Undisputed

The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus paired with the Intel Arc B580 delivers a performance profile in Undisputed that is heavily dictated by resolution and preset selection. The dataset reveals a system capable of high refresh rates at 1080p, but one that becomes increasingly constrained as pixel count and graphical fidelity rise. This analysis breaks down the measured FPS figures to identify the primary bottleneck at each setting tier.

Resolution Scaling

The transition from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160 produces a dramatic and consistent drop in average frame rates across all settings, with the scaling factor being steeper than what a purely CPU-limited scenario would suggest. At Low settings, the average FPS falls from 221 at 1080p to 160 at 1440p, a reduction of 27.6%, and then further to 101 at 4K, a 54.3% decline from the 1080p baseline. This steep curve indicates that the Intel Arc B580’s render output is the dominant factor even at the lowest quality preset, where the CPU would typically have more headroom.

With High settings, the scaling pattern is similar but slightly less extreme in percentage terms. The system achieves 132 FPS at 1080p, drops to 95 FPS at 1440p (a 28.0% reduction), and settles at 60 FPS at 4K (a 54.5% reduction from 1080p). The fact that the 4K High result sits precisely at 60 FPS suggests the GPU is hitting a performance wall where its pixel throughput and memory bandwidth are fully saturated, preventing any further scaling.

The Medium preset shows the most linear scaling behavior. The measured average goes from 159 FPS at 1080p to 115 FPS at 1440p (a 27.7% drop) and then to 73 FPS at 4K (a 54.1% drop). The min FPS figures at Medium also scale predictably, moving from 135 at 1080p to 98 at 1440p, and finally to 62 at 4K, indicating that frame pacing remains consistent even as the resolution increases.

Ultra settings present the most challenging scenario, with the average FPS halving at each major resolution step. The system records 85 FPS at 1080p, 61 FPS at 1440p (a 28.2% drop), and a demanding 39 FPS at 4K (a 54.1% drop from 1080p). The 4K Ultra result of 39 FPS is the lowest figure in the entire dataset, clearly demonstrating that this combination is not suited for maximum fidelity at the highest resolution. The consistent ~54% total drop from 1080p to 4K across all presets points to a GPU-bound scenario where the Arc B580’s 192-bit memory bus and 456.0 GB/s bandwidth become the limiting factor, rather than any CPU constraint.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B580 is the decisive component in these results, and its specifications directly explain the observed performance ceiling. The GPU operates with a base and boost clock of 2670 MHz, which is a fixed frequency, and is paired with 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 456.0 GB/s. This memory configuration is the primary constraint at higher resolutions, as the pixel and texture data required at 4K outstrips what this bandwidth can efficiently feed to the 2560 shading units.

The GPU’s benchmark scores place it in the 68th percentile of all GPUs, with an average score of 23021. Its nearest rivals in the database include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080, which scores 22895 (a delta of 0.6%), and the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP at 23061 (a delta of -0.2%). This indicates that the Arc B580’s raw compute capability is on par with a previous-generation high-end card, but its performance in Undisputed is more consistent with its mid-range positioning, particularly when the 80 ROPs are tasked with 4K output.

The frame rate data shows that the GPU’s 13.67 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but the transition to 4K exposes its limitations. For instance, the jump from 1440p High (95 FPS) to 4K High (60 FPS) represents a significant 36.8% performance loss, which is a direct consequence of the increased pixel shader workload. The fact that the 4K Ultra setting produces only 39 FPS, while the 4K Low setting produces 101 FPS, highlights how the GPU’s shading units and ROPs scale poorly with the combined load of high resolution and high-quality effects like shadows and reflections.

FAQ

*Q: What is the highest average frame rate this combo achieves in Undisputed?*

A: The highest measured average frame rate is 221 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.

*Q: Is this system capable of 4K gaming in Undisputed?*

A: Yes, but with limitations. At 4K with High settings, it averages 60 FPS, and at Low settings it reaches 101 FPS. However, at Ultra settings, the average drops to 39 FPS, which is below a smooth 60 FPS threshold.

Q: How does the Ultra preset compare to High at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the High preset averages 95 FPS, whereas the Ultra preset averages 61 FPS. This represents a 35.8% performance reduction for the higher quality settings.

Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, Low settings yield 221 FPS, while Ultra yields 85 FPS. The Ultra preset is 61.5% slower than Low, indicating a substantial GPU workload increase.

Q: Are there any frame rate minimums reported for the High or Ultra presets?

A: The data only includes minimum FPS values for the Medium preset at each resolution: 135 FPS at 1080p, 98 FPS at 1440p, and 62 FPS at 4K. Minimum values for Low, High, and Ultra are not provided.

Q: How does this combo rank against all other tested combinations in this game?

A: This specific combination of the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus and Intel Arc B580 is ranked 2117 out of 2813 tested combos in Undisputed, placing it in the lower half of the performance distribution.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system demonstrates its peak performance capabilities. With Low settings, the average FPS is 221, which is the highest figure recorded for any configuration. Moving to Medium, the average drops to 159 FPS, with a minimum of 135 and a maximum of 183 FPS, showing stable frame delivery. The High preset averages 132 FPS, which remains well above the 60 FPS standard. The Ultra preset at 1080p averages 85 FPS, which is the lowest for this resolution but still playable for competitive or fast-paced scenarios.

At 2560x1440, the performance scales down proportionally. Low settings produce an average of 160 FPS, which is still exceptionally high. Medium settings average 115 FPS, with a minimum of 98 and a maximum of 132 FPS, indicating good consistency. High settings average 95 FPS, which is adequate for most displays. The Ultra preset at 1440p averages 61 FPS, placing it right at the edge of a smooth 60 FPS experience, though the lack of a reported minimum value leaves some uncertainty about frame dips.

At 3840x2160, the GPU’s limitations become apparent. Low settings average 101 FPS, which is surprisingly robust for 4K. Medium settings average 73 FPS, with a minimum of 62 and a maximum of 84 FPS, suggesting occasional dips near the 60 FPS threshold. High settings average exactly 60 FPS, which is the minimum acceptable for a fluid experience. The Ultra preset at 4K averages 39 FPS, which is not recommended for serious play due to the likelihood of noticeable stutter and reduced responsiveness.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is a high-end desktop processor with 24 cores and 24 threads, a base clock of 3.70 GHz, and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. It is built on a 3 nm process and features 36 MB of shared L3 cache. In terms of raw compute, it scores 44253 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 2439 in single-core, placing it in the 96th percentile of all CPUs. Its average benchmark score of 93785 is nearly identical to its nearest rival, the Intel Xeon 6520P, which scores 93786 (a delta of 0%).

Despite its strong synthetic benchmarks, the CPU is not the limiting factor in Undisputed at the tested settings. The evidence for this is the uniform performance drop across all resolutions. If the CPU were the bottleneck, the FPS would remain relatively flat when moving from 1080p to 4K, as the CPU workload per frame does not increase as drastically as the GPU workload. Instead, the FPS drops by over 50% at 4K compared to 1080p for every preset, which is a clear sign of GPU saturation.

The processor’s 24 threads are more than sufficient for the game’s physics and AI calculations, which are typically single-threaded or lightly threaded in sports titles. The high boost clock of 5.50 GHz ensures that the game logic and rendering commands are processed without delay, allowing the Arc B580 to operate at its full potential. However, the CPU’s 125W TDP and dual-channel memory support with 115.2 GB/s bandwidth do not introduce any measurable constraints in this dataset, as the FPS figures are consistently limited by the GPU’s rendering speed.

Settings Recommendations

The optimal preset for this combination depends on the target resolution and the user’s preference for frame rate versus visual quality. For 1080p displays, the High preset at 132 FPS offers the best balance, providing a significant improvement over Medium’s 159 FPS in visual fidelity while still maintaining a frame rate well above the refresh rate of most 144Hz monitors. The Ultra preset at 85 FPS is also viable for those who prioritize image quality, as it remains above 60 FPS.

At 1440p, the Medium preset with an average of 115 FPS and a minimum of 98 FPS is the recommended choice for a high-refresh experience. The High preset at 95 FPS is also excellent, but the Medium preset’s tighter minimum frame rate ensures smoother gameplay during complex scenes. The Ultra preset at 61 FPS is borderline; it technically meets the 60 FPS standard, but the lack of a reported minimum suggests that users should be cautious about frame dips.

For 4K gaming, the Low preset at 101 FPS is the most sensible option if frame rate is the priority, as it delivers a smooth and responsive experience. The Medium preset at 73 FPS is the best choice for a balance of quality and performance, though its minimum of 62 FPS indicates occasional dips that may be noticeable. The High preset at 60 FPS is playable but leaves no headroom for demanding scenes, while the Ultra preset at 39 FPS should be avoided for anything other than screenshots or slow-paced observation.

How This Combo Ranks

In the broader context of tested hardware combinations for Undisputed, this setup is positioned at rank 2117 out of 2813 total combos, which places it in the 75th percentile of the rankings (lower rank number is better). This ranking indicates that while the combo is not among the top performers, it is not at the very bottom of the list either. The data suggests that the Intel Arc B580, despite its competitive benchmark scores, does not translate its theoretical capabilities into top-tier gaming performance in this specific title.

The GPU’s nearest rivals, such as the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 with a delta of 0.6% and the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP with a delta of -0.2%, show that the Arc B580 is in a performance tier with cards that are several generations old. This explains why the combo’s in-game rank is lower than the CPU’s impressive 96th percentile standing. The CPU is clearly capable of driving higher frame rates, but the GPU acts as a ceiling, capping the system’s overall performance at a level that is more modest than the individual components suggest.

The rank of 2117 out of 2813 also highlights the variability in game performance versus synthetic benchmarks. While the CPU and GPU both perform well in their respective benchmark suites, the combination’s ability to handle the specific rendering workload of Undisputed is limited by the GPU’s architecture and memory bandwidth. For users seeking higher rankings or better 4K performance, a different GPU would be necessary, as the data clearly shows that the Arc B580 is the primary constraint in this pairing.