confirms that the RTX 2060 provides a reliable baseline for competitive gaming, allowing the Ryzen 7 7700 to dictate the final FPS numbers.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data reveals a clear pattern: performance scales predictably with resolution and settings, but the system never drops below playable levels. At 1920x1080, the lowest average FPS is 322.8 on Ultra settings, while Low settings produce 547 FPS. The gap between Medium and High is smaller, with 358.2 FPS and 338.9 FPS respectively. This suggests that the CPU is the primary driver of frame rates at this resolution, as the GPU has ample headroom to render frames quickly.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain exceptionally high. Low settings yield 464.6 FPS, Medium produces 305.6 FPS, High delivers 287 FPS, and Ultra drops to 276.5 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra is approximately 188 FPS, which is significant but still leaves the system above 240 FPS for competitive play. At this resolution, the GPU begins to have a more noticeable impact, but the combination still exceeds the requirements for smooth gameplay.

At 3840x2160, the system still delivers impressive results. Low settings produce 373.1 FPS, while Medium, High, and Ultra yield 242.9, 233.9, and 222.2 FPS respectively. The drop from Low to Medium is substantial at 130 FPS, indicating that the GPU’s memory bandwidth and pixel throughput become more critical at 4K. However, even at Ultra settings, the average FPS remains above 220, which is more than sufficient for a high-refresh-rate experience. The data shows that this combination is capable of handling 4K gaming without compromise.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings balance frame rate and visual quality. For competitive play, Low settings at 1920x1080 provide the highest possible frame rate of 547 FPS, which is ideal for maximizing responsiveness on 360 Hz or higher monitors. However, this comes at the cost of visual fidelity. Medium settings at 1080p offer a middle ground, with 358.2 FPS, which is still well above the threshold for professional play while providing better visual clarity for spotting enemies.

For players using 1440p monitors, High settings deliver 287 FPS, which is excellent for most high-refresh-rate displays. Ultra settings at 1440p drop to 276.5 FPS, a negligible difference that may be worth the visual upgrade. At 4K, High settings at 233.9 FPS provide the best balance, as they maintain a frame rate high enough for smooth gameplay while rendering the game at its sharpest. Low settings at 4K produce 373.1 FPS, but the visual downgrade is often not worth the extra frames.

The data indicates that Medium or High presets are the sweet spot for most users. At 1080p, Medium gives 358.2 FPS, which is a 19 FPS improvement over High but a 189 FPS drop from Low. At 1440p, High at 287 FPS is recommended over Ultra, as the 10.5 FPS gain from dropping to Medium is not substantial. For 4K, High at 233.9 FPS is the clear choice, as it outperforms Ultra by 11.7 FPS while offering similar visual quality. Ultimately, the system’s performance is so strong that settings can be chosen based on preference rather than necessity, with no preset resulting in an unplayable experience.