Valorant

# Valorant with AMD Ryzen 5 5600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D delivers exceptional Valorant performance, with average frame rates ranging from 359 FPS at 4K Ultra to 495 FPS at 1080p Low. This combination ranks 1194th out of 2883 tested CPU-GPU combos for this game, placing it in the upper half of all configurations. The data shows that even at the most demanding preset, the system never drops below 359 FPS average, making it far beyond the requirements of typical competitive play. The RTX 5090 D sits in the 92nd percentile of all GPUs, while the Ryzen 5 5600 ranks in the 74th percentile of all CPUs, indicating a balanced pairing where neither component bottlenecks the other in this title.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average frame rate achievable with this combination in Valorant?

A: The highest measured average is 495 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings. This represents the ceiling for this configuration in the tested scenarios.

Q: How much performance is lost when moving from 1080p to 4K?

A: At High settings, the average frame rate drops from 415 FPS at 1920x1080 to 365 FPS at 3840x2160, a reduction of 50 FPS. At Low settings, the drop is from 495 FPS to 435 FPS, a reduction of 60 FPS.

Q: Which settings preset provides the highest frame rate at each resolution?

A: Low settings consistently delivers the highest average FPS across all resolutions: 495 FPS at 1080p, 469 FPS at 1440p, and 435 FPS at 4K. Medium settings sits between Low and High, while Ultra is the slowest at each resolution.

Q: What is the frame time consistency like for this configuration?

A: The only rows with min and max FPS data are the Medium settings presets. At 1080p Medium, the range is 359 to 485 FPS (average 422). At 1440p Medium, it spans 340 to 460 FPS (average 400). At 4K Medium, it ranges from 316 to 427 FPS (average 371).

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The Ryzen 5 5600 has an average benchmark score of 20468, sitting 0.1% above the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (20454) and 0.2% above both the AMD Ryzen 5 8500G (20425) and AMD EPYC 9454P (20422). It leads the AMD EPYC 7713 (20363) by 0.5%.

Q: What is the GPU's synthetic benchmark standing relative to its closest competitors?

A: The RTX 5090 D scores an average of 77712, which is 1.1% above the AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT (76904) but 1.6% below the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT (78940). It trails the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB (79396) by 2.1% and the Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB (79605) by 2.4%.

Settings Recommendations

The measured data clearly indicates that Low settings delivers the best raw performance for competitive play, achieving 495 FPS at 1080p, 469 FPS at 1440p, and 435 FPS at 4K. These frame rates are substantially higher than any other preset, with margins of 73 to 80 FPS over Medium settings at the same resolutions. For players prioritizing maximum responsiveness and refresh rate utilization, Low is the recommended choice.

However, the performance gap between settings is relatively modest in percentage terms. At 1080p, Ultra delivers 408 FPS compared to Low's 495 FPS, representing an 18% reduction. At 4K, Ultra produces 359 FPS versus Low's 435 FPS, a 21% reduction. Given that even Ultra settings maintain average frame rates above 359 FPS across all resolutions, players with high-refresh displays (up to 360Hz) can comfortably select Medium or High settings without dropping below typical refresh thresholds.

Medium settings offers the best compromise, providing a 422 FPS average at 1080p with a measured range of 359 to 485 FPS. This preset delivers 400 FPS at 1440p and 371 FPS at 4K, with the only min FPS data in the entire dataset. The consistency metrics suggest Medium maintains stable frame delivery, making it suitable for players who want visual improvements without sacrificing competitive performance. High settings sits between Medium and Ultra, delivering 415 FPS at 1080p, 394 FPS at 1440p, and 365 FPS at 4K.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals that this game is heavily CPU-bound with this configuration. At Low settings, the drop from 1080p to 1440p is 26 FPS (495 to 469), and from 1440p to 4K it is 34 FPS (469 to 435), totaling a 60 FPS reduction across the full resolution range. This represents a 12% performance loss when quadrupling the pixel count, which is remarkably small and indicates that the CPU is the primary limiter.

At High settings, the pattern is similar: 415 FPS at 1080p, 394 FPS at 1440p, and 365 FPS at 4K. The total drop of 50 FPS (12%) mirrors the Low settings behavior. Ultra settings shows the same trend with 408 FPS at 1080p, 387 FPS at 1440p, and 359 FPS at 4K, again a 49 FPS reduction (12%). Medium settings follows the identical trajectory: 422 FPS at 1080p, 400 FPS at 1440p, and 371 FPS at 4K.

The consistent 12% performance penalty across all settings presets strongly suggests that the RTX 5090 D is not being taxed by resolution increases in this game. The GPU's 32 GB of GDDR7 memory and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth are far beyond what Valorant requires, so even at 4K the rendering load does not meaningfully stress the card. Instead, the Ryzen 5 5600's six cores and 4.40 GHz boost clock appear to set the ceiling, as frame rates change only modestly when pixel count quadruples.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the configuration delivers its highest performance across all presets. Low settings averages 495 FPS, Medium averages 422 FPS with a range of 359 to 485 FPS, High averages 415 FPS, and Ultra averages 408 FPS. The spread between the fastest and slowest presets is 87 FPS, showing that settings have a meaningful impact even at this resolution.

Moving to 2560x1440, the averages shift downward but remain exceptionally high. Low settings produces 469 FPS, Medium delivers 400 FPS with a range of 340 to 460 FPS, High reaches 394 FPS, and Ultra achieves 387 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra narrows to 82 FPS, slightly less than at 1080p, suggesting that resolution increases compress the performance differences between presets.

At 3840x2160, the configuration still maintains triple-digit frame rates across all settings. Low settings averages 435 FPS, Medium produces 371 FPS with a range of 316 to 427 FPS, High delivers 365 FPS, and Ultra achieves 359 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra is 76 FPS at this resolution. Notably, the 4K Medium minimum of 316 FPS remains well above the refresh rates of most gaming monitors, indicating that even the most demanding tested configuration stays comfortably playable.

The Medium settings rows are the only ones with complete min-max data. At 1080p, the 359 FPS minimum and 485 FPS maximum bracket the 422 FPS average tightly. At 1440p, the range is 340 to 460 FPS around a 400 FPS average. At 4K, the range narrows to 316 to 427 FPS with a 371 FPS average. This consistency across resolutions indicates stable frame delivery without significant dips.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D brings massive specifications to Valorant, including 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus delivering 1.79 TB/s of bandwidth. Its 21760 shading units, 680 TMUs, and 176 ROPs provide compute capabilities that are dramatically over-provisioned for this game. The GPU's base clock of 2017 MHz and boost clock of 2407 MHz are high, but the data suggests these clocks do not limit performance in Valorant.

The GPU benchmarks place it in the 92nd percentile of all GPUs, with an average score of 77712. Its nearest rivals in synthetic testing include the AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT (76904, 1.1% slower), AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT (78940, 1.6% faster), NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB (79396, 2.1% faster), and NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB (79605, 2.4% faster). These small percentage differences in synthetic scores do not translate into meaningful differences in Valorant, where the RTX 5090 D's performance is constrained by other factors.

The near-identical frame rates across resolutions—with only a 12% drop from 1080p to 4K—demonstrate that the GPU is not the bottleneck. If the RTX 5090 D were the limiting factor, the performance penalty from quadrupling resolution would be far more severe. The 104.8 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 423.6 GPixel/s pixel rate are sufficient to render Valorant at any resolution with headroom to spare. In synthetic tests, the GPU's Passmark G3D score of 44065 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 376915 confirm its high-end positioning, but these capabilities go largely underutilized in this title.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600 is a six-core, twelve-thread processor based on the Zen 3 (Vermeer) architecture, built on TSMC's 7 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The CPU features 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache, providing a total of 32 MB of L3 for the six cores.

Benchmark results show the CPU's strengths: Cinebench R23 multicore scores 18309 and singlecore 2584, while Geekbench multicore reaches 9158 and singlecore 1936. The 3DMark tests reveal scaling from 1737 (2 threads) to 5659 (max threads), indicating good thread utilization. Passmark scores include 21541 for multithread and 3256 for single-thread. The CPU's average benchmark score of 20468 places it in the 74th percentile of all CPUs.

The nearest rival comparisons highlight how closely matched the 5600 is to other processors. It sits 0.1% above the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, 0.2% above the AMD Ryzen 5 8500G, 0.2% above the AMD EPYC 9454P, and 0.5% above the AMD EPYC 7713. These tiny margins in synthetic benchmarks suggest that any of these CPUs would deliver similar Valorant performance when paired with the RTX 5090 D.

The evidence points to the CPU as the primary performance limiter in this configuration. The consistency of frame rates across resolutions—with only 12% variation from 1080p to 4K—is the classic signature of a CPU-bound scenario. Valorant is known for being relatively light on GPU resources, and the data confirms that the Ryzen 5 5600's single-thread performance, reflected in its 2584 Cinebench R23 singlecore score, is what determines the achievable frame rates. The CPU's 4.40 GHz boost clock and 32 MB L3 cache provide solid gaming performance, but the 495 FPS ceiling at 1080p Low suggests that even faster processors could yield higher frame rates in this title.